Home

Abolishing Probate # 8: Hospice..Euthanizing the disposables

4 Comments

Join us this evening November 27, 2017 at 7:00 CST!

More

Advertisements

The Zika Virus, the Brazilian Microcephaly Outbreak, Cognitive Dissonance and the Elephant in the Room:

2 Comments

Duty to Warn

new-logo25

kohlsBy Gary G. Kohls, MD

_______________________________________________________

“The result? By November 2015, a variable number of months after injecting the vaccine into thousands of gestating women, the incidence of microcephaly sky-rocketed from essentially zero in October 2015 to 1200 cases in November and 1200 cases in December (the latest reported total is nearly 4000 up to mid-January 2016).”

__________________________________________________________

Covering-up Another Iatrogenic Disorder

Today (2/2/16), investigative reporter Jon Rappaport of nomorefakenews.com/ wrote:AP: ‘Brazilian officials said the babies with the defect [microcephaly] and their mothers are being tested to see if they had been infected. Six of the 270 confirmed microcephaly cases were found to have the [Zika] virus.’ Out of all the microcephaly cases re-examined in Brazil, only six have the Zika virus!That constitutes zero proof that Zika has anything to do with microcephaly.”

A glossary of terms for this column: More

Mandatory Vaccination for Adults: Wasn’t this one of those internet “myths”?

8 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25Marti Oakley

_____________________________________

What Will Be Considered Mandatory
The Federal Government’s proposed mandatory health insurance will mean mandatory vaccinations/immunizations. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) says that for anyone who refuses to keep up-to-date vaccinations, under the new health reform, you will not be able to obtain any health care you may need until immunizations are current.

_________________________________________

The federal mandate forcing vaccinations against your will, has now been entered into the Federal Register. You have until March 9, 2015 to comment before they arbitrarily enter this as a new “law”.

Bear in mind that no matter how many of us object to this assault on our 59203_518492681544067_1036204037_npersons, the end result is that they WILL register this as “law”. The entry into the federal register is simply a formality that allows them to gauge just how much interest and opposition there is to what they are planning. As we have seen in the past regarding other issues, comments expressing opposition to their plans are purged from the comments section by the thousands. Do not let this deter you. If your comment is scrubbed, comment again.

Read the full draft here and then post your comments:

Solicitation of Written Comments on the Draft National Adult Immunization Plan
The Daily Journal of the United States Government
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/02/06/2015-02481/solicitation-of-written-comments-on-the-draft-national-adult-immunization-plan

Bear in mind, that because this is part of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Congress, their staffs, government employees, including those attempting to pass this into law through rule-making agencies, are all exempt from these rules. The very people implementing this have been guaranteed that they will not be subject to it.

The very fact that the Constitution demands that all laws be applied equally, and, the fact that congress exempted themselves and so many others from it in violation of that demand, makes this “law” null and void as if it had never existed.  Yet, the Supreme Court decided to ignore that in its ruling.

This begs the question: “If vaccines are so safe and effective, why wouldn’t those attempting to pass this into law be the first to line up to receive vaccines?” Have you noticed that none of the public officials, not one congressman or even the president has made any indication that they have, or will, get vaccinated, against anything? Neither have any of those who are attempting to pass this rule (law). More

Exposing the corruption: News from the web

Leave a comment

strip banner

new-logo25Gary Jacobucci

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Weekly News Roundup September  13-20 More

Vaccine induced lunacy from the CDC

20 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley (C) 2012 All Rights Reserved

_______________________________________________________________________

Has the CDC lost its collective mind?

In what most likely has to be one of the most convoluted, twisted up, insane things to have come along in quite some time, the Centers for Disease Control (Contamination) have come up with what has to be one of the all-time idiotic rationales concerning vaccines.  This collection of mad scientists, government hacks, and NWO puppets has just published one of the most idiotic, screwed up explanations for why their “one size fits all vaccine even if it kills ya” is backfiring in a major way.

The polio vaccine that Bill Gates, an admitted population reduction advocate, has been funding in the forced vaccination of every one in third world countries, is killing some and paralyzing many, many more as the polio virus mutates in response to the vaccine.  This has created a far more virulent and aggressive strain of polio.  India is a prime target. Currently, an estimated 50,000 have succumbed to vaccine induced polio paralysis which as it turns out is far more virulent than the strain they claimed the vaccine would prevent.

Not to be deterred by anything that might resemble a precautionary truth, the CDC has decided that the reason the vaccine induced, virulent, mutated, strain of polio is sweeping India is NOT so much from the new strain being easily transmitted by those infected, or that the new strain is appearing only in those who got that magic polio vaccine,  its because there are still unvaccinated children who are causing the disease to spread.  Yeah…that’s it.  Only they don’t have it.

In the magical, mystical world of the CDC, anything can be explained away simply by choosing to refuse to acknowledge the reality of a situation and instead, creating an implausible excuse for why this mutation is spreading.  According to the CDC, it is the fault of the UNvaccinated.

People who never received the vaccine are causing a viral mutation from the vaccine that they never got, and they are still to be blamed for spreading a disease they never had.

Those who were vaccinated for polio can also contract the new mutated polio virus if they don’t in fact, incubate the mutation.

From GreenMedInfo: Nonvaccinated Are Blamed for Spreading Vaccine-Created Polio

The bottom line here is that they’re blaming the unvaccinated for spreading new versions of polio that are mutations from their vaccines. In spite of the fact that they may be giving the wrong vaccine for the polio that’s causing disease, and that vaccine’s virus is mutating into a new form of polio, the people to blame are those who could not possibly have had anything to do with it. And, even though people who have received the vaccine can also fall victim to the new polio, thus incubating it and passing it to others, it’s still the fault of the unvaccinated! More

After birth abortions, psycho-surgeries and sterilization

17 Comments

Marti Oakley                                                  copyright 2012

___________________________________________________________________

Every society has at one time or another practiced eugenics to some degree, if not openly advocating the eradication of those less perfect or ethnically undesirable. Perfection of course, determined by those making the decision to end or prevent life for others. This has now culminated in the growing movement around the globe to rationalize the culling of populations via after-birth abortions, voluntary sterilization, and psycho-surgeries intended to murder, prevent reproduction, or reduce to a blithering but docile idiot anyone who does not meet the standards of perfection.

The recent Journal of Medical Ethics article promoting the concept that a newborn should be allowed to die if :

  • a)The family can’t afford the child
  • b)The family just does not want the child
  • c)There is a genetic problem indicating possible disease or
  • d)The child is impaired or disabled in some way

I have to wonder here how long it would be until one of these medical ethicists decided that if a toddler reacted adversely to a vaccine for instance and became autistic or neurologically or physically impaired from the vaccine, would these ethical medical professors believe it would be alright to allow that child to die too?

The authors are Alberto Giubilini and co-author Francesca Minerva with the Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, and the Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, , CAPPE, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

It seems that Minerva and Giubilini believe it is ethical, moral and quite alright to murder a newborn that does not meet their high ethical standards.

when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.”

Minerva and Giubilini also believe that three days should lapse before a birth certificate is issued. During those three days those critical decisions could be made. Is the child perfect? Can we afford it? And most importantly….Do we even want it? More

THE INTERNET: Where Global Goblins, Great Deceptions, and Outright Lies Go To Die

11 Comments

By W. R. McAfee, Sr.

Copyright © 2012 by W. R. McAfee, Sr.  All rights reserved.

Opinion

The First Gulf war, fought to check Saddam Hussein’s attempt to take over Kuwait and its oil reserves, set off a series of Middle East military conflicts that have lasted more than two decades. Tragically, many veterans of these conflicts have returned home with serious medical problems; both physical and mental.

The VA, charged with meeting the medical needs of these veterans’  has been found lacking; sheer numbers, lack of funding, and incompetence being the most often cited reasons.

Medical problems for a large portion of these veterans  may very well have originated from the handling of—and battlefield exposure to—contaminated areas where U.S. ordinance containing depleted uranium (DU, or U238); used in the First Gulf war and all subsequent Middle East conflicts.

Radiation sickness at first appeared an obvious option for the veterans’ illnesses, but this was quickly tossed into the  Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) kettle, and later repositioned in the public’s mind as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Depression, headaches, weakness, fatigue, and multiple physical complications that varied among individuals, often accompany this exposure.

Yet, federally funded researchers didn’t make the radiation connection  following the First Gulf war—over in a few days because the distribution of the world’s oil supply was threatened—because congress and their handlers knew from the get-go there was not, and would not be, enough money in their U.S. piggy bank to fund the medical needs of these returning veterans’ once lawyers sunk their teeth into the causes of their illnesses, in my opinion.

Investigative reporter Katherine Russ wrote an accurate summary about the results of this  delayed medical care for our veterans , and a May 2011 ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals  directly addressed their mental health needs. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: