July 7, 2019
asset forfeiture and seizure, Australia, corruption, Government, NWO, The PPJ Gazette admiralty Law, asset forfeiture and seizure, common law, CORPUS-JURIS, corruption, Government, law of the dead, Law of the Land, Magna Carta, NWO, the Justinian Decpetion, The PPJ Gazette, trial by jury, Unidroit Principles 2016 1 Comment
Published on Jun 21, 2019
The real face of the European Union, a warning of what the Corpus Juris really is and the implications it has in relation to one’s common law rights and the protections of the Magna Carta… Link to the video: the Real face of the European Union: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZYcj…
July 11, 2012
Constitution, Government admiralty Law, Law of the sea treaty, LOST, Maritime Law, Marti Oakley, navigable waters, seabed authority, UN mining Enterprise, US Sovereignty, waters of America 12 Comments
Marti Oakley © Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved Reposting and reblogging: Retitling to redirect traffic will be treated as [theft of content]. No modifications of any kind are allowed. Original URL must be embedded in the repost and all author credits clearly visible, including copyright.___________________________________________________________________
On June 28th, 2012, Senator John Kerry (D)MA, convened a hearing on behalf of the Council of Foreign
Relations in support of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). Senator Kerry, acting on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) obviously forgetting that he is a Senator of a state and who, instead represented himself as the representative of a foreign interest, claims he will not bring the LOST Treaty up for a vote until after the election so as not to politicize it. I am wondering what the delay is?
The LOST treaty would in effect be full capitulation to maritime law (admiralty law) within the United States and would effectively obliterate what is left of the Constitution and the laws and protections associated with it. “Maritime law is the law that exclusively govern activities at sea or in any navigable waters.” (1)
The question now becomes: How to use definitions and terms to imply or dictate the application of LOST terms within and upon the land mass of the nation? Simple: you simply redefine the description “navigable waters“, to “waters of America”. This covers everything, allows for broad interpretations of the treaty and the law, (meaning it can mean anything they want it to mean at any time) and then include provisions that put any complaints outside the US court system. More
April 26, 2010
fluoride/water admiralty Law, farm water rights, Jim Oberstar, land theft, legislative corruption, PROPERTY RIGHTS, ranch water rights, water rights 1 Comment
Posted 04/23/2010 07:07 PM ET
Regulation: Rep. James Oberstar wants to rewrite the Clean Water Act. If the Minnesota Democrat gets his way, the federal government will have even greater authority to take private property.
This isn’t Oberstar’s first attempt. In 2007 he also tried to rewrite the water bill. He and others weren’t happy with Supreme Court rulings that defined the limits Washington has over bodies of water that have no nexus to navigable waters.
They want full federal control over all waters.
Consequently, changing the law has become an obsession for Oberstar, and not a harmless one. Should his rewrite become law, property owners will pay.
Oberstar, who represents the 8th District in the Land of 10,000 Lakes, wants to strike from the Clean Water Act the word “navigable,” a restriction in the original bill based on constitutional principles that limit Washington’s regulatory reach.
Without that check, the federal apparatus will have dominion over all waters in America. Rainstorm puddles, mud holes, drainage and irrigation ditches, ponds, intermittent streams and prairie potholes on private lands. These have nothing to do with interstate commerce, but would suddenly be subject to federal rules — as would adjacent property — if the word is removed from the law.
This would be a historic expansion of federal authority and has the potential to be a gross violation of Americans’ liberty.
Farmers should be particularly concerned. The Oberstar bill gives federal regulators the power to police farming practices and to take their land through regulatory restrictions if those practices are deemed to be in violation of the law.
With the federal government already hobbling California farmers by denying them water, in large part due to the Endangered Species Act, Oberstar’s ambition is an existential threat to farms. More
March 15, 2010
Recommended Reading/Books admiralty Law, books, commerce, fiat currency, loss of rights, They own it all Leave a comment
This is most likely one of the most important books you will ever read about admiralty law, fiat currency, and the loss of your rights. We highly recommend it.
Short interview with authors on Income Tax
Author’s web site: The New People Order
Did you know:
1. You are legally a debtor and chattel (property) owned by a hidden creditor.
2. There is a hidden lien on everything transacted for by or with a Federal Reserve Note.
3. Your entire alleged wealth is/has been liened, you don’t own anything! You merely have possession by privilege. This privilege may be yanked at any time if you don’t obey the real owner. More
March 14, 2010
Articles admiralty Law, census, census penalties, commerce, Maritime Law 1 Comment
US Code & Title are rules and regulations for the corporate federal government. They do not recognize or pretend to adhere to constitutional provisions, protections or requirements. You’ll note this was enacted citing the Department of Commerce and using commerce as the basis of authority ……putting you into Maritime/Admiralty law and out of common law.
TITLE 13 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 221
§ 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers More
March 3, 2010
Constitution admirality jurisdiction, admiralty Law, commerce clause, common law, Judiciary Act Leave a comment
Live link: Legal Information Institute
admiralty: an overview
Admiralty law or maritime law is the distinct body of law (both substantive and procedural) governing navigation and shipping. Topics associated with this field in legal reference works may include: shipping; navigation; waters; commerce; seamen; towage; wharves, piers, and docks; insurance; maritime liens; canals; and recreation. Piracy (ship hijacking) is also an aspect of admiralty.
The courts and Congress seek to create a uniform body of admiralty law both nationally and internationally in order to facilitate commerce. The federal courts derive their exclusive jurisdiction over this field from the Judiciary Act of 1789 and from Article III, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Congress regulates admiralty partially through the Commerce Clause. American admiralty law formerly applied only to American tidal waters. It now extends to any waters navigable within the United States for interstate or foreign commerce. In such waters admiralty jurisdiction includes maritime matters not involving interstate commerce, including recreational boating. Continue Reading »
March 3, 2010
Constitution admiralty Law, anti-trust, commerce, insurance, legislative corruption Leave a comment
While members of congress argue about the unfairness of state regulations that prohibit the sale of insurance across state lines, and, while they have the public solidly convinced that striking down this law through the unconstitutional implementation of the Heathcare Reform Act will somehow reduce the cost of healthcare the true reason for repealing McCarran/Ferguson Act is that it will move insurance from a state regulated activity and right, into interstate commerc and right on into Admiralty Law…..the law of Kings.
______________________________________________
The McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 (15 U.S.C.A. § 1011 et seq.) gives states the authority to regulate the “business of insurance” without interference from federal regulation, unless federal law specifically provides otherwise.
The act provides that the “business of insurance, and every person engaged therein, shall be subject to the laws of the several States which relate to the regulation or taxation of such business.” More
tsrad1@outlook.com
[paypal-donation]
Whistleblower Summit for Civil and Human Rights
Finally! News you can use for seniors!
The PPJ Gazette 