Marti Oakley

December 31, 2017


“For the purposes of this Convention, “enforced disappearance” is considered to be the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.

  1. No order or instruction from any public authority, civilian, military or other, may be invoked to justify an offense of enforced disappearance.”


While families, advocates and activists fighting this system of human trafficking, perpetrated by state and federal agencies and those who operate under their protection remain impervious to prosecution, a new and more vile element has reared its ugly head. Medical kidnap and abuse is now rampant and the death toll is rising. And who put this predatory system in place?? The very people you elected to public office!

While families opposed to this system have grown immense in numbers, congress still plugs its ears and pretends it doesn’t know. Or, they claim it must be an isolated incident. They never heard of such a thing before. Why didn’t they know about it if it was actually a problem? The fact is they did know, they do know and they also have no intention of interfering with the trafficking as it would result in hundreds of thousands and in some cases millions of dollars in campaign contributions (bribery) that they receive from the very organizations who put the programs in place and profit from them.

So now, in addition to being deprived of your identity, assets and freedom via probate tribunals, you can be deprived of your very life by those in the medical sector. Also, your children can be taken from you for no other reason than you asked for a second opinion on the diagnosis and proposed treatment they have planned. They can also be taken by a cps worker with no evidence of actual wrong doing by the parents, and CPS will never be required to produce any provable evidence that the kidnapping of your child was in any way related to any claimed abuse.

As with the elderly and the disabled, children are rendered dead in the law and become chattel property once they become a ward of the state and are now openly bought, sold, and traded for profit.

Issues that congress could easily and with authority, rectify:

End the theft of identity that results from being a “ward of the state”. Being declared a “ward is a civil death, equal in its legal consequences to a natural death”. You have no rights. You cannot speak for yourself because even though you are still breathing you are dead in the law. The living individual no longer is recognized. You have been declared legally dead. Your identity is given over to an individual who now presents themselves as you. And, as your new owner, now has access to all your life’s work and its assets. This is the perfect crime.

Enforced disappearances: End the arbitrary isolation of “wards”. These occur when the targeted victim is medically kidnapped and/or guardianized without due process and most times without any evidence that the actions taken against them were necessary.

This is also a human rights violation. These disappearances are often times done repeatedly as guardians move the victim from one facility to another, (and may do this numerous times) refusing to disclose where the victim is being held against their will or to allow families and friends to know their locations. (In the case of children captured in this system, they are moved from one foster home or residential facility to another and the cash register keeps ringing during the entire process.)

Being held against their will in an undisclosed location is a forced disappearance; it is unlawful detention without access to family or friends and is known as “incommunicado detention” and is done as a form of cruel and inhumane treatment, degrading the individual and their psychological state of mind. None of this is unintended. It is a specific method of cruelty meant to degrade the quality of life of the victim.

Article 2

For the purposes of this Convention, “enforced disappearance” is considered to be the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.

  1. No order or instruction from any public authority, civilian, military or other, may be invoked to justify an offense of enforced disappearance.


The Declaration on Human Rights

Every state has statutes forbidding the unnecessary isolation of targeted individuals. Yet, in virtually every single instance of guardianship abuse by professional predators, this is the first thing that happens. And those who sit in the position of holding these predators accountable for not only the unwarranted and unlawful imprisonment of wards, either do nothing at all, or, do every illegal and unlawful thing that they can to facilitate it. At this point, family members are required to pay a fee to spend time with the ward while the estate is simultaneously charged fees, which can be exorbitant, for allowing you to visit. That is assuming you are ever allowed to see them again.

End the practice of discarding pre-standing legal instruments to allow the trafficking to continue unimpeded. In several states, the BAR Associations have inserted little known rules into the statutes that allows probate tribunal administrators to discard pre-standing legal documents to be discarded at will per the request of the predator guardian and attorney’s. .

At this point, all those arrangements you made in an effort to secure your well being, and the distribution of your estate to your designated heirs is disposed of. Your new owner is now the beneficiary of all your assets by virtue of being gifted with a new alter-identity…YOURS!

Conversion: The converting of private property, now including homes and land, and

converting them to the use of the new (guardian) human owner, depriving the true owner of the use and enjoyment of that property and the unlawful conveyance of those tangible properties to the new human owner and disinheriting their designated heirs. This is an unlawful conveyance via the tribunal administrator to the for- profit guardian.

What is Theft by Conversion?

Theft by conversion occurs when a person lawfully obtains possession to the personal property or funds of another, and then converts the property into funds for their own use and without the person’s permission.

Appropriation of investment funds for the defendant’s unlawful gain

Intentionally failing to pay on an account that the defendant is entrusted with to oversee Deception is often a main element in theft by conversion.

Rules of Evidence: IF these tribunals are in fact, Constitutional, why are they not forced to follow the code on rules of evidence? We have seen hundreds and hundreds of times the administrator refuse to allow any real evidence to be presented, offered or entered into the administrative record that would refute the unproven claims of abuse, neglect, exploitation or one of the many other items on the laundry list recited to the tribunal as the reason for their cause of action in the identity theft that is about to take place.

He who claims must prove: Why has Congress not moved legislatively to force the for profit guardian and their attorney’s to prove the claims they make against the targeted individual and those attempting to defend themselves from those claims?

The requesting of an emergency hearing where the respondent is intentionally not notified and, does not have to be present because of the likelihood of “immediate injury, loss, or damage” is a fictional excuse for why the targeted individual will receive no due process, no notice of hearing and no opportunity to speak out on their own behalf. It is also grossly unconstitutional.

Definition of Ex Parte

  1. From, or for the benefit of, one side or party.
  2. Of, or relating to, an action in a legal proceeding brought about by one party without the participation or presence of the opposition.

As aside here: It is precisely because the targeted victim is about to suffer immediate injury via the actions of the predators and loss of not only their personal freedom, but also, identity which the predator now assumes, but also loss of all constitutional rights, all property rights and damage to their person as a result of isolation, chemical restraint and even the right to speak for themselves.

The “immediate injury, loss, or damage” they sight is the result of the actions of the predators themselves: a tacit admission that they know exactly what they are doing to the victim.

Inferior Courts Clause Art 111 Sect. 2 Clause 1

Section 1.

The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. ( congress has a duty to end these administrative tribunals and to make laws protecting the public from professional predators and to organize the courts). (emphasis, mine)

The power to stop all of this lays with Congress. Yet we do not have one politician honest enough to address this growing epidemic of human trafficking of the elderly, the disabled and children.

State legislators and your governor also have the authority to organize the courts in your state and to collapse or end the existence of these unconstitutional tribunals that exist for no other reason than to usurp the Constitutions, both state and federal, to allow the trafficking of the elderly, disabled and children for profit with the intent of profiting the state.

The list of illegal and unlawful activities is far too long and complex to go into in this article. But, you need to ask yourself why Congress refuses to recognize the rights of individuals caught in this system while allowing those committing an actual crime to continue preying on the public. Oh yeah….that is another one of those curious oddities in “probate”. No crime has been committed by the targeted victim, no injury has been suffered to those making the claims, and the statutes all say “due process” will be administered, but, it never is.

The families subjected to this cruel and inhumane abuse by state and federal agencies, agents and organizations is growing larger by the day. Congress’s failure to act, its failure and abject refusal to act in the public interest, to perform its duty to the public to protect them from just these kinds of things is not only egregious, but unforgivable.

Every state is receiving millions in funding from the Federal government in the form of block grants via Title XX of Social Security and these grants include millions for elderly care and services. They also receive massive funding for contracting with various federal agencies to not only fund the wholesale trafficking of the elderly, the disabled and children, but to keep this system of buying and selling us, the people, as lucrative as it is and running without interference.

It is time we held not only congress, but state governments responsible for the failure to act on behalf of the public and their duty to the public…NOT to those who have wads of cash to fund their next campaign.

We are disposable. We are expendable. We are commodities and the only commodity left in this country with any real value. They have destroyed everything else that made us a once great nation.


In Preiser v. Rodriguez, supra, the court said: “It is clear . . . that the essence of habeas corpus is an attack by a person in custody upon the legality of that custody, and that the traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody.” 411 U.S. at 484.

Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody.

Block Grants

Rule 605. Judge’s Competency as a Witness

The presiding judge may not testify as a witness at the trial. A

party need not object to preserve the issue.

(As amended Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011