Dear Mr. Kavanaugh,
I am a voter and resident of the State of Missouri. With regard to the recent justices’ vote of the Supreme Court of the United State, holding that the State of Texas does not have Standing to submit a Petition challenging the voting practice of Georgia and other states, I believe your negative vote is not in agreement with the Supreme Court adjudication of Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000). If the United States is still a nation of law, and not a nation that is dominated by private individuals / corporate firms who have acquired control of the mass media through financial entities of New York City, I strongly encourage you to reconsider your vote.
Respectfully,
John Q. Public
Ref: https://rielpolitik.com/2020/12/12/hybrid-war-former-special-forces-officer-warns-of-color-revolution-tactics-used-against-
The PPJ Gazette 
Dec 22, 2020 @ 18:04:29
Oldereb, thank you for sharing those things in the law. I really appreciate it. I’m not a legal beagle, but love to learn, and was so thrilled to find the “null and void” issue for whatever is repugnant to the Constitution. All of our rights are being steamrolled so utterly these days, its very sad.
Do you by any chance know of any pdf printables or resources folks can use to effectively and explicitly state, “No way!” to the unlawful vax. I’d hand out hundreds of these if I could. Problem is, the unlawful buzzards don’t even follow the laws we do have, ie Nueremburg code, the “No consent” etc. So there’s that. It is unbelievable.
Thank you again. Hoping you have a blessed and peaceful holiday.
LikeLike
Dec 18, 2020 @ 00:32:34
I like your quotation: Title 18 USC Section 242 “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.” “Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any state, territory commonwealth, possession or district to the deprivation of any rights, privilenges, (sic) or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution…”
Are you aware ‘Liberty” is secured as a Constitutional Right by the Preamble, the 5th and 14th Amendment, and includes the Right to Pursue a Livelihood ? Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564. Am Jur Sec,Vol 61A, #562, 1979 edition, has a column list of citations. Do you pay the unconstitutional income tax ? If such a tax existed, the government could seize 100% of your earnings and the status of 1860 would be reinstated.
LikeLike
Dec 17, 2020 @ 22:51:35
eek, forgot to note the applicable article, it was Article VI Section Two of the US Constitution. gist being: anything “repugnant” to the Constituion (aka, anything that robs individuals of their enumerated rights, the right of the people to life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness) is null and void.
LikeLike
Dec 17, 2020 @ 22:41:03
What the supreme court did in refusing to even look at the evidence was wholly unconstitutional. Mauro Passetti is right. it is just incomprehensible to me how far adrift we have gone from that great guiding document.
Just wanted to share some things I found recently which I pray the brilliant Marti and others can use. Dr. Richard Proctor spoke of this very topic recently on radio one with Timpone. He said the supreme court has no business usurping or insinuating itself as arbiter between the people and rights protected by Constitution. The latter is the supreme law of the land, even when despots and king butt nuggets insist otherwise.
In addition, found the following of interest:
“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
“An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.” – Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879)
“An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Title 18 USC Section 242 “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.” “Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any state, territory commonwealth, possession or district to the deprivation of any rights, privilenges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States,…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned, not more than one year, or both…..”
Why is there not one attorney in the entire USA who is utilizing the Constitution as the foundation to upend this whole commie coup takeover at the root?
LikeLike
Dec 17, 2020 @ 21:00:41
Margie, I am sure you are aware the communist revolution in Russia cost Jacob Schiff [of Wall Street] $20 million. His reward was the 600 million gold rubles. A soviet defector told congress in 1947 that if official USSR responses to questions were not timely received, she had a Manhattan telephone number for more timely answers.
LikeLike
Dec 17, 2020 @ 20:52:26
Margie, Your two concerns are certainly valid. If Biden is not inaugurated do you think Soros would buy more bricks for protesters ? Apparently Roberts thought Antfi was more of a threat than Trump followers ?
It is naive to conclude the election fraud is an isolated event. General Smedley Butler wrote of Wall Street’s attempt by Wall Street to recruit him to front for their coup in his 1930’s book WAR IS A RACKET. The current coup agenda is following the military training manual: : https://rielpolitik.com/2020/12/12/hybrid-war-former-special-forces-officer-warns-of-color-revolution-tactics-used-against-
Wall Street has been funding the NWO [now called GREAT RESET] using the Federal Reserve for 100 years to the [current] tune of $4 billion daily [not including stimulus deficit spending]. Ref. https://ppjg.me/2019/11/18/the-federal-reserve-a-different-view.
[Benjamin Ginsberg writes of numerous historic European bankers who funded rulers into perpetual warfare and social chaos until the citizens rose up and purged them from their nations in FATAL EMBRACE; JEWS AND THE STATE. [I wonder if we should learn something from his writing.] It is a historic fact that Jews controlled access to all lucrative occupations in 1870-1930’s Germany. When the SS marked all of the jew owned businesses (including all banks), they were over 90%. Germans resented being second rate citizens in their own country.
LikeLike
Dec 17, 2020 @ 15:39:15
There are two reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear the Texas lawsuit: One – Chief Justice Roberts and six of his Associate Justices caved-in to the threat of possible violence if they did the right thing and heard the lawsuit or Two – they don’t mind a Communist take-over of the U.S. Either way, their cowardice is noted and disgusting. Time to do away with lifetime appointments!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dec 16, 2020 @ 13:07:44
Mauro, Thanks for your research. You might mention that to your district judge and remind him/her they seem to have misunderstood.
Powell is also filing cases in SC with representation of voters from each state.
LikeLike
Dec 16, 2020 @ 12:23:19
I heard the Supreme”s decision the other day and then I did some legal research. I checked my dated Barrons law dictionary and checked “Standing”. What I found was that every Citizen Voter in the U.S. has Standing in a national election. If some States did not follow Constitutional Law, then those State’s votes are Illegal/Invalid or Null/Void and can’t be allowed in Vote counts! Period
LikeLiked by 1 person