strip banner
Chuck Frank


The California legislature now aims to tighten vaccine mandates even
if vaccines are unsafe, but for now, religious exemptions or a doctor’s note may be included as part of an exemption. Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein are talking about going one step further and removing the religious exemption. In spite of this, there still remains many grave concerns concerning mandated vaccines that have not been fully tested and which have been part of the “fast tracked” program.

One of the most controversial issues for many years has been that of28056_1th
autism. For now, there has been at least 30 studies which suggest a
link between vaccines and autism.

While studies have shown that autism, Alzheimer’s, allergies, asthma
– and other chronic ailments plague people who live in Metro-America, this fact is mostly nonexistent among the Amish who are those grassy rooted farm boys and girls from yesteryear. The “experts” express
complete bafflement about this fact.

But instead of sifting through any Amish studies that would solve the “mysteries” of various ailments, Big Pharma, the FDA and the California State Legislature is on a different mission. Don’t let a good crises go to waste such as the Disneyland measles outbreak. But there are other key factors that enter into the question.

Should dangerous vaccines be mandated? Absolutely not!

While the rise of autism is still a great concern, a Congressional
Hearing was put in place on Nov. 29, 2012.
The House Oversight Committee Hearing on Autism began with U.S.
Representative Dan Burton who played a 2 minute video showing vaccine
research from Canada on the toxicity of the preservative mercury.
Rep. Burton stated that, “We have gone from 1 in 10,000 children with
autism to 1 in 88 in 2008. It is worse than an epidemic, it is an absolute disaster.”

The genie is now out of the bottle.

Following Dan Burton’s overview was then a written testimony by Brian
Hooker who holds a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering and who is also
the father of a neurologically impaired fourteen-year old young man.
Steven received all of his infant vaccines through 15 months of age
and subsequently regressed into what is commonly called autism.
Brian Hooker continued. “For all of the children still to be born,
it remains more relevant than ever to also ask the question: What
role, if any, have vaccines played in the rising epidemic of autism.
Is it merely a coincidence that during this same time period, the
vaccine schedule for children in the US has shot up from 10
vaccinations to 49, making our country the most vaccinated nation in
the world?

Let me start by saying that over a period of 8 years during which I submitted more than 100 Freedom of Information requests to The Centers for Disease Control–the CDC–most of which were denied, I have nevertheless uncovered evidence of a disturbingly clear connection between infant vaccines and the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism.

I have found, further, that many of these vaccines contain mercury in the form of Thimerosal at many times the EPA toxic exposure limit. Despite these facts the CDC consistently denies the existence of a relationship between any vaccine or vaccine component, including Thimerosal, and autism, and has worked very hard to bury the fact that Thimerosal, a potent neurotoxin, has played a significant role in the current autism epidemic, as shown by their own studies.”

The Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s 2003 Mercury Medicine Report stated that mercury which is placed in vaccines is a known, and potent neurotoxin which affects the nerve system. By placing it
in maternal and infant vaccines it is at best irresponsible and at worst, criminal.

Dr. Hooker went on to say the following. “Regarding the possible link between Thimerosal-exposure in infant vaccines and the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders, which includes autism, I have encountered a Berlin-wall like resistance. I have been shut out of the information necessary to get to the bottom of the question.” Also, the initial analysis of the data used in the CDC’s own “landmark” study, by Verstraeten et al. published in 2003 in the Journal Pediatrics showed that infants exposed to the highest Thimerosal levels in their vaccines at one month of age were 7.4 times more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

The children exposed to the highest doses of mercury from vaccines were 7 times more likely to receive an autism diagnosis than children who received the lowest doses of mercury.

The FDA still admits on its website that Thimerosal is still in vaccines even though manufacturers began voluntarily removing Thimerosal from pediatric vaccines around 2000. It is “assumed” that most pediatric vaccines containing Thimerosal were “off the shelves” by 2003. But that is only an assumption which was the very word used by the National Vaccine Information Center in one of their reports.

There are multiple cover ups when entering into the world of Big Pharma. Recently a Merck vaccine scientist was threatened with jail time for going to the FDA and exposing massive vaccine data manipulation, including scientific fraud and data falsification which was being used by the vaccine industry to make its faulty products appear to work even when they didn’t according to a document filed with the United States government.

And what was the former Merck virologist Stephen A Krahling’s reward for being truthful? Merck’s senior management even went as far as to say that they would pay him off with promises of financial bonuses if he kept quite.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Civil action No. 10-4374. “Complaint for Violations of the Federal False Claims Act.”
This case is about Merck’s efforts for more than a decade to defraud the
United States with respect to the efficacy of Merck’s mumps vaccine.

When delving into the inner circle of drug companies and the FDA one
can readily see that the public is not being fully protected from the effects of vaccines while at the same time California legislators have not changed their mission to mandate unproven vaccines statewide.

Are we a government for and by the people who are still able to make important choices for our own families or will we place the very health of our families into the hands of the nanny state?