Marti Oakley ©Copyright 2013 All rights reserved
_____________________________________________________________________
Minnesota Department of Health: Coercion and entrapment
Question: If vaccines actually work with any degree of efficiency (not efficacy), why would non-vaccinated individuals represent any kind of threat to the vaccinated? Doesn’t the vaccine provide you with magical protection against whatever disease you supposedly took it for?
This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both. The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination. This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.
_______________________________________________________________
The Minnesota Department of Health is in the process of attempting to introduce even more vaccines into the mandated schedule for children from infancy, on. The toxic load of heavy metals, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, fetal cell lines from aborted babies (diploids), DNA strands from non-related species such as chickens and swine, live and dead viruses, thimerisol, mercury and whatever else could be found to 
load the vaccines, has many parents wondering just what is really going on. *Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic. By age two, most US children have received around 237 micrograms of mercury through vaccines alone. *See list below of contents of one vaccine alone**
Minnesota just recently banned formaldehyde in all products EXCLUDING VACCINES!
One childhood shot can contain as many as one million strands of someone or something else’s transfective DNA, now circulating in your child’s body.
So-called moral and social obligations that are being cited as a means of coercion to encourage parents to subject their infants, toddlers and young adults to intentional infection, heavy metal poisoning and the high risk of autism and other life long impairments, is just that: COERCION
The one size fits all approach of vaccines has produced an efficiency rate of about 34% over-all. That means that without hand-picking an ideal group [efficacy] that could possibly respond positively to the vaccine, there is only a 34% chance the vaccine will work at all [efficiency].
Efficacy simply means that IF a selected and ideal group of candidates for the vaccine were found and isolated, the vaccine could work at least some of the time. To find this ideal group would require extensive testing to exclude pre-existing known or unknown genetic disorders, current infections, past infections, blood work panels, and various other biological factors and medically based information gathering. This information gathering is almost never done.
How many times has any physician done any of these tests before admonishing parents to vaccinate their child?
While harping continually on the “efficacy” of vaccines, not one of those proposing increasing the toxic load have addressed the difference between “efficacy” as opposed to “efficiency”. Using the word [efficacy] is intentional and avoids the real issue of [efficiency].
MDH: We’ll set you up for future charges!
In their efforts to force compliance with this intentional assault on our children, the Minnesota Department of Health has responded by creating this form for parents who object to intentionally risking their children’s lifetime health with the injection of toxins in vaccines.
As is, the form is intentionally worded to imply that the parent or guardian is endangering their child(ren):
___________________________________________________
At about page 23. MDH Developed this form to have parents sign that looks like this
D.
If the parent/guardian conscientiously opposes required immunizations:
Not following vaccination recommendations may endanger the health or life of my child and others that
my child might come in contact with.
I hereby certify by notarization that:
I am opposed to all immunizations.
I am opposed to only the vaccines indicated. Vaccine(s) I oppose:
______________________________________________________
This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both. The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination. This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.
Here is a more relevant opt out form to use that avoids the word trap included in the proposed opt out by MDH:
As a parent(s)/guardian(s) of a minor child whose health and well-being is my responsibility, I am opting my child(ren) out of required immunizations which have been shown to adversely affect one in ten children.
It is not within the powers or authority of Minnesota Department of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, nor any other governmental agency to override my authority as parent/guardian especially when the issue at hand represents an obvious and known threat to the ongoing health of my child(ren) for whom I am responsible. The State, its agencies or agents, is not the authority and cannot assume or usurp my authority under a fiction of law, or color of law, especially when intentionally disregarding known scientific evidence indicating that a real and present danger exists from the massive overuse of vaccines.
The risks far out weigh any claimed benefits.
I/we, realize that not following Minnesota Department of Health recommendations for expanding the already massive load of toxins injected under the label of [vaccine], my/our child(ren) could be exposed to vaccine induced diseases and illnesses which arise from mutation of viruses contained in the vaccines and the overriding of the natural immune system incurred in children and adults who have been vaccinated leaving them vulnerable to many other biological disorders and possible subsequent life-time impairments that result from so-called vaccines. Vaccine induced illness and mutations of viruses is now commonplace.
The viral shedding that occurs for twenty-one (21) days after being infected with a vaccine by anyone who has voluntarily submitted to these injections, is a direct threat to the health of my/our, child(ren) and to myself/us and to the community at large.
The heavy metal overload, including high levels of mercury and/or its derivative thimerisol, is a recognized danger to the overall physical health of my child(ren).
The crossing of the blood-brain barrier as a result of the activity of the toxic chemicals in the vaccines represents a life-time risk for subsequent diseases, illnesses, impairments and even death; one in ten children now suffering from autism or comparable dysfunctions as a result of vaccines.
Current and future vaccination recommendations may endanger the health or life of my child and others that my child might come in contact with.
Because of the known and well documented risks of vaccines and the epidemic growth of autism that has resulted and, the emergence of vaccine induced diseases, and, the mutation of viruses in the vaccines producing new forms of the original, the privileged protection provided to manufacturers specifically due to the damages and death caused by vaccines which are well-known to the officials of Minnesota Department of Health, I choose to protect my child(ren) from these known threats by avoiding these vaccines:
Signed_______________ notarized____________
__________________________________________________________________________
Vaccines work by overriding and shutting down the natural immune system, the very thing we need to keep us healthy. Vaccines also cross the blood-brain barrier and attack the brain causing swelling and pain. Once this happens, the damage is done and unrelenting.
Viral shedding
After receiving a vaccination, you or your child sheds the virus(s) you were injected with. Weakened or mutated viruses are now expelled for twenty-one days into the surrounding environment.
This means every time you breathe in and out, walk through a room shedding dead skin cells, cough or sneeze you are expelling the virus you were infected with contained in the vaccine.
The ongoing mantra from vaccine proponents at the MDH and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is that because vaccines have been so successful the current generation has never witnessed the debilitating diseases that vaccines supposedly eradicated or prevented.
What we have witnessed is the growing number of children with life-time debilitating impairment, brain damage and the subsequent epidemic of autism, and even death that has resulted from vaccines. These numbers of vaccine injured children surpass by far those cited by proponents regarding unvaccinated childhood diseases.
Has the Minnesota Department of Health lost its collective mind? Or did they just sell it off to big pharma?
________________________________________________________________________
Resources:
http://vaccinedangers.org/the-myths-of-vaccine-safety-and-efficacy
**A Global Research article dated August 28, 2009,
Early and current Fears About Vaccine Dangers lists the ingredients found in most flu shots:
Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic. By age two, most US children have received around 237 micrograms of mercury through vaccines alone. Excerpted:
“Vaccines contain the following toxic and others substances:
– thimerosal (mercury);
– aluminum hydroxide and phosphate;
–ammonium sulfate;
– amphotericin B,
– animal tissues and fluids, including horse blood, rabbit brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg, pig blood, and porcine (pig) protein/tissue;
– calf serum and fetal bovine serum;
– betapropiolactone;
– macerated cancer cells;
– formaldehyde;
– formalin;
– synthetic phenol;
– gelatin and hydrolyzed gelatin;
– glycerol;
– human diploid cells (from aborted human fetal tissue);
– MSG;
– the anti-biotics neomycin and neomycin sulfate;
– phenol red indicator disinfectant dye;
– phenoxyethanol (antifreeze);
– potassium monophosphate;
– polymyxin B;
– polysorbate 20 and 80;
– residual MRC5 proteins;
– sorbitol;
– sucrose;
– tri(n)butylphosphate;
– VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells linked to the SV-40 virus known to cause leukemia; and
– washed sheep red blood cells.
One or a combinations of theses substances can play havoc with the human immune and neurological systems and cause deadly autoimmune and other diseases.”
https://ppjg.me/2013/07/02/formaldehyde-banned-in-childrens-products-excluding-vaccines/
http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/immunize/immrule/comments/index.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20272035/HB-15090
Vaccine Safety Manual
Early and current Fears About Vaccine Dangers
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14937
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfect
Cancer Linked to polio vaccine
https://ppjg.me/2013/03/13/anthrax-vaccine-children-targeted-for-testing/
https://ppjg.me/2013/05/11/minnesota-mdh-to-add-more-deadly-vaccines-to-childhood-burden/
https://ppjg.me/2008/03/29/vaccines-linked-to-autism/
http://autismactionnetwork.org/
https://ppjg.me/2012/02/29/vaccines-big-pharmas-atm/
http://boydgraves.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-origin-of-hivaids-before-and-after-9.html
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 : The funding of the Bio-terrorism AIDS virus HR 15090
HR 15090
Jul 21, 2013 @ 11:33:26
EXCELLENT article.
LikeLike
Jul 21, 2013 @ 06:54:58
In Fact, according to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/351 21USC351 Today’s vaccines may not be “safe” at all as required by law. Read the package inserts people! For all you skeptics or enemy propagandists who may have mistakenly come across this article such as those at the American Academy of Pediatrics, that want to force your drugs on others. I am not an Anti-Vaxxer at all. You can take all the vaccines you want!
LikeLike
Jul 21, 2013 @ 00:26:49
For those as interested as I to read the fullest account available of the conference — reviewed in some detail by Dr. Blaylock, as Louie C brought to our attention — here’s a link (from the Wikipedia article on the same conference [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Simpsonwood_CDC_conference]), maintained at safeminds.org (which the Wikipedia text [today, at least] identifies as an “anti-vaccination group):
http://www.safeminds.org/government-affairs/foia/Simpsonwood_Transcript.pdf
LikeLike
Jul 20, 2013 @ 18:54:05
This is a portion of the entire report:
http://www.wnho.net/vaccine_coverup.htm
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
I was asked to write a paper on some of the newer mechanisms of vaccine damage to the nervous system, but in the interim I came across an incredible document that should blow the lid off the cover-up being engineered by the pharmaceutical companies in conjunction with powerful governmental agencies.
It all started when a friend of mind sent me a copy of a letter from Congressman David Weldon, M.D. to the director of the CDC, Dr Julie L. Gerberding, in which he alludes to a study by a Doctor Thomas Verstraeten, then representing the CDC, on the connection between infant exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental injury. In this shocking letter Congressman Weldon referrers to Dr. Verstraeten’s study which looked at the data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink and found a significant correlation between thimerosal exposure via vaccines and several neurodevelopmental disorders including tics, speech and language delays, and possibly to ADD.
Congressman Weldon questions the CDC director as to why, following this meeting, Dr. Verstraeten published his results, almost four years later, in the journal Pediatrics to show just the opposite, that is, that there was no correlation to any neurodevelopmental problems related to thimerosal exposure in infants. In this letter, Congressman Weldon refers to a report of the minutes of this meeting held in Georgia, which exposes some incredible statements by the “experts” making up this study group. The group’s purpose was to evaluate and discuss Dr. Verstraeten’s results and data and make recommendation that would eventually lead to possible alterations in the existing vaccine policy.
I contacted Congressman Weldon’s legislative assistant and he kindly sent me a complete copy of this report. Now, as usual in these cases, the government did not give up this report willingly, it required a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to pry it loose. Having read the report twice and having carefully analyzed it; I can see why they did not want any outsiders to see it. It is a bombshell, as you shall see. In this analysis, I will not only describe and discuss this report, but also will frequently quote their words directly and supply the exact page number so others can see for themselves.
The official title of the meeting was the “Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information.” This conference, held on June 7-8, 2000 at Simpsonwood Retreat Center, Norcross, Georgia, assembled 51 scientists and physicians of which five represented vaccine manufacturers. These included Smith Kline Beecham, Merck, Wyeth, North American Vaccine and Aventis Pasteur.
LikeLike