Ruling that police must have a warrant or evidence of an actual emergency before invading a home without the owner’s consent, the Supreme Court has rejected attempts by police to expand their search and seizure authority under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Caniglia v. Strom dovetails with The Rutherford Institute’s arguments that allowing police limitless discretion to enter homes flies in the face of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This was yet another blatant attempt by law enforcement to create gaping holes in the Fourth Amendment force field that is supposed to protect homeowners and their homes against warrantless invasions by the government,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “Thankfully, the Supreme Court recognized that ‘we the people’ do not need another slippery slope argument allowing government officials to violate the Fourth Amendment at will under the pretext of public health and safety.” More
We have learned much as a society from the world psyop known as COVID-19. For example, we learned that the sars-cov-2 virus is fake and that the lab tests doled out to global citizens for the past year and a half were designed to return millions upon millions of false-positive test results.
We also learned that big pharma corporations were an integral part of one of the biggest medical frauds in the history of the modern world. We have a clear understanding at this point that the heads of sovereign governments from many countries are complicit players and partners in crime with a world government that seeks to thin the population and transform the human genome into something alien.
We now know that the people in charge of our public health and safety are not to be trusted. They have illegally and unprofessionally placed all healthcare consumers worldwide in harm’s way. We know that they are responsible for the pain, suffering, and deaths of many innocent victims. We know that ultimately they must be held accountable for their actions because they have sworn an oath to do no harm.
A couple of weeks ago we published the video round-table discussion with 5 medical doctors on the issue of people receiving the COVID-19 injections transmitting something, somehow to those people who have not received the shots. Most of the reports have been coming from women who have reported menstruation difficulties, heavy bleeding, miscarriages, and reduction of breast milk.
Dr. Larry Palevsky, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Carrie Madej, and Dr. Lee Merritt were the participants in the discussion, and since publishing their video on April 25th, at the time of publication of this article, it has been viewed by over 777,000 people in the Health Impact News network. See:
As one can imagine, their video has spurred a lot of discussion and research into this matter, and I would like to summarize some of what others have discovered about these bioweapons, incorrectly called “vaccines,” in this article.
Evidence that Transmission from Vaxxed to Unvaxxed is Intentional
Whistleblowers is brought to you in coordination with Marcel Reid and the Annual Whistleblowers Summit.
Our guest tonight is Carrie Devorah. Carrie is a recognized whistleblower. Carrie was recently confirmed as a successful whistleblower by the SEC on, what I expect is the first, of more confirmations to come.
“Idid the TIP Whistleblower pursuit on my own. I was not represented by Counsel. This is unheard of, moreso since I am the Financial Crime victim.”
Do THE PEOPLE of Calvin care? The election has yet to be certified due to an action in court that is yet to be litigated. BUT – why are there town meetings being with officers that are NOT duly elected?
Tune in!
PLUS- quick update on Darrell Wiggins who was up for parole for his 7th time.
“The fight for justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in my case, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity.” Frank Serpico
Do you have a verified story to share; or an idea for a topic about the health and well-being of and for us-The People? What about something inspirational and motivating or ideas for solving a problem. Would you like to get involved with advocacy? CONTACT: tanyatalks@outlook.com or injusticeinoklahoma@gmail.com
Join Coz and Marti tonight as they host Liz Rizzo,
Liz Rizzo was Rusty Warren’s companion. Rusty is a well known comedian from the 60’s. She had 7 gold albums from that period. Her cutting edge humor was signified in her popular routine, “Knockers Up!”. At 91, Rusty has fallen prey to guardianship trafficking. Abducted and held captive by her abductors, she is told Liz doesn’t want to see her or talk to her. This is trauma based bonding by the book. Isolated, terrified and suffering from the onset of dementia, everything is being done to dehumanize Rusty and frighten her.
“Rusty was my partner over 35 years, we built a life together. We have a Trust to protect our assets and she put her wishes in writing. Judge Lee in Tucson disregarded the Trust, taunted me about being gay and said I was not credible. I was legally Trustee of the Estate but they challenged it.”
As so many others have discovered, pre existing legal instruments are quickly discarded to allow the predators access to any assets. This was never about Rusty or her well-being. It was only about gaining access to her jointly held estate and stealing as much of it as possible. To do that, Rusty had to be taken prisoner and deprived of her legal capacity.
Please join us as we cover this case which exposes more of the hunting of the elderly for profit.
Earlier today, I received a plethora of emails from readers telling me about Dr. Joseph Mercola’s decision to purge his website of COVID-19 content. Dr. Mercola wrote the following:
Although I don’t believe that sars-cov-2 is a real virus, I do share Dr. Mercola’s belief that the COVID-19 pandemic is being used to bring about a global reset. The difference between me and others screaming about the health fraud taking place has to do with our opinions concerning the virus’s legitimacy or existence.
Until someone from the scientific community can completely isolate this alleged pathogen, without computer modeling, from an animal or human host and have the viral isolates examined and documented through several certified, independent laboratories, I will not buy the story! In my opinion, this virus is as fake as can be and only exists in people’s minds because of a bogus PCR test that has created millions upon millions of false-positive case numbers throughout the world.
I believe many doctors know the virus is not real. But when you assert that claim publicly, there’s no turning back, and any perceived public credibility you might have had will be thrown out the window. More
Larry P. Ann
President, Hillsdale College
Dear Mr. Ann,
Your plea for support to educate the public on the adverse affects of Socialism has been noted. It is respectfully submitted the adverse affects are not from the manifestations of Socialism but from the method of financing the government enforcement of imposed social benefits.
The benevolence of homo sapiens is visible in every natural tragedy. The physical involvement to assist the victims, and the received financial gifts freely offered witness the love and compassion for unknown victims of tragedy. But when government becomes involved, with forced extractions to fund the benevolence, the methods of financing become extortion with corruption and not love.
Governments have developed methods of confiscation of the public’s wealth without touching the pocketbook of each individual. One such method may be called deficit spending. Ginsberg has identified the forefathers of the USA system resulted in chaos and social ruin for more than 800 years. Tayyab Mahmud’s lengthy analysis has concluded financial entities consistently receive great benefits from recent financial collapse. Let us turn to the financial structure imposed on the USA some 100 years ago. More
Statements in this site are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law. Informed Consent requires a flow of information. Click on the hyperlinked sections to direct you to primary sources such as CDC, WHO, FDA documents.
Anyone trying to take down this site will be named as codefendant in Nuremberg 2.0 for being an accomplice to crimes against humanity. That includes social media. Lawyers are standing by.
***
Did you know?
1. The FDA did not approve Moderna or Pfizer mRNA gene therapeutics they dubbed “vaccines”. It simply authorized them. Fauci confirms.
19 doctors warned the world of the dangers. AstraZeneca is being dropped by 24 countries.
The CDC also confirms(2) the Pfizer & Moderna jabs are the deadliest of all “vaccines”, also in a bar chart. 5 prominent doctors discuss how the Covid jab is a bioweapon.
Erik Molvar, Executive Director of the Western Watersheds Project (WWP). discusses the significant ecological impacts of cattle (which are not native to the Americas) on public lands in the western U.S. Ranching is the most widespread commercial use of U.S. public lands and one of the primary causes of native species endangerment in the American West. WWP is a nonprofit environmental conservation group with a primary focus on the negative impacts of livestock grazing on 250 million acres of western public lands. Learn more about Erik’s extensive conservation experience and WWP at https://www.westernwatersheds.org.
Betrayed by Hospice with host Marsha Joiner – May 5, 2021 #52V
Our guest speaker is Sparky Johnson from Canada who is a warrior advocating for the elderly and spreading the word to fellow Canadians about the dangers of trusting without verifying. Her Aunt Beverly Hanes death was hastened at the hands of the medical profession in a Long Term Care (LTC) Facility on February 28, 2020. Sparky says she stands for life, love and truth and is willing to do the hard work and step up and speak out! As we have said previously, culling of the elderly has been happening across the country and is only getting worse!
Knowledge is Power and you have to verify what you are told.
Our goal is to warn those who have not experienced the horror of losing someone to unscrupulous medical practices before it happens! Do not let anyone write your loved ones last chapter. Stand up for them and with us!
JUSTICE – Join Us Supporting The Innocent Culled Elderly
Dial 917-388-4520 or listen live on the internet. 5 p.m. Pacific, 6 p.m. Mountain, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Time Zone
If you have a story to share about a loved one taken before their time, contact me at marshajoiner2018@gmail.com. You need verifiable data.
This chapter is a preliminary part of the forthcoming book “Corona Unmasked“, and it is made available by the authors for free download for private use only. To be ordered from the publisher, a bookshop or online. All rights reserved. The authors and the publisher have prepared this work with the utmost care. Nevertheless, any liability of the publisher or the authors is excluded.
Chapter 14: VACCINATION CRAZE
This is a pre-publication of a chapter that will be finalized in the forthcoming book, available April 2021
“Gene-based vaccines received emergency approval at lightning speed to combat a virus that is no more dan-gerous than influenza (34). There is now clear evidence that people can become severely ill and die from these vaccinations. No real-world benefit of vaccination has ever been shown. Until reliable and convincing data are available, this high-risk human experiment must not be allowed to continue.”
Will good things come only to those who wait?
Until now, most of the public has accepted and sup-ported the development of vaccines without doubt and hesitation. And rightly so, since vaccinations can save lives. But no vaccination will ever be perfect and free of side effects. Useful vaccines must meet two important requirements: 1. the vaccine must offer protection against a serious or even life-threatening disease; 2. its side effects must be within tolerable and acceptable limits. On balance, the benefit must be much greater than the risk. Sounds logical, doesn’t it? And it is true. Who would get vaccinated against a common cold if this meant taking an incalculable risk of severe side effects? Furthermore, not every vaccination has to be useful for every person. Living in Germany, we do not need a vaccination against yellow fever, since it does not occur here. We already know that COVID-19 puts a clearly defined group of people at risk – namely, those over 70 with serious preexisting conditions. For these people, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 might possibly make sense. Of course, before such vaccinations could begin, the vaccine‘s efficacy and potential dangers would need to be examined very carefully. However, the clinical studies conducted thus far have excluded precisely this group of patients, so that efficacy and risks remained unknown before the roll-out of the vaccine.
Does the “killer coronavirus” justify exceptions? More
But first **** ONE LAST CALL FOR LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR DARRELL WIGGINS
WHO ARE YOU COUNTING ON TO MOVE JUSTICE REFORM FORWARD?
What DO YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN?
DO YOU TRUST YOUR REPS * ANY OF THEM?
DID YOU GET VACCINATED? Are you worried?
ARE YOU GETTING VACCINATED? Why or why not?
DEFUND THE POLICE? Is that crazy or what! How about better training and oversight. How about following through on complaints. Weed out the bad
Let’s talk!
“The fight against justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and it never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in my case, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity. “ Frank Serpico
But first **** ONE LAST CALL FOR LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR DARRELL WIGGINS
WHO ARE YOU COUNTING ON TO MOVE JUSTICE REFORM FORWARD?
What DO YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN?
DO YOU TRUST YOUR REPS * ANY OF THEM?
DID YOU GET VACCINATED? Are you worried?
ARE YOU GETTING VACCINATED? Why or why not?
DEFUND THE POLICE? Is that crazy or what! How about better training and oversight. How about following through on complaints. Weed out the bad
Let’s talk!
“The fight against justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and it never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in my case, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity. “ Frank Serpico
Join Coz & Marti this evening, April 22, 2021 as we host one of our favorite guests, Dr. John Reizer. Dr. Reizer publishes No Fake News, one of the most popular sites on the net.
At issue this evening is the use of the fake Covid scamdemic to cull the elderly and the chronically ill from the population. Apparently the predatory practices of professional guardians along with their equally immoral attorneys, wasn’t removing the elderly and disabled fast enough. This system ultimately results in early death for the abductee. Now with the cover of the fake pandemic, thousands more elderly will make an early exit from life. Oh! Just as an afterthought…they might want to harvest your organs too~!
To add insult to a great injury, now a test of “social usefulness” will be applied to healthcare. How old are you? If they invest in your health, what can you do that would be of value to society as a means to determine what care will be made available to you?
Retirement takes on a whole new meaning under this plan. It could be that access to meaningful healthcare will be denied as your social usefulness indicator indicates you are simply retired. We have been commodified.
U.S. Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has just introduced legislation that would BAN the federal government from issuing or requiring the use of “vaccine passports” in the United States.
This is a positive sign that our leaders in Washington have heard our calls and understand the importance of rejecting any efforts to inflict something as grossly unconstitutional as vaccine passports onto the American people!
And, that’s why we’re asking you to reach out to your federal lawmakers once more, to encourage them to take a decisive stand against vaccine passports by supporting Rep. Biggs’ proposal.
You can reach your federal lawmakers in one easy step using this simple contact form that LifeSite is making available here, on the Voter Voice platform.
With a click of a button, your message is sent directly to your legislators, without having to look up any of their contact details.
When you click on the link, you will see the form on the right-hand side of the page.
The bill in question, called the “No Vaccine Passports Act,” would formally restrict federal agencies from both issuing and/or requiring vaccine passports – formal documentation confirming whether or not an individual has received the new Covid-19 vaccination – to access federal properties.
It would also make vaccine requirements to carry out normal, everyday activities, from grocery shopping to using public transportation, all the more difficult to achieve.
“I am profoundly disturbed that the Biden Administration would even consider imposing vaccine passports on the American people,” Biggs said in a press release, “My private healthcare decisions—and yours—are nobody else’s business. Vaccine passports will not help our nation recover from COVID-19; instead, they will simply impose more Big Brother surveillance on our society.”
Congressional Democrats maintain their smallest majority in a generation!
That’s why must exert maximum pressure on our federal lawmakers, and express our desire to see them take up the ‘No Vaccine Passports Act’ and vote to approve it as soon as possible.
Please take a few minutes to contact your U.S. Senators and House Member to request that they approve legislation against vaccine passports, and ensure that the United States of America asserts itself as the world’s foremost beacon of freedom in these challenging, often disturbing times.
Yours sincerely,
Michael J. DaPos and the entire LifeSite Team
PS – CLICK HERE to tell your U.S. Senator and House Member to oppose vaccine passports for Americans. Thank you!
Wild Horses, Mustangs, Adobe Town Herd Area, southwestern Wyoming, USA
On April 1, 2021 the Bureau of Land Management published their Environmental Assessment for five wild horse herds in the Red Desert of Wyoming, in the public lands that include the Checkerboard: Adobe Town, Salt Wells Creek, Great Divide Basin, White Mountain and Little Colorado. These herds are on 3,436,000 acres. Despite having a new administration and a new Secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland, the BLM pushed out this plan to remove 3555 wild horses, the largest proposed roundup in history. This brutal plan includes as alternatives for the remaining horses left on the range dangerous spaying of wild mares, putting IUDs in wild mares and gelding stallions. Not only does the BLM want to remove as many wild horses as possible without even doing an actual count of their numbers for the past two years, they want to leave the remaining horses sterilized so that ultimately the wild horses will be eradicated in these areas. Here is the link to the documents: https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/1501993/570
If you are asking why, the main reason for this aggressive action is the Rock Springs Grazing Association. They are one of the most powerful grazing associations in the country despite only having about a couple dozen member families, and they are the primary holders of grazing leases in these Herd Management Areas and the primary holders of private land within the Checkerboard. They consider all these 3,946,000 acres of public and private land to be “theirs.”
They will never rest until all the wild horses have been eradicated, and they have considerable influence over the Bureau of Land Management. I have been observing, photographing and documenting wild horses in these areas since 2004 and involved in 5 lawsuits to stop the destruction of these wild horse herds over the past 8 years, and no doubt soon will be a plaintiff on yet another lawsuit. If not for keen public involvement and lawsuits, these herds would have been zeroed out long ago. Under this plan, there will be 1550 wild horses total left on 3,436,000 acres, or one horse per 2216 acres.
Here is the imaginative table that includes population estimates based on made up numbers:
What does it mean that judges are state actors? It means that the constitution applies to them and what they are doing to you. Many state judges have excused their illegal actions by claiming that custody suits are civil suits between private parties and therefore there is no state action to be limited. This is a Big Fat Lie! The United States Supreme court definitively stated in 1948 that judges in purely civil cases, even where there are no state statutes being enforced, are state actors limited by the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that the United States Constitution undeniably applies in your child custody dispute and your state judge is duty bound to protect your constitutional rights whether they like it or not.Federal courts have held state court judges to be state actors for 134 years in many different situations. However, one Texas Appellate Court wrote an opinion finding that a father had no constitutional right to the custody and care of his children because he improperly presumed there was state action in his case. The appellate court said there was no legal basis for the father’s presumption of state action and that his argument was wholly without merit. In the court’s own words, “There has been no ‘state action’ in this case; rather, this was a private suit between two individuals concerning issues of divorce and child custody.” This made me so mad I decided to slap this court around a bit and expose publicly the Lies That Family Courts Tell. State judges have no problem picking on parents, so I felt it was time that parents have someone standing up for them.If you want to witness a state appellate court being schooled by a parent and get what you need to school your own judge, then you need to read this book!
If you choose to watch this documentary, be forewarned that it will probably change your outlook on life forever, and you could suffer severe emotional trauma.
Foster Care System Needed to House Children who are Trafficked
Children without their parents are now streaming across the border so fast, that it is putting pressure on the foster care system, which is needed to house all these children.
As we reported a few weeks ago, foster parents in California were speaking out and stating that they were being asked to house up to 26 children and even more, to handle the traffic of children coming across the border. See:
In addition to foster parents, “group homes” run by corporations who get lucrative government contracts to house these children, are also a destination for many of these children, especially the older ones, and many of these corporations, including religious non-profit organizations, have a long history of sexually abusing or trafficking the children they house.
Owen Shroyer of Infowars.com documents dozens of pregnant illegal immigrants in downtown McAllen, Texas who caravan to the corrupt and complicit Rio Grande Valley Catholic Charity in the dark of night to avoid being caught for their criminal activity.
And here’s a video report about these women being put on planes after they are processed at the border.
As we have reported many times here at Health Impact News, and especially on our MedicalKidnap.com website, the buying and selling of babies and children is one of the most lucrative businesses in the world.
Joining Marti tonight will be Elaine Mickman, alternate co-host for “In The Mix” Nothing in this broadcast is to be considered legal advise.
To speak to the hosts: 917-388-4520 and hit #1 to be put in the cue.
We are not attorneys, but the current state of affairs on so many levels has required the public to do their own legal research in an effort to understand just what exactly the BAR associations and the so-called judiciary are using to get away with the abduction, isolation, and theft of estates under guardianship.
We will be talking about our research into legal capacity, legal agency, and legal status; three areas of law the predators do not appear to want the public to have knowledge of. It is through the avoidance of these things that victims of the guardianship racket lose the right to their own identity, their medical treatment wishes and their estates. They also lose the right to freely associate with family, friends, and religious leaders. Isolation is a known form of human torture. This is what allows the predators to designate the victims as “things”, “units” and “merchandise”. We have been commodified! Seen by the predators as nothing more than a commodity to profit from.
Join us we take a look at just how deep this racket runs. The very people who are supposed to advocate for the law are the same people who twist it, abuse it and select only those things that will be benefit them personally in choosiing what to uphold or what to ignore.
Urge Your Legislators to Ban Vaccine Passports in Your State!
Note: This eblast is being resent with an updated link to allow citizens in every state to write to their personal legislators and Governor. States are going forward to prohibit vaccine and immunity passports. Take Action to support legislation that protects the fundamental right of privacy and prohibits government and businesses from issuing or using vaccine passports. The idea of vaccine or immunity passport has hit a deep nerve among Americans. The concept of such a passport solicits massive push back because of its opportunistic infringement on fundamental rights of privacy and the right of all people to make their own health and medical decisions, including the right to accept or decline a vaccine. The concept of vaccine passports endorses outright coercion. It blatantly promotes discrimination and segregation. It encourages businesses and individuals to become arms of the police power of the government to force compliance of government policies. People are rightfully asking: “Can they really do that?” “Isn’t there a law prohibiting the government or businesses from requesting my personal medical information before I am allowed to have access to public life or transact business?” “Can a business really block me from entering a bus or a train, a store, a theater, or a restaurant, if I don’t prove with proper data that I have obtained a government recommended vaccine?” Every individual has an inalienable and fundamental right to make decisions about their own bodies and their own health care, even during an emergency. The Constitutions of many states acknowledge the rights of their citizens. For example, Minnesota’s Constitution begins with: “Government is instituted for the security, benefit and protection of the people, in whom all political power is inherent, together with the right to alter, modify or reform government whenever required by the public good.” [MN Constitution Section 1.] And Minnesota spells out the right to refuse treatments and the rights of the people to make their own medical decisions even during an emergency with MN Statute 12.39 in part stating: “Notwithstanding laws, rules, or orders made or promulgated in response to a national security emergency or peacetime emergency, individuals have a fundamental right to refuse medical treatment, testing, physical or mental examination, vaccination, participation in experimental procedures and protocols, collection of specimens, and preventive treatment programs….” What would a vaccine passport do? Businesses would exclude individuals who have declined a vaccine or other medical treatment from receiving services even if the government does not require the vaccine or treatment. Americans coercing each other into injecting something into their bodies that they do not wish, goes against everything it means to be an American. It must give Americans pause. It doesn’t matter whether the impetus for coercion is coming from government or businesses or both, it needs to stop. We can learn from the past and the destructive ways that coercion and discrimination have been used to control people. It is a grave mistake and time to stand for Health Freedom.
If an American citizen crosses the Oregon-Washington or the New York-Pennsylvania border to shop at a nearby store, he might have to quarantine for two weeks. If the U.S. follows Israel’s example, a person might have to show a vaccine passport to drink a beer in a pub.
The police may be out in force to arrest rule violators for not wearing a mask even outdoors, for sitting on a park bench, for entering a deserted park to play, or for being at an Easter service with too many worshippers. So far, no disabled or elderly people or young mothers have died after being tased or knocked to the ground by officers in riot gear—as far as we know. But while shrinking police forces are thus occupied, homicides and other crimes escalate, and many calls go unanswered.
All of this masking, physical distancing, obsessive testing of healthy people, travel restrictions, quarantining people who have been near a test-positive person, constant disinfection, etc. must be necessary (and effective) to protect us from a third or fourth wave of COVID, right? No matter how many livelihoods and unalienable civil rights are destroyed, or how many suicides or drug overdoses occur
Obviously, the authorities do not believe this themselves. Not only do they famously violate their own rules, but they are silent about what’s happening at our southern border.
Migrants are pouring in from Central America and Mexico, where there are large outbreaks, traveling under crowded conditions where good hygiene is impossible.
Some of the migrants are tested for COVID-19. According to the National Sheriff’s Association, as many as 50 percent may test positive in some areas. In February, the Border Patrol apprehended more than 100,000 illegal immigrants at the southern border, and about 26,000 evaded capture. Of course, none of the latter are tested.
These migrants are probably on their way to where you live, maybe by bus, maybe by charter flight. After all, the town of Ajo, Arizona, population 3,700, can’t absorb 60 asylum seekers per day. The health precaution is to make those being transported by bus wear an N95 mask. Such masks are used by medical workers to protect themselves, but they do NOT protect others, especially if they have an exhaust valve to permit easier breathing. They are NOT suitable for potentially infected persons.
Where are the public health officials, the fear-mongering media, the American Medical Association, the mayors who continue to keep businesses closed, the people eager to snitch on their neighbors for inviting too many people to dinner? Why are they not raising a hue and cry?
There is no talk of vaccines. It is too late for many or most migrants, as they have already been infected. Many are too young. And how could we get uncoerced, informed consent for these still-experimental products from masses of non-English speakers? Injecting them would violate international law. How would we find adverse effects in untraceable people? How would we get them their second dose, or manage the large proportion suffering disabling immediate side effects, or treat severe allergic reactions in Border Patrol facilities? Would we deport refusers?
One proposal the Administration has evidently not considered: Give all the migrants and the agents caring for them a dose of ivermectin, repeated in 48 hours. This would wipe out the COVID threat, along with scabies, head lice, and all manner of parasites. It has been safely taken by billions of people since 1981.
Why not protect the migrants, along with people who will be in contact with them?
This wouldn’t solve all the problems of a leaky or absent border, or all the public health issues, but it might show us how to stop the pandemic fears in the rest of the country and free us all from COVID tyranny.
###
Jane M. Orient, M.D. obtained her undergraduate degrees in chemistry and mathematics from the University of Arizona in Tucson, and her M.D. from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1974. She completed an internal medicine residency at Parkland Memorial Hospital and University of Arizona Affiliated Hospitals and then became an Instructor at the University of Arizona College of Medicine and a staff physician at the Tucson Veterans Administration Hospital. She has been in solo private practice since 1981 and has served as Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) since 1989. She is currently president of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness. She is the author of YOUR Doctor Is Not In: Healthy Skepticism about National Healthcare, and the second through fifth editions of Sapira’s Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis published by Wolters Kluwer. She authored books for schoolchildren, Professor Klugimkopf’s Old-Fashioned English Grammar and Professor Klugimkopf’s Spelling Method,published by Robinson Books, and coauthored two novels published as Kindle books, Neomorts and Moonshine. More than 100 of her papers have been published in the scientific and popular literature on a variety of subjects including risk assessment, natural and technological hazards and nonhazards, and medical economics and ethics. She is the editor of AAPS News, the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness Newsletter, and Civil Defense Perspectives, and is the managing editor of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
“It would seem to me that if you are intent on depriving a targeted victim of their identity, this should be done in a civil court, where evidence would have to be provided under oath attesting to the charges being levied. Let a jury decide if your personal identity should be taken from you and gifted to a professional predator that most likely has a long and sordid history of preying on those they perceive to be vulnerable.”
Declaring the living individual dead to enable the theft of the estate.
Barratry, a term that is now referred to as archaic, rarely, if ever, appears in the legal lexicon. It is the act of knowingly bringing false claims and charges against a targeted individual by members of the BAR Associations. And, it is the result of “the frequent incitement of lawsuits and quarrels that is a punishable offense.”
Every such individual ever forced into one of these pseudo “courts” that are in reality, tribunals, has suffered barratry and been subjected to a foreign jurisdiction and form of “pseudo law”, within which they were specifically disabled and unable to defend themselves. These unconstitutional tribunals were specifically created for this purpose: to leave the individual totally unable to defend themselves against a system devised to render them without any rights or protections. The Constitutional authority for these tribunals has been argued under the 1st, 3rd and 4th Articles of the Constitution, the sheer number of these treatises being a clear indication that they are not Constitutional.
Next, is the use of personage ( a term redefined for obvious reasons). Both barratry and personage are crimes against the individual by members of the BAR. Both of these criminal acts are used to enact foreign statutory law against living people. Foreign to the people, as statutory law circumvents the natural rights and liberties guaranteed in the Constitution and erects a legal fiction contradicting and adverse to the Constitution Bill of Rights, to directly benefit its creators. Which is exactly the only purpose of statutes.
The term “personage” has now been redefined to mean a person of importance or rank. Originally, it meant to assume another individuals’ identity with the intent of accessing their property; an act criminally prosecutable.
Today we recognize personage as identity theft. Of course its only a crime if you do it…if a member of the BAR Association does it in collusion with a for-profit guardian intent on availing themselves of your identity with the intent of fraudulently accessing your assets, it is not a problem; just all in a day’s work. Once the identity theft has been secured, testamentary powers are gifted to the predators who now present themselves as the civilly dead person so that the liquidation of the estate assets can begin in earnest. More
TOPIC: SPCA International-Global Rescue and programs that they are involved in
Military support programs: Operation Baghdad Pups – SPCA rescue animals befriended by soldiers in active duty warzones and bring them to live with them in the US.Operation Military Pets – SPCA subsidize the cost of moving pets with military families on change of station orders – something the military does not cover
Shelter support programs: Shelter Support Grants – Direct cash grants to shelters and animal welfare organizations all over the world to continue their operations. SPCA just did a big push in February for spay and neuter month and gave over $100k to shelters who specialize in low cost spay and neuter operations
Veterinary supply aid – SPCA sends sterile surgical supplies/medications to shelters all over the world to assist in their animal care operations
Education – SPCA believe this is the most important piece of the puzzle, to educate the public on why animal welfare is important and improves communities
The PPJ Gazette “Voices Carry For Animals” Archived Live Interview Animal Advocacy Shows
All shows are archived so you can listen at your convenience.
CAll in number is 917-388-4520
Hit #1 if you wish to speak to the host.
Hosted by Marti Oakley
Whistleblowers! is brought to you in coordination with Marcel Reid and the Whistleblowers Summit, an annual event in Washington D.C..
Join Marti this evening as she hosts Lisa Belanger, a Massachusetts attorney who waged a massive battle over the seizing of and, abduction of her father in an unwarranted guardianship. Marvin Siegel was targeted for abduction by another attorney when he retired. Why? Marvin had an estate worth about 8 million. That of course has been drained almost to the bare penny–the exact remaining amount is still not known–absorbed by his own privately retained attorney, predatory attorney fiduciaries (guardians, conservators, GALs) other attorneys, predatory guardians and anyone else who could get their fingers in the pie.
As a result of challenging other attorneys for their misconduct, and for committing well documented fraud aided and abetted by the presiding judges, on February 1, 2021, Lisa was given a two year “suspension” from the State of Massachusetts Bar–which is on appeal & being evaded by the Full Bench of the Massachusetts highest court.
The blatant criminal enterprise of elder exploitation and estate theft is running openly across the country. With the facilitation of clerks, hearing examiners and actual judges of the so-called “law”, the elderly are hunted, abducted and robbed blind by professional predators.
Marvin Siegel was an honorable man who was preyed upon by his own colleagues.
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
-Franklin Delano Roosevelt
ON APRIL 15, 2020, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued “Executive Order 2020-50“, under the terms of which people infected with respiratory illnesses declared to be ‘COVID-19’ (C19) were transferred from hospitals into nursing homes across the state. Those nursing homes, of course, were filled with residents especially vulnerable to fatal outcomes from exposure to such dangers due to age and co-morbidities typical to the elderly.
The transfers were engineered despite the fact that normal overall hospital capacity was never “overwhelmed” by C19 cases. What’s more, dedicated field hospital facilities had been built (at enormous expense) to provide enormous additional capacity where the infected seniors could be cared for properly while being prudently isolated.
No credible reason of need existed for the transfer of the infected people into nursing homes like an army of Typhoid Marys. Nonetheless, that’s what happened.
In fact, that percentage may be even higher. Serious questions remain as to the possible low-balling of that nursing home fatality figure due to quirky rules about how designated nursing home residents outside of the facilities for some reason after becoming infected (such as hospitalization) are accounted for by the state, and because of Whitmer’s unexplained intransigence on the release of data.
SO WHY DID WHITMER ISSUE (and renew in mid-May) an order which caused pre-mature deaths to so many Michigan citizens? Well, in light of Whitmer’s steady refusal to talk about the matter, scorn of all related FOIA requests from any quarter, being shielded from investigation by her partisan comrade Attorney General Dana Nessel, and her having paid hush-money to her former Director of Public Health upon his departure from office not long ago, I can’t answer that question definitively.
But I can throw out some facts and do some spitballing…
No person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” — unless, it seems, that person becomes a victim of probate or family courts. At that point, such deprivation of liberty happens more often than most of us realize.
It happened to Marguerite Trent Caddis of Birmingham, Alabama. A probate judge appointed a stranger as her guardian, and she was forced into a nursing home against her will. By the time the courts were finished with the Caddis estate, there was $3.76 left, to be divided equally between her three daughters.
Her story joins those of retired Alabama schoolteacher Marian Leonard and Golden Flake heiress Joann Bashinsky, each of whom were placed under court-appointed guardianships by Jefferson County Probate Judge Alan King, who has since retired. Even after the death of a loved one, the court battles don’t end. Guardianship abuse leaves grieving heirs, like Leonard’s daughter Nancy Scott and Bashinsky’s grandson Landon Ash, bearing the brunt of the financial burden and emotional heartache of desperate ongoing battles against the probate courts and guardians as they attempt to honor the wishes of their loved one. These are lives which ended, not peacefully, but embroiled in bitter legal battles that refuse to end even at the grave.
On Monday night, 5 April 2021, Marti Oakley and John Leckrone will be discussing how attorney’s and guardians have been using the maritime admiralty constructive contract and racketeering fraud kangaroo courts to steal property and assets owned by victims of their criminal actions. John will explain what parens patriae is and how it is exercised for the benefit of those in control over the population. Slavery is still alive and well in the United States and until people get to the root of the problem this issue will continue unimpeded.
The intentional failure of probate tribunals to recognize a victims legal capacity, legal agency and legal status has allowed the racket to run wide open. While both state and federal governments turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to what is happening to our elderly and others, families are tormented, disinherited and deprived of their loved one.
The show begins at 8 p.m. Eastern Time, 7 p.m. Central, 6 p.m. Mountain and 5 p.m. Pacific
Of the 578 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 63% of cases were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations — almost twice as many as reported (36%) following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine. Seven cases of Bell’s Palsy were reported with Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine (1%).
Using a broadened search for any reference to anaphylaxis in chart notes resulted in 15,193 reports, with 52% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, 45% to Moderna and 3% to J&J. With each vaccine, nearly 42% of anaphylactic reports occurred in people aged 17-44.
According to the CDC’s website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
Let me ask you: Have you heard even one attorney or probate hearing examiner ever refer to the right and preservation of legal capacity for any of the elderly men or women who are targeted, kidnapped and imprisoned in the guardianship racket? Have you heard any probate examiner say they will consider the least restrictive alternative structure for protecting the lives of those targeted for estate theft and exploitation, and then actually follow through with that? No? There is a reason for that. The probate examiner, ministerial clerk, or magistrate is involved heavily in the guardianship racket.
All the while, our elected officials feign disbelief, claim they had no idea what was happening, insist it must be an isolated situation, that no one told them this was happening, and then claim they will look into it and get back to you. They won’t and they don’t. They all know to a greater degree than you or I do exactly what is happening and yet sit silently doing nothing to prevent and stop this system of human trafficking altogether.
“Legal capacity is a human right, “a social and legal status accorded independent of a person’s particular capabilities. Whether an individual has the cognitive ability to understand and appreciate consequences of her decisions—the traditional threshold of the common law—is simply not determinative of whether she has legal capacity. Even if she does not possess those decision-making abilities, she cannot be stripped of her legal capacity.” [1]
In probate tribunals, the living, breathing, man or woman suffers a civil death. These victims are summarily stripped of their identity. Effectively commodified, they lose all rights including, where they choose to live, what medical treatments they do or do not, want. They lose the right to freely associate with family and friends and are stored in a warehouse called a “nursing” home. Most are not allowed phones or any other means of outside contact. Although statutes in every state claim that isolation should be a last resort, in virtually every case it is the first action taken by the predator guardian. And no one says a word about this!
In addition to the loss of legal capacity the victim has also lost the right to and recognition of, “legal agency”. Once in grip of the probate tribunal and their associated lawyers and professional predatory guardians, the loss of legal capacity is complete. They lose all rights to access and control their own assets and may not enter into contracts of any kind or make any decisions regarding their own assets and property.
A number of human rights theorists further break down legal capacity into two parts: “legal status,” which is the ability to hold rights that the state must recognize, and “legal agency,” which is the ability to have one’s decisions recognized by the law. Both of these rights are summarily dismissed and rendered moot in the human trafficking system of guardianship
It just gets worse
So why are they using the term “best interests” and using that as a means and a reason to discard pre-standing legal instruments to determine what the victim intended or wanted? And why are probate examiners allowed to discard these legal instruments that state specifically what the victim would want if these situations occurred? Why aren’t they using a best interpretation of the will and preferences? Why? Because its difficult to steal an estate if you are forced to consider what the victim wanted as opposed to what the guardians want.
Yet everyday across the country, individuals are never informed that they have a right to their legal capacity. Using contrived incapacitation or mental competency as a metric to deprive individuals of their rights to make their own decisions and to be recognized as a living, breathing man or woman, the right to legal capacity is summarily disregarded. This is a major deprivation of rights under US Code 242. [2] It is also a declaration of civil death. You don’t exist. You died, but just haven’t stopped breathing yet.
Here in the US, probate tribunals were established specifically to avoid the constitution and any rights associated with that document. These are not courts of law. These are specially designed tribunals created to allow the unfettered theft of estates and ordinary assets by operating outside of the common law and any rights you thought you had. You have no rights, no protection from these predators and can be subject to probate facilitated kidnapping and imprisonment whenever one of these predators decides you have something they want. Its a system set up for easy pickings for the professional predators, and few, if any, penalties for them.
The activity of professional predatory guardians goes unchecked by the tribunal.
These tribunals were created supposedly because common law, civil and criminal courts, were overloaded with cases so a tertiary system (the tribunal system) had to be created to relieve the stress on actual courts of law. But who in their right mind sets up an alternative tribunal system and then fails to adequately fund it to allow for oversight?
Hearings are held many times without notice to the victim. Many elderly, if they are even allowed to attend hearings, do so without an attorney. There is no due process afforded in these tribunals, no right to defend yourself, no right to present evidence contradicting the charges against you by immoral attorneys and their predator friends, the guardians.
If they are allowed to attend, and, if they have their own attorney familiar to them, that person will be dismissed by the examiner. Then an attorney will be appointed for them that can be depended upon not to interfer with what has been agreed to before your appearance in the tribunal so that the theft of the estate can begin, unimpeded. The tribunal will many times fire a family attorney and appoint one who can be depended upon not to interfer with the plans already agreed to by the tribunal and the predatory guardians and their attorneys. The fix is in. No one is allowed to intervene who is not part of the criminal racket that is now fully operational.
If all else fails, the victim will be subjected to massive doses of pyschotropic drugs rendering them not only dysfunctional, but appearing to be delirious. Nothing is off limits when these predators decide that the victims’ assets should belong to them. In this condition they are summarily judged to be “incapacitated” or “incompetent”. Everyone in that tribunal knows exactly what is going on, including the victim.
It is seldom, if ever, that a victim of this predatory system is able to challenge the predator in the legal system. Isolated, traumatized, and many times chemically restrained to keep them subdued, victims are unable to assert their legal capacity and demand to be set free. This is no accident.
The elderly are being hunted by predators who do not care what happens to them. Isolated from family, friends and even religious connections, they are sequestered away from everyone. Isolated, traumatized and reduced to a commodity to be exploited and abused, they begin to wither, eventually succumbing to a miserable death at the hands of unspeakable monsters.
Guardians, attorneys and probate examiners: These are the predators among us who prey on other human beings.
Sources:
Eilionóir Flynn & Anna Arstein-Kerslake,
[1].Legislating Personhood: Realising the Right to Support in Exercising Legal Capacity, 10 INT’L J.L. IN CONTEXT 81, 83 (2014).
Definition of legal capacity
: the capability and power under law of a person to occupy a particular status or relationship with another or to engage in a particular undertaking or transaction by giving the organization legal capacity — International Court of Justice/Advisory Opinion
[2] 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
The phrase interested person refers to heirs, devisees, children, spouses, creditors, beneficiaries, and any others having a property right in, or a claim against, a trust estate or the estate of a decedent, ward, or protected person. It also refers to personal representatives and to fiduciaries.
In general usage, a human being; by statute, however, the term can include firms, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees inBankruptcy, or receivers.
Definition of legal capacity
: the capability and power under law of a person to occupy a particular status or relationship with another or to engage in a particular undertaking or transaction by giving the organization legal capacity — International Court of Justice/Advisory Opinion
Congratulations to Kentucky Medical Freedom Coalition for their win on securing into law the religious and conscientiously held belief exemption for any vaccine that might be mandated by the state due to an epidemic! The Governor did not sign the bill, but also did not veto it so it became law on Saturday, March 22nd 2021. Great work and thank you to everyone who worked to support this legislation!
Here is the bill language that now protects the health freedom right to make your own health care decisions regarding vaccines during an epidemic: (2)In the event of an epidemic in a given area, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services may require the immunization of all persons within the area of epidemic, against the disease responsible for such epidemic, except that any administrative regulation promulgated pursuant to KRS Chapter 13A, administrative order issued by the cabinet, or executive order issued pursuant to KRS Chapter 39A requiring such immunization shall not include:(a) The immunization of any child or adult for whom, in the written opinion ofhis or her attending health care provider, such testing or immunization would be injurious to his or her health;(b) The immunization of any child whose parents or guardians are opposed to medical immunization against disease and who object by a written sworn statement to the immunization based on religious grounds or conscientiously held beliefs; or(c) The immunization of any emancipated minor or adult who is opposed to medical immunization against disease, and who objects by a written sworn statement to the immunization based on religious grounds or conscientiously held beliefs.(3) The cabinet shall:(a) Develop and make available on its Web site a standardized form relating to exemptions in this section from the immunization requirements; and(b) Accept a completed standardized form when submitted. We are hopeful that other states will follow KY by passing legislation that protects the right of all people to make their own health and medical decisions.
By: Dr. Gary Kohls
