Home

Workers in Wisconsin Wear ‘I Got Chipped’ T-Shirts Celebrating New Implants

4 Comments

Big League Politics – by Shane Trejo

Employees at the Three Square Market in Rivers Falls, WI actually celebrated by wearing “I Got Chipped” t-shirts after they were implanted with microchips by their bosses.

The microchips are the size of a grain of rice, and they were embedded into the hands of employees for Three Square Market, a vending company that makes kiosks to dispense food and beverages. It was done supposedly for the purposes of convenience, and employees’ hands can now be read to verify their identity. 

Three Square Market Chief Operating Officer Patrick McMullan dismisses any concerns that microchipping his employees is akin to Big Brother. He told detractors to “take your cell phone and throw it away” to defend his invasive practice.

Biohax Sweden produced the microchips, and they have thousands of people implanted with their technology throughout the Europe. They hope to expand their business across the pond, and Three Square Market is happy to help them do so, as a modern dystopia continues to take shape.

The microchips were implanted by a local tattoo artist who pinched the individual’s skin after swabbing the area, and then made a small incision with a syringe before installing the chip.

“The pinch hurt more than the injection,” said McMullan. “It stung for about an hour and half afterwards, but now it’s getting back to normal.”

Since debuting the microchips in 2017, Three Square Market has vastly expanded their plans with the technology, hoping to convince larger firms to adopt microchips.

“We’ve been in touch with NASCAR, with baseball stadiums,” Three Square Market President Todd Westby told KSTP. “We’ve gotten in doors that we would have never gotten in before.”

They are looking into drastically expanding the technology and making it standardized, showing how it can already be used to open doors, buy food items, and turn on computer portals. Westby demonstrated how the microchips can effectively store biometric information as well.

“I scanned my hand and here’s my driver’s license information,” Westby said, holding up his phone to astonished reporters.

They hope to introduce the idea to the masses in the form of bracelets containing microchips, in order to get the masses used to having microchips implanted in their skin down the line.

“The microchip is a big talking point, but it’s not practical right now,” Westby said. “What is practical is RFID bracelets.”

While entrepreneurs, fake news readers, and government bureaucrats may love the idea of microchips, privacy rights advocates and devout Christians may disagree. Not only does the project facilitate ubiquitous spying, but it also may fulfill Biblical prophecy written in the book of revelation.

Revelation 13:16-17 states: “And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark— the name of the beast or the number of its name.”

The horrifying vision of the future described by George Orwell in “1984” could be made a permanent phenomenon if microchipping becomes mandatory.

Big League Politics

Dial T for Tyranny: While America Feuds, the Police State Shifts Into High Gear

1 Comment

 

By John W. Whitehead
April 30, 2018

“Big Brother does not watch us, by his choice. We watch him, by ours. There is no need for wardens or gates or Ministries of Truth. When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; a culture-death is a clear possibility.” — Professor Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Discourse in the Age of Show Business

What characterizes American government today is not so much dysfunctional politics as it is ruthlessly contrived governance carried out behind the entertaining, distracting and disingenuous curtain of political theater. And what political theater it is, diabolically Shakespearean at times, full of sound and fury, yet in the end, signifying nothing.

Played out on the national stage and eagerly broadcast to a captive audience by media sponsors, this farcical exercise in political theater can, at times, seem riveting, life-changing and suspenseful, even for those who know better. READ MORE HERE!

A FREE PRESS MEANS A FREE PEOPLE: IF YOU CAN KEEP IT

2 Comments

new-logo251_002Author, Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
database-photo1One of the greatest deterrents to a free society is having a controlled press that deceives, spreads disinformation, creates propaganda and also uses censorship while distorting the truth. Thanks to the Internet and the alternative news sources, the people now have the opportunity to fly below the radar and see what transpires in the secret world of the mainstream media and various shadow organizations.

This month, an announcement coming from the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated that the agency would be giving their own intelligence gathering associates the latest software called ACCENT, which is a new and improved version of spyware meant to follow the actual PRINT of hundreds of socio-political events plus news articles, posts, blogs or any other form of information that may be monitored by an automatic, computer software reader.

  I am assuming this software will analyze key words and phrases. This latest program, more than doubles the accuracy of the previously deployed program which enhances media monitoring to the max! Say what? More

Victory: Oklahoma Moves to Enact Law Accommodating Religious Objections to Biometric Photo Requirement on Drivers’ Licenses

Leave a comment

RutherfordHeader_2This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org.

May 18, 2016

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — Spurred on by a lawsuit filed by attorneys for The Rutherford Institute, the Oklahoma State Legislature is poised to enact a law that protects individuals from being forced to violate their religious beliefs by submitting to a biometric photograph as a condition of obtaining a driver’s license.

The Institute’s lawsuit, filed on behalf of Kaye Beach, a Christian, against the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (DPS), asserts that requiring a biometric photo requirement as a condition of obtaining a driver’s license violates Oklahoma’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Unable to renew her driver’s license because of her objection to the biometric photo requirement, Beach has been deprived of common benefits and services that hinge on possessing a valid driver’s license, including the ability to acquire prescription medications, use her debit card, rent a hotel room or obtain a post office box. Upon being signed by the governor, the new law, S.B. 683, would require that the DPS issue a nonbiometric driver’s license to anyone raising a religious objection to the biometric photo and destroy any biometric images of the residents held by the DPS. In April 2016, Oklahoma’s Court of Civil Appeals reversed a lower court judgment against Beach and reinstated her lawsuit.

“Whether a person views a biometric ID card in the form of a driver’s license or other government-issued form of identification as the mark of the Beast or merely the long arm of Big Brother, the outcome remains the same: ultimate control by the government,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “As Kaye Beach’s case makes clear, failing to have a biometric card can render you a non-person for all intents and purposes, with your ability to work, travel, buy, sell, access health care, and so on jeopardized.” More

LED Lights: We can spy on you everywhere!

1 Comment

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley

(c) copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved

___________________________________________________

This is Big Brother.  He is here. He is from the government and he is here to help you……….

More

The “Bad Actor” Buzzword

11 Comments

New World Reporter

Submitted by R.F. Goggin on April 19, 2012

________________________________________________________________

There’s a new convenient buzzword being bandied about, quite a bit lately, by people who seem hell-bent on usurping the protections offered to Americans by the U.S. Constitution. I am speaking of a term ‘Bad Actor’, which I seem to be hearing more and more from politicians or public safety officials, these days. Sounds an evil and threatening prospect, doesn’t it?

Yes indeed it does to me, at least, and that’s surely because it’s supposed to unnerve and scare somebody just like myself, and you as well, of course. It’s a slogan-like soundbite beginning to bubble around seemingly everywhere in the mainstream media to make you think that you are being protected by some big brother operative in the guise of ‘Uncle Sam’.   The problem, however, it seems to me, with such a broad and indiscriminate label or classification is that even if one were to look up the definition of these two words in conjunction with one-another, they would discover that any such distinction were it to be imposed upon a U.S. Citizen, does not necessarily allude to criminal behavior at all, or moreover, to some terrorist design or intention.   Hell, ‘Bad Actor’ could simply be slapped upon someone who is having a bad day.

With only a preliminary examination of the term in question for the purpose of this article, one on-line dictionary, defines Bad Actor as follows :

  •  1. A mean, ill-tempered, troublemaking, or evil person.   While another, comes up as:
  •  1. One that consistently behaves or reacts poorly.

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that you were a student riding a city bus to school in Houston, Texas, and some TSA official approached you while in transit and demanded to have a look in your backpack for no apparent reason whatsoever (yes, such outrageous things have now arrived, and will increasingly become commonplace in the United States). And let us also suppose, that this government someone or other – invading your privacy and harassing you as such, made you feel as though you were being violated? Which, in turn, compelled you to complain passionately or indignantly; or even to refuse to comply with the procedure? More

TS Radio with guest Brent Johnson of Global Freedom Report

Leave a comment

More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: