Author:  Elaine Mickman

Author Contact: Court-gate@yahoo.com

At a time in society when inclusion seems to top the list for priority in government and many private entities, there is an entire and growing population of people simultaneously being treated sub-human as second-class citizens without rights over their own body and without access and supervision of their own property and income, and virtually, the right to their own existence as the result of either illegal Guardianships or the Unconstitutional Act of ordering-away Constitutional Rights.

There’s no denying that usurping Constitutional Rights is a form of cancel-culture-suppression and Official Oppression only achieved by the Courts superseding their authority and the Constitution.

Illegal Guardianships are corrupt “cancel-cartels” whose agenda is to rob unsuspecting individuals of their assets, income, and property. Guardianship strikes and expands beyond the elderly and includes targeting those in family court as well as those who are expecting monetary settlements that somehow comes to the attention of a Guardianship “gang”.

A wish-list outcome is predetermined and then the Court-system and/or Guardianship “gang” proceed with filings to create and justify a path that “follows the money-paved road”. No boundaries, no limits, no transparency, no laws. Manufacturing and fabrication of documents and tampering of records with cruel intentions is the scheme to “smash a life to grab the cash.”

Toxic officials or bureaucrats that are also on the naughty list include Court Prothonotaries and Clerks who can control or tamper dockets to “gate-keep” court access. Each court “player” is a significant piece in advancing fraudsters while obstructing a victim every step of the process. For example, the Prothonotary or Clerk of Court can impede filing for legal recourse by the Prothonotary stamping a filing late or defective so that a filing never reaches the Court for review.

Retaliation against whistleblowers who report and file Complaints can include, but is not limited to the denial of jobs, promotions, and even the denial of public assistance such as SNAP food stamps, LIHEAP heating assistance, and medical insurance for financially qualifying individuals by County Assistance employees falsifying Applications to disqualify people.

The judiciary self-determines if they are bias, prejudice or present a conflict regardless that most Judges are elected through campaigns funded by attorneys who expect a favorable ruling when a judge is elected on the bench. When Judicial misconduct is alleged, the Judicial Conduct Board is the entity where a Complaint is filed and is reviewed and determined. The PA JCB is self-policing and composed of sitting judges, privately-practicing attorneys, and some lay people appointed by the Governor, amounting to non-policing by Judicial colleagues.

The existing conflicts of interest are indisputable, but PA has also recently decided to add another layer of protection for the Judiciary called the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board when it is unclear if the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is compliant with the PA Constitution. Where’s the additional protection for “we the people”?

Most law suits against Judges and government employees are swiftly dismissed by their claiming immunity regardless that the law only provides and protects with immunity if Judges and government employees are acting within the scope and boundaries of the law, and are not abridging the privileges and rights of “we the people.”

The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment provides that “no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privilegesand immunities of citizens of the United States.” 

U.S. Const. Amend XIV§1, Cl. 2.

Most, if not all, states have laws pertaining to what’s called sovereign immunity. Sovereign immunity in Pennsylvania falls under 1 Pa. C.S. § 2310 and protects with immunity to those in their individual and official capacity provided they are “acting within the scope of their duties”

While every case is unique and there is no once-size-fits-all, based on textbook, the judiciary can be sued if they violate the Hobbs Act under 18 USC 1951 and Civil Rights, and government employees can be sued under a Bivenssuit.

If records support an illegal or unjustified Guardianship, a Guardian could be potentially sued for “Abuse of Process” by misusing the filing of Guardianship for the distinct purpose of accomplishing another matter for which a Guardianship is not intended such as confiscating assets from a person unwilling to sign-away their property.

“An abuse of process is the unjustified or unreasonable use of legal proceedings or process to further a cause of action by an applicant or plaintiff in an action.” “A respondent or defendant typically claims the other party or plaintiff is misusing or perverting the regularly issued court process not justified by the underlying legal action.” “The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are:(1) the existence of an ulterior purpose or motive underlying the use of process, and (2) some act in the use of the legal process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings.”

The courts are being weaponized against “we the people” in what is known as a Kleptocracy which is when the government steals from the people.

It can’t be overstated that the courts are terrorizing “we the people“, an “Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins.” John Locke, Book II of Two Treaties of Government.

The Judiciary failing to Rule by Law has devolved into “Ruling by Tyranny” so that the courts are effectively operating as “slaughterhouses” and countless statistics of “we the people” are the “slaughter” whether through the loss of life, liberty, or property. “If eyes are turned blind to the judiciary not Ruling by Law, then we’ll never see justice.”….Elaine Mickman

* Hobbs Act- Under 18 USC 1951 is a federal law prohibiting extortion by wrongful use of force or fear, or the attempt of these crimes affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

* Bivens Suit- A Bivens action generally refers to a lawsuit for damages when a federal officer who is acting in the color of federal authority allegedly violates the US Constitution by federal officers acting.

* Civil Rights 42 US 1983 (civil) / 18 US 241 (criminal)

* Conspiracy 42 US 1985 (civil) / 18 US 242 (criminal)