Home

TS Radio Network: #2 on What are “Courts of Record”..What courts are NOT!

6 Comments

Join us this evening September 25, 2018 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

Advertisements

From John Leckrone: This is public, judicial and constructive notice.

Leave a comment

John Leckrone

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Remember there are only 4 things an all capital letters name can be. 1. A ship. 2. A corporation. 3. A dead body. 4. A slave. Look at all of “YOUR” papers and bills from “government”. JOHN LECKRONE is not me, it is the title to a cestui que vie trust. The social security number is the number to that trust. This is what the corporations are going after. When walking into a courtroom you are walking onto a foreign pirate ship in dry dock and are considered to be all four items listed above. You are considered to be a PERSON with duties and responsibilities and not a man or a woman with unalienable rights.”

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some people simply cannot handle the truth regarding the police and sheriff’s as being part of a criminal cabal. Most people have convinced themselves with the help of a lot of state run propaganda that the policy enforcement officers (off eye seers) and sheriff’s (shire rives) are the “good” guys.

When people like me point out the nature of the system and that these criminals with costumes, badges and guns are agents of corruption of a country wide extortion racket we are blackballed. Most people are statists who believe that they have benevolent masters. Who makes the best slaves? Those who do not recognize their slave status. Thus they consider us to be crazy when we challenge their deeply held beliefs and expose them to truth.

Yes I am anti “cop” because I know what every one of them are. I have explained it to each of you several times on my timeline here on facebook. Yet that does not make me anti law which is the perception. It makes me anticorruption and antiracketeering. There is a difference between legal and lawful and just because doing something may be illegal that does not necessarily make it unlawful. Also just because something legal under the color of law that does not make it lawful if it is causing harm.

This deeply held conviction of mine sometimes costs me “friends” which is the reason for me now writing this article here. I am tired of being seen as the bad guy because I know the truth and do not worship at the alter of the thin blue line. I refuse to kiss the boots of tyrants acting under the color of law. I instead expose these people in uniform for their crimes in the hopes that maybe one day people will stand together to take back their rights to live in peace instead of fear and perhaps a few of these criminals will change their ways and wake up to their actual job title of mafia enforcer. On that same note though I am very much in favor of peace officers whose only job is to keep the peace and protect people’s unalienable right’s and property. Make absolutely no mistake, sheriff’s and police officers are not peace officers and if asked bluntly will admit this fact.

Finding a man or woman who is actually a peace officer is like looking for a pin in a haystack. Even the “good” cops usually commit several common law felonies every day while “doing their job”. The few people who I have heard about that go out of their way not to plunder from the general population on behalf of their masters find themselves working lousy jobs and passed over for promotions and in some cases even fired. Their “crime” being that of having a conscience and a moral compass.

More

Caution! Predators at work! Professional guardians in America

Leave a comment

painy Join us this evening at 7:00 pm CST! More

H.R. 3188: The groundwork for denying access to the courts on all levels

9 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley        © copyright 2014 All rights reserved

________________________________________________________________

If H.R. 3188 passes and is signed into corporate contracting law and then converted to a public law, it will be used as a precedence for future obstruction of the public, by corporate federal agencies, to prevent access to the judicial system for remedy against federal encroachment.  More

TS Radio: The trap of administrative courts

Leave a comment

painy

dd395-Judge%20(site) More

States fight back against NAIS

6 Comments

 

 deesdeocbirds

In what can only be nothing more than a last ditch effort to eradicate all family farms and ranches, USDA has been caught repeatedly misrepresenting the voluntary National Animal Identification System and many states and groups are fighting back.

Without any approval or oversight from congress (none being needed as USDA operates as a self –regulating agency) USDA launched the NAIS with the usual bleating about [national security].  This threat was identified as the possibility that some rampant terrorist might somehow sneak some bio weapon into the country and infect a cow or corn field with some disease no doubt developed while hiding out in a cave somewhere on the other side of the world.  I suppose its possible considering how insecure our ports of entry are. 

More than likely, any attack of a bio weapons nature will come from one of the hundreds of bio labs now operating right here at home.  The US is the most prolific producer of bio weapons in the world and has created and designed some of the most lethal biological weapons ever to have been cultivated. 

Using the usual scare tactics of terrorist attacks, NAIS was launched with one goal in mind: eradicating family farms and ranches and establishing the complete takeover of all food producing lands and animals by huge multi-national corporations.  Instrumental in this takeover is the designation of PREMISES ID, rather than property ownership.

Defining Premises within the law

Premises, signifies a formal part of a deed; and it is made to designate an estate.

Estates:  Lands and tenements when generally called premises, or when particularly spoken of as, the premises, will be sold without reserve.

Conveyancing:  That part in the beginning of a deed, in which are set forth the names of the parties, with their titles and additions, and in which are recited such deeds, agreements, or matters of fact, as are necessary to explain the reasons upon which the contract then entered into is founded;

 and it is here also the consideration on which it is made, is set down, and the certainty of the thing granted. The technical meaning of the premises in a deed is every thing which precedes the habendum.   (http://www.lectlaw.com/

Ha`ben´dum    (hå`bĕn´dŭm) n. 1. (Law) That part of a deed which follows the part called the premises, and determines the extent of the interest of estate granted. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Habendum

Premises ID when viewed as a conveyance, could be construed to mean voluntarily abandoning what you owned.  You convey control of your property by signing up for Premises ID, voluntarily abandoning your control of the property and subjecting the property to the newly acquired control of the government.  Simply put:  you just gave away your property and any rights to control or use that property as YOU see fit.  At this point, legally, the property is no longer property but rather a premises and can be sold and controlled by someone other than you without reserve.

Premises signifies a formal part of a deed as mentioned above.  To designate is to name or entitle and to create an estate.  A premises has no protection under the United States Constitution and allows no exclusive rights of ownership.  Once you have signed onto PREMISES ID, you have put your property into a state of legal limbo and have agreed to the new status as nothing more than a tenant farmer or sharecropper.  Of course you will still have to make the mortgage payments until they take it from you.

Animals belong to the owner only so long as the owner retains possession of them.  Once you enter into the National Animal Identification System, you no longer legally own the animals.  They are no longer under your control, but rather under the control of the USDA. 

 

The USDA uses the term [stakeholder] to identify those who own animals, implying under the statutes and codes you are a third party interest until the legal owner can be determined.  No doubt in an administrative court which administers codes and statutes, not constitutional law. [you could not access a civil, constitutionally controlled court]

UN policy of STAMPING OUT/Agenda 21 rules for controlling access to food supplies and sources.

Using the UN Agenda 21 rules the USDA has adopted, there is no requirement for the USDA to vaccinate or to quarantine sick animals.  In fact, they don’t even have to prove there is a real threat to the animal population, or to substantiate that any disease is present or a threat prior to stamping out entire animal populations in a six mile area surrounding the claimed infection or disease.  The only requirement of the NAIS is that USDA follow UN Agenda 21 guidelines and eradicate all animal life in that area.   That means every fish, bird, dog, cat, cow, horse, deer, raccoon etc……every living thing is killed in its tracks. 

This isn’t about food safety, animal safety or national security:  this is about food access and control.

How they get away with it

1946 Federal Administrative Procedures Act.   The Administrative Procedures Act is the law which allows US Federal Agencies to create the rules and regulations they can then enforce.  This Act is a subversion of constitutional government and should be repealed.  It was another case of congress ceding its authority to a non-elected agency allowing the construction of codes and statutes and avoiding constitutional provisions and laws.

Using regulations they themselves created, in essence creating laws in abeyance of congress, the USDA can also amend any of these regulations and rules at will and at any point can rewrite their own laws.  http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/laws/administrative-procedure/

NAIS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th, and the 14th Amendments, suspending and substantially violating the rights of private citizens without so much as a hearing in congress, not that it would do any good.  Congress has shown itself consistently to support the most un-American and anti-constitutional policies and laws ever foisted on the American public and neither party is a protector of constitutional rights.

Its difficult to know that any time we are dealing with our own government or its agencies, we must constantly be on guard for hidden agendas, the hiding of hostile intent, or the practice of [altered functions].  This means that although the thing being promoted may have a good and beneficial purpose if applied as it is marketed, an altered function which is hidden, destructive or implemented with malice will be the reality.

Kudos, to all of you out there fighting this battle to keep government from controlling our land and animals and our right to chose the foods we want to consume.

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

 

http://www.nonais.org/

Website devoted to fighting NAIS. Technical Documents section:  [Cooperative Agreements] that the USDA has with each State  and full text of NAIS directive.

 

Other resources:

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p141.htm

http://www.tofga.org/

http://www.farmandranchfreedom.org/

info@picfa.org 

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/

http://libertyark.net/

http://arkansasanimalproducers.8k.com/

http://www.vicfa.net/

www.dogpolitics.com/my_weblog/2007/06/mary-zanoni-of-.html

www.farmandfood.org/newscommentary/articles_past/News_apr06.htm

 

The Occupation of the United States, or…how Lincoln made slaves out of all of us.

7 Comments

In 1871, the District of Columbia (D.C.) was created and at the same time a new constitution was adopted by the 41st congress which, without authority or authorization granted itself the status of a corporation to operate within the ten dedicated miles of Washington (District of Columbia)D.C..  The UNITED STATES corporation exists only within the District under the new constitution of 1871.  As a corporation, it is bound and ruled by commercial contract law, not by the common law of the people.[1]

Lincoln suspended the constitution (the one we think we operate under) during the Civil War and established martial law.  That order has never been retracted or rescinded as required under the Lieber Code [2]. There has been no declaration of peace, nor any treaties between the newly adopted constitution and the occupied people of the formerly sovereign states, to retract the order.  We have effectively been in a state of occupation perpetrated by the corporation operating in the District of Columbia known as THE UNITED STATES or as, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (a corporation).[3]  This is opposed to the collection of sovereign states known as the United States of America.

Capitalization is an important point to take note of here.  Capitis Diminutio Maxima: (meaning a maximum loss of status or “civil death” for the individual. Through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) the individual (with rights) is reduced to slave status with no rights or in this case to a corporate trust as an entity who can own nothing. This is why any correspondence with federal agencies which have to do with taxes or legal issues with the government will have your name capitalized.  This capitalization is a notice to you that;

a) You are a corporately held trust no different than any other commodity and have no human status.

b) You will appear in an administrative court rather than a judicial court and cannot use the constitution to defend yourself because the Uniform Commercial Code will be administrated as per contract commercial law, not the common law.

There have not been any judges in America since 1789. There are only Administrators. This is why so called “judges” are appointed and not elected.  Administrators, not judges, are appointed by federal and state officials to administer commercial contract law using the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).  Which I guess would explain how people with no law background become “judges”.  Judges administer law, while administrators administer codes and statutes. [4]

Commercial contract law (UCC) is used to override the common law that we believe we are living under via the constitution. Our court systems are nothing more than a web of administrative courts which administer the law of contracts.  In order for the law of contracts to apply to you, you must first enter into a contract with the corporation: in this case, THE UNITED STATES (a corporation).  To enter into this contract you simply have to register to vote, file a birth certificate, apply for government provided benefits of any kind, get a driver license, apply for a business license, pay a fee for permission to use or access government owned properties (parks, etc.) or waterways.  There is no instance when your interaction with what we know as THE UNITED STATES (a corporation) does not result in you automatically being entered into contract with said corporation.  Once done, you have ceased to be a human individual in the eyes of the government and now are reduced to a corporate trust (an entity) and vulnerable and subject to the law of contracts. 

How does this happen?  Ever hear of something called an “adhesion contract”?  These are contracts with irrevocable terms which never change.  Each and every time you sign your name for taxes, licenses or government benefits you are in effect renewing the contract.  This renewal or even first time signing is a statement to the effect that you agree to the control of the federal government (a corporation controlled by contract law) and have forfeited your rights to constitutional protections.  In the case of taxes unless you sign the w-2 or the Form 1040 or any of the other forms, in essence agreeing to the contract you are not obliged to pay.

The one advantage to all of this is that under the laws of contracts, you the signatory, must be informed in advance of all provisions of the contract.  In lieu of this you can revoke your signature and be repaid all funds paid into Social Security and taxes going back to the original and first time you entered into the contract unknowingly.

 

You should also be made aware that “citizens of the UNITED STATES” includes only those people living within the corporate ten mile boundary of the District of Columbia. Using this basis for defining who was and was not a citizen enabled the changes to the original “Trading With the Enemies Act” of 1917. Under the original law it described “enemies of the state” as “other than citizens of the United States.”

Section 2 subdivision ( c ) Chapter 106

 

Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b “…any person within the United States.”

H.R. 1491 Public No. 1.”

 

Notice in both cases that United States is not capitalized, so neither version of this act is applied to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.    It applies to the common citizen of the occupied collective states, or the United States. 

 

So all this time, I, who prided myself on actually reading the Constitution, assuring myself that I knew what my rights were, what the laws were, and thoroughly convinced that a return to the Constitution would reverse all the devastation heaped on us by one corrupt administration after another; one spineless congress after another have had to admit that we have no options left to us.   All of us who are here now and those to come, have and will exist in servitude to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES.

 

Some days it’s good to be old.

 

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

[1]With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62). Act 1871 allows the “Corp US” to control the country in the place of the natural Government
http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf

 

[2]Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (Lieber Code). 24 April 1863.

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/73cb71d18dc4372741256739003e6372/a25aa5871a04919bc12563cd002d65c5?OpenDocument

[3]http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html

(15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

 

 [4]FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1Stat.138-178

 

From SourceWatch   http://www.sourcewatch.org/

The Trading With the Enemy Act, Title 12, §95(a) and §95(b) of the United States Code, is considered by many to constitute a declaration of war made in 1933 against the people of the United States by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.[1]

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Trading_With_the_Enemy_Act

%d bloggers like this: