Home

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SCREWS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGAIN!

January 24, 2011

ppjg corruption, Government , , , , , , , , , , 5 Comments

John Wallace (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved 

________________________________________________________

“The Federal Reserve’s recent actions in flooding the world with new dollars and most recently using accounting trickery to make the American taxpayers responsible for any bad investments they make, is surely cause for immediate action by our new congress.”

________________________________________________ 

On January 6th, the international Banksters at the private Federal Reserve screwed the American people again and not too many people noticed. It seems that the Banksters became concerned that the Fed might suffer some monetary losses if the value of their massive amount of bond holdings were to decrease. So what did they decide to do? More

Propaganda or Not?

January 24, 2011

Lynn Swearingen Uncategorized , , Leave a comment

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

___________________________________________________________

This is a “Nice” Newsweek Article with telling graphic and this quote among from the eminent recruiter who is – uh – retired due to “loose lips sinking some ships” in bar talk with a Rolling Stone reporter:

“Responsibility is most easily accepted when the need is clear and expectations are defined by tradition.”

Back to “buck up folks” the Propaganda Machine is in full form! Remember these? More

HOW A FRAUDULENT GUARDIANSHIP COMMENCES AND CONTINUES

January 24, 2011

ppjg Guardianship Abuse , , , , , , , 94 Comments

Guest Author: Angela V. Woodhull,Ph.D.

© 2010-2011, Angela V. Woodhull, Ph.D.  All rights reserved.*

________________________________________________________

“A large part of the victim’s money is spent on attorney’s fees and guardian’s fees.  As long as there is ample money in the victim’s guardianship account, the guardian and her attorney cohorts will file motion upon motion after motion to the courts,”

___________________________________________________________

STEP ONE—“EMINENT DANGER”—THE INITIAL COURT       PETITION

The professional guardian, with the assistance of her attorneys, commences the embezzlement process by filing an emergency petition in the probate courts to become the “emergency” “temporary” guardian

Florida guardianship statutes, like many states, (Chapter 744) require that there be an “eminent danger” in order for the petitioner to become the “emergency temporary guardian.”

The guardian oftentimes fabricates the “eminent danger” by , stating that there is a neighbor or relative or stranger who is taking advantage of the elderly person.  In some cases, this may be a somewhat true statement, albeit an exaggerated claim.  In most cases, upon further investigation, there has been no “eminent danger” whatsoever.

Step One takes away all of the victim’s civil rights and therefore gives the guardian and her attorneys full control over the victim and his or her assets.

STEP TWO—THE EXAMINING COMMITTEE   More

Predatory Guardians: How Courts are Allowing Professional Guardians to Rob Your Assets

January 24, 2011

ppjg Guardianship Abuse , , , , , , 29 Comments

Guest Author: Angela V. Woodhull, Ph.D.,

licensed private investigator and author of Police Communication in Traffic Stops and Private Investigation Strategies and Techniques

_______________________

“Law enforcement agents, social workers, and judges have all been trained to maintain a watchful eye over exploitative family members.  Yet no one seems to be guarding the guardians.   Family members have complained to local law enforcement, the state attorneys’ office, and even the F.B.I. “

___________________________

Marie Long was worth $1.3 million when she suffered a stroke and came under the “protection” of a professional guardian.  Three short years later, she is penniless and subsisting off of a meager social security pension and Medicaid.

  • Louise A. Falvo, 91, had accumulated nearly one million dollars when she was placed under a guardianship that was commenced with a forgery of her daughter’s signature by a probate attorney.   Within three months, Louise A. Falvo was dead.  Two and a half years later, the guardianship remains open.  The guardian and her attorneys have, to date, been awarded by the judge more than $350,000.00 of Falvo’s estate—“to benefit the ‘ward’”—who is deceased.
  •  Corretta Brown was placed under guardianship when the Department of Children and Families discovered that her home was uninhabitable.  Today, Brown is deceased, her assets have disappeared (more than $100,000.00), and all of her debts—totaling more than $75,000.00 in nursing home costs, remain unpaid.  The professional guardian, it was discovered, was not  licensed and has since fled the state of Florida with Brown’s assets.
  • Marie Sandusky signed a power of attorney to guarantee that her beloved daughter, and not her rejected son, would manage her financial affairs and health care directives.  Today, Sandusky has a court-appointed guardian who has spent more than $300,000.00 of Sandusky’s money in attorney’s fees.  The reason?  Sandusky’s rebuked son hired an attorney and together they made false allegations against Sandusky’s beloved daughter.  As the “wheels of justice” move forward, Sandusky’s money is legally used to fund the frivolous feud.
  • Debra Duffield, 58, has been under the control of a professional guardian for the last four years.  She was only 54 years old when an involuntary guardianship was petitioned against her by a professional guardian who gleefully discovered (tipped off by a social worker) Duffield’s substantive worth when Duffield was hospitalized for anorexia and a broken hip.   During the last four years, the vast majority of her assets have been converted to attorney and guardian fees.  Duffield, who was diagnosed as merely bipolar, had allegedly been financially exploited by a friend—hence, the rationale for the guardianship.  She is confined to a nursing home without rehabilitation .   She sits in a bed, smelling of urine and fecal matter, watching television.  The guardian and her attorney regularly and steadfastly  bill her account for merely “reading her file” or checking on the latest whereabouts of her former girlfriend.  Soon, Duffield, who once owned a fabulous house complete with expensive antiques, valuable imported rugs and fine paintings, will be penniless.

When you hear the word “professional guardian,” what do you think?   Do you think of someone who protects the elderly?  Assists them with their daily needs?  Guarantees they are protected from financial exploitation and physical neglect?

Think again.  More

%d bloggers like this: