Home

One Outsider’s Take on the Russian Hacking Charge

1 Comment

new-logo251_002by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                      Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As one with no access to inside information, but arguably of sound mind and with a propensity for paying attention and seeking reality, here’s what I make of the Obama administration’s and others’ attacks on Russia and Putin particularly for interference in the recent U.S. presidential selection. I draw this conclusion as no Republican and, as of now, no Democrat. Apologies in advance for the seriously, indefensibly long sentences – that’s the way I think. If I had a day or two to chop them down…

1)The administration, media, and Democrats in general and certainly all good, “right-thinking” Americans and globalist elitists are so stunned and undone by Hillary Clinton’s election loss to the uncontrollable Mr. Donald J. Trump, whom they thought they had sufficiently demonized to prevent even the least possibility of his winning, that they conclude there must have occurred some awful contamination or sabotage of their right-intentioned side’s rightful and accustomed control process, which had always worked before as planned at securing a desirable outcome. More

Washington Post-CIA connections destroy Post’s “election hack” claim

9 Comments

Jon Rappoport’s Blog

By Jon Rappoport

“The CIA says” is never a great way to start a sentence. But that’s the basis of the latest charge that Russia hacked the US presidential election.

Members of Congress have now been secretly briefed by the CIA on “the Russian affair,” and media, led by the Washington Post, are running with the story that Russia influenced the US election on the side of Trump.

Until and unless the denizens of Langley decide to show specific and convincing evidence for their claim, this is disinformation.

It’s easy to assemble a circumstantial case. But each case has to be judged on its own merits, and the devil is in the details. If we aren’t privy to those details in the “Russian affair,” no judgement is possible. Of course, major media outlets don’t seem bothered by that. They’re happy to cite the CIA as an authority—conveniently ignoring the fact that people in the intelligence field are taught to lie. It’s their stock in trade.

You might remember the Washington Post’s role in defaming and destroying Gary Webb, who, in 1996, published a series of articles in the Mercury News about the CIA seeding black Los Angeles neighborhoods with crack cocaine. The Post basically asked the CIA whether the charge was true, and when the Agency denied it, the Post attacked Webb as a “fake news” reporter. The same Washington Post is now leading the campaign to tie the Russian government to Hillary Clinton’s defeat. And the Post, once again, is using unproven statements from the CIA to back up their claim.

More

The Syrian School Airstrike Killing 22 Schoolchildren: Another US “False Flag”? Blaming Russia

3 Comments

new-logo25haogopin

Writer, investigative journalist

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov explained that after closer examination and careful analysis, the video released to Western media allegedly depicting the airstrike in Idlib Province consists of more than ten separate pieces of footage fragmented together. Thus, it appears to be a hoax designed to incriminate the Russian aerospace group for killing innocent kids. “

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It doesn’t get any more diabolical than this, US Empire is now using innocent children as sacrificial lambs in yet another false flag blaming the Russians. Read my latest Global Research post in full text below…

The Western media seizes every chance to twist the truth in favor of another round of Putin bashing as its worn out flimsy excuse to escalate further hostilities against Moscow. The liars of the West never fail to add fuel to their propaganda war machine fire.

The latest hype is blaming a Russian airstrike for destroying a school in the rebel held Idlib Province in northern Syria, killing 22 children and six teachers.

Immediately the UN as the Washington vassal it is, through the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) for added sensational effect no less began milking the tragedy for all it‘s worth, denouncing the killing as “an outrage” and probable war crime, adding that it’s the deadliest attack on a school in the near six year Syrian conflict.

More

%d bloggers like this: