Home

The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty .Loss of Liberty …

Leave a comment

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/18.html

Getting away with murder

Would the US allow its citizens to be attacked and killed by a foreign power and then cover up the facts?It would – and it has.

On June 8th, 1967, the Israeli military attacked and attempted to sink the USS Liberty as she sailed under a US flag in international waters. Thirty-four US servicemen were killed and 171 injured by a well-coordinated, multi-wave assault which included the use of napalm.

The Israeli military called the attack a “tragic mistake” and then-President Lyndon Johnson agreed it was nothing more. Sailors who were aboard the ship were warned not to disclose the facts of what happened that day under penalty of court martial – or worse.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/18.html

More history that’s been all but erased from public consciousness

 

 

Israel has one of the most successful economies, yet the US gives it $6 billion in foriegn aid each year as American’s lose their homes, their jobs and our economy founders on the brink of disaster.  Why?

The Constitution Forum….http://www.constitutionforum.us/

Leave a comment

Here’s another extraordinary find.  We will be linking our blogroll to this site also.  This is an informative and well written information site that includes the writers lawsuit against the federal government over the GATT agreement. 

http://www.constitutionforum.us/

Look for articles from this writer/publisher in the near future.  Alan Adaschik

Let us know what you think!

Marti

The Hipaadiva! Check out this site!

Leave a comment

All those question”s you have about patient rights, what’s being done with your personal information, what you should know and who might have that information can be addressed on this site we just found at www.hipaadiva.wordpress.com 
Check it out! 
hipaadiva.wordpress.com

They Know What’s in Your Medicine Cabinet…. by Chad Terhune

Leave a comment

Special Report July 23, 2008, by Chad Terhune

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_31/b4094000643943.htm

Excerpted from the full article:

“Most consumers and even many insurance agents are unaware that Humana, UnitedHealth Group , Aetna (AET), Blue Cross plans, and other insurance giants have ready access to applicants’ prescription histories. These online reports, available in seconds from a pair of little-known intermediary companies at a cost of only about $15 per search, typically include voluminous information going back five years on dosage, refills, and possible medical conditions. The reports also provide a numerical score predicting what a person may cost an insurer in the future.

An investigation last year by the Federal Trade Commission found that the two companies supplying these pharmacy profiles—MedPoint and IntelliScript—violated federal law for years by keeping the system hidden from consumers. But the FTC has merely required disclosure if prescription information causes denial of coverage or some other adverse action; the agency imposed no penalties. MedPoint and IntelliScript say they are now fully complying with the FTC’s order. ”

Read the full article here:

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_31/b4094000643943.htm

The Law of Contracts: Government Agencies Existing as Corporations

3 Comments

The Law of Contracts: Government Agencies Existing as Corporations

 

While researching the incorporation of the federal government in 1871 I discovered that not only had the government been made over into a ruling corporation, but through extension so had multiple government agencies.  This came about over the years since the original coup of 1871 and has been incrementally extended to almost all government agencies and departments.

 

What does this mean to you?

 

It means that agencies such as, the Department of Agriculture for example, is a fully accredited corporation operating independent of the federal government with few exceptions.  Although the creation of this corporation came with certain caveats that allowed the fed to minimally instruct or legislate its activity, the DoA is no different than any other privately held corporation and subject to nothing except the law of contracts, administered by administrative “judges” who pin their decisions not on the common law of the United States, but rather, on the system of codes and statutes known as the Uniform Commercial Code.  The UCC is simply the US version of British Maritime Law.

 

This means that when dealing with this corporation (or any of the other hundreds of sub-corporations owned by THE UNITED STATES), especially in litigation, any correspondence from them will have your name fully capitalized as notice to you that you are a corporate trust with no human implication, and therefore not subject to common law.  Your interaction with this agency will be subject to the Uniform Commercial Code, and you have no right to use the constitution to defend yourself. 

 

So who owns the Department of Agriculture and other government agencies/corporations?

 

The DoA like many other corporately held agencies is owned by the parent corporation:

THE UNITED STATES (a corporation) a.k.a. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  Because it is incorporated, THE UNITED STATES is governed by the law of contracts and not the constitution of the United States (the common law applied to citizens of the collective and formerly sovereign states before 1871)

 

This simple piece of knowledge explains why “agreements” (not treaties) are entered into which put the rights of the corporation above those of human beings. CAFTA is an ideal example here.  CAFTA explicitly puts the rights of the corporate interests above those of humanity, and profits, above any human right.  Any law currently on the books or under consideration for passage can be struck down immediately using the “trade illegal” provisions of CAFTA.  Any law which in the eyes of the corporate interest precludes them from making all the profits they believe they are entitled to, is deemed “trade illegal” and can be legally challenged, again using the UCC.

 

As a corporation, THE UNITED STATES has no obligation to abide by the constitutional provisions and requirements necessary to pass a treaty under the constitution or subject to common laws provided in it.  These provisions, if adhered to, make treaties the supreme law of the land.  This means that each and every state, after having thoroughly vetted and voted on the passage of the treaty is required to abide by its requirements.  No exceptions.  A corporate agreement is not subject to any of these provisions as it is ruled by administrative code and statute and not by common law. 

 

Because the trade agreements are not legal treaties, compliance cannot be forced upon the states….but none of your representatives or senators will tell you that.

 

“Agreements” are simply corporate agreements between the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, and other corporate entities from other nations, all of them operating as governmental authorities.  

 

In the last few years, court decisions rendered in courtrooms in which administrative law is being administered, (meaning statutes and codes, and not the common law) decisions such as the one by “Judge” Barbadoro in New Hampshire.  In April of 2007 he handed down a decision that said,  “corporations, as legal persons, have “free speech rights” that would be infringed”. 

 

From http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org   ……..

 

 “But corporate lawyers (acting as both attorneys and judges) subverted our Bill of Rights in the late 1800’s by establishing the doctrine of “corporate personhood” — the claim that corporations were intended to fully enjoy the legal status and protections created for human beings.” (1) (end excerpt)

 

In the case of Guantanamo detainees, one judge declared that while some corporations have human rights, some humans do not. 

 

It is important to understand the creation of corporate personhood in the context of our government and its corporate agencies.  The judge in the above case referring to detainee’s was obviously referring to the corporate personhood of THE UNITED STATES as superior to the human rights of the detainee.  This kind of judicial and preferential treatment with regards to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES is helping to establish the precedence which will be used in subsequent legal battles where the rights of the individual are cast aside in favor of the corporation.

 

These are some of the government agencies which have been recreated as corporations:

·   Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation                     Reconstruction Finance Corp.     

Add to this list the FDA, USDA, HHS, HSD, DoA, DoD, and every other government agency. Each and every one of them including the corporate federal government (THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) is listed on Dunn & Bradstreet and is issued a DUNS credit report.  Each and every one is a for-profit corporation.                     

 

Also included in the corporate recreation of our government is the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage.(2)

Before we can ever hope to clean up the corruption of our government, we first have to eliminate the incorporation of the government that took place in 1871.  Everything that has transpired since that year is a direct result of the corporate coup that overthrew the legitimate legal government of the United States. 

Once you understand that what you are fighting is not the government, but rather a, corporation acting as government, things begin to fall into place.   Understanding  that what you are dealing with is a collection of governmental corporations, the aberrations in our legal system, the trashing of our constitution and the loss of our civil rights all begins to make sense. 

©2008 Marti Oakley

(1)

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/personhood/guantanamo_human_persons.php

 

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Governmentowned_companies_in_the_United_States

%d bloggers like this: