Home

Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

1 Comment

Source: Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

Advertisements

Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

18 Comments

Be sure to read the comments that are coming in.  Click the link above to access!

Marti Oakley

PPJ Gazette copyright ©

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution for the United States authorizing, or otherwise directing the creation of these self protecting unions that have monopolized our judicial system at every level and use that monopoly to profit at the public’s expense. And, there is nothing authorizing the incorporation of these specialized unions or of the Supreme Court itself. Yet here we are in the grips of these corporate entities who have monopolized the very judicial system meant to protect America from just such things.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In every state and on the Federal level, the BAR Associations have established a monopoly on our courts and our so-called judicial system. The existing Sherman Act: the Clayton Act and FTC Act only become active when the monopolized systems that have been established harm consumers. I can think of no other more harmful monopoly to the American public overall, than what passes for the judicial system in America and its associated BAR unions that not ony control and own our courts, but also profit mightily from doing so. The law is what they say it is regardless of what the law might actually be.

The Sherman Act outlaws “every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade,” and any “monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize.” Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. Obviously, the Supreme Court has decided that the monopolies that exist in our courts are not unreasonable. Especially since they too, participate in that monopoly.

Q: Do you believe the monopolies on our courts at every level via so-called BAR Associations are unreasonable?

When individuals go to all the expense and time of acquiring a degree in law, why should they then be required to pass some contrived test, many times at great expense, to acquire a union card (The BARS are UNIONS) permitting them to work in the field they trained in or to practice their trade in any court room in this country? No union card? No access to the courts. Didn’t pay your BAR union dues for access to the courts they monopolize? Too bad for you!

Even the Supreme Court of the United States has established itself as its own BAR. To be heard in this highly politicized “court”, you must be a member in good standing for four years in another BAR union before you can apply to appear in their closed union shop called the Supreme Court. More

TS Radio: “Voices Carry for Animals #147”- We Love Pit Bulls- Help STOP BSL!

1 Comment

***Tune In Tuesday*** On Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:00 pm CST

LISTEN LIVE HERE

5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST…

 You can also listen to the show by calling (917) 388-4520 press 1 to Speak to Guest

This show will be archived so you can listen to it anytime

Hosted By Debbie Dahmer
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Guests will be: Dianne Lynn Elko – Founder of We Love Pit Bulls & Animal Advocate for all animals, and Kim Brown– Head Administrator & also Animal Advocate for all animals.

Dianne Lynn Elkofounder of We Love Pit Bulls since 2012, there are almost 80,000 members. Dianne has 8 Pit Bull groups on Facebook. There are awesome admins who help her everyday to help our Pit Bulls. We want to change the way the world sees Pit Bulls.We stand for Pit Bulls,we believe in adopt,don’t shop,we want to see an end to dog fighting and BSL.

Breed-specific legislation is a type of dangerous dog law. It is defined as any ordinance or policy that pertains to a specific dog breed or several breeds, but does not affect any others. Proponents of breed-specific laws seek to limit public exposure to well-documented dangerous dog breeds by regulating the ownership of them.

BSL needs to disappear. BSL is discrimination, stero-typing, prejudice, unjustifiable, inhumane, and injustice. When a dog attacks, all animals should not be held accountable.

Stop the BSL from killing these innocent dogs. More

%d bloggers like this: