Home

SCHUMER SAID THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION CAN BE DAMNED

5 Comments

new-logo25strip bannerBy Don Jans

www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com

mygrandchildrensamerica@gmail.com

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Schumer just openly advocated his demand to obliterate the United States Constitution by eliminating any opposition to the Marxist/Progressive agenda. He proposed doing this by eliminating free speech and ignoring the co-equal branch of government, the United States Congress. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________

The Washington Free Beacon reports that Marxist/Progressive Senator from New York, Charles Schumer advocated the Tea Party organizations be targeted, saying, “the Obama administration should bypass Congress and institute new campaign finance rules through the IRS.”

Schumer is further quoted as saying: “It is clear that we will not pass anything legislatively as long as the House of Representatives is in Republican control, but there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies — we must redouble those efforts immediately.”

Schumer doubled down on his previous calls for Obama, head of the regime and Marxist/Progressives to use the IRS to target Tea Party groups while speaking before the extreme-left, tax-exempt Center for American Progress (CAP).

Schumer just openly advocated his demand to obliterate the United States Constitution by eliminating any opposition to the Marxist/Progressive agenda. He proposed doing this by eliminating free speech and ignoring the co-equal branch of government, the United States Congress.  The first amendment to the constitution guarantees free speech.  Free speech became constitutionally protected when the founders added the Bill of Rights to the constitution so the constitution would be able to be ratified by the people.  The intent was not to guarantee just the free speech of those who promote pornography as championed by the Marxist/Progressives, but it was primarily intended to protect the right of those opposing those in government to voice that opposition. Schumer is saying it is this right of those in opposition to the agenda of the Marxist/Progressives that should be eliminated through the actions of the Internal Revenue Service, a part of the executive branch of government.

Schumer than goes on to say the regime should bypass congress by having the IRS impose rules to eliminate freedom of speech of those who oppose the agenda of the Marxist/Progressives.  When Schumer said the IRS should impose rules, he was saying the regime should through the concept of arbitrary law make law.  The constitution says that only congress has the right to make law.  The three co-equal branches of government with checks and balances were established to prevent the very situation Schumer is advocating; arbitrary law with one branch of government becoming all powerful. More

Warning: Government Can Be Harmful to Your Health

1 Comment

strip banner

Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD., http://www.aapsonline.org/

“In 1989, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-sponsored study tested an experimental measles vaccine on 1,500 six-month old Black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles. The CDC admitted in 1996 that parents were never informed that the vaccine was experimental.”

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Trust in our government was a mere 19 percent in 2013 according to Pew Research Center. Not surprisingly, 56 per cent of Americans think it is not the government’s responsibility to provide a healthcare system. Waivers, favors, off-the-cuff rule changes, and the bungled launch of the Affordable Care Act website validate that distrust.  Bureaucratic incompetence and cronyism are not the only reasons we should be wary of government involvement in our medical care.

The federal government has a checkered history when it comes to medical judgments. We now cringe at the words of the revered Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the 1927 case, Buck v Bell upholding Virginia’s sterilization law for the institutionalized “feeble-minded.” “[Carrie Bell’s] welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization. It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. . .Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” In fact, Carrie’s mother was a prostitute, but not feeble-minded. After Carrie’s release she maintained a job as a domestic worker and became an avid reader. Her “feeble-minded” daughter was on her school’s honor roll.

Let’s recall the appalling Tuskegee Syphilis Study lasting from 1932 to 1972.   The U.S. Public Health Service used 400 hundred mainly poor, illiterate black sharecroppers with syphilis as lab animals. They were told they had “bad blood,” but not that they were actually suffering from a serious but treatable disease. All subjects succumbed to untreated syphilis so our government could track the natural progression of the disease. More

%d bloggers like this: