Home

This I Think I Know, (And So Should You)

Leave a comment

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                               

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Their enemies, after all, sit in Congress, Parliament, the WH, the State Department, or Westmonster – not on bicycle seats or at hoe-down music fests on Hwy. 91. If they’ve seriously “had it”, why don’t they ever go after the crafters of the berserk policies they so much profess to hate? Can anyone answer?”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<><><>

     At least to believe the media (and who does anymore? – certainly, fewer and fewer), the question on every American’s mind this star-crossed Hallowe’en night is something like: “How do the gossamer-thin ISIS/ISIL terror networks now covering and threatening nearly every country on the face of the earth (including apparently 53 out of 54 in Africa) manage to inspire amateur, would-be (or, never-thought-of-it before) jihadists in the U.S. to rent vehicles out-of-state in order to slam them into chockful bike paths (reminiscingly near the one-time Twin Towers and 7, quite coincidentally, I’m sure), killing at least 8 and wounding dozens more?

But, actually, I think I know what may have happened here – just as I thought, apparently correctly, in the more-splashy Las Vegas case a month ago. I chose deliberately to say “may have” and “think” because I have absolutely no direct evidence. But I don’t need direct evidence to conclude the overwhelming probability for my surmise, on the basis of 90 – 95% of such cases in which the genuine inspiration for the attack is conclusively revealed and traces straight back to the FBI-CIA nexus, the axis of the lion’s share of the world’s current baffling, radically-destabilizing wave of mass evil. (Throw in the Pentagon/Situation Room into that axis/nexus of iniquitous operations for good measure – to say nothing of the closely-linked deceptions, bald-face lies, and beyond-volatile anger and confusion generated). More

Advertisements

The Nature of the United States Government

Leave a comment

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                                  Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear Reader, note that none of what follows would be true if the defenses in the Constitution and the Declaration were in force in spirit and letter. Should you find some part untrue, please say so, and celebrate that!

Dispassionate vs Engaged

To those who demand a more dispassionate account of such resonant human affairs, I say this: If I were reporting the parts per million of sulfur in water, or the order of finish in the third race at Belmont, then maybe. If I’m talking about the effects of the months-long horrific battle of Mosul on inhabitants of the city, then it’s not my style – unless you want a dry list of the number of limbs, organs, dreams, lives, and homes permanently stolen, including no interviews or on-the-ground impressions, the truth rendering even histrionics part of the objective story. The account I’m about to render, while still slower in its progression, carries all the same implications as that, on a worldwide scale, without exception.

The Nature of the Governance

First, it must be acknowledged that the U.S. government doesn’t normally attempt to ascertain and doesn’t respond rationally to verifiable facts, whatever those may be, in any instance. Matters with which it concerns itself are, in general, those it sees as vehicles to enhance itself or forward one of its multiple entwined agendas or those of a concerned agency, in some cases, a single official. A narrative is established and sold to the public or cognizant parties embodying the benefit perceived to said government itself, an agency, or involved official, at best only loosely representing verifiable facts, and word is passed down the ranks as necessary that that’s the line to adhere to, all claims to the contrary to be ignored or dismissed – never seriously entertained or rebutted. The same can be witnessed regarding the arbitrary U.S. “justice” system. More

“Is everything a conspiracy?”

4 Comments

(With thanks to Dr. Tony Hall for posing the question)

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                           Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  With so many abrasive strands apparent these days in the noose now synched around our neck, there is a rule of thumb I believe is true and applies: “If there is a noose around your neck, you can be sure it didn’t get there by itself.”

Recently, I got into what turned out to be an aborted debate online with a fellow named Brandon Smith, a sort of guru or online prophet of a New World Order to be sprung on us in due time. I responded to a warning he posted to that effect, characterizing the NWO as a “full-spectrum destabilization of old world economics and geopolitics.” I answered that the forces, major tendencies, and key players of the NWO are already here, and we have already started experiencing the dream, decidedly for the worse. In very many respects, the NWO is here and now.

His answer to this surprised me. Paraphrasing, he said “No, the New World Order will be incomparably worse than anything we’re experiencing now.”

To which I replied that the insults of the mailed fist could get much worse as the noose tightens (to mix metaphors) – or not. But the authors and the various strands of the wrongs to be endured were already largely set, and the applicable question might be whether a fetus (and I personally perceive we’re at least way past that stage) should be considered human and formative, even if not yet wholly developed.

And, to this, I didn’t get any answer. More

Modern “Progressivism”: The Globalists’ New Inquisition

2 Comments

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                        

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

________

To this world’s associated Globalists, NWO, Neocon warriors (with other people always doing the fighting, paying the bills, paying the ultimate price), pan-Middle East Zionist Supremacist iniquitous ubiquitous meddlers: Here’s a proposition for you. To wit: If you would like to legitimize your plan and global enterprise, to get us all on board and knowledgeably behind it, why not just spill it out honestly, ALL of it, so we can all of us either vote it up or down? More

Why I Am an Anti-Globalist

3 Comments

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                    

  Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Back when I was new on this earth and arriving in town in a yellow school bus, the better part of a century ago (gulp), there was a program that came on our black and white TV in the late afternoon each day called “Captain Video”, in which, as I recall, the main characters were served by a robot name of “Tobor”, “robot” spelled backward – clever. More

The Psychology of Global Terrorism

Leave a comment

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     What if you lived in a town and had an implacable enemy for a hundred years and counting who lived over on the other side of town, who you always found it handy to blame for practically anything that went wrong? And though this sworn enemy went around heavily armed, because of your ceaseless, unstoppable blood threats, oaths, and warnings, you managed, through extortion, bribery, and theft to pay for the frighteningly expensive high-caliber weaponry that you expect would not only most certainly take him out – or alternatively convince him that you kept it cocked and loaded perpetually with full intent to use it to blow him away, and so would see fit to surrender and submit to living as your disarmed, groveling servant, turning over his uncommonly rich store of goods for your use and enjoyment? What would be most likely to happen if such were the state of relations between you and such a primary designated blood rival?

According to your calculations and intel, discharging your powerful weapon toward him would end his life or, if not, so devastate him that he couldn’t retaliate. Either way, you could safely appropriate his chattels, which suits your intent. That’s what you’ve counted on, kept as a sort of open secret for years. More

My humble radical fix for the world

2 Comments

911 Grassroots Interviews Author/Would-Be Decider James Hufferd, Ph.D.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

911 Grassroots: So, Mr. Hufferd, what is it you would endeavor to “decide”, if you were able to, that is?

James Hufferd: Well, the fate of the world, to make it a better place for productive, well-intentioned people to live, even thrive in.

911 G: You don’t see it as that at present, then? How so?

JH: The world I see has become all tattered and twisted in knots, stressed way beyond the endurance of most. Or, we’ve just given up and avoid engagement in anything beyond our back yard. Or the elevator shaft allegedly connecting our flat with the ground. Our finances, for more of us every day, are in ruins, simply awful monsters we don’t dare face. World leaders are taunting each other worse than 6-year-olds fumbling nukes and other assorted w.m.d like carnival bears tossing around Tiffany glassware. Suicides 22 a day among those who’ve been pushed too close to the fire…

911 G: So then, what you’re suggesting is some now new way of wringing our hands?

JH: No! Gosh, I mean hell, no! That is what everyone seems to be doing – get out in the street and squall like an 8-month-old outraged toddler, maybe carrying signs, not buying Cheetos from the wrong stores, signing our name on a list – just the strategy we’ve been trying for a couple hundred years. And, surprise, it’s not working! Because – well, partly because, we’ve just telling people who do bad stuff to please knock it off. And it’s how they make their bucks, the way they bilk us, so they’re not going to stop it. They’re never going to. Because it works and we have no obvious way of ever stopping them. And a little part of what they do, after all, might even be good and needed. So, what we need to try to do is force a clear, reasonable limitation on it. Look, right now just might be the worst possible time to suggest what I’m about to suggest, what with this controversial, but generally cheered, staged reaction to Syria. Or, from another standpoint, if my idea can be tested by this and survive, well…

911 G: So, before we get too far into that, what is your take on what’s going on in Syria? More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: