Duty to Warn – in Three Parts

By Gary G. Kohls, MD, Utilizing the Writings of Neil Z. Miller and Jeanne Lenzer – 2016

                     Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Protecting the Private Good?

                By Jeanne Lenzer, Associate Editor, The British Medical Journal, USA – May 15, 2015

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PART 1

The Alleged Coronavirus “Plague” and the Unnecessary Risking of a Second Great Depression – Thanks to Big Pharma, The Globalist/Corporate Oligarchs and Kissinger’s Eugenics Movement

1] Why Anything that the Financially-compromised CDC says About Anything, Especially the Current Coronavirus “Pandemic”, Must be Taken With a Giant Grain of Salt

(That is, as long as the agency denies its decades of serious conflicts of interest and also continues to be subservient to the nefarious, hidden economic interests of Big Pharma Corporations like Roche and Regeneron and Billionaire Wall Street Oligarchs like Bill Gates)

BMJ 2015; 350 – https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2362

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) includes the following disclaimer with its recommendations: “CDC, our planners, and our content experts wish to disclose they have no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products… The CDC does not accept commercial support.”

The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law.

Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars (annually) in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.

Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, told the BMJ, “The CDC has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. Financial dealings with biopharmaceutical companies threaten that reputation.”

Industry funding of the CDC has taken many doctors, even some who worked for CDC, by surprise.

Philip Lederer, an infectious diseases fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, and a former CDC epidemic intelligence service officer, told The BMJ he was “saddened” to learn of industry funding.

The CDC’s director, Tom Frieden, did not respond to a question about the disclaimer.

Frieden told The BMJ by email, “Public-private partnerships allow CDC to do more, faster. The agency’s core values of accountability, respect, and integrity guide the way CDC spends the funds entrusted to it. When possible conflicts of interests arise, we take a hard, …

(SNIP)

Ed. Note: The remainder of this article has been protected by a paywall that would cost any prospective reader 37 US dollars to have access for only a 24-hour period!!

Fortunately, Neil A. Miller, the author of “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers” has done the hard work of examining the above abbreviated, censored-out article that puts the US CDC in a very unfavorable light, especially now – while the world’s innocent and unaware soon-to be victims of a fascist, totalitarian Medical Martial Law (with police-enforced, very profitable vaccinations of the entire population, with no regard to medical contraindications) and a highly likely Severe Recession and subsequent Great Depression that could approximate the famous one that followed the Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929.

These dire consequences are likely to occur because of the so-called “Coronavirus Pandemic” – with the leadership of the co-opted CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS and DHS (all with some sort of conflict of interest with Big Pharma and the corporate Oligarchs) mis-leading the nation into risking hundreds of thousands of un-necessary bankruptcies and lay-offs and starvations and homelessness and suicides by repeatedly acquiescing to their Big Pharma controllers by consistently refusing to allow any discussion of the potentially curative and preventive effects of nutrient/vitamin therapy for viral illnesses, which would have effectively and affordably competed with the disease-producing, highly toxic, over-vaccination agendas of bureaucratic entities such as the CDC, the AAP, the AMA, the AAFP, etc, etc.

Hence the following summary of the above British Medical Journal article that Miller published just a few years ago (page 313). Miller titled the page thusly:

The CDC Receives Money from The Pharmaceutical Industry that Influences Decisions it Makes About the Public Welfare

Here is Miller’s summary of the 2015 BMJ article, starting with this quote:

“The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law. Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”

The CDC claims that it has no financial dealings with the manufacturers of commercial products but this is not true.

In 1992, Congress passed legislation that created the non-profit CDC Foundation to encourage relationships between the CDC and industry. Pharmaceutical companies donate to the CDC Foundation.

The CDC receives millions of dollars annually in “conditional funding” from corporations and the CDC Foundation. The CDC uses conditional funds to oversee controversial recommendations and studies. Corporations can punish the CDC if it conducts research that affects their profits.

Industry funding inserts bias into treatment recommendations and study results which is unacceptable for a public health agency.

The CDC has a systemic lack of oversight of its ethics program.

The CDC’s high credibility among physicians would be threatened if they learned that it takes money from pharmaceutical companies.

The fact that the CDC takes money from industry cannot be fixed by asking the CDC to be more ethical and avoid conflicts of interest. US Legislators caused this problem and can make new laws to fix the problem (GGK note: that is, if most legislators weren’t also “owned’ by Big Pharma and other Wall Street interests).