The recent suicide of Jeffrey Epstein pretty much guarantees additional players associated with the sexual predator will remain untouched and safe from exposure or prosecution.
Any future investigations and or discoveries concerning the criminal activities of other key players in prominent political positions will not be occurring. After all, you can’t put a dead man on trial and dead men don’t talk about associates or accomplices.
Does anybody with at least two functioning brain cells believe that Epstein, a guy in solitary confinement and on suicide watch, actually committed suicide?
The death of this sub-human animal was about as predictable as the two mass shootings last week by “Bourne Identity” dial up assassins that were most likely implemented by the powers that be to divert attention away from the Epstein mess that was never supposed to see the light of day in the first place.
The shootings quickly reset the mainstream news cycles and placed those tragedies in the forefront of people’s minds.
The people running the show didn’t want the general population thinking too long about Epstein and all those crazy conspiracy theories attached to him.
There are certain people in the world that should be referred to as the untouchables; they’re off limits when it comes to being held accountable for their criminal involvement in anything. I think you know who they are.
What do you think about this subject?
The PPJ Gazette 
Aug 15, 2019 @ 23:36:00
Marti, I think I’ve lost another comment. I should have saved it….need to rewrite from scratch
I run another “strange” website (you may recall) https://exopolitician.wordpress.com where I offer live “DNA” readings to the inquisitive few. One of my special abilities is to be able to “see” a person’s energy field or ectoplasm (which is unique – and acts like a “marker” for intelligent entities with reconnaissance technologies).
For triviality’s sake, I read the field of an old video of Epstein and it did not match the one that was in custody, even allowing for excessive traumatisation. This means they were DIFFERENT people.
Two other things which highlights a “rat”. Michael Jackson (who beat the FBI at their own game) had an island that was sensationalised. Was that the “prepper”?
The “powers” tell us Epstein prepared meticulous diaries as “insurance” (or fabrication to “fit up” those in power that “need” to be removed). Really now? So why was he imprisoned and why is he dead?
I feel an Ozzie Thinker article titled “Was Epstein Guilty?” is in the wings 😉
Best
OT
LikeLike
Aug 12, 2019 @ 13:35:47
I don’t trust Steve Pieczenik but he has to tell the truth sometimes. He says people like Jeff go here in Russia.
http://pieczenik.blogspot.com/2012/12/barvikha-russia-luxurious-haven-for.html
LikeLike
Aug 12, 2019 @ 12:06:46
I have talked with not one person Ozzie, who believes for a minute that this man committed suicide. As with Ken Lay (Enron) who died supposedly in a ski accident in Vale Colorado, the “death” is just a little too timely and convenient. And they do this over and over again. Many people have suggested he is most likely alive and well and hidden safely away. There are many ways to keep people quiet. Especially when they are holding such explosive information about the elites. And after all, we don’t prosecute or hold accountable any of the elite no matter how egregious their crimes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aug 11, 2019 @ 23:50:51
Marti – hopefully this isn’t a duplicate response (your system made me log in again as I’m using a different computer)
Jon
I was debating with associates recently. Did you know that paedophilia is the “number one most popular thing to hate” currently? A high profile British policeman infamously stated “paedophilia is worse than murder” when commenting on Gary Glitter’s sensational first trial. I have written about popular insanity over coherent analysis of the subject more than once.
Given this background, assuming Epstein was “suicided” (or has he been presented new ID for “services to the brotherhood”?), I can’t help noticing how well-scripted the collection of papers supporting “evidence” is. It almost runs like a screenplay. Could some of these papers (used as evidence) be fabricated? Or, in the case of a serious subject like “paedophilia” (worse than murder), does fabrication never happen?
Additionally, it never ceases to amaze me that criminals (whatever their status) always use suggestive code words that are so instantly recognisable, they may have “cut to the chase” and come right out with it. I guess that adds to the power of those “immaculate” forces that “protect” us. They are better than anyone (whatever their status) on the “other side”.
I guess now Epstein’s “out of the picture”, we’ll never know “the truth”…
.
Just my twopenny worth.
Best
OT
LikeLiked by 1 person