Home

Unsafe blood donations contain vCJD: UK – A lot of Bull over BSE

1 Comment

Live Link: Meat Trade Daily

13 May 2010

 
news.suite101.com
“The organiser, Christine Lord, lost her only son Andy Black, to vCJD when he was only 24. He didn’t eat beef or have a blood transfusion so she thinks his vCJD occured from eating school meals with mechanically recovered meat in them or through the vaccinations he had as a child. Interestingly, all of his vaccine records from the age of five, disappeared, as did the records of many other victims.”
The government has recorded 168 deaths due to variant CJD – caught from infected bovine material – but this figure is contested as being inaccurate because many of the families who have lost a loved one to this devastating brain disease say that they were never recorded in the official statistics. More

Animal Factory: What are you really eating?

Leave a comment

The book Animal Factory, by David Kirby, takes a close look at factory farms and the problems they cause. In an interview with Time Magazine, Kirby talked about these farms and the appalling lack of government oversight and the outright refusal of government to address these issues.

Among the problems Kirby notes:

“… you’re often no longer feeding animals what they’re genetically designed to eat. CAFO cows eat a diet of milled grains, corn and soybeans, when they are supposed to eat grass.

The food isn’t natural because they very often put growth hormones and antibiotics in it. That becomes a problem when you put that manure on the ground.”

Can you say “agrobacterium”? 

Animal Factory also looks at the fate of the Neuse River in North Carolina, where waste runoff from pig farms caused massive fish die-offs.

Civil servants are personally liable for their actions: “I was just following orders” is no excuse

6 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

____________________ 

He violates the statute not merely because he has a bad purpose but because he acts in defiance of announced rules of law. He who defies a decision interpreting the Constitution knows precisely what he is doing. If sane, he hardly may be heard to say that he knew not what he did. Of course, willful conduct cannot make definite that which is undefined. Willful violators of constitutional requirements, which have been defined, certainly are in no position to say that they had no adequate advance notice that they would be visited with punishment. When they act willfully in the sense in which we use the word, they act in open defiance or in reckless disregard of a constitutional requirement which has been made specific and definiteScrews v. United States , 325 U.S. 91 

______________________________________

 

The typical constitutional tort action involves an individual who has been injured by the action or inaction of a government official. The individual plaintiff will argue that the government should be liable for the injury because its conduct violates some constitutional provision. There is also tortious interference as a remedy.

 

The situation in Wisconsin today is rife with mountains of evidence of the acts of state personnel knowingly violating not only state but federally protected rights to property and commerce.  These actions have caused a loss of trade, ended family businesses, harassed and terrorized families and individuals and have been perpetrated under fictions of law and the color of law by individuals who believe they can violate anyone’s rights as long as they claim they work for the state and that they can do so with immunity for their actions.  We believe otherwise. 

 

The evidence of tortious interference ending or restricting the Constitutional right to trade freely with the intent to benefit:

 

  • Including trespass to land and,
  • To engage in a lawful business free of government interference,
  • By erecting administrative codes and statutes, meant to disrupt or end your right to engage in business and trade, and creating,
  • Autonomous corporate agencies empowered to unlawfully create laws injurious to the sovereign citizens to benefit corporate contractors and donors,
  • To construct barriers to the rights to engage in a lawful business and the use of agency personnel to harass, terrorize and prosecute private individuals to force compliance to statutes, codes and regulations intended to erect barriers to trade and the free flow of commerce by anyone other than approved corporate special interests.  
  • Violating the 4th Amendment against warrantless searches or seizures,
  • Ending the right to due process and judicial review
  • Claiming they need no proof or evidence of wrongdoing or disease; only a belief

Incorporated state agencies, and that includes every agency you can think of, More

“The shaming of one Canadian has shamed all Canadians.”

2 Comments

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

By Paul Koring
Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Station, Cuba

KHADR ROUTINELY TRUSSED UP IN CAGE

 ~ Liberal MP Paul Szabo, apologizing in the House of Commons for the RCMP’s treatment of lobbyist and arms dealer Karlheinz Schreiber. (Schreiber’s pants had fallen down while RCMP officers led him, in handcuffs, to a waiting cruiser after his testimony before the Commons Ethics Committee.)

“Deciding whether or not to murder Quadr.

“We could do basically anything to scare the prisoners,” Mr. Corsetti said, adding that detainees were often chained in stress positions in cages and that constant screaming and yelling filled the Bagram prison. He also said beating prisoners was banned but they could be threatened with nightmarish scenarios like clandestine transfer to Israel or Egypt where they would disappear.”

______________________________________ 

You’re 15 years old, in the company of hardened militants who are associates of your father. A foreign army has invaded the country and unleashed a massive bombing campaign. Soldiers come knocking one morning and demand entry. The men around you refuse and a firefight ensues, culminating in the occupying air force bombarding the compound you’re in, killing everyone but you and one other person. What happens next is disputed. As the soldiers enter the bombed-out compound a grenade is thrown and explodes near one of them. He later dies of his wounds. Based on witness reports, the thrower could have been one of three people: you, the man lying beside you, or a U.S. soldier outside the compound wall. More

Another pro-Monsanto Supreme Court justice?

2 Comments

 

Barry Estabrook highlights the fact that Kagan filed suit on behalf of MONSANTO in an attempt to overturn the ban on GE alfalfa.  So now we not only would have Clarence Thomas, former Monsanto attorney with a penchant for pornography, we would also have another Monsanto flunkie sitting on the Supreme Court. Not to mention Michael Taylor, the new food “czar” in the White House,   Marti
______________________________________________
Barry Estabrook |  The Atlantic Monthly |  05.12.2010

It’s a good thing for Elena Kagan that there’s no non-GMO litmus test for Supreme Court nominees. She’d flunk. More

PUBLIC SERVANT’S QUESTIONNAIRE

Leave a comment

Before giving out ANY information, or attaching your signature to anything, make sure the agents at your door, on your land, in your barn, first fill this questionaire out.  You have a RIGHT TO KNOW who these people are, who they represent and under what authority or basis in law they claim to elicit information from you, to be used against you.  Although the agent(s) appearing may be employed by your state that employment is the result of the acceptance of federal funding: they are implementing federal business plans and will be supplying any and all information gathered from you to federal agencies routed through their offices. 
This questionaire was compiled by Al Whitney:
Cut and Print this form________________________

PUBLIC SERVANT’S QUESTIONNAIRE

Public Law 93-579 states in part:

“The purpose of this Act is to provide certain safeguards for an individual against invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal agencies…to permit and individual to determine what records pertaining to him are collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by such agencies.”

The following questions are based upon that act and are necessary in order that this individual may make a reasonable determination concerning divulgence of information to this agency.

Fill out the form completely. If any question does not apply, mark the answer with .N/A. or .Not applicable.. Do not leave any question blank.

Public Servant Information More

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: