~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m not going to be able to convince the majority of people out there that they’re being hoodwinked and played like a violin, but that’s what’s happening. This is a psyops screenplay and we are in a movie. There are writers, directors, producers, and actors. And most importantly, there are people in the audience taking in the daily drama. The story is getting bigger and the drama more intense. Are you scared?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By Dr. John Reizer
Author of The Target List Novel
The powers that be have taken the Chinese coronavirus scare campaign to an all-time high. The way the story is being portrayed by the mainstream media, regulatory agencies, and others that exert great influence on the collective psyche of healthcare consumers, it is clear that this subject is purposely being blown out of proportion.
According to a recent article in the New York Times, 360 have died and 17,000 are infected from the coronavirus. There is also talk about the virus becoming a pandemic because of active epidemics taking place simultaneously on two or more continents.
What does all of this scary information really mean for most people? The short answer, not too much.
An epidemic by definition means that there is one more case occurring in an area than normally expected by health agencies. If zero cases are expected in a region and you have one case, that can technically be considered an epidemic. If you have several of those situations occurring at the same time on different continents, you can technically refer to that situation as a pandemic. Theoretically, you could have a world pandemic occurring when only two or three cases of a new condition are taking place. It’s important to be familiar with the lexicon of a profession before getting emotional about certain buzz words being tossed around in the news.
So, let’s take a look at the raw numbers being thrown around by the scaremongers; the ones directing the daily medical drama on the news networks about the coronavirus. The stock markets are tumbling and the sky is falling because 360 people have supposedly died from the coronavirus.
But how do we know these people have died from the coronavirus? How have these people been tested for the virus and are the tests reliable? Do we blindly trust the sources giving us the information?
Mostly, these people have died from pneumonia or respiratory challenges. There’s no sure way to determine that the pneumonia was from the coronavirus. The deaths could have come from bacterial infections that caused pneumonia, cold infections that caused pneumonia, or from air pollution that caused pneumonia with no ties to bacterial or viral microbes whatsoever. Incidentally, air pollution in China is a very serious problem and many people there succumb to pneumonia caused by air pollution every year.
The point is, it’s easy to fudge results when it comes to viral epidemics. The same things are done in the US every year concerning influenza reporting. There are lots of people mistakenly counted as having influenza. In reality, they don’t have the flu. They have other conditions that cause respiratory problems. The numbers are inappropriately padded during the flu season to help sell vaccines and other drug products.
But for the sake of this discussion, we’ll pretend that 360 people have died globally and 17,000 others have become infected. Don’t get me wrong, I am sorry 360 people have died from the virus. But that’s a pretty small number of victims to be getting all this attention. We’re talking about the entire world. If we put all the victims and sick people supposedly infected with coronavirus in a minor league baseball stadium, there’d still be a lot of empty seats.
The common cold kills many thousands of immunosuppressed patients each year. It’s hard to get an accurate number because there are no vaccines for the common cold, so you don’t see the scary numbers being hyped by regulatory agencies when it comes to cold viruses. They only hype what they have a vested interest in promoting. That would be profitable viruses like influenza and in the future, the coronavirus because they can promote antiviral medicines and toxic vaccinations.
In reality, the common cold will kill many more people this year than the coronavirus. The common cold deaths are often reported as influenza cases or other diseases that are being promoted to sell whatever the powers that be want to be marketed.
The current media blitz regarding the coronavirus is akin to another 911 event. It has been designed to bring fear and uncertainty to the masses. It will create for those running the show an opportunity in the future to push the medical agenda of making vaccines mandatory for everybody. It will do this just as 911 gave the American public a reason to support endless wars in parts of the world that we shouldn’t be involved with.
I’m not going to be able to convince the majority of people out there that they’re being hoodwinked and played like a violin, but that’s what’s happening. This is a psyops screenplay and we are in a movie. There are writers, directors, producers, and actors. And most importantly, there are people in the audience taking in the daily drama. The story is getting bigger and the drama more intense. Are you scared?
Feb 27, 2020 @ 08:29:47
Thank you Louie for all the back ground info. In my opinion, we have a government in the last stages of locking us down. No efforts are being made to stop the spread of this lab created bioweapon into the US. Watch it mysteriously appear across the country.
LikeLike
Feb 26, 2020 @ 14:17:16
May 29, 2019
Speaking at a recent event at the World Health Organization’s annual assembly, Seth Berkley, CEO of the Global vaccine alliance GAVI, stated that doubts about vaccines spread across social media “at the speed of light,” and that the spread of “misinformation about vaccines,” is “not a freedom of speech issue,” and that “social media firms need to take it offline” because “it kills people.”9
He also stated there’s “a strong scientific consensus about the safety of vaccines,” referring to the spread of negative vaccine information as “a disease.” It’s well worth remembering that GAVIs primary mission is to “shape markets for vaccines and other immunization products.” Clearly that will not be as easy if people understand the risks.
The WHO and U.S. government are founding partners of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided $750 million in seed money to spearhead the creation of GAVI, a public-private partnership and multilateral funding mechanism involving the WHO, governments, the vaccine industry, the World Bank, philanthropic foundations and civil society groups
Several of my recent articles have discussed the rapidly progressing effort to vilify (if not outright criminalize) those who express concerns about vaccine safety and to shut down free speech about vaccine harms in the U.S., along with increasingly tyrannical measures, forcing people to get vaccinated or face significant fines or jail time. Here’s a summary of some of the most prominent examples:
The World Health Organization lists “vaccine hesitancy” as one of the top 10 global public health threats for 2019
httpTwitter Joins in Censoring Vaccine Material
To this ever-growing list we can now add Twitter, which on May 10, 2019, announced44 users searching for vaccine-related Tweets will immediately be directed to “a credible public health resource,” namely the vaccines.gov website, which is run by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
“Noncredible commentary and information about vaccines” will not be included in auto-suggested queries. Twitter is also planning on expanding this censorship tool to include “other important public health issues
s://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/05/joseph-mercola/censorship-is-the-last-tool-of-tyrants/
Seth Berkley
Seth Berkley is CEO of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and was formerly with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Rockefeller Foundation before going on to become founder, president, and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. In 2009 he was nominated by Sergey Brin as one of Time magazine’s “100 Most Influential People in the World
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feb 26, 2020 @ 14:15:56
GAVI
Big Pharma is cost driver of GAVI
05.12.2019
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) called on the GAVI Vaccine Alliance not to pay huge subsidies to Big Pharma companies for pneumococcal vaccine
MSF demanded the GAVI to immediately stop paying out funds from a remaining US$262m subsidy to Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for the pneumococcal vaccine. “Pfizer and GSK have reaped more than their fair share of donor money for the pneumococcal vaccine, on top of the combined nearly US$50bn in sales they have made over the last 10 years from the vaccine, so it’s time for Gavi to stop this big pharma payout,” said Kate Elder, Senior Vaccines Policy Advisor, MSF Access Campaign. “Instead of lobbing more money at Pfizer and GSK, Gavi should start supporting countries to prepare for the alternative supplier that promises lower pneumococcal vaccine prices for all countries.”
Gavi, the Vaccines Alliance, uses donor funds to pay for vaccines in the poorest countries. Recognising that newer vaccines often take more than a decade to reach developing countries after their introduction in high-income countries, in 2007 Gavi and six donors set up a special fund called the Advance Market Commitment (AMC) to speed up the global rollout of the lifesaving pneumococcal vaccine in the poorest countries. This special fund, the AMC, also aimed to incentivise vaccine manufacturers to produce suitable and affordable versions of the pneumococcal vaccine. The donors pledged $1.5 billion in a special subsidy fund that is used to top up the base price of the pneumococcal vaccine charged by each company.
Pfizer and GSK charge Gavi roughly $9 for each child to be vaccinated in the poorest countries, and then receive a top up from the subsidy that amounts to each company being paid $21 per child in total. In middle-income countries that don’t qualify for Gavi support, Pfizer and GSK have charged as much as $80 per child (through UNICEF Supply Division) to be vaccinated, with the result that many such countries have not started using the vaccine at all.
https://european-biotechnology.com/up-to-date/latest-news/news/big-pharma-is-cost-driver-of-gavi.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feb 26, 2020 @ 14:14:07
As posted in PPJ Gazette (Thank you Marti)
2015
The Coronavirus was patented here in the US in 2015
NationalAddictionNews.com
LikeLike
Feb 26, 2020 @ 14:12:32
This was an Action Alert sent out by Alliance for Natural Health
2017
Federal Quarantine Powers Quietly Expanded without Congressional Approval
Your right to be left unthreatened in your own home could be at risk. Here’s
In January of this year, on the last day President Obama was in office, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a final rule that expands its authority to apprehend, isolate, and quarantine individuals suspected of having any of nine diseases on the US quarantine list: cholera, plague, diphtheria, smallpox, yellow fever, infectious tuberculosis, viral hemorrhagic fevers (like Ebola), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and varieties of influenza that may cause pandemic.
This is the first time the quarantine rules have been updated since the 1940s. Under the old system, the CDC’s authority to quarantine was limited primarily to those entering the country or crossing state lines. And even then, in practice, the feds typically deferred to state and local health officials to contain the spread of infectious diseases.
Under the new rules, the CDC can detain people anywhere in the country without getting approval from local health officials. The definition of “ill persons” has also been broadened, which means that the agency can detain a broader group of people it thinks are exhibiting the symptoms of infectious disease—symptoms as common and as wide-ranging as headaches, cramps, and fevers. Airline and ship crews are required under the new rules to report overt signs and symptoms of sick travelers to the CDC.
Additionally, the CDC can quarantine you for seventy-two hours before the case is subject to a review—and that review is conducted by (you guessed it) the CDC.
Some health authorities fear that the CDC’s power grab will have the opposite effect. Fearing new draconian quarantine rules, as well as surveillance from a flight crew, sick people will likely take additional measures to hide an illness.
The final rule stipulates that when a person is quarantined, medical examinations and treatments can only be performed with prior informed consent. This was only won through a vocal backlash of concerned citizens. But if you have been forcibly removed from your home, how much freedom of medical care choice do you have left?
The rule specifically mentions measles and pertussis, and allows the CDC to monitor travelers displaying common symptoms of those illnesses. Note that measles and pertussis are non-quarantinable diseases—for now. But state health officials can quarantine individuals for certain communicable diseases, depending on state law. Massachusetts has perhaps the most harshly authoritarian law of this kind that we’ve seen. The state can remove you from your home pretty much anytime they want to do so.
While stopping the spread of deadly infectious diseases is laudable, it is unacceptable to pursue this goal at the expense of Americans’ most basic civil liberties, such as the right to remain in their homes unmolested by government.
Action Alert! Send a message to the CDC (with a copy to Congress) telling them that the final quarantine rule is unacceptable and must be amended to respect our most basic rights, and that such rule changes should only be made with congressional approval—and not by bureaucrats. Please send your message im
LikeLiked by 2 people