Home

National Survey Reveals Strong Opposition To North American Union

Leave a comment

APC News Release

For Immediate Release

Contact: Tom DeWeese, President
American Policy Center
70 Main Street, Suite 23
Warrenton, VA 20186
(540) 341-8911

National Survey Reveals Strong Opposition To North American Union

While President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada continue to deny that the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is the beginning of a North American Union, Americans around the nation are expressing their growing opposition to the scheme.

The American Policy Center, (APC) a grassroots activist organization located in suburban Washington, DC has just concluded a survey of one million American households. The survey, titled Do Americans Support a North American Union asked a series of questions concerning the SPP and the Trans Texas Corridor (TTC). The survey package also included a four-page report prepared by APC entitled NAU Fact Sheet”, providing details about the SPP, the TTC and how these programs are being implemented quietly, behind closed door meetings like the one just completed in New Orleans.

It is important to note that APC did not select households that might represent specific ideological positions. The chosen households represented neither conservative nor liberal positions. Instead the recipients were a wide verity of Americans who live in the direct path of the proposed Trans Texas/NAFTA Corridor, from Texas to Minnesota.

The questions on the survey were:

1. Have you heard of the Security and Prosperity Partnership?

58% of those responding said they had NOT heard of the SPP.

2. Do you think private corporations should have the power to enforce trade policy that may adversely affect our national sovereignty and independence?

This question relates directly to the establishment of Public/Private Partnerships between private corporations and government which grant no-compete clauses and Comprehensive Development Agreements (CDA) which provide guarantees by government to the corporations on investment returns. As such, projects like the TTC are not free enterprise but rather government-sanctioned monopolies. As APC explained this process in the survey, fully 95% of the recipients OPPOSED such policy.

3. Chapter 11 of the NAFTA Agreement states that, disputes over NAFTA-related issues will be heard in NAFTA courts superseding U.S. local, state and federal courts, including the Supreme Court. Question three asked,

Do you think this would be a threat to U.S. Sovereignty?

91% responded YES.

4. The SPP calls for expanding the U.S. security perimeter to include the borders of Canada and Mexico. Question 4 asked,

Do you think it would strengthen U.S. Security to expand our borders to the outer borders of Canada and Mexico?

87% of responders answered NO.

5. Do you think it will strengthen U.S. Border security to allow trucks from Mexico and Canada to travel, free of inspection, up a corridor which has been built and controlled by foreign corporations into the heartland of the United States?

Texas Department of Transportation has already signed a 50 year agreement with a Spanish company named Cintra to build the TTC. In September of 2007 the Bush Administration started a pilot project to allow Mexican trucks to cross the U.S. border without inspections and are free to travel inside the United States. Meanwhile, the Senate passed the 2008 omnibus spending bill that was clearly written and designed to put the breaks on the current pilot program, according to sponsor Senator Bryon Dorgan. Yet, the Bush Administration, under the leadership of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, continues the program, now in violation of federal law.

95% of responders to the APC survey OPPOSED the Mexican truck project.

6. Would you support efforts to replace the U.S. dollar with a common North American currency some call the “Amero?” Though denied by the Bush Administration, there has been much discussion in economic and academic circles about the creation of a North American currency much like the Euro. In October, 2007, during an appearance on the Larry King Show on CNN, former Mexican President Vicente Fox answered in the affirmative when King asked him about the creation of a united currency. In the May/June issue of the Council on Foreign Relations magazine Foreign Affairs, in an article entitled “The End of National Currency” economist Benn Steil said the dollar is a temporary currency.

92% of survey responders said NO, they would not support such a common North American currency.

7. Do you believe there should be public hearings and debate on this policy before it is allowed to move forward?

To date, there has been no congressional legislation, no congressional hearings and no congressional oversight concerning the establishment or operation of the SPP. No federal money has been officially allocated by Congress. No official authority has been provided for the creation of the SPP. Obviously, Americans feel it is wrong to make such significant changes in our national policy without open debate as 95% of survey respondents said YES, there should be debate and discussion.

8. Should the Bush Administration be allowed to move forward with its plans to crate a North American Community without Congressional approval? Again, the American people have shown they understand that it is Congress which decides such policy as they responded with a resounding 97% NO to this question.

9. Do you believe the United States should be harmonized or merged into a union with Mexico and Canada? The words most often used by the Administration concerning the SPP are, harmonize and integrate. The United States is a representative Republic; Mexico is a socialist government; and Canada is part of the British Crown. There are no grounds for harmonization unless drastic changes are made to the US judicial and financial system. 88% of survey responders said NO to harmonization with Mexico and Canada.

10. Finally, responders were asked to provide their own comments and thoughts on the SPP. The word most often used was Treason. Another said, I want no part of the social health care of Canada and I do not want to incorporate Mexico’s turmoil and poverty into our United States.  Many others said, I want secure borders, not easy traffic between the US, Canada and Mexico. Said another, Bush’s actions formulate a horrifying destruction of our proud nation. Stronger language was used by many more responders. Clearly Americans, once they learn about the SPP are strongly opposed.

However, once again this week (April 21-22) in yet another closed door SPP meeting in New Orleans, President Bush and his fellow heads of state from Mexico and Canada continue to deny the SPP is anything more than a dialogue among the three nations.

Yet, said Tom DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, the Texas Department of Transportation signs an agreement with the Spanish company Cintra, containing no-compete clauses and guaranteed returns; as the Kansas City council loans $2.5 million to build the inland truck port called KC Smart Port; as the twenty SPP working groups continue to write policy; as the Mexican trucks roll over our borders; as high level meetings go on the Bush Administration dares to deny that ANYTHING is happening. Why? The responses to APC’s survey show why. When Americans understand the truth, they say NO in resounding numbers. Concluded DeWeese, clearly the American people are overwhelmingly opposed to the harmonization of North America. We just want our country — strong, independent and secure.

Click here to visit the American Policy Center website

 

SEND THIS MESSAGE TO AT LEAST TEN MORE PEOPLE! APC is now offering you a quick and easy way to multiply your efforts and help win more battles! Simply click here to send this APC Action Alert to up to TEN of your friends! Its fast, it’s easy and most of all, it’s extremely effective in KILLING OPPRESSIVE POLICIES!

 

 

Canadian’s Forced to Subsidize Illegal Immigrants

Leave a comment

Sent to PPJ from a Canadian reader:


It is interesting that the federal government provides a single refugee with a monthly allowance of $1,890.00 and each can also get an additional $580.00 in social assistance for a total of $2,470.00.

This compares very well to a single pensioner who after contributing to the growth and development of Canada for 40 to 50 years only receives a monthly maximum of $1,012.00 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement.


Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees!

Let’s send this to all Canadians, so we can all be ticked off and maybe we  can get the refugees cut back to $1,012.00 and the pensioners up to $2,470.00 and enjoy some of the money we were forced to submit to the Government over the last 40 or 50 years.

Please forward to every Canadian to expose what our elected politicians are doing – to the over-taxed Canadian.

 

 

What most Americans don’t realize is that our neighbors to the north are suffering the same assaults on their freedom, the same breakdown of representative government as we are here in the states.

 

Although the mainstream media in both countries has colluded with the governments to black out news that affects us all, the truth somehow leaks out. 

 

Just this week, Harper, Bush and Calderon met in New Orleans to cement more of the Security & Prosperity Partnership that will facilitate the end of each of our sovereign nations;  Nothing less than treason by any account.

 

First they denied there was any such agreement.  Now they meet openly and in defiance of our laws prepare the way for the North American Union.  A clear violation of the Logan Act prohibiting and making it a crime to engage in any discourse on any level by any individual that includes subverting the Constitution or sovereignty of the United States. 

 

Then they denied there was any intent to build a NAFTA super highway, actually three of them from Mexico to Canada, now they openly hail its construction as a step forward…….for the globalist’s maybe.

 

We were all called conspiracy nuts for raising hell about these things and trying to get them exposed.  We were called “crazies”.

 

Well……look whose crazy now! 

Marti Oakley

LONG LIVE OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS!

Leave a comment

President Bush Participates in Joint Press Availability with President Calderon of Mexico and Prime Minister Harper of Canada
Gallier Hall
New Orleans, Louisiana

 

“We talked about trade. Mexico, Canada and the United States made a bold decision in the early 1990s. Our countries decided to reduce our trade barriers through the North American Free Trade Agreement. That was a visionary move by previous leaders, a move that has benefitted all three of our countries — a lot. [Not the USA!] Trade has tripled. [ IN WHICH Direction!?]

 Our economies have grown by more than 50 percent. “ (WHERE?? NOT in the U.S.A.!)

 

“Now is not the time to renegotiate NAFTA or walk away from NAFTA. Now is the time to make it work better for all our people, and now is the time to reduce trade barriers worldwide.”

 

– President’e Bush

 

Source:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080422-5.html

 


Joint Statement by President Bush, President Calderon, Prime Minister Harper  April 22, 2008

“The SPP complements the success of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has helped to triple trade since 1993 among our three countries to a projected $1 trillion in 2008. [Our trade DEFICIT proves that,eh?] 

NAFTA has offered our consumers a greater variety of better and less expensive goods and services, [Where?] 

encouraged our businesses to increase investment throughout North America, [NOT in the USA!] 

and helped to create millions of new jobs [WITH the exception of the USA!] in  all three countries.

NAFTA is key to maintaining North America‘s [GLOBALISTS] competitive edge in an increasingly complex, fast-paced and connected global marketplace.

Source for above: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080422-4.html

Whats in your Gardasil??

3 Comments

After reading numerous reports on the pro’s and con’s of Gardasil I decided I needed to check into this a little more.  I was stunned to find out that Gardasil contains;

Polysorbate 80….which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Sodium Borate….Used to kill roaches and is considered a dangerous poison.

Formaldehyde… Used for embalming

Aluminum………at the rate of 225 mcg per each of three doses (total 675mcg) a toxic level.

Gardasil is a recombinant vaccine.  Recombinant vaccines are constructed by the use of either yeast or bacteria to produce massive quanitites of an individual viral or bacterial protein based on DNA sequencing technology.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/recombinant+vaccine

recombinant vaccine…..one created by recombinant DNA technology

Recombinant vaccines are created by utilizing bacteria or yeast to produce large quantities of a single viral or bacterial protein. This protein is then purified and injected into the patient, and the patient’s immune system makes antibodies to the disease agent’s protein, protecting the patient from natural disease.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself. Traditional vaccine risks come from the organism not being totally weakened (attenuated) or a reversion to a virulent (disease causing) form. Another advantage of a recombinant vaccine is that it does not need an adjuvant. An adjuvant is an agent that stimulates (irritates) the immune system to find and react to the vaccine agent. Some adjuvants have been implicated in causing cancer in some animals over time.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself.

If this statement is true…………why are young girls dying from the administration of Gardasil?  Why are so many becoming ill after even the first injection?

For some answers to these and other nagging questions about the attempts to forcibly vaccinate our young women against a virus with no link to cancer go here>>>>

 

http://www.vaclib.org/news/2006/gardasil.htm

Vaccination Liberation – Information

 

Update for 2007

December 2007, “HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed:

·  The FDA has stated “HPV is not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Evidence shows HPV vaccines actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6% in some women.

·  The FDA has admitted that “most [HPV] infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Why mandatory vaccination policies ultimately lead to the harming of young women.

·  [JAMA]… rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced by vaccination.”

·  The real story behind the HPV vaccination frenzy: Disease mongering, corporate profits and junk science. More on the HPV Vaccine Hoax

 

Vaccines also contain aluminum, used to excite the immune system of the body, and which considerably boosts the toxicity of mercury. When injected into children the mixture readily overpowers their nervous system to cause severe brain, neurological and allied damage.

If you know of a young woman who has been forcibly vaccinated with Gardasil and who has suffered adverse reactions including infertility, please send us your story.

Marti Oakley

 

 

 

 

Neo-Con Calls For Shredding Constitution, Imposing World Government

Leave a comment

A recent Austin-American Statesman review of Neo-Con Philip Bobbitt’s new book Terror and Consent features an image of a shredded Constitution under the words “Everything must go,” which acts as a suitable entrée to a disgusting diatribe which praises Bobbitt’s call for the end of America and its replacement with a de facto world government in the name of fighting terror. The words, “How to Fight Terrorism” are in place of a torn piece of the Bill of Rights. Read more…

%d bloggers like this: