National ID: Who Will Resist?

Leave a comment

National ID: Who Will Resist?
by Timothy Baldwin, Esq.

“By resisting, I mean the state representatives passing laws, the governor entering orders and the courts rendering judgments, preventing the federal government from attempting to tax their people for that federal power and from implementing their procedures upon the people of that state. I mean actually and physically resisting the federal government from occupying the state’s territory to execute those unlawful actions.”

U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) introduced a bill which would require all persons in the United States

(“U.S.”) seeking to be employed to obtain a government-issued biometric National Identification card.(FN1) Not so surprisingly, this measure has come in the name of “protecting America” against illegal immigrants working in the U.S. unlawfully. Thus, “[t]o ensure that only people legally in the U.S. can work here, the bill will propose a biometric I.D. for EVERY AMERICAN before anybody can get a job.” (FN2) This is yet another method by which the federal government continually institutes practices and principles contrary to what a Free Confederated Republic should be and contrary to principles of limited government, self-government, natural rights, and true constitutional intent and meaning. Judge Andrew Napolitano rightfully calls this legislation a “monstrosity” and predicts that this bill will not pass. (FN3) Perhaps Judge Napolitano is correct, but we should consider what the people of the U.S. once rejected but now embrace. More

healthcare reform: 16,000 new IRS agents enforce fines and penalties


  • $695 or 2.5% of income – the fine if refuse to purchase health insurance (or refuse to report you do)
  • $2,000 – fine on employers for failure to buy health insurance for employees
  • 16,000 new IRS agents (no new doctors, and likely loss of doctors)
  • 10-13% increase in individual insurance premiums
  • CCHC President TWEETING on the House Debate:
    Go to:

    Call Congress NOW!

    The 2-hour Debate Begins soon.

    Pontification already on display.
    (view on C-SPAN).

    Speaker Pelosi does not yet have all the votes!

    BREAKING: Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) appears to have disappeared. She may not show up to vote. She voted yes on the first House bill under duress. She now needs encouragement to vote NO: 202-225-2965; FAX 202-225-5859

    Below are two separate lists of House members you can call and fax. More



    Live Link:   Outragedpatriots.com

    I don’t care who you are … Democrat, Republican, or Independent … liberal or conservative … blue state or red state … you have to be appalled at the sheer gall of this woman!

    This is QUEEN PELOSI’S NEW JET!!!  More



    Live Link: atgpress.com

    by: A Disgusted Informer

    The article you are about to read with the document, is what I had said in *Going After the Wrong People* on atgpress, that there is no Secretary of the Treasury of the US . This is the actual document abolishing the real US Treasury in 1921.

    This also proves the Secretary was to transfer to the TREASURER many functions of the Treasury.

    The only thing that exists today is A DEPARTMENT of TREASURY, which IS NOT a Treasury. See Black’s Law 5th Ed page 393 for DEPARTMENT and Websters 1828 dictionary says.

    DEPARTMENT (1) Literally: a separation or division; hence a separate part, or portion;

    (2) A separate allotment or part of a business.

    IRS is only a private corporate entity as listed on Manta and Dun & Bradstreet as the IRS. If you want to write to the Treasury that no longer exists, as you think it should be, try writing to the Federal Reserve as it is now the fiscal agent of the United States A.K.A. Congress when assembled.

    Fits right in with the government being a private corporation and the Department is not a treasury any longer just called a department of treasury when there is no treasury. More


    Leave a comment

    Todays article was received from Rebekah Sutherland

    Distinction between enemies who are subjects of a foreign government, and are therefore called” alien enemies,” and those who are denizens and subjects of the United States, and being engaged in civil war, are called” public enemies. ”

    An alien owes no allegiance or obedience to our government, or to our constitution, laws, or proclamations. . A citizen subject is bound to obey them all. In refusing such obedience, he is guilty of crime against his country, and finds in the law of nations no justification for disobedience. An alien, being under no such obligation, is justified in refusing such obedience. Over an alien enemy, our government can make no constitution law, or proclamation of obligatory force, because our laws bind only our own subjects, and have no extra-territorial jurisdiction. More



    By: John Wallace 
    Liberty News:  If the “Gang of Three” (Obama, Pelosi and Reid) get their way and the unconstitutional Health Care bill is somehow rammed through the congress and signed by the imposter President, against the will of the majority of the American people, full Amnesty for the illegal aliens will be next.
    If the communist style nationalization of the American Health Care system is completed, the Democratic-Communist Party will next try to steamroller the legislative approval of the remaining parts of their American Communist Manifesto before the elections in November of 2010.
    Amnesty will be first, followed by Cap and Trade and then they will come after our guns.
    President Obama has already approved a tentative plan drawn up by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) that will allow illegal aliens to be put on a path to citizenship, offer green cards to keep high-skilled foreign university graduates in this country and create a temporary program for low-skilled workers, with some of these workers also getting the chance to become citizens. How does this help the American worker? More

    S510 will include the assault on dietary supplements


    by: Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


    The McCain/Dorgan Dietary Supplement Safety Act, another of those misnamed pieces of legislation; this one intended to begin the down hill slide into Codex Alimentarius.  Of course it was promoted as a consumer protection bill when in fact it is a direct attempt to gut the DSHEA (Dietary Supplement Health Education Act) passed in1994.  DSHEA passed unanimously and protected the right of American consumer’s access to high quality, high potency supplements.  This act also kept the dietary supplements industry out of big pharma’s hands as they are not medicinal, but rather, nutritional.  Supplements are a food form, not a pharmaceutical medicine.

    The thrust of the McCain/Dorgan bill was to move supplements into the pharmacy category and out of the food category.  As supplements contain no pharmaceuticals and occur naturally in nature big pharma can’t run the usual “theft and patent” scam claiming they created it or created some new version of it.  Because supplements are nutritional rather than medicinal this change in how supplements are treated would have ended the right to choose if and what supplements we could buy and the level of potency. More

    %d bloggers like this: