Join us Sunday May 12th, 2013 at 7:00pm CST! More
May 12, 2013
May 11, 2013
Minnesota Department of Health is attempting to by-pass public hearings under the assumption that no one is watching and no one cares…..to increase the number of types of childhood vaccines mandated for pre-school through secondary education. Many of the child hood vaccines are made from aborted fetal tissue and may be linked to autism. One jab of the needle and your infant or small child can have as many as one million strands of someone else’s, or several someone else’s DNA. Also, there is a difference between efficacy and efficiency. Efficacy simply means that the probability of a benefit to individuals in a defined population from a medical technology applied for a given medical problem under ideal conditions of use is possible, not proven or conclusive; simply assumed to be so.
May 11, 2013
environmental pollution, Toxic food bio-diversity, bio-pirates, Collin Peterson, FDA, genetically engineered foods, GMO's, gras, Marti Oakley, Monsanto, Monsanto Protection Racket, NAIS, USDA 3 Comments
The letter below was received from Rep. Collin Peterson, 7th District, Minnesota. Peterson’s letter details his love of gmo’s and his belief that no science exist to substantiate the claims that gmo is harmful to human health. With numerous countries around the world banning the use of gmo seeds, the importing of gmo products into their countries, and the massive number of scientific studies that were actually done to document the threat to the environment and public health that these frankenfood creations are causing, it appears Mr. Peterson is oblivious to all. Makes you wonder what planet this guy is on.
Mr. Peterson’s comments are in black.
My responses are in blue.
Dear Mr. Oakley:
Thank you for contacting my office about genetically engineered foods. I appreciate hearing from you.
Dear Mr. Peterson: I doubt that you appreciate hearing from me or anyone else who isn’t on the bio-piracy wagon. I am fully aware that this is a very lucrative association for you , not only politically, but personally as well.
Since the first genetically engineered crops became commercially available in the mid-1990s, U.S. soybean, cotton, and corn farmers have rapidly adopted them.
Farmers have not rapidly adopted genetically engineered crops unless you considered being coerced, bullied, terrorized, threatened with lawsuits or finding that bio-pirates such as Monsanto have monopolized the market and have the Supreme Court of The United States firmly in their pocket and also a cushy little seat in the White House to protect their interests, willing adoption of these crops.
Since that time there has been no scientific evidence suggesting that these crops are harmful. More
May 10, 2013
CORPORATIONS, environmental pollution chemtrails, weather modification, UCC, government corporations, environmental damage, Washington state, Agricultural Defense Coalition, Rebecca Em Campbell, OPPT, Toxic Biochemical Geoengineering 2 Comments
Note: Rebecca will be our guest on Monday May 13th, 2013 on TS Radio, at 3:00 CST!
“Whereas beginning on October 24, 2012, the One People’s Public Trust (OPPT) has filed a series of Universal Commercial Code (UCC)-based public interest legal actions in Washington State, Washington DC and the Hague de-chartering and foreclosing upon all private, for-profit corporations masquerading as governments worldwide, such as the Washington State Corporation and its subsidiaries, among them its state Department of Ecology: Compilation of OPPT-Related Articles/Websites“
One People’s Public Trust (OPPT)Public Interest Courtesy Notice
Rebecca Em Campbell
Affiliation(s): One People’s Public Trust (OPPT)
107 Pine St., No. 332 Seattle, WA 98101-1550
April 10, 2013
Alleged Government Agency/Corporation:
Washington State Department of Ecology
DUNS/SEC Corporate Code Number of Alleged Government Agency/Corporation:
DUNS No. 808882385
300 Desmond Drive Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Ongoing Toxic Biochemical Geoengineering (Chemtrails) Operations Portrayed as Weather Modification Contract Projects in Washington State. Whereas, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) states that the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) has primary supervisory responsibility for “weather modification” in Washington State;
Whereas, the aforementioned section of the RCW states that the Department of Ecology must give public notice in advance of permitting such “weather modification” in Washington State;
Whereas no public notices for contract bids/department acceptances of such bids for “weather modification” contracts can be found in any generally accessed publication/website of record in Washington State, yet persistent toxic biochemical contrails (chemtrails) frequently appear inthe skies over Washington State, often with perceptible injury to the people and environmentof this state since at least 1994:
: Toxic Clear Gelatinous Blobs in Rainfall Sicken Residents of Oakville, Washington State-1994 Air Controllers in Washington State/British Columbia Concerned Over MassivePersistent Contrails (Chemtrails) Spraying-2002 Playing God with the Weather Over the San Juan Islands.
May 9, 2013
Join Ruthie May 9th, 2013 at 8:00pm CST! More
May 8, 2013
HEALTH advance health care directives, death panels, Healthcare, living wills, Marilyn M. Singleton M.D..JD., patient autonomy, Policy for Medically Ineffective (Futile) Treatment”, Uniform Health Care Decisions Act Leave a comment
When advance health care directives (“living wills”) were popularized, the guiding principle was to allow patients to choose to “die with dignity.” But one man’s dignity is another man’s poison. Surveys suggest that half of those with a serious chronic illness prefer to die at home. The other half prefer treatment in hospitals.
Advance directive legislation has evolved from a means to ensure patient autonomy to a license for health providers to withdraw medical treatment—even against a patient’s wishes. Statutory advance directives provide that individuals “have the right to give instructions about their own health care,” but they fail to mention that such instructions may not be carried out if individuals have chosen life. (See, for example, California Probate Code section 4701).
The Uniform Health Care Decisions Act (UHCDA), model legislation developed in 1994, has been adopted in whole or in part by several states. It provides that health-care providers—without legal consequences—may decline to comply with an individual’s health-care decision that “requires medically ineffective health care or health care contrary to generally accepted health-care standards applicable to the health-care provider or institution.” Not surprisingly, the key term, “medically ineffective” is not defined. Any attempts at specificity would force an open debate on the morality of rationing and “playing God.”
Patients must be informed of the rules before the final seconds of the game. Under state laws, circumstances under which wishes can be denied range from a terminal condition or permanent unconsciousness (Alabama) to being permanently unconscious or “an incurable or irreversible condition” that will cause death “within a relatively short time” (Maine).
Unbeknownst to patients, many hospitals have policies that flesh out treatment withdrawal standards. For example, Stanford Hospital’s “Policy for Medically Ineffective (Futile) Treatment” states:
Medically ineffective refers to treatment that would not offer the patient any significant benefit. If an attending physician believes treatment is not medically ineffective and assumes care of the patient, treatment is not medically ineffective.
This tortured clarification anoints the physician as the final arbiter. More