Home

Winning Through Intimidation, Losing Through Nincompoopery

2 Comments

 

by James Hufferd, Coordinator                                                                                  911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     The White House Easter message, delivered via video by President Trump, is “Christ is risen”. Therefore, peace on earth! And he yet again pre-punctuated that pronouncement just days before with the bit of news he let slip that “We’re getting out of Syria very soon, coming back home to where we want to be, where we belong.”

Now, why would he say a thing like that when all indications are that the U.S. is staying in parts of Syria, especially where we’ve been building big forts to steel the oil and tweak Assad, at absolutely no authority’s invitation, indefinitely? Or, why would he say over and over that “we” have ISIS nearly defeated, when it’s been proven to anyone caring and willing to check it out that “ISIS”, in fact a coterie of U.S. mercenary allies or asset terrorist groups posing as a caliphate, has instead been routed by the Syrian Army and Russian air power – making the U.S. side apoplectic enough to have had it and ramp up bating the suddenly spectacularly resurgent bear? If he didn’t see it on Fox News (and assuredly he didn’t), has no one told him?

Likewise, in all the proven U.S. domestic false-flags – Parkland, Las Vegas, Orlando, etc., etc., going back to Boston Marathon, Sandy Hook, and likely the great Northeast hurricane (just plain Sandy) and long before – did the president at the time sit in his office and plan all of those? No! Resoundingly, no! (Although the agency programs permitting and authorizing them may well have been – and probably were – administration policy in the day). More

One Outsider’s Take on the Russian Hacking Charge

1 Comment

new-logo251_002by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                      Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As one with no access to inside information, but arguably of sound mind and with a propensity for paying attention and seeking reality, here’s what I make of the Obama administration’s and others’ attacks on Russia and Putin particularly for interference in the recent U.S. presidential selection. I draw this conclusion as no Republican and, as of now, no Democrat. Apologies in advance for the seriously, indefensibly long sentences – that’s the way I think. If I had a day or two to chop them down…

1)The administration, media, and Democrats in general and certainly all good, “right-thinking” Americans and globalist elitists are so stunned and undone by Hillary Clinton’s election loss to the uncontrollable Mr. Donald J. Trump, whom they thought they had sufficiently demonized to prevent even the least possibility of his winning, that they conclude there must have occurred some awful contamination or sabotage of their right-intentioned side’s rightful and accustomed control process, which had always worked before as planned at securing a desirable outcome. More

Evidence, nuance, & Persuasion

2 Comments

new-logo25 James Hufferd, Ph.D.

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

______________________________________________________________

Does overwhelming evidence persuade? Generally not, surprisingly. Because Americans at least, by and large, tend to accept, with little or no effective questioning, the official explanations of a rapidly growing number of horrific events — of which the JFK assassination and 9/11 are only the most prominent examples – either based on trumped-up (good word!) or no credible evidence at all.

Meanwhile, purveyors of alternative explanations and narratives, including scores of untitled,,,top-notch, impeccably credentialed, and highly reputable scientific investigators, have produced by now thousands of highly persuasive documents, books, and documentaries garnering scores or hundreds of irrefutable facts implicating insiders and point-by-point expositions of necessarily elaborate plots. And read and digested by mostly us activists ourselves. In response, the general public remains inert and unmoved, and more often than not, indignant at even the best-intentioned iconoclasts ineptly trying to disabuse them of their (note the word!) blissful preferred ignorance. After all, no one likes to be woken up from the “security” of a sound and pleasant sleep.

Part of our problem for certain is nuance.  Streamlined simplicity carries the day almost always. Most people aren’t news nerds, deep investigators, or eager buyers of highly unpleasant realities that, if embraced, are likely to get them into an awful lot of trouble as well as spoil their day. And there is a growing perception currently that we are drifting through shark-filled waters, making it advisable to stay inside the boat, with plenty of examples of the sorry fates of those why didn’t. It’s not so much a matter of people believing what they want to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, as of people declining to embrace something proven to be imprudent, dangerous, and practically-speaking (just ask them), totally useless.

Think of your family sitting around the big table at holiday time. At least, your relatives aren’t likely to actually kill you over your unpopular, however evidence-driven views about 9/11. But you might not get invited back next year if you open your mouth too often for comfort and might even find yourself shunned before dessert rolls around. But, at least you won’t have to listen to credible, focused counter arguments that bolster the official position, because there aren’t any.

In fact, whatever headway you can reasonably hope to make with your self-protecting kin or anyone else inclined to push back has got to be achieved very quickly. You’ve got to be prepared to state irrefutable points in rapid-fire fashion, 1, 2, 3. Because that’s all the time and attention you’re ever likely to get. So, be prepared. And though even (if not especially) your own kin are likely to explode, erupt, or play hurt in response, you’ve given them a gift of something not too difficult to remember, to ponder alone and maybe even check out. And note, the genius of this approach is not that you’ve foisted on them a whole seminar or the equivalent of an 18-page well-reasoned technical paper. Quite to the contrary.

Prepare, be forearmed, and you can wade even into online blogs you know will be predisposed to hostility from the first clue. Find a way to insert yourself into a thread on a however remotely related subject in such a way as to succinctly assert at least a couple of unanswerable points of 9/11 evidence, provide a couple of choice web site links, and get out, leaving them showering obscenities on the snippets of text you’ve left behind while mumbling innocuously in their beards or beers or both. I did that last weekend, joining an online blog discussion of a hit piece/hate piece article in National Review, an unapologetically bitter right-wing rag. I quickly got as scurrilously savaged as a rat in a pit-bull ring, but picked up as a reward almost four-hundred instant visits to this web site. Do things like that. Be fearlessly persistent! No one kills you on the internet. (It’s later.) Don’t go for soft targets all the time. Make people think for whom thinking is a revelation, who have never thought or have forgotten how. Politely slam hard-right and left-gatekeeper bullies in the gut, those Fox-fed jackals who assume themselves well-insulated from raw reality’s ravenous rigors. Understandingly shame them that they don’t know… well… anything when it comes to reality, and ever so gently persuade them that they’re not alone and why they need to either learn and pass it on or die stupid. (Because, if you know but rest on what you know, due to fear, dread, complacency, or ennui, you’re a worse obstacle than those who don’t or don’t want to know.) Cynicism has already changed the world as much as it’s ever going to.

If you’d like to stimulate viral readership of any of the articles posted here (www.911grassroots.org), leave a comment, pro, con, or otherwise, to ignite a discussion – the more the better – it works!

9/11: Why Chroniclers Demur

1 Comment

new logoby James Hufferd, Ph.D.

911 Coordinator, Truth Grassroots Organization

_________________________________________________

Let’s face it – America is fantasyland and always has been.

The ancestors of 98% of us, and in some cases we ourselves, came to this country (and those of you elsewhere, please understand) in the firm belief that they (we) would soon be well-to-do, respected, and trouble-free full citizens of this land of plenty, this virtual Heaven, where the good will always come out on top. The meaning of things here isn’t what it is, but what you would like it to be. “Liberty and justice for all? We already have that! Don’t tell me we don’t! Sure, there are problems!” 9/11? “I don’t need to look at the evidence! I know it had to be those foreigners, because no Americans would do or allow anything that evil, even if they were in the hapless joke of a government. It’s not conceivable, I don’t care what you say your evidence shows.”

On the other hand, my friend Dante Vignaroli wrote in Facebook: “Amazing that in the history of aviation airplanes crashing into things like buildings and the ground left no debris, like wings, tails, jet engines, seats, bodies, wheels on 9-11-2001. I remember another dark day in America, it was 11-22-1963. And there are many other similar days in the past and more will continue to happen until the people finally say enough is enough and refuse to be lied to by our government.”

If only far more Americans would summon the will to use and trust their own minds instead of internalizing the constant inane narration overriding their honest, unimpaired, amply demonstrated (in other venues) ability to think!

But the incredible response to 9/11 of A-list public intellectuals and informants down the line, from (yes, sadly) Oliver Stone to Charles Lewis, the well-reputed top-level “investigative” journalist who wrote the brand new book, 935 LIES, uniformly neither affirm nor deny the government’s and media’s 9/11 lies. They just leave either mention or anything more than passing reference to the whole, key stupendous and era-transforming episode out, as if it never really happened!

After I checked the content and carefully examined the table of contents and index of the distinguished Mr. Lewis’ heralded book, astonishingly finding nary the slightest mention of 9/11 nor of the JFK atrocity amid the hundreds of certified lies and deceptions he deigned to document, I shot the author an email inquiring how that could happen, what with more abundant evidence of more and far more-consequential lying in those two cases than for any of the instances actually cited to illustrate the argued depravity of decades of successive administrations? Maybe he planned a second volume, with 9/11 lies as its singular focus?

And he answered without hesitation: “9/11 is a massive subject, yes, which has been heavily covered and analyzed by the local, national and international news media, by academics and by government institutions and commissions. And despite that, it will still take decades for the full truth to emerge, as with all major historically significant and complex subjects.

“However, as especially in the case of presidential assassinations and UFOs, I generally avoid sensational but uncertain assumptions and curiosities which have not and cannot be proven authoritatively. Life’s too short. Some of us choose to walk on firm ground. That includes me. I generally try to avoid quicksand and quagmires [but am happy to point out and document nearly a thousand other blatant government lies to the American people by their sleazy controllers. I just can’t venture to look into anything that might rile anybody too much, especially my sponsors. You understand.”]

It’s like the Soviets’ scrubbing inconvenient non-persons out of official photos. Those – and I think all of those who are approved to depict our common histories and paint approved limited hangouts into all of our probing minds are doing just that with 9/11, permanently creating false consciousness instead of arguing niggling points of honest protest and answering arrays of impossible questions, by focusing the discussion precisely everywhere else. And the real sources, meanwhile, not being approved, exist only as scraps in our own cut-off non-minds, and being non-sources, don’t exist, are beneath the slightest notice. The world goes on without reality being noted.

Our pipeline to everyone everywhere needs to expand exponentially.

Surface and Depth: 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

Leave a comment

new logoby James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

*

The great ocean of waters figuratively and with consistency represented by the global narrative reported in the American and western media since the watershed date of 9/11/01 displays a surface appearance fundamentally unchanged from that of the post-World War II era and long before: There are the western democracies with their patriotic combined citizen militaries defending and promoting alleged rationalism, democratic decision-making, and rule of law, belligerently aligned now against terrorist totalitarian and irrational, hateful and destructive potentates and hordes, just as they were formerly aligned against irrational and totalitarian world communism and before that wrongheaded vicious totalitarian fascism.

People who don’t delve beneath the surface headlines or seek multiple or additional sources via the Internet or critically assess the basically unchanging narrative and explanations as they are so fervently spread necessarily view the world in the same way their frontier ancestors arrayed against an “irrational” and irredeemable “savage” Indian enemy, ostensibly bent on destroying them and “civilization” all but unanimously did three hundred years ago. Just fill in the blanks with the name of the current irrational and savage foe-designate and support as a necessary defensive act his annihilation or pacification and appropriation of his resources. Then set up those you fail to kill physically in a puppet state, region, or reservation under your control to enjoy the choice of leaders you choose to permit and approved values you control and choose to promulgate.

And if some impertinent outsider – say, a Putin – comes along disputin’ your pacification or eradication process with target nations in mid-procedure – which is (as distinct from the subservient media’s bland reporting of it) literally like making sausage, then pox and blood-curdling threats on him! Because, and I quote: “If you’re not with us, you’re with the terrorists”.

So, basically, those of our fellow citizens who don’t or won’t delve beneath or beyond the visible, changeless, endlessly-presented surface or assess matters critically for themselves subscribe to that still-predominant view themselves. And, naturally enough, they tend to consider those of us who dispute with however powerful evidence that 9/11 and a bevy of other atrocities mainly (but not all) committed since 9/11 were put-ups committed or commissioned by the U.S. and its western allied governments or secretly-supported terror groups to provide a pretext and justification for continual marauding and pacification operations, off our rockers. Is that any wonder, from people who consume mainline (or who mainline) news exclusively and take it raw?

In the roiling subsurface extending to depth reported by a number of more-or-less reliable alternative primary investigators, on whom we alternative synthesizers rely, on the other hand, the relatively changeless basic image of the good settler and his upright community versus the dirty, rotten savage ever menacing force is revised through our facilitated seeing far more clearly and from various angles. Our more penetrating independent view reveals who, from facts and leaks, is the system-driven aggressor in case after case and which contender appears to be most consistently misrepresenting facts and at times fabricating the whole story. We can see it, and we report as we do not to be perverse, but because we look beneath the surface, or behind the curtain. If others see otherwise, so be it!

And the purpose and goal of some of us is never to maintain a particular line or narrative, but to urge the creation of a world truly observing in practice the very precepts that were expounded if not practiced by the most eloquent of our forefather ancestors: that “all [persons] are created equal”, “a government of, by, and for the people”, and to achieve in reality the practice of “a decent respect for the opinions of mankind” wherever they are held. To which we can properly add the blessings of “liberty and justice for all,” anti-theft and murder, and a robustly-restored, unabridged respect for full and open truth. Amen.

And so, I submit that this is how the particular point of view represented and urged on you by this web site can be explained, to the best of my ability.

JH: 5/25/15

%d bloggers like this: