Home

TS Radio: Abolishing Probate # 11: Families abused by a corrupt system

1 Comment

Join us Monday evening January 8, 2018 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

Advertisements

Guardianship Abuse & Medical Kidnap: While congress sits silent and does nothing

3 Comments

Marti Oakley

December 31, 2017

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“For the purposes of this Convention, “enforced disappearance” is considered to be the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.

  1. No order or instruction from any public authority, civilian, military or other, may be invoked to justify an offense of enforced disappearance.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While families, advocates and activists fighting this system of human trafficking, perpetrated by state and federal agencies and those who operate under their protection remain impervious to prosecution, a new and more vile element has reared its ugly head. Medical kidnap and abuse is now rampant and the death toll is rising. And who put this predatory system in place?? The very people you elected to public office!

While families opposed to this system have grown immense in numbers, congress still plugs its ears and pretends it doesn’t know. Or, they claim it must be an isolated incident. They never heard of such a thing before. Why didn’t they know about it if it was actually a problem? The fact is they did know, they do know and they also have no intention of interfering with the trafficking as it would result in hundreds of thousands and in some cases millions of dollars in campaign contributions (bribery) that they receive from the very organizations who put the programs in place and profit from them.

So now, in addition to being deprived of your identity, assets and freedom via probate tribunals, you can be deprived of your very life by those in the medical sector. Also, your children can be taken from you for no other reason than you asked for a second opinion on the diagnosis and proposed treatment they have planned. They can also be taken by a cps worker with no evidence of actual wrong doing by the parents, and CPS will never be required to produce any provable evidence that the kidnapping of your child was in any way related to any claimed abuse.

As with the elderly and the disabled, children are rendered dead in the law and become chattel property once they become a ward of the state and are now openly bought, sold, and traded for profit.

Issues that congress could easily and with authority, rectify:

End the theft of identity that results from being a “ward of the state”. More

U.S. Marshals in Hot Pursuit of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki

11 Comments

Michael Volpe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The US Marshals have an operation to bring in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.

Grazzini-Rucki, who is currently in hiding in an undisclosed location, revealed she recently learned details of the operation.

She said she’s been told the US Marshals are treating her as a dangerous fugitive.

Grazzini-Rucki currently has no warrant for her arrest and is not a fugitive.

As such, any operation to bring her in by the US Marshals- which among its mandates tracks fugitives- would be illegal.

This would not be the first time that the US Marshals have inserted themselves in her case and both times previously it was also illegal. More

Changing the “War No More” Sentiment of Armistice Day to the War-Glorifying Propaganda of Veterans Day

Leave a comment

Duty to Warn

By Gary G. Kohls, MD – 11-11-17

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Oh, my name is Francis Tolliver, in Liverpool I dwell,

each Christmas come since World War I I’ve learned its lessons well,

that the ones who call the shots won’t be among the dead and lame,

and on each end of the rifle we’re the same.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

99 years ago, on 11-11-1918, at precisely 11 am Paris time, a cease-fire (aka “truce” or “armistice”) was agreed to and signed by military negotiators from France, Britain and Germany. The terms of the truce ultimately resulted in the end of the “War to End All Wars” 7 months later when the Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919.

Germany’s surrender to the Allies was regarded as the prudent thing to do after Kaiser Wilhelm’s tyrannical monarchy was overthrown by democratic socialist forces earlier in 1918. Erich Ludendorf, a classic example of Prussian militarism, was one of the German generals who first broached the idea of starting the negotiations that eventually led to Germany’s surrender.

Ludendorf saw that 1) Germany’s army was terminally exhausted, demoralized and poorly equipped; 2) the United States had finally entered the war with fresh troops; 3) the fledgling government at home was in disarray; 4) the war had bankrupted the nation (as all wars eventually do – unless there is enough looting and plundering of the occupied territories); 5) that civilians at home were starving; and 6) that victory was an impossibility. The writing was on the wall; Germany had no choice but to surrender.

The armistice was signed at Compiegne, France by four French and British military officers, the German Foreign Minister, two German military officers and one German civilian. More

Rutherford Institute Challenges Police Use of License Plate Readers as Mass Surveillance Tool to Track Citizens Not Suspected of a Crime

Leave a comment


This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org.

RICHMOND, Va. — The Rutherford Institute has asked the Virginia Supreme Court to prohibit police from using license plate readers as mass surveillance tools to track citizens whether or not they are suspected of a crime. In filing an amicus brief in Neal v. Fairfax County Police Department, Rutherford Institute attorneys argue that Fairfax County’s practice of collecting and storing license plate reader data violates a Virginia law prohibiting the government from amassing personal information about individuals, including their driving habits and location.

Mounted next to traffic lights or on police cars, Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR), which photograph up to 3,600 license tag numbers per minute, take a picture of every passing license tag number and store the tag number, date, time and location of the picture in a searchable database. The data is then shared with law enforcement, fusion centers and private companies and used to track the movements of persons in their cars. There are reportedly tens of thousands of these license plate readers now in operation throughout the country. It is estimated that over 99% of the people being unnecessarily surveilled are entirely innocent. The Virginia Supreme Court will hear arguments today in Neal v. Fairfax County Police Department.

The Rutherford Institute’s amicus brief in Neal v. Fairfax County is available at www.rutherford.org.

“Incredibly, Americans cannot even drive their cars without being enmeshed in the government’s web of surveillance. We’re on the losing end of a technological revolution that has already taken hostage our computers, our phones, our finances, our entertainment, our shopping, our appliances, and now, it’s focused its sights on our cars,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “By subjecting Americans to surveillance without their knowledge or compliance and then storing the data for later use, the government has erected the ultimate suspect society. In such an environment, there is no such thing as ‘innocent until proven guilty.’” More

The Assassination of JFK, the ‘Lone Gunman’ Mythology and the CIA’s Weaponizing of ‘Conspiracy Theories’

Leave a comment

Duty to Warn

By Gary G. Kohls, MD

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

“We’ll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American people believe is false.” – William Casey, Director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan (1981)

“’Conspiracy theory’ is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events as off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States, raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.”Professor James F. Tracy   (To read the original CIA Document 1035-960, that is the origin of the term that weaponized the term “conspiracy theory, go to: http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html)

__________________________________________________________________________________

It has been 54 years since President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. Many eyewitnesses who were on the scene heard multiple gun shots, some of them coming from the “grassy knoll” at Dealey Plaza. One expert eyewitness at Parkland Hospital ER, a surgeon, has testified many times that he saw a small round entry wound in the front of the neck and large exit wound in the back of his head, which contradicts the official “no-conspiracy” “single shooter” theory.

Ever since that fateful day, every attentive, alert, non-distracted, truth-seeking American patriot who wants and needs to know the truth of the matter has been asking questions and doing independent investigations because they don’t believe the official, approved story and have no reason to believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission. With every deceptive, dismissive or untruthful answer, these patriots know that they have been duped.

Being treated as ignoramuses or loony “conspiracy theorists” has a way of energizing intelligent folks who have seen through official attempts at obfuscation, which is why more and more inquiring people are losing confidence in our nation’s over-privileged and often sociopathic, serially-lying elites, politicians, corporatists, multibillionaires, militarists, talking heads, media celebrities and other so-called leaders. More

This I Think I Know, (And So Should You)

Leave a comment

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                               

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Their enemies, after all, sit in Congress, Parliament, the WH, the State Department, or Westmonster – not on bicycle seats or at hoe-down music fests on Hwy. 91. If they’ve seriously “had it”, why don’t they ever go after the crafters of the berserk policies they so much profess to hate? Can anyone answer?”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<><><>

     At least to believe the media (and who does anymore? – certainly, fewer and fewer), the question on every American’s mind this star-crossed Hallowe’en night is something like: “How do the gossamer-thin ISIS/ISIL terror networks now covering and threatening nearly every country on the face of the earth (including apparently 53 out of 54 in Africa) manage to inspire amateur, would-be (or, never-thought-of-it before) jihadists in the U.S. to rent vehicles out-of-state in order to slam them into chockful bike paths (reminiscingly near the one-time Twin Towers and 7, quite coincidentally, I’m sure), killing at least 8 and wounding dozens more?

But, actually, I think I know what may have happened here – just as I thought, apparently correctly, in the more-splashy Las Vegas case a month ago. I chose deliberately to say “may have” and “think” because I have absolutely no direct evidence. But I don’t need direct evidence to conclude the overwhelming probability for my surmise, on the basis of 90 – 95% of such cases in which the genuine inspiration for the attack is conclusively revealed and traces straight back to the FBI-CIA nexus, the axis of the lion’s share of the world’s current baffling, radically-destabilizing wave of mass evil. (Throw in the Pentagon/Situation Room into that axis/nexus of iniquitous operations for good measure – to say nothing of the closely-linked deceptions, bald-face lies, and beyond-volatile anger and confusion generated). More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: