Home

Wyoming Joins Phony “Sovereignty Movement”

6 Comments

According to an article on the Tenth Amendment Center website, Wyoming’s governor Dave Freudenthal has just signed Wyoming’s Joint Resolution 2 (HJ0002), claiming “sovereignty on behalf of the State of Wyoming and for its citizens under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government or reserved to the people by the Constitution of the United States.”

The problem with this, as well as with identical resolutions from several other states, as I have pointed out before (see “Sovereignty Hypocrisy,” “Sovereignty Hypocrisy – Part II,” and “Sovereignty Hypocrisy – Part III”), is that Wyoming, like all the other states “declaring sovereignty” is simply blowing a smoke screen to conceal its involvement in the New World Order police state that is slowly coalescing right before our eyes.

As with most of the other states “declaring sovereignty,” Wyoming also has FEMA camps within its borders, More

What Alex Jones & Infowars Don’t Want You to Know About the “Sovereignty Movement” – Addendum

14 Comments

In yesterday’s article, exposing the deliberate policy of Alex Jones and Infowars to promote the phony “sovereignty movement,” I said that I would show you links to my Infowars comments, but for the fact that they’d been deleted.

Well, this morning, I made screen captures of a conversation I had begun last night with another commenter to the article on Sarah Palin and the Alaskan “sovereignty” resolution, which concluded this morning with some very revealing comments that prove the points I made in my article that (1) Jones and crew regularly practice censorship on the comments sections and that (2) others are in agreement with me on the “sovereignty” issue and they have been silenced by Infowars, as well.

Here are the screen captures, showing the relevant posts in the conversation. There is some overlap of the images, in order to get it all in and maintain the proper context. Meanwhile, for those who would rather see the actual article on Infowars and read everything that was said there, here is the link to that, as well.

Screen Capture #1

Screen Capture #2

Screen Capture #3

Screen Capture #4

Screen Capture #5

What Alex Jones & Infowars Don’t Want You to Know About the “Sovereignty Movement”

35 Comments

If you’ve been a reader of PPJG for long enough, you are probably aware of my three-part series of articles on the phony state “sovereignty movement” (see Sovereignty Hypocrisy, Sovereignty Hypocrisy – Part II and Sovereignty Hypocrisy – Part III), but what you may not be aware of, unless you’ve been a frequent reader of the comments sections at Alex Jones’ Infowars.com website is the agenda Jones has to promote this phony “sovereignty movement.”

Since last year, when I personally brought to Infowars’ attention the declaration of sovereignty by Oklahoma (my home state) and Infowars ran with the story two days later (without any thanks to or mention of me, of course), Alex Jones and crew have been trumpeting this “movement” as it developed.

As state after state followed Oklahoma’s lead – often using the exact same verbiage that Oklahoma used in its declaration – Jones had each of these states’ governors and sponsoring representatives on his radio program as guests, where they were not only allowed to give their “sovereignty” propaganda to Alex Jones’ audience, but were praised by Alex Jones as true “patriots.”

The problem, as I have detailed in my articles, is that this so-called “movement” is a ruse designed to placate the masses and to lull the gullible into a state of false security, believing that their respective states are somehow going to save them from the federal colossus when martial law comes.

As I have detailed, all of the states “declaring sovereignty” have FEMA camps within their borders. This includes the latest addition to the sovereignty roster, Alaska, which has five FEMA camps.

In addition, several of the same states have passed laws within the past year or so that facilitate the rise of the police state. Most of this has been in the form of new gun laws that facilitate gun confiscations during martial law, but which are carefully worded to make it seem as if they do the exact opposite. Some don’t even do that, but have been promoted as if they do and the public – which doesn’t bother to read beyond the headlines, much less read the actual laws themselves – has bought into this propaganda.

Furthermore, one week from tomorrow (July 27th) will begin a week long FEMA National Level Exercise (NLE 09) in which Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, New Mexico and Louisiana will be policed, not only by a coordinated grid of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, but the combined military forces of four foreign nations (Mexico, Canada, the UK and Australia). Oklahoma was the first state to “declare sovereignty.” Louisiana is among the states “declaring sovereignty,” also. Yet, here they are, fully cooperating with this unprecedented event in which foreign troops will be quartered on U.S. soil for the purpose of policing Americans! It is illegal for our own military to do so (under the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878), let alone foreign troops!

The fact is, as I have said before, the police state control grid will be local. It will depend, for its very existence, upon the complete cooperation and participation of every one of the states. There is no way around this.

Given that, it is a very apparent contradiction, then, that these same states would be “rebelling” against the federal government they are cooperating with.

Yet, even when this is pointed out and proof is shown to demonstrate it, most people will stubbornly cling to the idea that somehow these states are seriously declaring sovereignty from the federal government.

Infowars has certainly been no except to this and my personal efforts there to wake up their audience to this has been met with hostility and overt censorship. I have repeatedly attempted to post comments under their articles, complete with links to evidence that supports my contentions, and these comments have been immediately deleted. I would provide you links to them, but the problem is, they’re no longer there!

So, why would Alex Jones stifle any dissent about the “sovereignty movement?” Why would he, for example, immediately cut off a caller to his show who posed the same question about the sovereignty movement that I have, calling the young man who called in someone with a “loser attitude,” yet offering no argument against the man’s position? This happened. I heard it with my own ears. Not only did Jones not state his reason for doing so, but he quickly changed the subject. Why is that? Why won’t Jones and company even allow the discussion of the possibility that the sovereignty movement is phony?

The answer is that he knows it is, but he doesn’t want you to know. Alex Jones has a vested interest in promoting this phony sovereignty movement, and it goes beyond simply wanting to save face for his having promoted it. It is not simply a matter of wanting to avoid having to admit he was wrong about it. He hasn’t admitted so and he never will. Why? Because this phony agenda serves the same goal Jones’ own agenda does: to promote and incite violent rebellion against the United States Government for the purpose of serving as a catalyst for martial law and the ushering in of the full police state grid. That is what the Alex Jones Show exists for. Well, that and making lots of money for Alex Jones and Ted Anderson, the owner of GCN (which is an ABC affiliate).

FEMA to Hold Regional “Anti-Terrorism” Drill in July

32 Comments

According to a page on FEMA’s own website, they will be holding a “National Level Exercise” from July 27th through July 31st, 2009.

What is significant about this “exercise” is that it will be the first that is regional in scope, encompassing all of FEMA Region VI (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexcio, Oklahoma and Texas), and, even more significant is that it will also be the first time in our history that troops from foreign countries will be involved in policing American citizens on U.S. soil. Those countries participating will be Australia, Canada, Mexico and the UK. This will be the first time since 1814 (the end of the War of 1812) that armed British troops have been on American soil menacing Americans. The last time the bastards were here, they burned our national capitol building.

The stated objectives of this exercise are, as is typical of our government in recent years, vaguely worded:

* Intelligence/Information Sharing and Dissemination

* Counter-Terrorism Investigation and Law Enforcement

* Air, Border and Maritime Security

* Critical Infrastructure Protection

* Public and Private Sector Alert/Notification and Security Advisories

* International Coordination

So, in other words, they will be spying on us, imposing illegal and unconstitutional “law enforcement” upon us, shutting down access to air, sea and land travel, closing down access to bridges, roads and highways, enlisting the aid of the Infraguard private sector Stazi force against us, and “coordinating” all this with assistance from other nations that have no business being involved in U.S. internal affairs.

FEMA states that this drill will be “White House directed” and “congressionally mandated.” Of course, as many of us know, that really means it’s being mandated by Bilderberg, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the international banking cartel that is behind all of these organizations.

Of course, all of this is being done in the name of “fighting terrorism,” and the drill will supposedly begin somewhere outside the U.S. (I’m guessing Mexico), then move into the U.S. It will involve supposed “terrorist attacks” that will then become a threat to the U.S.

On September 11, 2001, the Department of Defense was running military “drills” concurrently with the “attacks” on New York and Washington, D.C. and, as many researchers have pointed out, these drills were used to achieve two things: first, to mask the real attacks that the drills were simulating and, secondly, to send our fighter jets to locations far away from the areas being attacked, thus facilitating the attacks.

I believe this FEMA drill may be something similar. Actually, I believe it may be one of three things:

1. The beginning of a martial law take-over, focusing on the region where they have determined they will have the most resistance first.

2. A drill/exercise, as FEMA claims, to test the waters for a full blown nationwide martial law take-over and to acclimate the public to the next phase of conditioning: i.e., having armed foreign troops blatantly on U.S. soil, violating U.S. citizens’ rights.

3. A drill/exercise designed to see if they can get us to revolt, in which case, they will go from drill mode to the real thing immediately.

As a life-long resident of Oklahoma, I am debating whether to go somewhere outside of FEMA Region VI for the four days of this drill, or  to stay put and make sure my shotgun is locked and loaded. Given possibility number three, I’m thinking maybe a short vacation might be in order.

For Infowars.com’s take on this FEMA exercise, see their article on the subject.

Marti Oakley’s Interview on the Dr. Stanley Monteith Show: The NAIS

Leave a comment

Last night, I recorded Marti’s excellent interview on the subject of NAIS and it has been posted on my own Free Zone website (under the Eugenics/Depopulation Agenda section).

Cybersecurity Act of 2009: End of the Internet as We Know It?

2 Comments

S.B. 773 and 778, introduced last week by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) and Sen Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and collectively referred to as the “Cybersecurity Act of 2009” appears to be the “legal” last nail in the coffin of the internet.

The language of the act appears to be focused upon protecting the corporate elite’s use of the internet exclusively:

“To secure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the internet and intranet communications for such purposes…”

The bill also provides for “…the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cyber security defenses against disruption, and for other purposes.”

This act will also give the Secretary of Commerce new and sweeping powers to regulate the internet. That this power is being invested in the Secretary of Commerce only underscores the emphasis upon reserving the future of the internet for the use of corporate interests, which had been predicted last year.

But, even more chilling is that there appears to be a deliberate program being implemented to carry out false-flag “cyber attacks” to justify the passage of this bill. The bill, itself, states, in Sec. 2. Findings:

“(3) According to the 2009 Annual Threat Assessment, ‘a successful cyber attack against a major financial service provider could severely impact the national economy, while cyber attacks against physical infrastructure computer systems such as those that control power grids or oil refineries have the potential to disrupt services for hours or weeks,’ and that ‘Nation states and criminals target our government and private sector information networks to gain competitive advantage in the commercial sector.

This just so happens to coincide with a report in Computerworld’s Security section, describing alleged “cyber attacks” against “key parts of the U.S. Electrical grid,” which, strangely, isn’t substantiated in any way. There is no mention of where or when this supposed “attack” took place, nor is there any mention of who “the hackers” might be. What is stressed, though, is that “perhaps [it was done] with the intent to cripple the country’s power infrastructure,” and that these undisclosed “hackers” “most likely gained access like any other cybercriminal — by exploiting a bug in software such as Windows or Office…”

This is reiterated by mention, within the Computerworld article, of another such report from the Wall Street Journal. As in the Computerworld article, the Wall Street Journal also makes no disclosure of the identities of these cyber criminals, but says they are “cyberspies” who “…came from China, Russia and other countries…”

So, the stage has been set and the actors are in their places, ready to carry out the elite’s plan to create some sort of “cyber attack” hysteria that will be used to serve as the rationale for some sort of “solution” that will be needed to “protect” us from this sort of thing ever happening again. And, low and behold, concurrent with the supposed “attacks” comes the solution – in the form of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. How prescient of Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe to have come up with just what we needed and just in the nick of time!

Isn’t it uncanny that these “attacks” happened to occur after months of the media’s calling for the need for “a new internet?” The New York Times has quoted Rick Wesson, the chief executive of Support Intelligence, a computer consulting firm (I wonder if he’ll be one of those among the new “cadre of information technology specialists”?) , as saying, “If you’re looking for a digital Pearl Harbor, we now have the Japanese ships streaming toward us on the horizon.” How convenient.

The End Approaches

19 Comments

As a member of Warn the People, I have been apprised of some new information about the impending police state control grid. What is significant about this information is that, first of all, it comes from FEMA and, secondly, it is of a very timely nature.

The gist of it, which you can hear in its entirety in the two videos here, made by WTP members on the West coast, is that our corporate overlords are planning to “shut down all the banks” by August or September of this year – a scant five or six months from now – and there will be “roadblocks and checkpoints” installed on every major highway, freeway and interstate. The “rural areas” are to be left alone while the cities will become increasingly militarized.

My own analysis, based upon two years of research, shows this is consistent with what I’ve learned about the New World Order plan to take down the United States.

For example, there is the film Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, by Alex Jones, which, in the first few minutes of the film, mentions that we will be “herded into compact cities” and that the outlying rural areas will be left to decay, as part of the plan to “re-wild” the bulk of the North American continent, allowing it to return to nature. This “rewilding” has been hinted at in a recent History Channel documentary titled, Life After People, in which several commentators from various disciplines speculate on how the world would be after the “hypothetical” removal of all human life.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: