Home

Animal Advocates Radio “Voices Carry for Animals #301”- Dylan’s Dog Chaining Law – Jennifer Kanady

Leave a comment

**Tune In **LIVE INTERVIEW**Animal Advocates Radio

Voices Carry For Animals #301on

March 4th @7:00 PM est

LISTEN LIVE Podcast >> HERE<<

4:00 pm PST..5:00 pm MST ..6:00 pm CST ..7:00 pm EST

Listen to the LIVE Show by Calling

(310) 982-4270

Press 1 to Speak to Guest

Hosted by Debbie Dahmer

SPEAKING OUT FOR THE ANIMALS WHO HAVE NO VOICE & NO CHOICE!

More

TS Radio Network: Whistleblowers! Jon Stremel 3/4/21

Leave a comment

Thursday March 4, 2021 at 7:00 CST

5:00 pm PST…6:oo pm MST … 7:00 pm CST …8:00 pm EST

Listen live →HERE!

All shows are archived so you can listen at your convenience.

CAll in number is 917-388-4520

Hit #1 if you wish to speak to the host.

Hosted by Marti Oakley with guest Jon Stremel

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TS Radio Network is brought to you in coordination with Marcel Reid and the Whistleblowers’s Summit, an annual event in Washington D.C,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Since 2018, Petty Officer 1st Class Jon Stremel has been fighting to protect his son from an alleged abusive parent.  Strongly objecting to any allegation of abuse by that parent, the case was turned over to the FAP (family advocacy program).   They ruled the incident did not meet the criteria for child abuse.  Stremel then went to the . IDC  (incident determination committee) which only sees the evidence FAP chooses to give them and whether incidences get recorded at all.  Much of the evidence Stremel had compiled was never turned over which prevented the IDC from making a fully informed decision.

As all of this transpired, Stremel sought protective shelter for his son and himself only to be told that because he was a man, there was nothing available for him.  The shelters only providing services to women and their children.

Stremel has filed an EO (equal opportunity) case alleging the FAP staff clearly discriminated against him solely because he was a man and intentionally withheld evidence supporting his claims.

%d bloggers like this: