Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Like plucking plumbs off a tree. Sometimes, everyone appointed gets engorged. Even the most prestigious law firms understand these cases are financially stable and represent reliable lifeblood income to the firm. They not only bring in good steady monthly income to pay overhead, but often can be manipulated to produce extensive windfall profit on top of ordinary daily case maintenance costs. Probate and estate assignments can be easy pickins’, bringing in as much as the largest client or other, less dependable kinds of cases” (End Quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The redistribution of wealth so often wailed about by the wealthy, whereby they believe if they have to pay taxes in direct proportion to income like every other taxpayer is forced to do, it is somehow because “some people just want a hand-out”, is a true diversion from the actual redistribution of wealth that occurs everyday in probate courts across the country.

The only thing of real value ever possessed by any country is its people. Through successive administrations, whether Republican or Democrat, our country has been robbed of its economic dominance, its ability to produce the best, the most and the most valuable commodities on the globe. The only thing left to buy, sell and trade of any value are the people themselves. And we the people have been commodified…turned into the last market for fast money to facilitate the greed of the few.

While the battle rages in the public as to whom is hellbent on destroying the traditional American family, the truth is, only the government has the power to do this. It is the government through policy, program creation, and bribery (funding) that families are ripped apart. Block grants to states facilitate the unconstitutional tribunal systems for which there is little to no oversight. This is intentional.

What is overwhelming most normal people is the vast number of sociopathic predators who make a parasitic living off assuming the identity of a living human being, then presenting themselves as that person and availing themselves of the benefits of someone elses life work. In legal circles they are called professional guardians. To the rest of the sane world they are predators; parasites on society at large.

Quoted from “The Dark Side..A law treatise on Judging” by Caroline Douglas J.D.

Page 307 para 4,5,6

EXAMPLE ONE: THE PROBATE COURT GUARDIAN SYSTEM”

The system for safeguarding the financial affairs of incapacitated people is riddled with problems that have drained the estate of the vulnerable and enriched politically connected lawyers and others, according to a report by the NY State Chief Judge, Judith S. Kaye.”(66)

Handling estate cases are a plumb assignment in every state, because they are highly lucrative; there is little risk in the routine work; there is generally no questioning the bill; and the attorneys often run up padded bills without any oversight. The lawyers get hand-picked by judges to represent estates of people who died without a will, or are senile or incapable of handling their own affairs, and minors.

Client assets get plundered by lawyer billing and costs and even asset transfers to lawyer players”(67) Even bankruptcy trustees collude with estate lawyers—or receivers (all judge appointments) to blatantly divy up client assets—personal and corporate, and acquire them for themselves. Like plucking plumbs off a tree. Sometimes, everyone appointed gets engorged. Even the most prestigious law firms understand these cases are financially stable and represent reliable lifeblood income to the firm. They not only bring in good steady monthly income to pay overhead, but often can be manipulated to produce extensive windfall profit on top of ordinary daily case maintenance costs. Probate and estate assignments can be easy pickins’, bringing in as much as the largest client or other, less dependable kinds of cases” (End Quote)

I would add to this that incapacity is no longer a legitimate prerequisite as there is no standard or clarification for what incapacity actually encompasses in these tribunals. The Probate system in any state,

  • operates outside the common law,
  • adheres to no Constitutional rights or liberties,
  • allows predator guardians and attorneys to make accusations of wrong-doing for which they have no evidence and are not required to produce.
  • Does not have to follow the “rules of evidence” as required in a Constitutional Court of Law,
  • Allows the predators to assume the identity of the targeted victim (tribunal sanctioned identity theft)
  • to rob the estate
  • to disinherit lawful heirs
  • to isolate the victim,
  • forcibly medicate for chemical restraint
  • and to force the victim to pay for these criminal actions brought against them by the predator under the ruse of incapacity.

High Volume Predators

With the boomers coming into their senior years, some of these predators who pose not only as guardians, but also carry a BAR union card, are getting rich doing business by volume. One such predator operating in the Detroit area has allegedly 1600 “clients” guardianized. These are recipients of social security, and if she’s really hit the jackpot, also VA retirement benefits and sometimes railroad retirement benefits. Her victims are housed and held prisoner in one of her numerous residential homes, most of which have never been inspected. Food is scarce, as is heat in the winter. Each of them gets $44.00 a month spending money while she has made herself the payee on their benefits.

In Pennsylvania, one virulent predator who is operating guardian services under various business names covering at least 10 counties, has and estimated 400 “clients”, most of whom she has never seen and whom she bills routinely for services she is supposed to be rendering but can produce no evidence indicating that she has provided those services.

We could talk about Florida and Tennessee here, but frankly we don’t have that much space to devote to these two states. Be advised that this system of identity theft, estate theft, financial exploitation, elder neglect, abuse and lack of care is rampant in every state. And, just because it has not yet landed on your doorstep does not mean you are immune from this activity. It just means they haven’t gotten around to you yet.

In Summary

We have been bounced back and forth between the legislative and judicial branches, each claiming due to the separation of powers you must go to the other. Both are lying. These tribunals are operating under the executive branch via umbrella agencies, such as Social Services, or the Department of Aging and the Elderly. These umbrella agencies are contracted to a like federal agency and receives funding from them to keep the federal business plan operating. http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers.aspx

There are some states, such as Illinois who have attached the probate system under the district courts. How this was done escapes me, as the district court is a court of law, while the probate system is a tribunal which does not deal with law; only statute, code and regulations. These are generally constructed to void your natural rights and liberties and to void any Constitutional or lawful requirements.

In the end, there is not one legislator that I have been able to find who is not aware of exactly what is happening in these tribunals to the elderly and the disabled. Then, taking money in one hand from the very stakeholders who use this system of identity theft, estate theft and financial exploitation, for profit, while extending the other to you claiming they will “look into it” Of course they don’t and they won’t. Those block grants handed out through Title XX of Social Security can be worth many, many millions of dollars to the individual states and they sure don’t want to stall out the money train. https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title20/2000.htm

The Judiciary itself has become a threat to the public as it no longer adheres to the law in most cases or to its own code of ethics and conduct. “Your Honor” has almost become an oxymoron. Probate administrators are NOT judges, they are executive administrative appointees who sit in place of an actual judge of law. https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/administrative%20law%20judge

http://thelawdictionary.org/judge/

http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers.aspx

(66) Jane Fritsch, Guardianship Abuses Noted including a $1,275 ice creamNew York Times, Dec 4 2001 http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/04/nyregion/guardianship-abuses-noted-including-a-1275-ice-cream.html

(67)Attorney Coffey claimed his client wanted to gift him with her oceanfront home but his client didn’t remember that.

CONSTITUTIONAL CASE LAW – voidjudgements.net

voidjudgements.net/suedc/constitutionalcaselaw.pdf

CONSTITUTIONAL CASE LAW. … there can be no rule making or legislation which … “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot . be converted into a …

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/98/61/case.html

U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/448/1

(See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398;  Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and

Held:

State officers may be held personally liable for damages under 1983 based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Pp. 3-10.

; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/administrative-law/administrative-law-keyed-to-strauss/obtaining-judicial-review-access-to-court-to-challenge-agency-action-or-inaction/owen-v-city-of-independence-2/

See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2009-title42/pdf/USCODE-2009-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1983.pdf

https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title20/2000.htm

Advertisements