Join us December 2nd, 2012 at 7:00 CST! More
TS Radio Guest: James Roger Brown on The organized crime element in elder abuse
December 2, 2012
Guardianship Abuse, radio elder abuse, forced drugging, James Roger Brown, looting estates, Marti Oakley, organized crime in Child Protective Services, organized crime in elder abuse, property theft, The Sociology Center, TS Radio 2 Comments
TS Radio: The rights of wards and conservatees
November 25, 2012
Guardianship Abuse, radio Beverly Newman, California, corrupt probate courts, elder abuse, elder advocates, estate theft, Florida, Linda Kincaid, Marti Oakley, predatory guardians, property theft, TS Radio 1 Comment
Join us Sunday evening, November 25th, 2012 at 7:00 CST! More
Judges, lawyers use guardianships to prey on elderly
September 9, 2012
Guardianship Abuse, radio Barbara Hollingsworth, Chemical restraints, corrupt probate courts, elder abuse, human trafficking, payrolling attorneys, predatroy guardians, property theft 2 Comments
Reprinted with Permission
Local Opinion Editor
The Washington Examiner
Think your well-tended nest egg will protect you from the depredations of old age? Don’t count on it.
Little has changed since the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled almost a decade ago that Probate Judge Kaye Christian abused her power by ordering retired economist Mollie Orshansky, creator of the federal poverty line, removed from her sister’s care in New York and placed in a District guardianship against her will.
Even multimillionaires cannot prevent a judge from appointing a total stranger to take complete control of their affairs — and banish family members who object.
That’s what happened to five-term D.C. Council member Hilda Mason and her husband, Charles, a Harvard graduate who traced his lineage back to the Plymouth landing. Despite Charles’ $22.5 million fortune, this power couple ended their lives in squalor.
Blind, wheelchair-bound and suffering from diabetes and skin cancer, Charles spent his last days in dirty clothing and worn-out shoes, with fingernails so long they curled around his fingers.
“He looked like a hobo,” one witness told The Washington Examiner. His frail wife suffered a broken collarbone when one of her “caregivers” ran her over with a four-wheel-drive vehicle.
At the time of Hilda Mason’s death in 2007, debris and broken furniture littered every room of the couple’s once-stately Shepherd Park home. The roof leaked and the house was infested with rodents and insects.
As attorneys helped themselves to the couple’s assets, Episcopal Senior Ministries reported that “there appears to be no individual or group that is currently responsible for the cleaning/condition of the house.”
According to a Jan. 9, 2001, court transcript, a clearly competent Charles Mason testified before the same Judge Christian that he no longer wanted the Virginia attorney he had previously hired to represent him.
Less than three months later, Charles was declared incompetent after an adverse reaction to a psychotropic cocktail landed him in Suburban Hospital’s psychiatric ward. More
Exploitation of the elderly: Predatory guardians at work
September 9, 2012
Uncategorized Barbara Hollingsworth, Chemical restraints, corrupt probate courts, elder isolation, Guardianship Abuse, Linda Kincaid, Marti Oakley, NASGA, property theft, TS Radio Leave a comment
5:00 PST… 6.00 MST … 7:00 CST … 8:00 EST More
Klamath Basin Crisis: Feds set to seize 241,438 acres and 274 stream miles
February 5, 2012
Agenda 21, PROPERTY RIGHTS Agenda 21, critical habitat, green-washing, Klamath basin, property theft, state land theft, toxic environmentalism, wildlife corridors 2 Comments
IMPORTANT: sucker comments due tomorrow feb 6.
Friends,
Attached are my comments on proposed sucker critical habitat. At the public meeting we were told the designation would not affect us. However, if you read the proposed critical habitat, it not only designated most of our water, it talks about displacing resource users, mandating lake levels and stream flows… targeting logging, agriculture, grazing, sediment! IF they were to mandate that much water for the hundreds of thousands of suckers, there would be nothing left. Check out those who sued to enforce the habitat.
I hope you will write something, even if it’s short. I spent hours on writing comments and the ‘submit’ button didn’t work. I have until tomorrow to hopefully get it to work since they do not accept email. Let me know if you can make the ‘submit’ button work
See attached comments. Below is the press release:
Revised Critical Habitat Proposed for Lost River and Shortnose Suckers,“The proposal includes two critical habitat units totaling 241,438 acres and 274 stream miles in southern Oregon and northern California.” Meeting Jan 19. Comments due Feb. 6
HERE is where to find the document
An interesting read of KWUA comments on the draft recovery plan: f They feel the KBRA folks want to participate in that! Those NGO’s are in the coalitions to mandate the removal of resource users.
Links:
TS Radio with guest Ron Ewart of National Association of Rural Landowners
February 3, 2012
Agenda 21, Truth Squad Agenda 21, freedom, liberty, Marti Oakley, NARLO, PROPERTY RIGHTS, property theft, Ron Ewart, rural landowners Leave a comment
Join us Friday morning at 11:00 a.m CST!
This is the rescheduled broadcast with Ron Ewart
9:00 PST a.m.
11:00 CST a.m.
12:00 noon EST
Ron Ewart, president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) joins the show to discuss the theft of rural lands.
Call-in Number: (917) 388-4520 Listen Live HERE!
Give us a call on SKYPE: 320-281-0585 or email us at truthsquadradio@gmail.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley
_______________________________________
Biography of Ron Ewart, President
National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO)
And NARLO’s history and accomplishments
Guardianship Abuse with Dennis Ball 2012 Presidential Candidate
July 24, 2011
Guardianship Abuse 2012 election, Dennis Ball, families, Guardianship Abuse, human bondage, human trafficking, Marti Oakley, property theft, rights/liberities, wards 2 Comments
Join us Sunday evenings at 5:00 CST More
Connecticut estate case exposes inheritance rights realities
April 10, 2011
Guardianship Abuse Connecticut, elder abuse, estate planning, Estates, guardianships, Lou Ann Anderson, power of atty, probate abuse, property theft, trusts, wills Leave a comment
Guest Author: Lou Ann Anderson
Lou Ann Anderson is an advocate working to create awareness regarding the Texas probate system and its surrounding culture. She is the Online Producer at www.EstateofDenial.com, a Policy Advisor with Americans for Prosperity – Texas Foundation and a Director of Women on the Wall. Lou Ann may be contacted at info@EstateofDenial.com.
_______________________________________________________
People believe they have the right to determine their final asset distribution. The legal industry perpetually promotes proper estate planning as a vehicle to ensure wishes are honored. Greed and self-interest, however, can derail even the most well-prepared of plans and today’s probate system is increasingly home to such actions. The estate of Josephine Smoron, an elderly Connecticut woman with expressly clear wishes, exposes the harsh realities of American property rights and rights of inheritance.
Josephine Smoron believed estate planning documents would ensure her longtime caretaker Sam Manzo’s inheritance of Smoron’s 80-acre farm and cows valued at more than $1 million. Recognizing local interest in developing her property, Smoron was adamant that churches previously involved in a dispute over her brother’s estate have no claim to her estate. These wishes were clearly expressed in a 1996 will and an updated 2004 version.
As Smoron’s health deteriorated, Manzo was replaced as her conservator by a court-appointed conservator under the orders of Southington Probate Judge Bryan F. Meccariello. Before Smoron’s June 2009 death at age 92, Meccariello approved a change in her will designating all property be given to three area Catholic churches. Manzo was disinherited and there appeared no evidence this change reflected Smoron’s wishes.
A purchase agreement with local developer Carl Verderame promptly surfaced and plans for Smoron’s farm becoming home to an $18 million indoor sports complex generating $200,000 of new tax revenue were announced. Manzo filed a complaint with Connecticut’s Council on Probate Judicial Conduct that resulted in Meccariello being “censured” for the second time in three years causing the judge to withdraw his bid for re-election. More
Oakland Four’ Sued by LCMS – Interview by Rev. Cascione
March 29, 2010
Articles LCMS, Lutheran Church, personal lawsuits, property theft 1 Comment
Dear National Religion and/or News Editor:
Our Redeemer Lutheran Church of Oakland, California has filed a motion for summary judgment as defendants in a legal case being pursued by the California–Nevada–Hawaii District of the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, and its District President, Robert Newton.
The motion is attached. For further information, please contact Dr. Sharon Bowles of San Francisco State University at airshay2@cs.com.
Court file: wORD 97 VERSION OF P&A in support of defendants summary judgment (3)
There are also 2 videos on You Tube which will brief you on this case. See: View interview with Oakland Four Oakland Four’ Sued by More
Bush criminalizes anti-war movement and humanitarian aid
November 8, 2008
Uncategorized bush, criminals, Executive Orders, Iraq, Marti Oakley, natioanl emergency, national security, property theft, Secretary of the Treasury 1 Comment
This is only one of the Executive Orders issued by a tyrant; a man totally dedicated to eradication of the Constitution, civil liberties and inalienable rights.
What you can read in this Order are the words of man terrified of his own people; one who seeks to silence them. Notorious for his own criminal activities, threatened by possible prosecution for crimes against humanity, Bush has effectively rendered dissent against government actions as criminal. This Executive Order is written to be intentionally and broadly interpreted. On its face it appears to criminalize persons who might be actively involved in supporting Iraq either physically or monetarily against the United States. This can even include those (religious groups?) who might try to give humanitarian aid.
As in almost all of Bush’s E.O.’s, he grants himself the power at will to be the single or unilateral “decider” of who is or is not one of this newly created class of criminals.
Its an odd turn of events when the most corrupt and criminal among us abuses its power and authority to criminalize Constitutional rights.
July 17, 2007
Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,
(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:
(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or
(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;
(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.
Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.
Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.
Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.
Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 17, 2007.
