I watched the presidential press briefing on the coronavirus today, April 22, 2020. The presentations have become a long-running soap opera visible on plenty of American televisions. It’s absolutely amazing how much fake news was being spewed out of the mouths of everybody participating in that circus act.
But the one thing, in my opinion, that really stood out from all the other lies coming from the medical doctors surrounding the POTUS were the comments made by Dr. Robert Redfield, the Director of the CDC. Read the official transcript from C-Span below:
“I THINK THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS GOING TO HEED THE REQUEST TO RELOOK AT THEIR VACCINE HESITANCY AND I’M CONFIDENT THAT THE PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WE ARE PUTTING TOGETHER NOW ACROSS THIS COUNTRY SO WE CAN EARLY CASE SITE DIAGNOSE AND CONTACT TRACE, OLYMPIC, AND TACKLE, BLOCK, AND TACKLE, THAT SYSTEM IS GOING TO BE THERE AND WE ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO CONTAIN THIS VIRUS.” – Dr.Robert Redfield – CDC Director
Ladies and gentlemen, that paragraph of text provided by the CDC Director exemplify very well what event 201 (the simulation back in October 2019) and event 202 (the fake world pandemic currently in progress) have always been about. The powers that be rolled out a psyop event called the coronavirus world pandemic to get American citizens to rethink their hesitancy about getting vaccines. Because you see, dear readers, the few that control the many have a plethora of vaccines they want to inject inside our bodies.
The CDC is, for all intents and purposes, more of a drugstore than it is a government agency designed to protect the public. They receive monies directly from the pharmaceutical industry through the CDC Foundation. It goes something like this: the drug companies give the funds to the CDC Foundation, and the CDC Foundation hand the monies to the CDC. No conflicts of interest there, right?
I want readers to understand something important. I don’t write articles on this blog for 97 percent of the population that are close-minded and uninterested in learning about what’s transpiring in the world. I don’t care about communicating the truth to those people. I am interested in educating 3 percent of the population that’s already awake and interested in understanding what’s taking place in front of their eyes.
Vaccine theory does not work! It has never worked and should have been discarded long ago. Contrary to popular belief that has been fueled by disinformation written and disseminated by drug companies, vaccines cause the proliferation of diseases throughout society. They do the exact opposite of what we have been taught.
Natural and Herd Immunity
When people acquire infections from their natural environment, the entire human immune system is activated. It goes through many sophisticated processes that allow the body to form lifelong antibodies to that specific microbial invader. This is known as natural immunity and is what should have been allowed to occur concerning Covid-19. The general population should have never been locked down or isolated from one another. When people are allowed to socialize with others, citizens will become infected, recover, and will form herd immunity throughout the population. They will not have to contend with second or third waves of infection from that microbe.
Vaccines
When vaccines are introduced into humans, they bypass the normal portal of entry and overstimulate portions of the immune system. This, unfortunately, causes an overabundance of antibodies to be produced. The vaccines stress out the immune system and can throw it out of balance setting up the stage for life long battles with autoimmune disorders and other diseases. Also, the antibodies that are produced from the vaccines do not protect the person from the conditions in question, and booster shots are required to keep the antibody level sufficient in the human body.
Over the years, we have been taught so many ridiculous concepts about microbiology, viruses, and vaccines. The reason for this is because vaccines are very profitable products, and the big pharma companies are champing at the bit to produce them. This is especially true since the US Government has limited healthcare consumers to a $250,000 maximum award for vaccine product injuries.
If a person is injured by a vaccine product, he or she must file a claim in a national vaccine injury compensation court. There are virtually no legal remedies for people injured by vaccines. And this is why the drug companies can’t wait to enter the vaccine market. Big pharma companies have lobbied hard to get the government to legally mandate vaccines for the American public.
Keep in mind, Covid-19 is most likely not a real virus, but rather a fictional story that has been crafted by gifted writers in a studio. The words pandemic, epidemic, and outbreak are predicated on case numbers for a specific disease. The case numbers concerning Covid-19 are predicated on unreliable lab test kits that are prone to giving lots of false-positive results, the misreporting of other diseases as Covid-19 cases, the misreporting of deaths from other conditions as Covid-19 cases, the misreporting of presumptive positive cases as actual Covid-19 cases, and the inappropriate reporting of Covid-19 cases that have been diagnosed with only a CT scan to check for the presence of pneumonia in the lungs of patients.
If we remove the case numbers based on the quack science listed above, there would be no world pandemic, no epidemics or outbreaks, and no sensational news stories to obsess over. And there would be no lockdown and destruction of world economies!
CDC director Redfield has already stated that this coming fall, we will be dealing with two possible epidemics: influenza and the second wave of Covid-19. The director (head drugstore marketer) was licking his chops as he was telling the American viewing audience to make sure to get those flu jabs later this year. Interestingly to note, medical researchers have stated that influenza vaccines confuse the human immune system so much that it increases the chances of people contracting coronaviruses. Do you think the good doctor should rethink his advice to people about getting flu shots in 2020?
The PPJ Gazette 
Apr 25, 2020 @ 14:53:20
Europe’s Vision On Central Bank Digital Currency Offers Cautionary Lessons For Cryptocurrency
Mar 31, 2020,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2020/03/31/europes-vision-on-central-bank-digital-currency-offers-cautionary-lessons-for-cryptocurrency/#6092452b71c5
The European Central Bank released, a few months ago, a little-noticed working paper on how it sees central bank digital currency fitting in with its financial system.
The ECB’s working paper is probably one of the most comprehensive working documents when it comes to how a central bank akin to the Federal Reserve working with the American constitutional system and the scale of the American population might think about central bank digital currencies and how they would contrast with cryptocurrencies. There are some cautionary lessons to be taken out of the paper and a few observations.
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic really swung into action and the WHO encouraged contactless payments while central banks quarantined physical bills, the ECB called banknotes out for limited efficiency and old technology. This is a problem that is now being seen across the world as countries try to get stimulus dollars to their citizens.
Patchwork legacy systems, from mailed paper cheques, to handing out physical banknotes are ill-suited to quickly get money in the hands of people who need it, and there are many efficiency losses along the way: for example, in 2017, the FDIC indicated about 8.4 million households in the United States were unbanked, meaning any cheques this group would get would likely lose value through inefficient manners of deposit forced on them by lack of access to conventional banking.
2) Worry about money laundering means that privacy/anonymity will likely take a backseat.
The working paper contains a direct reference to deposit based central bank digital currency
3) Central banks love digital currency as a means of exchange, but absolutely deplore it as a store of value
While that might be great news for those corporations, it calls into question the amount of data these contractors and the ECB will hold over the financial transactions between essentially everybody based in Europe — and what could be done with such data in terms of tracking the finer details of everybody’s life.
LikeLike
Apr 25, 2020 @ 14:06:15
Marti, I posted a comment that landed in the spam box
LikeLike
Apr 25, 2020 @ 14:05:44
Europe’s Vision On Central Bank Digital Currency Offers Cautionary Lessons For Cryptocurrency (excerpts)
Mar 31, 2020,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2020/03/31/europes-vision-on-central-bank-digital-currency-offers-cautionary-lessons-for-cryptocurrency/#6092452b71c5
The European Central Bank released, a few months ago, a little-noticed working paper on how it sees central bank digital currency fitting in with its financial system.
The ECB’s working paper is probably one of the most comprehensive working documents when it comes to how a central bank akin to the Federal Reserve working with the American constitutional system and the scale of the American population might think about central bank digital currencies and how they would contrast with cryptocurrencies. There are some cautionary lessons to be taken out of the paper and a few observations.
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic really swung into action and the WHO encouraged contactless payments while central banks quarantined physical bills, the ECB called banknotes out for limited efficiency and old technology. This is a problem that is now being seen across the world as countries try to get stimulus dollars to their citizens.
Patchwork legacy systems, from mailed paper cheques, to handing out physical banknotes are ill-suited to quickly get money in the hands of people who need it, and there are many efficiency losses along the way: for example, in 2017, the FDIC indicated about 8.4 million households in the United States were unbanked, meaning any cheques this group would get would likely lose value through inefficient manners of deposit forced on them by lack of access to conventional banking.
2) Worry about money laundering means that privacy/anonymity will likely take a backseat.
The working paper contains a direct reference to deposit based central bank digital currency
3) Central banks love digital currency as a means of exchange, but absolutely deplore it as a store of value
While that might be great news for those corporations, it calls into question the amount of data these contractors and the ECB will hold over the financial transactions between essentially everybody based in Europe — and what could be done with such data in terms of tracking the finer details of everybody’s life.
LikeLike