strip banner
new-logo25Chuck Frank




The sky is falling while the world is a-buzz with the effects of warming trends and climate change. A little hot air here, and a little CO2 there will bring about the best loan sharks along with the world banking elite who will gladly “lend” their billions and services “at interest” to any nation reeling from the greenhouse effect. But, how many “let it burn” forests do the climate changers need each year to accomplish their warming and trendy goals?

Now then, the world’s political leaders will gather in New York on the 23rd of September for a special summit. U.N. Climate Secretary Ed Davey was quoted as saying the following;

“I think there’s a lot of support for having something that is legally binding, it’s just the extent of what is covered by that, is where the negotiations will be.”

Legally binding? Now, doesn’t that kind of mean the world’s taxpayers will get hit when governments sustainable targets are NOT MET? I’m sure it does. Has anyone heard of the backdoor gas tax? It’s been
talked about.

Ok, so factories and automobiles have been targeted as those mighty greenhouse agents causing higher temperatures. And then there is the three year drought in California that is affecting the rain and snow. But does this theory truly prove that climate change will be here for a long, long time?

Interestingly enough, environmental science is suspiciously lacking in the auto/factory category, because when the dots are all connected we find that one of the largest contributors to CO2 (carbon dioxide) levels in the atmosphere happens to be wildfire smoke!

Hello! Why is this always missing in most of the “climate” studies?

Is it to convince the nations that Man alone and industrialization irresponsible for a swing in the earths temperatures and so the nations must now bow down and de-industrialize or be taxed and fined?

world summit photoWildfires regularly send huge amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, soot, dust and volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere. Much of this gets deposited at higher latitudes, discoloring land, snow and ice, and thus speeding up warming by absorbing more sunlight that was previously reflected back into space. Also, there is a major threat which wildfire smoke poses to crop yields, as well as the people’s safety and health, the quality of soils and forests, and finally the effect of warming the air.

Large-scale fires in western and southeastern states can pump as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in a few weeks as a states’ entire motor vehicle traffic in a year, according to newly published research by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

While carbon pollution gets a lot of attention, the Arctic is also strongly affected by emissions that can result from wildfires. Studies show that the presence of wildfire smoke is a serious contributor to warming the oceans and also adds to the decline of the sea ice and snow cover in the Arctic. It is a decline that has been hugely underestimated in climate models. Still another main contributor to sea ice and snow melt is hot methane gas trapped beneath the ice working its way up from the ocean floor while bubbling to the surface.

While all of this points to a worldwide cataclysm where oceans rise and islands will sink, the latest up to date evidence suggests still another picture of the Arctic.

Today, instead of an ice meltdown, graphs show that the polar ice cap is much better than it was a few years back and despite those “realistic” predictions six years ago by climate scientists who showed the North Pole completely melted by now, the Arctic ice sheet is clearly experiencing an astounding rebound. So perhaps the enviros are well on their way to becoming the newest members of the Arctic’s frozen chosen? And thankfully, Santa Claus can now return to the North Pole.
Now, I pose the question; Is “man made” climate change something that is being fabricated in order that all nations would finally come together under one umbrella for the “good” of the planet before it is destroyed?

“…In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”– Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs, April 1974 (The official publication of the CFR) Council of
Foreign Relations.

Radical environmentalism and climate change is the final stepping stone to the loss of liberty and freedom which is then replaced by one world tyrannical government. It is the NWO and Agenda 21 in a nutshell. Resist this evil or be caught unaware by a warming trend such as a frog that’s in water who does not know that his freedom and his life will soon be over.