Historically, more often than not, there are many governments that make horribly wrong decisions which affect generations to come. Russia in the photo is one such country that has done this. So if one considers making government a “god” for the good of the country or for the “good of the whole”, then it it is likely that in many instances there will be drastic consequences such as what happened in the Ukraine in 1933 under Stalin when 7 million people starved from hunger because they did not want to be part of the Soviet Union. The Ukraine again, as of late, is suffering because of a rogue mother Russia.
However, Russia’s case is not unique, because often the majority at the hands of a chosen few who are at the top of the pyramid in a nation that seeks to sustain themselves though various ways which will include high taxation, with very little representation. Then, millions of government workers become part of the money pool, all the while, states and counties operate in the same fashion. These “public servants” who are classic controllers, lord their authority over the common people in excess, while at the same time fear is used to prevent resistance. These types of governments, rather than ruling by the consent of the governed, rule by force in order to further their pet agendas but also keep their government jobs and their fat retirements. And yes, for the record, America is one of these countries.
In a new twist of fate, on June 23 of this year, the people of the UK(i.e., Great Britain) will vote in what is called the EU referendum which asks whether or not the people should choose to remain in the European Union or leave it. In essence, national referendums of this kind are rare in the UK and only two referendums to date have been held with the first being on the membership of the European Economic Community in 1975 and the second one which adopted the Alternative vote system in parliamentary elections in 2011.
By allowing the people, as a whole, to vote on a major issue such as this, it is a step in the right direction, and especially so when considering the implications of joining up with the European Union that would eventually propel the UK into a loss of sovereignty while
taking on EU mandates which include climate change, environmental standards, fines, a World Court, an EU military, dishonest banking, and much more. The EU elite, generally speaking, would end up being a sacred cow which in the end will milk the system, while placing extreme burdens upon the people as a whole. Thus, it is my hope that the people of the UK will vote “no” and not continue to be part of this “grand plan” which is obviously the next step in creating a New World Order.
In contrast. this same idea of bringing nation states together is also on the drawing board in America and it has to do with annexing Mexico and Canada into the U.S. which would then become the North American Union. Yet what exactly would transpire in an arrangement of
this kind? The consensus of many is that it would be much the same as the EU to where a loss of sovereignty would naturally result with a greater centralization of power which would then be shared by an oligarchical elite such as what has been created in Brussels, Belgium
that oversees the affairs of the EU.
With that said, knowing the dire consequences of gravitating towards a North American Union oligarchy, would the American people first be given the right to vote on a similar UK-referendum agenda? And does the U.S. Constitution even provide such a mechanism of this kind?
The answer is, it does not.
Taking this a lot further, the lack of a referendum mechanism clearly reveals a major flaw in the U.S. Constitution to where the very will of the majority can be overruled by either the U.S. government or a future North American Union coalition. And to add to this nightmare, the Bill of Rights which was meant to protect the people from rogue governments would then be swept away. Thus, with the stroke of a pen an authoritarian form of government would decide the plight of the people and the U.S. Constitution would be laid to rest.
For the record, massive governments always lead to more centralization and this means that, in the end, we the people will have no voice and no choice in major matters of the state. And if you are a person who thinks that you still have a voice today, then just look around and
see how many rights have been taken away even before 9/11.
America, have your eyes been opened yet? Your country is at the crossroads of life. The choice is now ours to make. Either we the people who wish to remain free must act now before it is too late or this nation, which was based upon God given rights, will be lost to
those rogue individuals who are intent on destroying one nation under God. There is a narrow road that points to God and freedom, but there is still another road which is wide and it leads to oppression and destruction.
So we must now choose this day whom we will serve.
May 22, 2016 @ 04:05:43
I feel I must comment on any issue involving individual rights in the USA. I know of no other case this extreme, do you?
I have made some new contacts that may have the authority to assist in getting justice for my neighbor illegally applying chemicals to my property with intent to cause me harm. His property was a legally nonconforming property and there are very strict laws that apply when redeveloping a legally nonconforming property. Illegal building permits are not acceptable for redeveloping nonconforming properties. SORRY ABOUT THAT!
In reference to the illegal application of chemicals to my property for 5+ years when I verbally told him not to. I requested an incident report from the Police chief just minutes after I told him not to do ANYTHING to my PRIVATE property. The police chief did submit to me an incident report, two of them in fact because the first one did not have any reference to what I had reported. The second one did, however 16 months later, the chemicals had already rendered me unable to function. The chemicals continued, I requested the police chief file a trespassing complaint against him. He refused stating that he did not want to make the neighbor mad. Apparently the severity of my skin condition at that time being to the degree that I could not bear to wear cloths, and the fact that trespassing is a criminal offense this officer did not have the courage to uphold his oath of office and to do his duty to enforce the laws against all crimes. The officer having the law behind him still was so afraid of making this neighbor mad, that says much about how evil and erratic the officer had to have know about the character of my neighbor. It is no surprise then that within a year of so that Police chief opted to resign over being terminated,
It is my opinion the when any government official is discovered to have committed ethical violations, there should not be available the option to resign with positive recommendation to their next employer or be terminated. Too me that is unethical. Then people wonder why there is so much corruption within law enforcement. Seems like common sense to me. Pass around a cop who has been found guilty of unethical behavior but do not let his next employer know about his prior record. That is not right to the next community, is it?
Then I request from the Mayor to manage the police dept, by having them file a complaint against my neighbor for trespassing. No, he said he couldn’t do it because they would be writing tickets constantly when neighbors had a beef. Well Mr. Mayor when a neighbor is trespassing on private property by applying chemicals with intent to cause harm for the previous two years as if it was part of maintenance to his yard work you really do not have the choice to opt out. If a criminal offense is committed you have the duty under your oath of office to manage your police dept to file criminal complaints against all crimes reported by citizens. You also state in your oath for all citizens. Well you did not request they not file frivolous criminal complaints against me, I was given multiple criminal citations, all of which were not in violation of any law, you managed to waste taxpayers money on legal fees, attorneys fees, court fees for criminal complaints against me that in the court room I never had to utter one word. The City’s attorney immediately stated to the court the the City would dismiss the case and pay all court fees. NOT ONE WORD DID I UTTER TO DEFEND MYSELF. The complaints were ridiculous, there were no law against what the complaint stated. This situation carried over from Mayor #1, #2, #3 & #4 in the five year period in which my neighbor never ceased illegally applying chemicals to my private property with intent to cause me harm. All four of the Mayors did continue to allow frivolous criminal complaints be filed against me on my neighbors behalf. All at the expense of the tax payers of the City of Montrose, Ia.
I talked to the County attorney about the illegal application of chemicals to my property by my neighbor, requesting a criminal complaint be file against him, its not like anyone could not see the severity of my skin condition, getting worse with every passing year. The scars on my body today are recognizable as my having suffered a serious injury. The County Attorney had the same response as the Mayor’s he did think neighbors filing complaints against each other would solve anything, it would just fuel the fire. Well Mr. Short your actions were no indifferent than that of the four Mayors. My request for a trespassing complaint against my neighbor was legitimate and would have protected me from further physical harm. You took an oath of office and have the duty to prosecute all criminal offenses in Lee County. You refused that duty to file a complaint against my neighbor and you also refused to prosecute the City of Montrose clerk for multiply criminal offenses that I personally submitted the hard evidence of, to you. Again in court I never even got into the court room, the neighbor you filed the complaint on behalf of never even showed up at court. Had that of been me I am sure a contempt charge would have been filed. Your assistant came out in the hallway and yelled at me in front of te general public as if I had committed a crime. I had not and I believe a public apology is proper from your assistant. You stated to me in regard to the CIty clerks criminal offenses that, “You would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County”. You and I both know your job is to prosecute all criminal offenses in Lee County. You filing frivolous criminal charges against me is a waste of Lee County taxpayers money. Your criminal charges against me are not even actions in violation of the law. Your refusal to prosecute the City clerk is in violation of your oath of office and has only given her the opportunity to continue committing criminal offenses due to her position as clerk for the CIty of Montrose, Ia.
Now to get back to this group. I was just checking in to see if any of you have discovered any other cases in which
1. the City clerk has committed four counts of document fraud, two counts of altering City code, or knowingly making false statements and was not terminated or criminally charged.
2. A neighbor owning a legally nonconforming property, redevelops it with no regard to the laws for redeveloping a legally nonconforming property. The building permits issued for the redevelopment are illegal and has been allowed to apply chemicals to his neighbors property without their permission for an extended period of time of 5+ years.
You can follow me and like and share if you want at my main page that I post regularly on. Thanks guys and you get to finding me some cases that some of you have claimed this shit happens to people all the time. Because I don’t believe you. Prove it to me.
LikeLike
Apr 25, 2016 @ 23:45:27
Excellent post. I don’t usually see eye to eye with Frank, but he’s right on the money here. Well done!
Best
OT
LikeLike