Home

TS Radio: Geneveive’s Nightmare P/2 & another Carol Hershey Victim

1 Comment

Join us Sunday evening September 17, 2017 at 6:00 pm CST!

4:00 pm PST … 5:00 pm MST … 6:00 pm CST … 7:00 pm EST

Listen Live HERE!!

CAll in # 917-388-4520

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hosted by Marti Oakley

Mary Bush returns for part 2 of her mothers guardianship case. Geneveive is still being isolated and held prisoner for-profit. Mary who lives about 15 miles from the locked in facility where her mother is, has not seen her mother since January 2016. Mary has since discovered and reported to Chester County Adult Protective Services that her mother again has not seen her cardiologist for a year and a half.

After filing another petition to the court to get her mother to her doctor, the court issued an order stating “I will not micromanage (Guardianship Services of Pennsylvania) care decisions absent compelling reasons”. The court also ordered that Mary who is her mother’s legal health care agent is to ” cease and desist” “scheduling appointments for her mother”. If guardianship is about protecting vulnerable older adults, then who is the Court really protecting?

Hour 2:

Jeffrey Hennell joins the show to talk about yet another victim of Chester County, Pennsylvania probate, his mother. Jeffrey’s mother was another victim of Carol Hershey. The house sold, personal items sold and family memorabilia left in a dumpster…including his father’s ashes.

 

Advertisements

The Horrors of Court-Appointed Guardianship – Gretchen’s Shortened Life

Leave a comment

TS Radio: Is mass murder happening in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania?

Leave a comment

Join us Monday evening September 11, 2017, at 7:00 pm CST!

F. Harvey Whitten

Listen Live HERE!

More

TS Radio: Mary Bush and Genevieve’s Nightmare

6 Comments

Join us Sunday evening September 10, 2017 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

Though the court has ruled Sandra Grazzini-Rucki too poor to pay for her own filings, her ex-husband’s attorney thinks she should pay for his.

4 Comments

Michael Volpe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lisa Elliott, the long-time attorney for David Rucki, filed a notice for a taxation of costs- meaning she wants the other side to pay for the costs of filing- with the appeals court.

In her response, Grazzini-Rucki’s attorney, Michelle MacDonald explained to the court that her client is a pauper.

“Appellant, Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki, hereby objects to the taxation of costs and disbursements dated September 1, 2017,” MacDonald said in her response, “on the ground that: Appellant was granted informa pauperis status and is a pauper.”

By granting Grazzini-Rucki informa pauperis status the court has deemed Grazzini-Rucki too poor to afford to pay for her own filing fees and they are thereby waived; but that hasn’t stopped Elliott from demanding she pay for her client’s filing fees.

MacDonald, after receiving a $5,000 retainer in early 2013, has been working on Grazzini-Rucki’s custody case pro-bono; she was once forced to conduct part of a custody trial while handcuffed to a wheelchair.

The latest filing follows a similar filing by Elliott in late August asking the court which handled her client’s divorce to order Grazzini-Rucki to pay for all the filing fees- in excess of $3,000- she accrued in that court.

The series of events defy logic. More

TS Radio: Brian Kinter and the JAM Million Parent March

1 Comment

Join us this evening September 8th, 2017 at 5:00 pm CST!

Judicial Accountability Movement 

Listen live HERE!

More

URGENT HELP NEEDED – 317-590-0876 – A REAL CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN JUDGE?

Leave a comment

For the past few years, author, educator, and elder and child advocate, Dr. Beverly Newman, has been discriminated against in the Indianapolis court system, where her decades-old incurable, progressive disabilities are discounted and even denied.  Since 2015, Dr. Newman has not even been a party to her Dad’s probate case (Cause No. 49D13-1009-ES-040244) before Judge James Joven, but he continues to issue orders against her as a non-party and has stated his intent to “punish” her if she does not travel to Indianapolis, against expert medical opinions, 1200 miles from Florida, where she has stayed and never left since 2009.

Beverly Newman’s delicate health does not permit her to travel, according to medical records filed with Judge Joven, who recently struck the written expert medical opinions from the court’s record.  Additionally, two attorneys in Judge Joven’s court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, have publicly and repeatedly subjected Dr. Newman to disability discrimination, denying her disabilities in their numerous court filings over the years, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

On September 6, 2017, on the 14th floor of the City-County Building, at 1:00 PM, Judge Joven has stated he will arrest Beverly Newman if she does not travel to Indianapolis in violation of her Jewish religious beliefs not to risk her life except in extreme emergencies.  Is this what our grossly-overcrowded Indiana jails are for?

To remove Judge Joven from this case, for permitting intolerable disability discrimination in his courtroom,  and to sanction officers of his court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, contact:

Indiana Supreme Court, which appointed Judge Joven to this case, Chief Justice Loretta Rush   rush.externship@courts.in.gov

Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett      city-county.council@indy.gov

Lieutenant Governor Suzanne Crouch            scrouch@lg.in.gov

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki maybe homeless, jobless, and penniless but that doesn’t mean should not be paying child support to her multi-millionaire ex-husband.

9 Comments

Michael Volpe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The court acknowledged that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki is currently earns no money but used the concept of imputed income to justify its ruling.

Imputed income allows judges to base child support based on an income level the judge deems is reasonable even if the party is not currently earning that living.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That was the peculiar ruling from the Minnesota Court of Appeals authored by Judge Jill Flaskamp Halbrooks.

Judge Halbrooks upheld a decision by Judge Maria Pastoor of the Minnesota’s First Judicial District who ordered Grazzini-Rucki to pay her ex-husband, David Rucki, $975 per month in child support.

David Rucki is a multi-millionaire who received 100% of the marital estate along with sole custody of their five children in an even more bizarre ruling by Judge David Knutson.

Pastoor’s original ruling was even more bizarre because she made the ruling while Grazzini-Rucki was incarcerated for helping to hide her two oldest daughters after David Knutson forced them into the custody of her ex-husband’s sister, who the two girls insisted was abusive to them.

“Grazzini-Rucki argues that the CSM erred by imputing potential income to her because the CSM (1) disregarded her actual income, (2) failed to make a proper statutory analysis, and (3) improperly adopted a level of income determined by the district court in a prior order. A CSM must calculate a parent’s income based on her potential income.” Judge Halbrooks stated in the order, justifying how a homeless woman can be forced to pay child support. More

CHILDREN: PRAY OR PREY?

6 Comments

 

          

Beverly Newman, Ed.D.

Child and Elder Advocate, Author, and Journalist

helpelders@hotmail.com     

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Our goal is to get hundreds of letters/emails in support of us sent to:

vice.president@whitehouse.gov

Mike Pence /former Gov. of Indiana

~~Richard.payne@courts.in.gov                   

Richard Payne /Attorney for Indiana Supreme Court

~~toakes@indy.gov

Judge Timothy Oakes/ Presiding Judge of the Marion Superior Court  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

” The predator’s attorney, James Voyles, who has repeatedly served as the President and Vice President of the Indy Bar, boasted that 47 people had written letters to the court on behalf of the predator, which letters described the predatory coach as “paint[ing] a picture of a wonderful young man.”  This “wonderful young man,” after he had been exposed as a remorseless serial predator, repeatedly tried to persuade his victim to take the blame herself for the crimes he had committed and texted the male Park student, who had violently attacked the victim and her friend on the Park campus, “The nice thing is that I can get any job in the state.”

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s not a pretty picture, as they say.  No, I retract that.  It’s a hideous, odious picture of a Midwestern capital that shuts its eyes to child abuse and trafficking, shuts its eyes, closes its doors to victims, and slams its doors against mandatory reporters like teachers.

Years ago, CPS, in an Indianapolis suburb, would repeatedly receive reports of a prolific child molester, a prominent elected official, and routinely shred them, according to its staff.  Long ago, the official left Indianapolis, but his trail of tears stayed.

Now, City headlines tout such good news as “Indianapolis man won’t go to prison for molesting daughter with cancer.”  Even if you believe in climate change, the climate for kids in Indy is not changing, except for the worse.

If your heart breaks to know that this tiny victim of predation gets no justice, move.  I am quite serious.  Show your intolerance for hate against children with your feet and the seat of your pants.  Do not let your children and grandchildren grow up in a climate of hate against the child, hate against the sanctity of the child. More

Massachusetts Legislature Poised to Give Immunity to “Guardians”

15 Comments

For information regarding the Statehouse and other general building information, please call the main Statehouse phone number.

Main Statehouse Phone Number(617) 722-2000

Contact your Legislators

Search by street address for a list of legislators that serve your area. Then, use the contact information on their member page to reach out to them about issues for which you have questions or concerns.

 David Arnold
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Commentary
There is currently an act before the Massachusetts Legislature to establish the Office of Adult Guardianship and Decisional Support Services. (S.1177/H3027). The purpose of the bill is to provide guardianship services to “unbefriended” people who are unable to manage their affairs.

More

Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

18 Comments

Be sure to read the comments that are coming in.  Click the link above to access!

Marti Oakley

PPJ Gazette copyright ©

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution for the United States authorizing, or otherwise directing the creation of these self protecting unions that have monopolized our judicial system at every level and use that monopoly to profit at the public’s expense. And, there is nothing authorizing the incorporation of these specialized unions or of the Supreme Court itself. Yet here we are in the grips of these corporate entities who have monopolized the very judicial system meant to protect America from just such things.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In every state and on the Federal level, the BAR Associations have established a monopoly on our courts and our so-called judicial system. The existing Sherman Act: the Clayton Act and FTC Act only become active when the monopolized systems that have been established harm consumers. I can think of no other more harmful monopoly to the American public overall, than what passes for the judicial system in America and its associated BAR unions that not ony control and own our courts, but also profit mightily from doing so. The law is what they say it is regardless of what the law might actually be.

The Sherman Act outlaws “every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade,” and any “monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize.” Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. Obviously, the Supreme Court has decided that the monopolies that exist in our courts are not unreasonable. Especially since they too, participate in that monopoly.

Q: Do you believe the monopolies on our courts at every level via so-called BAR Associations are unreasonable?

When individuals go to all the expense and time of acquiring a degree in law, why should they then be required to pass some contrived test, many times at great expense, to acquire a union card (The BARS are UNIONS) permitting them to work in the field they trained in or to practice their trade in any court room in this country? No union card? No access to the courts. Didn’t pay your BAR union dues for access to the courts they monopolize? Too bad for you!

Even the Supreme Court of the United States has established itself as its own BAR. To be heard in this highly politicized “court”, you must be a member in good standing for four years in another BAR union before you can apply to appear in their closed union shop called the Supreme Court. More

TS Radio! Danny Tate & Marti Oakley–Live from DC

Leave a comment

Join us this evening, Monday July 24, 2017 at 7:00 pm CST!

Please visit http://www.whistleblowersummit.com/summit_at_a_glance/

for a complete schedule of events.

More

PART 4: LAWYERS CHARGED WITH FLEECING ELDER MARVIN SIEGEL OUT OF MILLIONS…NOW SEEK TO GET HIS DAUGHTER DISBARRED

1 Comment

BOSTON BROADSIDE CITED IN COMPLAINT TO BAR COUNSEL

PART 4

 

by Lonnie Brennan

“High-powered lawyers” is an understatement to describe the North Shore powerhouse of attorneys who have been accused of isolating and medicating retired Attorney Marvin H. Siegel of Boxford, Mass. in order to liquidate his estimated $7 million estate. More

Briefs Reveal More Shocking Behavior in Rucki Case.

2 Comments

Michael Volpe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In separate response briefs to pro se attorneys, the Dakota County Prosecutor’s Office has acknowledged jury tampering, misdirected an allegation of witness tampering, and refused to respond to address all allegations of judicial misconduct in the Rucki case.

The briefs from Dakota County Prosecutor James Backstrom were in response to briefs filed by Dede Evavold and Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, both representing themselves.

Evavold has been representing herself after the state ruled her too well off to receive an attorney while Grazzini-Rucki was represented but was so disgusted by her attorney’s brief that she filed one on her own.

Her attorney, Steven Russett, who was provided by the Minnesota Appellate Public Defender’s Office, did not respond to an email and voicemail for comment.

In the most startling admission, the prosecutors acknowledge- responding to Grazzini-Rucki- that a reporter approached the jury while they were in a common area during a lunch break and asked if any wanted to be interviewed when the trial ended.

The reporter’s name is Laura Adelmann, who works for the Sun Current, the hometown newspaper of Lakeville, Minnesota, where the Rucki’s live. “There was one occasion during trial in which it was it was reported to Judge Asphaug that a reporter (I.E. Laura Adelmann) had approached the jurors while they were eating in the common area of the courthouse and asked if she could interview them after the trial was over.” Backstrom’s brief stated.

This incident occurred on Friday July 18, 2016, while the trial was ongoing, and on Monday July 21, 2016, Judge Asphaug issued this statement to the court gallery. More

The Whistleblower Summit for Human Rights July 27 & 28, 2017 Washington DC

4 Comments

Use this link to view the events timeline for the summit.

http://www.whistleblowersummit.com/summit_at_a_glance/  More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: