Treason in America: The Council of Foreign Relations (DVD)

Leave a comment

Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations, the first documentary program on DVD of the TruthLies series, is already available at Amazon.com.

Over the years, even the most naive American has had a diffuse suspicion that there must be a secret reason why, most of the time, our government helps our enemies and betrays our friends. In Treason in America, Servando Gonzalez provides exhaustive evidence proving that the reason for this is because a group of rich, powerful individuals have conspired to infiltrate the U.S. Government and most of the American life. This group of conspirators, the Invisible Government of the United States, reside at the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan, headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations –an organization that acts like a secret society.

In this program, Gonzalez shows how this corrupt organization operates, and what their plans are. He also provides ample information showing that, behind almost every act of treason committed against the peoples of the U.S., Latin America, and the world, there has been one or more CFR members.

Gonzalez explains how CFR’s secret agents infiltrated in the U.S. Government manipulated President Truman to create the CIA and the National Security Council. According to Gonzalez, since its creation in 1947, the CIA has never served the interests of the American people, but of Wall Street bankers and oil transnational corporations. Gonzalez also shows that the NSC is a key element in understanding how the CFR conspirators, through selective flow of information, have gained almost total control over American presidents, treating them like mushrooms: keeping them in the dark and feeding them manure. He shows abundant evidence of CFR conspirators in the NSC commanding the Commanders-in-Chief, and the reasons why, like in the case of Vietnam, the Iraq war was lost even before it began.

– Instructive, informative, enlightening, and sometimes shocking
– Factually accurate, with new revisionist historical and political theories
– Explains historical and political events otherwise unexplainable
– Shows the unknown, dark side of American politics

Order your copy of Treason In America today at Amazon.com.


Media Silence on Events in Canada

Leave a comment

One of the major reasons I began this website is the lack of reporting of substance by what is supposed to be our national and even local news.  For three years I have published my own email gazette trying to expose issues that never see the light of day no matter how much cable or Dish TV you purchase.  What I find appalling is the substitution of celebrity and non-news, rather than actual informative journalism.

A case in point is news from Canada.  Unkown to a majority of Americans, Canadians are waging their own battle against the New World Order, the Security & Prosperity Partnership, the NAFTA highway, the North American Union and the outsourcing of vital contracts related to infrastructure and data mining.

In protest over the outsourcing of census taking to Lockheed/Martin, Canadians by the hundreds of thousands have refused to comply and submit information to L&M.  About 63 are being agressively pusued and prosecuted for refusing to provide L&M with information, saying that this particular company is part of the American War Machine and citing the fact that the census was more than adequately handled by the government prior to this.

We will be posting regular updates to this situation.  In the meantime……

If you are one of those who are being prosecuted by the government in connection to refusing to participate in the census in Canada, please either send an email to:

306-373-8078  Saskatoon, SK



You can also post a repsonse on this website. 



Canadians Fighting Lockheed/Martin & Loss of Confidence in Government: Part 3

Leave a comment


SUBJECT: Census Data


October 13, 2006



Ivan Felligi

Chief Statistician of Canada




Industry Canada

Minister Responsible for Statistics Canada Maxime Bernier minister.industry@ic.gc.ca



Cc: Jacques.Morin@a.statcan.ca; Lyne.St.John@a.statcan.ca


CC: Lockheed-Martin

President (Canadian operations)

Martin Munro


613-599-3270 ext 3498 (Martin’s exec asst, Diane Grandy)


Dear Ivan,


I am in receipt of your registered letter dated October 3, 2006.


It does not address my reason for non-compliance with the census, communicated to you consistently and beginning back in 2003.


The reason you provide for the necessity of compliance with the census is not truth. I presume that if your reason is an untruth, it is because you do not have a truthful reason to offer.


I would be failing my responsibilities as a citizen were I to bow in cowardice to anyone, civil servant or otherwise, who attempts to intimidate me with the threat of the judicial system – jail time and fines – when there is no reasonable basis.


Lockheed-Martin is a large part of the American war machine. I will not, through complicity, add to their financial profits. I communicated this to you more than two years before the census, as did many other Canadians.


If I am to be treated equally before the Law, then you must equally refer the thousands of other Canadians who have not complied with the census to the Judicial system. I presume you are doing this.


The reason you have provided for the necessity of my compliance, quoting from your letter of October 3, 2006 is: “A compulsory response is required of all respondents because the census is essential for providing the information needed by governments, businesses, researchers and individual Canadians to shed light on issues that are critical to virtually every sector of society. If respondents were to arbitrarily choose whether or not they would answer the census questions, the result would not accurately reflect the characteristics of the population and would therefore not be considered useful or reliable.”


I am sorry to say, but that is a load of bull. Most people off the street know it’s not the way statistics work. I find it offensive that citizens are treated as though they are ignorant. In my particular case, I am a graduate of the College of Commerce, University of Saskatchewan. I majored in Quantitative Analysis (Statistics) and graduated with Honours. Every day we are provided with reliable statistical information not based on 100% sampling.


I repeat my point: if you must resort to blatant untruths I presume it is because you don’t have a valid argument to offer.


Another point I would like to make: you chose to define the Canadian census in a way that necessitated the out-sourcing.


On your website you record that the first census in Canada was conducted in 1666, the first national census in 1871. For centuries and decades the Government has defined the census in a way that civil servants had the capability of doing the work. To me, quite frankly, it is prudent to keep one’s work within the limits you are capable of managing.


If the Government is not capable of doing that which has been successfully managed by civil servants for decades and centuries, then the answer is to fire those responsible for the mismanagement. The answer is not to knowingly create some over-sized census monster which weakens one’s capabilities and then dictates an attitude of “I am so weakened I must rely on Big Daddy LM to help me out.”


Statistics Canada and its employees are to serve the interests of the citizens of Canada. Previous administrations have done that very well. If not, there would have been problems in the past. I am not aware of any. So I suggest that you need to re-think what you are doing.


Third and final point: in the last paragraph of your letter you say, “I would like to assure you that the information you provide on your census questionnaire will be kept strictly confidential, …”.


I reassure children so they may feel safe and secure. I think you mis-read the situation: I am secure, I am an adult. I do not need to be reassured by you. I will arrive at my own conclusions by observing your actions and by reading what you write.


Furthermore, not once in my communications with the Government have I mentioned concerns about the confidentiality of information. I have been clear and explicit in the reason for my non-compliance. You repeat this mantra about confidentiality. Not once have you addressed or attempted to address my explicitly-stated reason for non-compliance: the Statistics Canada contract with Lockheed-Martin enriches a corporation that plays a very large role in the American killing machine.


I am not being snooty. I am not “radical”. I come from rural Saskatchewan which is small “c” conservative country. I am “mature”, a Mother of 2 children. I do not believe in increasing the hatred in the world through killing other people and their children. Lockheed-Martin profits from the killing.


I don’t know into which pigeon hole you have slotted me. I am able to think.

I can connect the dots between my actions and wider outcomes. I was a member of and benefited from the Girl Guides of Canada for many years. I learned service to community. That community and sisterhood extends to women in all countries of the world. I had the privilege of attending an international camp. I slept in the same tent, cooked, laughed and danced with these women when they and I were young. I really don’t like seeing them killed, as in Iraq. That’s killed, as in dead. Why would I participate in, or be a collaborator with Lockheed-Martin? Perhaps you have not read the Washington Post, October 11? 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred (research overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health). The killing, once started, does not stop.


You were told by thousands of Canadians that Lockheed-Martin is a large part of the American war machine. You made a bad decision to “out-source”.


Your letter of October 3 is an attempt to coerce me through the threat of jail time and fines. Were my plate not full at the moment, did I not have more important priorities, I would be researching the avenues through which to lay charges, to “turn the matter over to the Department of Justice”, as you say. So that you might be tried for your tactics vis-a-vis me.


Yours truly,

Sandra Finley

Saskatoon, SK S7N 0L1


Canadians Fighting Lockheed/Martin & Loss of Confidence in Government: PART 2

Leave a comment

of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)

comprising Halifax Friends Meeting, Antigonish Worship Group, Dartmouth Worship Group and South Shore Worship Group

Lucienne Robillard

Minister of Industry

House of Commons

Ottawa ON K1A 0A6

February 15, 2004

Dear Lucienne Robillard,

The Halifax Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) is very concerned about the Canadian government’s decision to award a $20.5 million dollar contract to a unit of the U.S. weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT).

The $20.5 million dollars is the amount to be spent to contract out work of Statistics Canada on the 2006 National Census. Lockheed Martin Canada Inc.

is to lead a consortium that includes IBM Canada, Transcontinental Printing Inc. Canada and ADECCO Employment Services Ltd. Canada.

In February 2003, Lockheed Martin Canada Inc. was also awarded a multi-year contract by the Canadian Department of National Defence to provide a health care information system on Canadian Forces personnel. That contract is worth approximately $17 million and covers only the first 14 months of the project. The contract has the potential to exceed an estimated value of $56 million, however, if all four phases are delivered over the anticipated 10-year period.

These decisions were made while Alan Rock was serving on Jean Chrétien’s Cabinet as Minister of Industry. We are writing to you, the new Minister of Industry, to make you aware of our continuing objections.

While Quakers realize that, under the North American Free Trade Agreement

(NAFTA) and World Trade Organization Agreement regulations, non-Canadian firms are eligible to bid on contracts to provide essential public services, we are loathe to see the Canadian public’s tax dollars flow to a military contractor that benefits richly from the development (and deployment) of weapons of mass destruction.

We are also loathe to assist a principal member of the U.S.

military-industrial complex to further develop its capacity to collect, store, analyze, and retrieve sensitive information on citizens of any country.

We have read that a spokesperson for former Public Works Minister Ralph Goodale has stated that under the obligations of the NAFTA, Canada cannot alter contracts with Lockheed Martin and if we were to do so we could be sued for millions of dollars. (Toronto Star, October 15, 2003)

We ask you, in your capacity as Industry Minister and in conjunction with other members of Cabinet, to find a way forward that would best extricate our country from these contracts.

While many would welcome an outcome in which Statistics Canada would be allotted the funding and capacity to fully carry out an activity as important as the Canadian census, it is of particular importance to Quakers

– because of our Peace Testimony* – that contracts not be let to a subsidiary of a trans-national corporation that sold almost $27 billion dollars worth of weapons in 2002.

We therefore ask:

1. that your government cancel all its contracts with Lockheed Martin and 2.

that you pledge not to grant millions more to Lockheed Martin in the future.

We would appreciate hearing from you soon in regards to this important matter.


Sylvia Mangalam

Clerk of the Halifax Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)

1388 Bedford Highway Bedford NS B4A 1E2

* George Fox’s declaration of 1661 to Charles II is referred to as the Friends Historic Peace Testimony: “We utterly deny all outward wars and strife and fightings with outward weapons, for any ends or under any pretence whatsoever. And this is our testimony to the whole world.”

cc: Paul Martin, Prime Minister of Canada; Stephen Owen, Minister of Public Works; Jim Peterson, Minister of International Trade; Bill Graham, Minister of Foreign Affairs; David Pratt, Minister of National Defence; Ivan P.

Fellegi, Chief Statistician of Canada

Our Monthly Meeting will also be sharing this letter with other Friends’

Meetings, as well as the general public.



Canadians fighting Lockheed/Martin: Loss of Confidence in Government: PART 1

Leave a comment



From fall 2006:


2006 Census Canada – Non-Compliance



There have been a few media reports about the high rate of non-compliance with the 2006 census. The cause has been attributed, for example, to a transient population (e.g. Alberta).


If you are in the email networks you know what the media is not telling: the Government contracted-out part of the 2006 census to Lockheed-Martin Corporation which is part of the American military machine. People have refused to co-operate with the census as a form of protest or resistance.


There are a number of reasons why the census should not have been out-sourced but the Lockheed-Martin situation is pivotal.


My first communication to the Government about their plans to “out-source”

to Lockheed-Martin was in 2003. I have appended a copy of the excellent letter from the Quaker (Society of Friends) community in Halifax dated February 2004. …


Later, we worked with the Government on the GDR (Government Directive on

Regulating) which is part of so-called “Smart Regulations”. I used the GDR to reinforce the point about the census, telling the Government that Canadians are learning non-compliance with regulations. I told them there would be a high level of non-compliance with the census for very legitimate reasons, if they did not change their direction. It wasn’t hard to figure out, from all the protest. The rule of law in Canada is being undermined which is a very serious situation.


Corruption, governments in bed with the people they are supposed to regulate, the complete failure to regulate to protect “the commons”, the gun registry, contracting-out to corporations like Lockheed-Martin, etc. etc. – all PREDICTABLY lead to a loss of confidence and consequent disrespect for the laws of the land. Definitely not a good place to be. You can point this out to the Government, but they seem incapable of hearing.


I have continued to communicate with Ivan Felligi (Chief Statistician for Canada) about the census. A Statistics Canada person phoned me and we talked the matter through, or so I thought. I have participated in the on-line support network at Vive le Canada. These are people who have resisted the census in various ways. Statistics Canada personnel also watch the site.


There is a recent posting from one of them.  (April 2008, web address deleted;  the page is no longer available.)


“Count Me Out” (a play on the Government promotion of the Census “Count Me In”)was another web-site for the sharing of information in 2006.


There are thousands of people across Canada who have not complied, many of them for the same reason: Lockheed-Martin. On July 5th we circulated in our network the report that 400,000 adults in British Columbia alone had not sent in their census forms – 10% of the population. The Government stepped up efforts to gain compliance. They do not disseminate the information on how many people have sabotaged the census in various ways, from the provision of inaccurate information up to refusal to submit.


The letter I received this week from Ivan Felligi tells me, “If your completed questionnaire is not received by Statistics Canada by October 27, 2006, I will turn the matter over to the Department of Justice with a recommendation that appropriate charges be laid….”


Further, if I am tried and found guilty of an offence under the Statistics Act, I “may be liable to a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both.”


The reason given by Ivan for why the census form from me is required, is simply not true. It is contained in my reply to him (copy below). 



The following is my letter to Ivan Felligi, head of Statistics Canada. I have cc’d it to the President of Lockheed-Martin Canada, Martin Munro. And to Maxime Bernier, who, as the Minister for Industry Canada is responsible for Statistics Canada.



CONTACT AT: 306-373-8078

MARK DANKOF’S AMERICA w/ Mark Dankof (He’s Back!)

Leave a comment

New Programs on the Republic Broadcasting Network (www.republicbroadcasting.org )


MARK DANKOF’S AMERICA w/ Mark Dankof (He’s Back!)
Sundays, 7:00 AM – 9:00 AM ( Starting April 20th, 2008 )
Mark Dankof
Call In Number: 800-313-9443
Show Time: Sundays, 7:00 AM – 9:00 AM

The show will consist of news analysis of critical domestic and international developments, seen through the lenses of Mr. Dankof’s Old Right, Paleo-conservative, anti-New World Order worldview. Guests will be drawn from political, media, and literary circles both in the United States and abroad, who contribute to the show’s themes and edify the listening audience. The listener call-in format employed in the previous Mark Dankof’s America stint on the Republic Broadcasting Network will be retained again.


                       Website: www.MarkDankof.com                     

                                                       E-Mail Address:


Mark Dankof is a contributor to the American Free Press and serves as a talk show host and radio broadcaster for the Republic Broadcasting Network. Born in Wiesbaden, Germany, the son of a United States Air Force Colonel, he graduated from Valparaiso University in 1977 and from Chicago’s Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in 1983. In recent years, he has pursued post-graduate work in systematic theology and theological German at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. His thesis interest pertains to Martin Chemnitz’s evaluation of the Council of Trent (1545-1563). Formerly the 36th District Chairman of the Republican Party in King County/Seattle and later an elected delegate to Texas State Republican Conventions in 1994 and 1996, he entered the United States Senate race in Delaware in 2000 as the nominated candidate of the Constitution Party against Democratic candidate Thomas Carper and Republican incumbent William Roth. He is an Endowed Life Member of the National Rifle Association and a Life Member of the Texas State Rifle Association. Pastor Dankof now serves Immanuel Lutheran Church of San Antonio at http://www.ilcsa.org. His personal web page may be accessed at http://www.MarkDankof.com. He is a member of the clergy roster of the Lutheran Ministerium and Synod–USA found at http://www.lmsusa.org.


UNESCO….An experiment in global education has vague answers and even less authority.

Leave a comment

The Question:

After viewing the vast amount of plans for education on your website I have an honest question for UNESCO about UNESCO policies and procedures.

I am of the understanding that the UN and UNESCO and all the other UN agencies are merely a place where countries meet to talk.

I am of the understanding they are not any kind of government in and of themselves. Therefore, I am wondering how UNESCO see themselves as the authority by which our educational standards are set and mandated in for example, the USA, which is a free country?

In other words, what gives UNESCO the authority to control the curriculum of our US schools? My guess would be that UNESCO has NO authority to be influencing the USA schools and that teachers should not do things they know are wrong and are detrimental to a child’s mental health and learning.


Thank You.

Interested Party

The Answer:


UNESCO’s role is advisory. The plans and policies you can see on UNESCO’s website are collected and made public as part of UNESCO’s knowledge-sharing role. UNESCO functions as a laboratory of ideas and a standard- setter to forge universal agreements on emerging ethical issues.

The Organization also serves as a clearinghouse – for the dissemination and sharing of information and knowledge – while helping Member States to build their human and institutional capacities in diverse fields. In short, UNESCO promotes international co-operation among its Member States in the fields of education, science, culture and communication.

More specifically in the case of education UNESCO has a mandate to coordinate international partners, and monitor progress in countries and regions towards the implementation of six  internationally agreed goals to achieve education for all by 2015.  To do that it prepares the annual EFA Global Monitoring Report.


In the case of curriculum development UNESCO’s International Bureau of Education (IBE) provides technical assistance to countries. This service is provided upon request.


 For the question of teachers UNESCO alerts the world to the most serious issue facing the teaching profession today: the acute or impending shortage of qualified teachers. The growing demand for teachers caused by Education for All, combined with an aging

teacher population in developed countries, will create shortages of at least 15 million teachers in the next decade.

UNESCO also encourages Governments to use two international norms:

The 1966 ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers and the 1997 UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel. They provide guidelines on how educational authorities, communities and teachers’ associations can improve teacher recruitment, training, working conditions, academic freedom, and security employment (including tenure).

I hope this helps
Best regards,

Ulrika Peppler Barry

Team manager
EFA Global Monitoring Report
tel:33-1-4568 2128
fax:33-1-4568 5641


UNESCO, office 3099
7, Place de Fontenoy
75352 Paris 07 SP, France



UNESCO is the driving force behind NCLB and a standardized global education that results in illiterate and uneducated students.  Another creation of the United Nations that has crept into our system with the intent to dumb down our young people.  Knowledge is power and UNESCO is determined that todays students have neither knowledge or power. 

%d bloggers like this: