Home

And Now The End Of Brexit

3 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

If something looks, smells or tastes like a conspiracy, chances are pretty damn good it is one.

A long time ago, powerful think-tanks got together and figured out a way to stop the masses from putting any credibility into ideas that governments might regularly conspire against their own citizenry. Their clever plan was to popularize a specific label that would, for all intents and purposes, inoculate the masses against believing the obvious. The label that was selected was “Conspiracy Theory.” According to a Freedom of Information request by the New York Times in 1976, the label “Conspiracy Theory” was made into a weaponized term to discredit minority groups of people from pushing conspiracy agendas that questioned the veracity of government reports.

The “Conspiracy Theory” label can very effectively defuse a specific problem before it ever has a chance to breathe. Whenever something big occurs that stinks of a massive conspiracy, the powers that be immediately inoculate the masses against such thought behavior by injecting the “Conspiracy Theory” label into the public domain. It goes something like this:

“Yesterday’s terror attack is already being dubbed as a false flag event by the lunatic fringe and other conspiracy theorists.”

When the hypnotized public read and hear such statements from the mainstream media companies, they automatically close their eyes and cover their ears with regards to anything that deviates from officialdom. In reality, the masses are routinely immunized against logic by coming into contact with this cleverly weaponized label. No matter how blatantly obvious the truth might be concerning a specific incident, the large majority of people worldwide will be unable to embrace anything other than what has been disseminated by the government’s script writers.

More

Advertisements

Measles Misinformation Campaign: Dr. Bergman Exposes Vaccines

Leave a comment

Breaking down the measles misinformation campaign, Dr, Bergman exposes the misinformation campaign promoted by vaccine manufacturers and MSM.  Questioning government policies can be dangerous business:

Pharma Death Clock

Leave a comment

Total Deaths Since January 1, 2000…

Logo

Big Pharma’s chemical warfare on humanity dwarfs the number of victims killed by all world wars and acts of terrorism combined…

While drug companies profit billions, people are dying by the millions.

Chemotherapy
19,236,546
Iatrogenic Deaths
15,080,220
Hospital Errors
8,464,080
Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR)
4,039,674
Bedsores
2,212,202
Hospital Malnutrition
2,092,936
Adverse Drug Reactions
2,039,073
Medical Error
1,885,181
Hospital Infections
1,442,740
SSRIs
769,461
Surgery-Related
615,569

More

From 1969, The Jaffe Memo: How to reduce the population

1 Comment

Jaffe Memo

The ‘Jaffe Memo’ is an infamous document produced by Planned Parenthood in 1969 which, in a single page, conveys the lengths that elitists are willing to go to ‘manage’ the U.S. Population.

Planned Parenthood portrays itself as an advocate for women’s rights and autonomy and sexual freedom, but items on the list reveal a different story.

How to reduce the population of the United States? Here are some of the ideas that were on the table:

  • Fertility control agents in water supply.
  • [Induce?] Chronic Depression
  • Compulsory abortion
  • Compulsory sterilization
  • Discouragement of private home ownership

Not exactly the sorts of things consistent with ‘autonomy’!

The ‘memo’ is a synthesis of a number of ideas then in wide circulation, both inside and outside of Planned Parenthood. Because of its concise summary of these ideas, the memo serves as a useful illustration of a whole range of disconcerting policy considerations. The memo itself indicates that it was “derived primarily” from people such as M. Young, W. Shockley, L. Day, and others.

Circumstances that unfolded in the United States shortly after the memo was circulated privately strongly suggest that some of these proposals, at least, were implemented. Whether or not they were implemented because of the advocacy of Planned Parenthood’s ‘Population Control’ division (Frederick Jaffe being in charge of that division), is not the concern of this site. That said, the reader should be aware that these organizations are very aware of their complicity in such schemes, and have been active in trying to alter the record. As it pertains to this memo, Jaffe’s own son, David Jaffe, has been active on the Internet whitewashing the record regarding his father.

More

Doctor Robot for You, Real Doctor for Me

Leave a comment

Contributor & author: Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD, (California) board-certified anesthesiologist and President of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons  (see bio at bottom of release)

Interview – Contact booking at dr.marilynsingleton@gmail.com, or call Dr. Singleton directly at 510-421-5800

 

Preview:  Medical technological aids have now jumped the shark. An unbelievable, but—thanks to cell phone video—verifiably true news report detailed how a robot rolled into a patient’s Intensive Care Unit cubicle and a physician’s talking head appeared on the robot’s “face” and told the patient the sad news that he had a terminal illness. While remote medicine is reasonable in rural areas where access to medical care is limited, telling a patient he is going to die from a TV screen is a crime against all medical ethical principles.

  We can certainly expect more medicine by proxy as larger corporations and the government takes more control of our medical care

_____________________________________________________________________________________

March 19th, 2019

Doctor Robot for You, Real Doctor for Me

by Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JDl

A couple of years ago, computer programs, algorithms, and glorified Google searches were touted as the replacements for a physician’s analysis of a patient’s medical condition. Compressed medical research is quite useful for clinicians who are presented with novel situations and have no readily available colleagues with whom to discuss the case. However, the purpose of flow charts should not be to replace the brains of busy clinicians or, worse yet, be a cookbook for the practitioners at drugstore clinics.

Medical technological aids have now jumped the shark. An unbelievable, but—thanks to cell phone video—verifiably true news report detailed how a robot rolled into a patient’s Intensive Care Unit cubicle and a physician’s talking head appeared on the robot’s “face” and told the patient the sad news that he had a terminal illness. While remote medicine is reasonable in rural areas where access to medical care is limited, telling a patient he is going to die from a TV screen is a crime against all medical ethical principles. More

Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year

1 Comment

Jon Rappoport’s blog

by Jon Rappoport

March 20, 2019

(To join our email list, click here.)

Medical News Today reports that, in 2011, there was a modest uptick in the number of prescriptions written in the US.

The increase brought the total to: 4.02 billion.

Yes, in 2011, doctors wrote 4.02 billion prescriptions for drugs in America.

That’s an average of roughly 13 prescriptions for each man, woman, and child.

That’s about one new prescription every month for every American.

The Medical News Today article concluded, “…the industry should be heartened by the growth of the number of prescriptions and spending.” Yes, I’m sure the drug industry is popping champagne corks.

We’re talking about prescriptions here. We’re not talking about the number of pills Americans took. We’re also not counting over-the-counter drugs or vaccine shots.

Pharmacopoeia, a 2011 exhibition at the British Museum, estimated that “the average number of pills a person takes in his or her own lifetime in the UK is 14,000.” That’s as a result of prescriptions. Including over-the-counter drugs, the 14,000 number would swell to 40,000 pills taken in a lifetime.

What are the effects of all these drugs?

More

%d bloggers like this: