Home

Bureau of Land Management Ignores the Laws of United States AND Nature

37 Comments

strip banner
new-logo25Guest OpEd by Grandma Gregg

Straight from the Horses Heart

GRAPHIC: Rain Horse courtesy of Lydia Rose

__________________________________________________________

“BLM also considers themselves as being “above” Mother Nature too…”

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) publicly published the statement that they are above the law and rain_horse_by_lydia888the 1971 Congressional Wild Horse and Burro protection LAW DOES NOT PERTAIN TO THEM! BLM stated: “The … [Congressional] Act … is not pertinent to the overall management of the wild horse and burro populations by the BLM and USFS. In general, it protects the wild horses and burros from such actions by the general populous.”

Well … apparently the BLM also considers themselves as being “above” Mother Nature too because they insist wild horses must be removed from their legally designated land (our public land) because of current widespread “drought” and BLM has been pushing this same drought agenda for at least three years. Basically these “emergency” roundups are just a front/excuse to round up as many wild horses and burros as they want, when they want and behind the public’s back with no accountability by using bait/water trapping. Read this trapping article:

In order for anything to be considered normal or average there must be ups and downs. In 2011 the precipitation in Elko (mid-Nevada) was 125% of normal, 2012 was 63% of normal and as of April 2013 Elko had 78% of normal precipitation and since then [May] it has had another almost half-inch of rain and today’s forecast states, “BRIEF HEAVY RAIN” and “MODERATE TO LOCALLY HEAVY RAIN IS CURRENTLY FALLING” and “RAINFALL RATES OF ONE-QUARTER TO ONE-HALF INCH PER HOUR IS POSSIBLE IN THIS [storm] BAND”. More

The Absolute Right to a Trial by Jury

2 Comments

strip banner

  new-logo25 Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mr. Don Bird below is pressing the point with his California State Legislator, with whom he has gained an open door of opportunity.

You see, back in 1969 a plot was engineered by the California Legislators that if they could dispose of the right to a jury in criminal cases, they could expedite cases much faster without the involvement of juries. To pull off this plot against the People of California, they had to “invent” a whole new class of jury less crimes33049_1thm heretofore unrecognized in the Constitution called “Infractions.”

While Don Bird wishes to keep his challenge limited to the State of California Constitution, I am not so limited in my lead-in statements. The fact is, in our U.S. Constitution it is clearly written:

“The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury.” Article III, Section 2, Clause 3.

The two controlling words herein are “except,” and “shall.” There is but only one criminal jury trial exception, and that is in matters of impeachment, otherwise there “shall” be a jury trial.

And, yes, the California State Constitution, as well as all states, recognizes that its Constitution and laws are subjective to the U.S. Constitution,

“The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Article III, Section I.

Here, I would like to relate to a humorous actual incident of a criminal trial in which I was called upon to appear in court and to answer to the criminal charge involved therein. Pursuant to Article I, Section 16, “Trial by jury is an inviolate right and shall be secured to all,” More

The Ruthie Report: Texas Border Volunteers

1 Comment

banner logo

Please join Ruthie this Week May 30, 2013 at 8:00 pm CST!
big ruthie
6:00 pm PST … 7:00 pm MST … 8:00 pm CST … 9:00 pm EST
Listen Live HERE!
CAllin # 917-388-4520
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Special Guest : Charles of the Texas Border Volunteers
8 pm Lead Stories…8:30 pm Criminally and or Insane…9 pm Guest
Want to know what is really happening on the border?
Want to know what the real numbers are of those crossing illegally
Want to hear the TRUTH not … DHS “Pit Bull” Napolitano’s  version
Join Ruthie with her guest Charles and find out !!!!!
Personal Note: Thank You to the Texas Border Volunteers for all they do!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Minnesotans Seeking Immigration Reform               

Wildlands MAP for California

5 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25 Heather Gass

_______________________________________________________________

The One Bay Area PCAs are tied to this report! This just came out a little over a week ago. This is the information the ABAG/MTC folks were using in their presentation of PCAs the other day.  Several of their maps came from this site.

The SCWildlands organization is responsible for creating the Wildlands MAP for California. This latest pdf is 612 pages and is shows the wildlands corridors for the Bay Area and the missing linkages. This identifies all the private land they will be targeting for taking in the future!

Land owners had better beware! More

Professional Probate: 3 Billion annually in stolen estates

9 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley  ©copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

____________________________________________________________________

“In every state are statutes regarding the treatment of the elderly, and especially those who are unfortunate enough to be rendered a ward of the state.  And, in every state, city, county, these statutes are ignored, violated and dismissed by the so-called [probate judge] in order to allow the predator unfettered access to all assets and for absolute control of the victim.”

                                              ________________________________________

Professional Probate: 3 Billion annually in stolen estates

While it is imperative for the organized criminal rings operating under cover of probate courts to convince the public that it is only squabbling family members who abuse, neglect, financially exploit and mentally torture the elderly, the fact is, 95% of these cases are committed by professional fiduciary’s; strangers to the family and the victim.  Commonly referred to as predatory guardians, these individuals have amassed massive fortunes at the expense of the elderly who committed the new age crime of “aging E006039with assets”. 

The PEW Research Center Reports:

According to a report recently issued by the Pew Research Center, on average Americans over the age of 65 have 47 times as much wealth as Americans under the age of 35.

And every one of them have been targeted by professional predators just waiting in the wings to relieve them of their life’s financial accruals.

“This system of theft will continue until the entire estate has been stolen leaving the victim penniless. At this point, Medicare and Medicaid are used as the cash cow to cover medical expenses and the inflated charges of nursing, the doctors’ visits and vast amounts of medications are charged off to these services costing these services millions each year in padded billing. ”

State statutes prohibit isolation

In every state are statutes regarding the treatment of the elderly, and especially those who are unfortunate enough to be rendered a ward of the state.  And, in every state, city, county, these statutes are ignored, violated and dismissed by the so-called [probate judge] in order to allow the predator unfettered access to all assets and for absolute control of the victim.  This is in effect, a civil death.  It is also grand larceny sanctioned by the court with the judge fully anticipating profiting from the activity. More

California: UN Agenda 21 at work

2 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25 By Heather Gass

_________________________________________________________

The One Bay Area PCA meeting was filmed. If you have been in the fight against regionalism you should watch this video. The Williamson Act is being phased out so that conservation easements and multi-level unaccountable bureaucracies can take over land rights.

Watch a small group of citizens ask the tough questions!

The One Bay Area plan has two components;

  1. PDAs (Priority Development Areas) and,
  2. PCAs (Priority Conservation Areas).

The PDAs are the areas within the existing Urban Growth Boundaries where they will be building Stack and Pack housing. All other areas will be targeted for conservation!

Priority Conservation Area (PCA) Meeting, Oakland, Ca, 5/23/2013

The PCAs are the first areas that will be targeted. This meeting was filled with stakeholders, public agencies planners, land trusts, etc. All waiting to make deals.

MTC will be working with the SCC (State Coastal Conservancy) to dole out $10 million of our Tax Payer Transportation funds to UN-elected, UN-accountable groups (like Greenbelt Alliance, Sierra Club) etc. These agencies will then go target private property owners into signing conservation easements. The easement holders will be in control of the land. Not the land owner.

The beneficiary of the carbon credit windfall will be the easement holder (land trusts). These easements will have completely different management plans depending on who holds the easement. The end goal is to form the California Essential Habitat Corridor System, which will create a wildlife corridor system throughout California.

CalTrans and DOT are the fed and state agencies that are also involved. The ONLY way MTC is getting away with spending transportation funds on conservation instead of highways is because they are going to find “Conservation” projects that need some type of transportation related infrastructure and then they can divert funds to these projects.

This is NOTHING about conservation. This is about diverting funds from roads to pet projects with special interest groups

NY SAFE ACT: WHADDYA GONNA DO WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU?

3 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25By John W. Wallace – NY OathKeeper

Please send your ideas and suggestions for the “Plan A” to me by email:    john@NewYorkOathKeeper.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Every time I think about the Hitler-like, socialist, unconstitutional New York Safe Act that was passed in the middle of the night by the New York City dominated New York State Legislature and signed by a Governor who would be president, I think of the TV show “Cops” in which the theme song says: “Whaddya gonna do when they come for you – Bad Boys, Bad Boys” etc. etc.

We know that the state of New York arbitrarily came up with its own definitions of what so called “AssaultBE-A-qCCYAAzKlH Weapons” are. The definitions were obviously concocted out of thin air by a group of New York City “Girly Man” legislators who obviously know nothing about guns.

One of the things they identified that makes certain rifles “assault weapons” is if they have a loop on it for a bayonet. Never mind the fact that as far as I can determine, no person in New York State has been murdered or even assaulted by a person using a rifle with a bayonet attached to it in well over a hundred years. It doesn’t matter to these socialists because they will say and do anything to take our guns. That is their ultimate goal.

What is also interesting about this new law that was rushed through the legislature in the middle of the night is that there is a requirement that there can only be a maximum of seven bullets in a magazine. How did they come up with this magic number of seven? Unfortunately, the hastily passed legislation did not even exclude police officers. So, the criminals will have any number of bullets in their illegal guns, because they do not obey gun laws anyway, and the police officers and law-abiding citizens will be limited to seven. Never mind that seven bullet magazines are not even made in the USA.

The NY SAFE ACT makes certain rifles legally purchased in the past by American citizens, who happen to reside in New York State, illegal to purchase or sell to another state resident. This is clearly unconstitutional. Why has the New York State legislature concentrated their efforts on turning law-abiding American citizens into criminals using ex-post facto laws? The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that if a person doesn’t have a criminal background, laws that make something you own illegal when it was purchased legally, are unconstitutional. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: