November 8, 2014
Brennan Center for Justice, CIA & Facebook, Constitution, corruption, electronic surveillance, exploitation of personal data, facial recognition, FBI, in home surveillance, iphones, Michael Price, SMART TV's, unconstitutional surveillance, voice recognition
By Michael Price –
Brennan Center for Justice
“Don’t say personal or do sensitive stuff in front of the TV.
You may not be watching, but the telescreen is listening.”
November 8, 2014
I just bought a new TV. The old one had a good run, but after the volume got stuck on 63, I decided it was time to replace it. I am now the owner of a new “smart” TV, which promises to deliver streaming multimedia content, games, apps, social media, and Internet browsing. Oh, and TV too.
The amount of data this thing collects is staggering. It logs where, when, how, and for how long you use the TV. It sets tracking cookies and beacons designed to detect “when you have viewed particular content or a particular email message.” It records “the apps you use, the websites you visit, and how you interact with content.”
It ignores “do-not-track” requests as a considered matter of policy.
It also has a built-in camera — with facial recognition. The purpose is to provide “gesture control” for the TV and enable you to log in to a personalized account using your face. On the upside, the images are saved on the TV instead of uploaded to a corporate server. On the downside, the Internet connection makes the whole TV vulnerable to hackers who have demonstrated the ability to take complete control of the machine.
More troubling is the microphone. The TV boasts a “voice recognition” feature that allows viewers to control the screen with voice commands. But the service comes with a rather ominous warning:
“Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party.” Got that?
Don’t say personal or do sensitive stuff in front of the TV.
You may not be watching, but the telescreen is listening. More
October 7, 2014
Constitution, Corrupt courts
administrative edict, administrative evasion of procedural rights, administrative law, administrative power, Constitutional law, corrupt courts, Hillsdale College, Imprimis, prerogative power, procedural rights
A Nation Beguiled
“But there are problems with this conventional history of administrative law. Rather than being a modern, post-constitutional American development, I argue that the rise of administrative law is essentially a re-emergence of the absolute power practiced by pre-modern kings. Rather than a modern necessity, it is a latter-day version of a recurring threat—a threat inherent in human nature and in the temptations of power.”
Columbia Law School
“Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.”
PHILIP HAMBURGER is the Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. He received his B.A. from Princeton University and his J.D. from Yale Law School. He has also taught at the University of Chicago Law School, the George Washington University Law School, the University of Virginia Law School, and Northwestern Law School. A contributor to National Review Online, he has written for several law reviews and journals, including the American Journal of Legal History, the Supreme Court Review, the Notre Dame Law Review, and the Journal of Law and Politics. He is the author of Separation of Church and State, Law and Judicial Duty, and, most recently, Is Administrative Law Unlawful?
The following is adapted from a speech delivered on May 6, 2014, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series.
There are many complaints about administrative law—including that it is arbitrary, that it is a burden on the economy, and that it is an intrusion on freedom. The question I will address here is whether administrative law is unlawful, and I will focus on constitutional history. Those who forget history, it is often said, are doomed to repeat it. And this is what has happened in the United States with the rise of administrative law—or, more accurately, administrative power. More
September 16, 2014
Constitution, corruption, DOMESTIC TERRORISM
America's Constitution, Congressional Investigation of the Southern Poverty Law Center, corruption, Department of Homeland Security, Southern Poverty Law (Lie) Center, SPLC commits hate crimes, SPLC domestic terrorist, surveillance, Tom DeWeese, U.S. Constitution
But something went wrong. Today the SPLC is no longer a poverty law center. They are trying to smear and silence dissidents who dare to stand for the Constitution, question the hero worship of Lincoln, and who support national sovereignty against the UN. They have turned into something not unlike the Klan they sought so brilliantly to stop except without overt violence. Tom DeWeese is doing a great job fighitng Agenda 21 and ICLEI. He does not deserve this kind of treatment:
Click here to demand a congressional investigation of the SPLC
I need your help by signing the “Citizen’s Demand for Congressional Investigation of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).”
Let me explain.
The American Policy Center (APC) and I have been openly attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
To date, there have been FOUR separate “special reports” released by SPLC against me personally – painting me as a hate-driven domestic terrorist!
Of course, SPLC has a long history of attacking organizations and individuals who defend the Constitution and oppose big government programs.
They regularly accuse us of racism and hate because we want to stop the massive growth of government and the wasteful spending programs that are bankrupting our country.
I get used to such attacks. It’s what they do to try to discredit us.
But this time the attack is different. It truly frightens me because the outcome of this new SPLC attack against APC and me could result in government investigations, the banning of my ability to travel, or even the destruction of APC.
Here’s why I’m concerned.
The Southern Poverty Law Center issued a new report titled “Agenda 21, The UN, Sustainability and Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory.” That report targeted me personally as a leader in the “anti-government Patriot movement.” And the SPLC report said I am part of a network of radicals peddling hysterical conspiracy theories against our Government.
Worse than just the SPLC report – is the fact that it was used as the bases of even more attacks from two national magazines – Fortune Magazine and Newsweek Magazine.
Newsweek’s attack was a cover story called “The Plots To Destroy America.” The article quoted SPLC’s Mark Potok, saying, “These kinds of theories…(are) completely distorting any rational discussion we can have in this country.” More
August 18, 2014
Constitution, DOMESTIC TERRORISM, Police State
America's Constitution, government sponsored domestic terrorism, Laguna Journal, Michael Webster, militaring police, national police, Police State, standing army
“In other words, the twenty-first-century war on terror has melded thoroughly with the twentieth-century war on drugs, and the result couldn’t be anymore disturbing: police forces that increasingly look and act like occupying armies…”
The direction being achieved by militarizing our cops is to train them to be an occupying force under the control of the Federal government and its minions instead of being
our friendly public servant whose job was once to “serve and protect”.
As most Americans firmly oppose the current morphing of local police from protects and serves and community policing to federally militarized and federally subsidized occupying force.
In the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, Mo., an unarmed 18-year-old black man was killed by police in broad daylight.
By now, what’s happening in Ferguson is about so many second-order issues— the militarization of police with systemic racism, and how citizens can redress grievances, among other things—that it’s worth remembering what actually happened…
Last week Ferguson was sending shock waves across America and around the world. Many viewers first tuning into the national news thought they were observing a 3rd world riot that we so often see coming from places like the Middle East, Russia, China or some out of control banana republic. No these pictures were coming from Ferguson Missouri in the heartland of America. We as Americans need to examine the problem of the militarization of our police.
Dr, Edwin Vieira, Jr. writes in his new book that we now have a choice to make – do we want to continue to live in a police state, or do we do something about it.
As Karl Bickel, a senior policy analyst with the Justice Department’s Community Policing Services office, observes, police across America are being trained in a way that emphasizes force and aggression. He notes that recruit training favors a stress-based regimen that’s modeled on military boot camp rather than on the more relaxed academic setting a minority of police departments still employ. The result, he suggests, is young officers who believe policing is about kicking ass rather than working with the community to make neighborhoods safer. Or as comedian Bill Maher reminded officers recently:
“The words on your car, ‘protect and serve,’ refer to us, not you.”
June 27, 2014
2nd amendment, radio
2nd amendment, gun control, gun rights, John Wallace, Marti Oakley, New York, New York SAFE Act, Oathkeepers, TS Radio
Join us live June 27th, 2014 at 7:00 pm CST! More
June 5, 2014
American sovereignty, Constitution, Diplomatic Immunity, Government, International Organizations Immunities, John Wallace, Liberty News Online, UN troops, United Nations military, United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, united Nations withdrawal
John W. Wallace – NY OathKeeper
Liberty News Online
The American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 – Repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws. It directs the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body.
Requires closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. Prohibits:
- (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N.,
- (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation,
- (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation,
- (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and
- (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees. ———————–
THE TEXT OF THE BILL IS BELOW:
HR 75 IH 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 75
To end membership of the United States in the United Nations. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2013 Mr. BROUN of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
A BILL To end membership of the United States in the United Nations. More
April 12, 2014
10th amend. Center, Government
democrats, Don Jans, elections, Government, Marxism, progressivism, republicans, Tea Partiers, tenth amendment, United States Constitution, vote fraud
by Don Jans www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com ____________________________________________________________________
Election season is upon us.
Local and state elections are taking place and will continue through November 4th with the all-important mid-terms. Do these elections really matter? I would suggest perhaps more than ever. These elections could determine if we ever have another election that even resembles fairness. All have witnessed the effort to limit free speech and control the press in such a way as to affect the outcome of elections. We have seen the term “voting intimidation” redefined so it applies for some but not for others based on the whims of the Attorney General. We have seen efforts to enhance voter irregularities so as to benefit the Marxist/Progressives. This election will determine the future control the Marxist/Progressives have to continue to further their agenda to complete the fundamental transformation to a classless Marxist society that was promised in November of 2008. Not only are the congressional elections critical to stop this course of action, but so are all local and state elections. Many people will be assisting with campaigns, working phone banks and walking precincts. We learned about private citizens being attacked by the directive of powerful people in Washington. An example is Catherine Engelbrecht of “True the Vote” who has had the full power of the federal government attack her by a directive of Elijah Cummings. Freedom Loving Americans advocate that only citizens should be allowed to vote and to prove citizenship is reasonable. The Marxist/Progressives advocate that anybody should be able to vote including non-citizens, people who died, and pets. They tell their supporters they should vote early and often. We recently saw the Marxist/Progressives who advocate voting early and often believe so firmly in this concept that they honor those who admit to breaking the law with multiple votes. North Carolina is learning many people have voted not only in North Carolina but also in different states. More
April 10, 2014
1st Amendment, BLM corruption
BLM corruption, cattle, Clive Bundy, Eminent domain, federal corporations, Hage case, JBS Brazil, Marti Oakley, NEVADA, PPJ Gazette, PROPERTY RIGHTS, US beef, USDA, wild horses
Marti Oakley © copyright 2014 All rights reserved
As “troops” are assembled against one lone rancher, the assault on private property rights and 1st Amendment rights are being ratcheted up at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada.
From Ben Swann:
UPDATE: Strike teams of 15-20 agents are attempting to take the cattle and often in the process killing and burying the cattle in the desert. A group of roughly 100 peaceful protestors attempted to stop them and got in front of a convoy of agents in an attempt to call in the local sheriff as they perceived this as an illegal action. BLM agents began violently attacking the protestors, throwing women to the ground with a number of men being tazed. Agents ended up retreating after their initial attack. Protestors are awaiting and anticipating a more forceful response and requesting assistance from all freedom fighters/lovers in the SW U.S. and nationwide.”
Across the country, but most especially in the Western states, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has revealed itself to be nothing more than an uncontrollable and direct threat to the sovereignty and economic stability of the states. At issue currently, is the massive militarized preparation for the assault on the Clive Bundy ranch in Nevada, orchestrated by the BLM.
Having already illegally seized 277 of the Bundy’s 900 head of cattle, the BLM with the cooperation of so-called “professional cowboys” and with the willful blindness of Nevada’s governor, state representatives and senators, the Bundy’s stand prepared to defend themselves, their land and property rights, even to the point of death. The BLM has indicated it is more than willing to oblige the Bundy’s, setting an example to other ranchers or property rights activists that the BLM will do what it pleases and no one will stop them.
This is what the BLM and its agents are doing to other Americans. Regardless of your position on the Wild horse & Burro’s, or your position on cattle operations, your focus here should be the violent assault on a private property owner by agents employed by a federal corporation that routinely violates property rights, and rights of the individual to benefit the federal government. If this man loses this battle, if we do not support him in his efforts to protect what is rightfully his, we all lose!
As the preparations by the BLM and its thugs continues, the level of testosterone oozing from every pore of agents dressed in military gear, flying military style helicopters overhead and brandishing weaponry and personal gear more suited for a military conflict, is literally dripping off the mesquite. Nothing is quite as invigorating as being part of a military style operation against one lone individual, knowing that that individual has little or no defense against the assault you are about to launch against them. And, also knowing that regardless of how unwarranted, illegal or heinous your actions are, you will never be held accountable. More
April 9, 2014
1st Amendment, BLM corruption
1 st amendment Violation, BLM corruption, Constitution, First Amendment Area, grazing rights, land rights, Police State, PROPERTY RIGHTS, Red Flag News, Ruby Ridge
April 7, 2014
(by Paul Joseph watson, Infowars.com) – A Ruby Ridge-style standoff is brewing in Nevada, where dozens of armed federal agents are closing in on cattle rancher Cliven Bundy over claims that Bundy has allowed his cows to graze illegally on government land, endangering a protected species of tortoise.
8 News NOW
Vowing to take a stand for, “your liberty and freedom,” Bundy says he is prepared to be killed as authorities surround a 600,000 acre section of public land as a result of Bundy violating a 1993 Bureau of Land Management ruling which changed grazing rights in order to protect the endangered desert tortoise.
“With all these rangers and all this force that is out here, they are only after one man right now. They are after Cliven Bundy. Whether they want to incarcerate me or whether they want to shoot me in the back, they are after me. But that is not all that is at stake here. Your liberty and freedom is at stake,” Bundy said.
Bundy’s refusal to recognize federal authority over the land under dispute and his failure to pay tens of thousands of dollars in grazing fees stems from his assertion that his family’s history trumps bureaucracy.
“My forefathers have been up and down the Virgin Valley ever since 1877. All these rights I claim have been created through pre-emptive rights and beneficial use of the forage and water. I have been here longer. My rights are before the BLM even existed,” Bundy said.
Accusing feds of seizing Nevada’s sovereignty, Bundy says he has fought the battle legally, through the media, and is now gearing up to fight it physically.
“Armed agents are forming a military-like staging area to prevent anyone from approaching the area,” writes Mike Paczesny.
Bundy asserts that his case is emblematic of how America has been transformed into a “police state,” labeling the government’s actions “pathetic”.
Hundreds of federal officials, aided by helicopters, low flying aircraft and hired cowboys, began rounding up Bundy’s cattle on Saturday as Bundy accused them of “trespassing,” adding that the impact will only serve to raise beef prices for residents of Las Vegas 80 miles away.
Feds postponed a similar raid in 2012 over fears the action would spur violence. Bundy has drawn a lot of support from the local community and protesters are heading to the area to demand authorities back off. Officials have created a taped off “First Amendment Area” where demonstrators can voice their concerns. A sign placed inside the area reads “Welcome to Amerika – Wake Up” alongside a hammer and sickle logo.
“The rights were created for us,” Bundy told the Las Vegas Review Journal. “I have the right to use the forage. I have water rights. I have access rights. I have range improvement rights, and I claim all the other rights that the citizens of Nevada have, whether it’s to camp, to fish or to go off road.”
Addressing the justification of seizing the cattle to protect a species of tortoise, Bundy stated, “I’ll never get it. If it weren’t for our cattle, there’d be more brush fires out here. The tortoises eat the cow manure, too. It’s filled with protein.”
The standoff has echoes of the 1992 Ruby Ridge incident, during which Randy Weaver, accused of selling an ATF agent two illegal sawed-off shotguns, became embroiled in a tragic confrontation with the the United States Marshals Service (USMS) and the FBI, resulting in the death of Weaver’s son Sammy, his wife Vicki, and Deputy U.S. Marshal William Francis Degan.
The story also brings back memories of New Hampshire couple Ed and Elaine Brown, who were involved in a nine month standoff with armed law enforcement and feds as a result of their refusal to pay income tax. The Browns were later convicted of “plotting to kill federal agents” because of their refusal to surrender and were both given de facto life sentences.
In a series of YouTube videos, Cliven Bundy and his wife outline the background behind their decision to take a stand against the feds, arguing that their fight is a constitutionally-driven line in the sand to push back against the usurpation of big government.
March 31, 2014
2nd amendment, Police State
2nd amendment, 2nd amendment attack, campaign for liberty, corruption, Government, gun confiscation, gun control, Minnesota, minnesota legislature, Obama, Police State, right to bear arms, UN Small Arms Treaty
Editors note: Obama has just signed on to the U.N.s Global Small Arms Treaty claiming he will implement it by executive order. This is NOT a valid treaty and has NOT been ratified by the Senate and therefore has no force of power. This is why there is a concerted effort within the states to deconstruct the 2nd Amendment, one state at a time. Unfortunately, several Democrats and Republicans in the Minnesota legislature are on board with the Obama plan.
Campaign for Liberty
I warned about the gun-grabbers’ plans to take guns away without a trial.
Now they are dangerously close to achieving their goal and I need you to act today to stop them.
Senate File 2639 (SF 2639) and House File 3238 (HF 3238) are bills “prohibiting persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing weapons”. Even those not convicted of any crime must give up their guns to a third party.
These orders are given out routinely with no evidence required. The “feelings” of the accuser would result in innocent people running the risk of becoming a felon before they are tried for a crime.
In an effort to fool liberty and pro-gun activists, the gun-grabbers modified HF 3238 with a fig leaf “compromise.”
However, even with the “compromise” language, the anti-gun HF 3238 still strips people of their Second Amendment rights without a trial.
This is a dangerous precedent, which will set the stage for further attacks on the rights of all gun owners.
Call your State Senator and State House Member today. Tell him or her to reject the fig-leaf “compromise” and vote NO on SF 2639 and HF 3238. Find your legislators by CLICKING HERE.
Votes on SF 2638 and HF 3238 may happen at any time now.
Don’t get me wrong – abusers should be prosecuted, and women and children should be protected from violence.
But SF 2639 and HF 3238 are disguises for attacking your constitutional right to due process and your right to keep and bear arms.
If enacted, these bills would require all guilty-until-proven-innocent parties to hand over their guns to someone else while they try to prove their innocence.
The gun-grabbers know they cannot be upfront about their intentions to destroy the Second Amendment because then their plans would fail.
That’s why they have been trying to chip away at our gun rights piece-by-piece.
That is why we must stand up now and tell the politicians in St. Paul NO to SF 2639 and to reject the fig-leaf “compromise” in HF 3238.
Please, call your state Senator and Representative now. Tell him or her to vote NO on SF 2639 and HF 3238 at each and every opportunity.
Minnesota Campaign for Liberty
P.S. The anti-gun forces are determined to use the anti-gun majorities in the legislature to attack every Minnesotan’s Second Amendment rights by passing SF 2639 and HF 3238.
Call your state Senator and Representative and tell him or her to oppose SF 2639 and reject the fig-leaf “compromise” HF 3238 now. You can find your legislators by CLICKING HERE.
March 31, 2014
baby boomers, Constitution, freedom, Government, liberty, Michael Webster, old farts, reclaiming America, US Borderfire Report
General Michael (Mick) Webster
“Yes, we are old and slow these days but rest assured, we have at least one good fight left in us. We have loved this country, fought for it, and died for it, and now we are going to save it. It is our country and nobody is going to take it away from us. We took oaths to defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that is an oath we plan to keep.”
Both young, old, black, brown, white, yellow, red, 99 percenter’s’, tea partier’s, students, union and non-union, republican, democrat, independent, no affiliation, government worker, or retired we are all in this together. Let’s join hands and stand together shoulder to shoulder this may 16th in Washington DC.
The typical U.S. household headed by a person age 65 or older has a net worth 47 times greater than a household headed by someone under 35, according to an analysis of census data released recently. If all of us “old farts” have all of the money, we should be able to fight for our freedom and liberty. Governor George Wallace during his run for the office of the presidency Said: “There is not a dimes worth of difference between the political parties”. Let us try to elect someone who might be near honest and not be after feathering their own nests. That means NEW BLOOD, across the board.
The younger adults yes, our own children like to refer to us as senior citizens, old fogies, geezers, and in some cases dinosaurs. Some of us are “Baby Boomers” getting ready to retire. Others have been retired for some time. Yes, it’s true, we walk a little slower these days and our eyes and hearing are not what they once were. We have worked hard, raised our children, worshiped our God and grown old together. Yes, we are the ones some refer to as being over the hill, and that is probably true. But before writing us off completely, there are a few things that need to be taken into consideration.
March 24, 2014
2nd amendment, Constitution
2nd amendment, Constitution, gun rights, Minnesota, Minnesota legislators, self defense, void laws
Marti Oakley © copyright 2014 All rights reserved
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . .
That great sucking sound you hear coming from the Capital is issuing from elected politicians as they bow, scrape and pucker up for Bloomberg. Bloomberg needs to go somewhere else to push his anti-2nd Amendment agenda.
Minnesota legislators both Republican and Democrat, have embarked on a mission to render the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution for the United States as void. Obviously enamored by the mere appearance of the highly detestable Michael Bloomberg from New York, a man who is reviled by many in his own state, politicians are lining up for the chance to do his bidding right here at home. Bloomberg showed up here in Minnesota after attacking New York gun owners and by co-opting a social group and converting it to a million mother’s campaign against owning guns in order to give his attack on the Constitution some kind of legs.
What are you people thinking?
I have no idea what it is going to take to make state legislators in every state realize that the public is not going to abide gun control laws. Most people realize this has nothing to do with preventing crime, and has only to do with limiting your right to defend yourself. After all, an unarmed population is a compliant population, especially when only the criminals will have guns. And make no mistake, if these first rounds of attacks are passed, more will come as they steadily chip away at the 2nd Amendment.
In fact, the bills currently under consideration in the Minnesota legislature are far more than that as your Constitutional right to due process is also relentlessly attacked. Also under attack is your right to speak out especially when in the presence of the political candidates who have promoted anti gun issues:
SF1915 by Senator Katie Sieben – restricts free speech near an election by subjecting efforts to call out candidate’s for their anti-gun records and to intrusive record keeping and reporting requirements. In other words, this is a “Gag-Act” designed to shut down Minnesota Gun Rights for exposing their actions to the public eye!
Well! She must be mighty proud to put her name on an open effort to abridge the 1St Amendment right to free speech.
March 20, 2014
a Nation Beguiled, bill of rights, civil libertities, commodity money, Constitution, dissident writing, dumbing down protocol, Occupy Wall Street
Response By : Olddog/ ANationBeguiled.com
Response to an article By Catherine J. Frompovich, Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Generally speaking, this article would normally be found in the comments section of the site it was read from, but I was so pissed when I read it I decided to obtain the help of Jefferson’s Voice to write a rebuttal, which is copied below.
The bottom line is the dumbing down protocol has eviscerated critical thinking skills in this country and reinforced an evolutionary old hard wired tendency to ignore insidious threats. Then there are endless distractions that create all kinds of addictive behavior and profound myopia. How do we overcome this?
Sometimes shocks like the 2008 economic contraction will wake some people up, hence, Occupy Wall Street. For now though, the slow dismantling continues and American frogs continue to sit in the pot and cook. It’s time for some powerful epiphanies to get the frogs moving! To get started, let’s be honest that TPTB working around the clock to destroy our civil liberties and republican form of government (and all nation states, for that matter) are not simply greedy corporatists, they are international banksters and their minions, their agenda is both soul crushing and far reaching. Connect the dots. More
March 1, 2014
1st Amendment, Agenda 21
1st Amendment, Agenda 21, common Core, free speech, rights of journalists, rosa koire, whistleblowers
THE RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT THE POLICIES OF ITS GOVERNMENT ARE, WITHOUT DANGER TO OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, HAS BEEN DESTROYED.
THIS IS UN AGENDA 21.
In late January, 2014, CSPAN aired a Columbia University School of Journalism panel discussion entitled Journalism After Snowden. It was re-aired a couple of nights ago and I watched it, spellbound. Notably, the panel included the editor in chief of The Guardian Newspaper (USA branch) Janine Gibson; the executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson; Cass Sunstein, Obama’s former head of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and Harvard Law professor who was recently appointed by the President to an NSA review panel.
New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson stated in as intense a way as possible that journalists are under threat of prosecution if they publish a story because THE GOVERNMENT HAS CHANGED THE RULES FOR A FREE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. In our free society a journalist had been willing to go to jail to protect the identity of a source. This dedication to a free press has been a vital part of our republic. More
February 18, 2014
America 2000, Chuck Smith, common Core, Constitution, education, fmailies, Goals 2000, international curriculum, Marti Oakley, Smith fix, TS Radio
Join us this evening, February 18 , 2014, at 7:00 pm CST! More
December 23, 2013
Constitutional Republic, Enemy, fascists, Government, overthrow of the Republic, We the people
This may well be one of the most “to the Point” presentations of how our government views us, and how we view them. Those in government are not part of “We The People”……. they have by their actions and words, declared us, the public, to be enemies of the fascist’s that have overthrown our Constitutional Republic.
November 2, 2013
2nd amendment, Constitution
Ammoland.com, Dean Weingarten, Florida, Gun Watch, jury nullification, oath of office, Second Amendment right to bear arms, sheriff, uphold the Constitution
c2013 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)- It has become common for liberal fascists to proclaim that “only the Supreme Court” can interpret the Constitution.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Every legislator, every elected politician, every police officer and person in the military takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They do not take an oath to follow orders given by the Supreme Court.
It is a myth that only the Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution. It was not always so, and legislators and juries commonly interpreted the Constitution in the United States before the “progressive” era. One of the strongest checks on government power is the power of the jury. A jury has the power to decide that a law is unconstitutional or that a particular application of a law is unjust.
In Florida, an elected Sheriff released a prisoner when the Sheriff believed the prisoners constitutional rights had been violated. A disgruntled deputy lined up another job, then accused the Sheriff of corruption. From wkzo.com:
BRISTOL, Florida (Reuters) – A Florida sheriff was acquitted on Thursday of charges that he committed misconduct and falsified public records when he freed a jailed man who carried a loaded gun without a permit.
Suspended Liberty County Sheriff Nick Finch, 51, had testified that he released Floyd Parrish from jail because he had a constitutional duty to uphold the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Conservative organizations and activists opposed to gun control rallied to the sheriff’s defense after Governor Rick Scott suspended him last summer. Scott reinstated him shortly after the jury delivered its verdict.
So we have a very interesting case where a Sheriff acts on his principles, and is upheld in them by a jury of his peers.
Perhaps we will see the start of a trend.
Link to Gun Watch
About Dean Weingarten;
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.
Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by – AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source
Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2013/11/jury-finds-sheriff-not-guilty-for-upholding-oath-of-office/#ixzz2jWlUPVNu
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
October 29, 2013
Agenda 21, Constitution, PROPERTY RIGHTS
Agenda 21, Agenda 21 and regional planning, California, Constitution, Detroit, Oregon, Plan Bay Area, Portland, private property rights, PROPERTY RIGHTS, rosa koire, San Francisco Bay Area, sustainable development
A note from Rosa Koire (author of “Behind the Green Mask”):
On October 30, at 8:30 p.m. (Eastern Time), “For The Record,” a 60-Minutes-style news program on Blaze TV, will air “The Agenda” a documentary on UN Agenda 21 and regional planning. This excellent, well-produced program examines the impacts of Smart Growth and regional over-reach on the San Francisco Bay Area, Detroit, and Portland. I was pleased to be featured in the show and hope that you’ll be able to watch and share it with your fellow activists and friends.
To watch for free, click here.
We are fighting to stop the worst regional plan in the United States here in the San Francisco Bay Area–its impacts will be felt all across the nation. We believe it will be the template for the rest of the country and have launched a legal challenge to stop it. Will you help us defeat this UN Agenda 21 plan by making a donation to the legal fund?
Thank you for your commitment to exposing and fighting UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. Awareness is the first step in the Resistance.
Rosa Koire, ASA
Post Sustainability Institute
October 24, 2013
Constitution, nullification/federal mandates
Archuleta County, Constitution, constitutional liberties, constitutional sheriffs, defense of their freedom, federal tyranny, Fully Informed Jury Association., liberty zone, oath of office, patriots, Sheriff Mack, Sheriff Mack’s Constitutional Posse, U.S. Constitution, unconstitutional lawlessness, unconstitutional powers, United States Constitution, USCDA
Michael Webster: Syndicated Investigative Reporter.
There is a web site called Liberty Zone were they say the U.S. Constitution is defended. According to the web site a liberty zone is a concept to engage, local county citizens in defense of their freedoms and rights, their true constitutional liberties and rights from encroachment by lawless, unconstitutional powers of federal, state, or local governments and courts.
They go on to say that “everyone knows there is something terribly wrong with our governments, and that the problem is getting worse by the day. Many true patriots, and even many who haven’t even thought of themselves as “patriots,” are sick at heart at the unconstitutional lawlessness, greed and corruption taking place in our Republic, but are frustrated at what to do about it. Many join various groups created to help educate people, and to begin to resist the growth of tyranny, which is a great thing to do, but this doesn’t address the real place change must take place… at out local, County level, and with the People. What can be done to unite citizens in towns, cities and counties across our great Republic”.
The site points out that the various Federal, State and Local governments have strayed far outside their authority and are unconstitutional in many actions. Unless The People stand up for the laws of the land and for the Constitution of the U.S.A., as it was intended and as “The People” expect it to be, our way of life is threatened and will cease to exist. There are millions of people across the country that belong to various groups that hold to these beliefs as well, but are so diluted at the local level that nothing can be done to effect grass root, local efforts.
They claim the solution is creating your local county, city or town as a “Liberty Zone” and is the start to bringing like-minded people together. Liberty Zones locally will be that focal point for individuals, irrespective of group affiliation, and allow our County citizens to support the varied missions of the many allies we all have in our varied groups. The ONLY way the People will secure their liberties is to stand together to defend the Constitution, both federal and state. More
October 19, 2013
2nd amendment, Government
2nd amendment, Democratic senators, Government, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Treason, UN Small Arms Treaty
Contributed J.S. Rugg
SO – WHO WOULD VOTE FOR SUCH A TREATY?
THE ANSWER: MR. OBAMA
AND THESE 46 SENATORS:
> Baldwin (D-WI)
> Baucus (D-MT)
> Bennett (D-CO)
> Blumenthal (D-CT)
> Boxer (D-CA)
> Brown (D-OH)
> Cantwell (D-WA)
> Cardin (D-MD)
> Carper (D-DE)
> Casey (D-PA)
> Coons (D-DE)
> Cowan (D-MA)
> Durbin (D-IL)
> Feinstein (D-CA) Biggst Scumbag
> Franken (D-MN)
> Gillibrand (D-NY)
> Harkin (D-IA)
> Hirono (D-HI)
> Johnson (D-SD)
> Kaine (D-VA)
> King (I-ME)
> Klobuchar (D-MN)
> Landrieu (D-LA)
> Leahy (D-VT)
> Levin (D-MI)
> McCaskill (D-MO)
> *Menendez (D-NJ)
> Merkley (D-OR)
> Mikulski (D-MD)
> Murphy (D-CT)
> Murray (D-WA)
> Nelson (D-FL) Real Scumbag
> Reed (D-RI)
> Reid (D-NV)
> Rockefeller (D-WV)
> Sanders (I-VT)
> Schatz (D-HI)
> Schumer (D-NY)
> Shaheen (D-NH)
> Stabenow (D-MI)
> Udall (D-CO)
> Udall (D-NM)
> Warner (D-VA)
> Warren (D-MA)
> Whitehouse (D-RI)
> Wyden (D-OR)
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD – THESE PEOPLE MUST BE REPLACED IF AMERICA IS TO SURVIVE
October 19, 2013
American Jurisprudence, articles of freedom, congress, Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Freedoms and Liberties, John Wallace, national sovereignty, nationalist Third Party, Oathkeepers, Preamble to the US Constitution, representatives, senate
By John W. Wallace – NY OathKeeper
“Let the facts reveal – the Federal Government of the United States of America, which was instituted to protect the rights of individual citizens, instead – threatens our life, liberty and property through usurpations of the Constitution; and emboldened by our own lack of responsibility and due diligence in these matters, has exceeded its mandate, and abandoned those founding principles which have made our nation exceptional;”
|I believe that our individual Freedoms and Liberties, as well as our nation’s sovereignty, are in danger because of the unconstitutional actions of our federal government, both Republicans and Democrats. I was a New York delegate to Continental Congress 2009, held in St. Charles, Illinois from November 11th to November 22nd, 2009 and I am also a signer to the “Articles of Freedom.”
I firmly believe that the time has come to establish a third party, a nationalist party, whose members and elected representatives truly support the United States Constitution. Like millions of my fellow Americans, I have raised my right hand and took an oath “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
How could anyone who has pledged to support and defend the Constitution, reconcile the following violations of the Constitution that are destroying America?
1. For many, many decades, our Government has been meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, without any Constitutional authority, causing foreign nationals to direct their hostilities towards us, which has given us a War on Terror and a growing Police State at home that is repugnant to the Fourth Amendment and the General Welfare of a Free People; More
September 5, 2013
chemical attack in Syria, Constitution, false-flag, Government, illegal war, military action, military strikes, Obama and the Pentagon., separation of powers, Syria, wars of aggression
Gary Jacobucci has collected the top articles from across the web concerning Obama’s plan to start yet another illegal war.
You Cost America a Great Deal This Past Week, Mr. President
Charlie Daniels Infowars.com Sept. 4, 2013
In my soon to be 77 years as a citizen of the United States of America, having lived through Japan’s sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, the dark days of WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Watergate, 9/11 and all the other serious and profound events our beloved nation has been involved in over the last three quarters of a century, I have to say with all sincerity that I have never seen a president as confused, befuddled, impotent, insincere and as out of his depth as Barack Obama has become in dealing with the Syrian issue.
Senate Foreign Relations Panel Approves Military Action in Syria
Julie Wilson Infowars.com September 4, 2013
US inches one step closer to war with Syria
Wednesday the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved authorization of US military action in Syria. While the vote still needs to be approved by the full Senate next week, the action is a slap in the face for a majority of Americans who oppose any sort of military intervention in the Middle Eastern country.
Congress Prepares Resolution Allowing Obama to Attack Syria
Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com September 4, 2013
Constitutional scholar: resolution eerily like previous Gulf of Tonkin resolution
Gulf of Tonkin false flag resulted in the Vietnam War that killed more than 3 million Southeast Asians and nearly 60,000 Americans.
Despite Secretary of State John Kerry’s assurance that Arab countries will pay for an attack on Syria, opposition to the ill-conceived operation is growing.
The National Review Online quotes Rep. Matt Salmon of Arizona. Salmon said hundreds of constituents – with the exception of two – have called his office urging him to resist the move in Congress to vote in favor of attacking Syria.
“I don’t see any national-security imperative for our country at all. Both sides in this equation are bad actors,” Salmon said. “Other than saving face for the president, I don’t understand what we would be doing,” he added.
Salmon also told the NRO few believe Obama’s strikes will be surgical. “Nobody believes this is going to be a couple surgical strikes” he said dismissively.
The Arizona congressman said that he believes Obama will flaunt the will of Congress and attack Syria if Congress fails to issue an authorization. It will be a full-blown constitutional crisis if Obama overrides the will of Congress and would represent the “most significant flouting of separation of powers in this nation,” the congressman said.
Regardless of polls showing an overwhelming number of Americans opposing any military action against Syria, on Wednesday the Senate worked overtime to draft a resolution allowing Obama to strike the Arab nation under what the Washington Times described as “very tight circumstances.” More
September 4, 2013
Constitution, depleted uranium, DOMESTIC TERRORISM
chemical weapons, depleted uranium, District of Criminals, national security, Syria, US bioweapons labs, war, white phosphorus weapons
Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2013 All rights reserved
You won’t hear anyone say the word, war.
This parsing of words, this come-to-be expected word weaseling is nothing new. Kerry, Dempsey, the President and every Senator never uttered the word “war” which would require the consent of congress to wage. The refraining from using this word and instead referring to the war plans for Syria as a “strike, intervention or action”, is what the President is relying on to by-pass congress and the Constitution. As long as no one dares call it a war, there appears to be no need for the President to get congress’s consent.
As the country rises up and resoundingly rejects any action of any kind in Syria, the propaganda is running knee deep in the District of Criminals. Because of the decades long stream of what has turned out to be faulty “intelligence”, outright lies about whatever fictional threat they were using to to attack another nation in order to seize their assets (oil) and to depose one government after another only to install a government more to our liking, we are faced with another needless war.
The US Senate is meeting and discussing how and why they intend to start another senseless war, this time in Syria. The pretentiousness of these discussions borders on the absurd and is an insult to the intelligence of America. Continually citing “intelligence”, human, satellite and other methods of spying, Senator’s Menendez and Corker are followed by the new Secretary of State, John Kerry, among others. Each of them attempting to somehow tie the civil war in Syria to the national security of the United States. This will last for hours of course, due to the fact that there is no connection. This makes the argument particularly tedious.
Among the weakest arguments heard over the last several days; “It would make us appear weak”. Well now, if ever there was an argument for bombing and terrorizing another nation on the other side of the globe, it would have to be our big giant national ego. Apparently, our government believes that the Syrian people are not terrorized quite enough as a result of internal turmoil and the proper response to this would be to create more turmoil, more terror and to destroy everything in sight along with “collateral” damage. This means men, women AND children will be unilaterally harmed or killed by our actions.
Supposedly vast intelligence exists to indicate that a chemical attack actually took place. This intelligence came from the same sources who supplied the intelligence for the Iraq war. You remember…….the evidence that never was?
Collateral damage in Syria is said to be deemed to be “low” in this instance. So,.. what? So are we going to accept 5,000 men, women and children being killed by us? 10,000? 20,000? What’s the magic number?
IF I understand this correctly, gassing people is a big problem, but blowing them up along with their entire community so that you can overthrow their government and seize their national assets, is not. More
August 27, 2013
Agenda 21, BLM corruption, Constitution, Debbie Coffey, Government, Uncategorized
BLM corruption, Bureau of Land Management, Chapter 8 of the NAS report, Debbie Coffey, Delphi, National Academy of Sciences, wild horse & burros, Wild horse slaughter
Debbie Coffey Copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved.
While some advocacy groups quickly lauded certain aspects of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report regarding the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Wild Horse & Burro Program, Anne Novak of Protect Mustangs noticed something and brought it to my attention:
On page 275 of this report, under the Chapter 8 topic of Social Considerations, the NAS Board advised the Bureau of Land Management:
“One possible method to gather the latest information from experts and to focus it on a particular problem is to use a Delphi process.”
What’s troubling about this? The Delphi process was developed in the 1950s by the Rand Corporation, and has since been used for the purpose of maneuvering segments of the public into accepting predetermined government policies.
In other words, the Delphi process gives the illusion of public input and participation, but the input isn’t really considered and participation doesn’t matter. It’s basically just a way for the government to pretend there is public participation and accountability.
BLM photo of National Wild Horse & Burro Advisory Board meeting
Here’s how the Delphi process works: There is a predetermined outcome. (Most likely, not the one you’d hoped for.) And who picks the supposedly unbiased “experts” who will be submitting “the latest information?” Who chooses what to “focus” on? (Not you.)
There may be a series of meetings where people are broken into smaller groups and sit at different tables around the room. The purpose of this is that if knowledgeable people arrive together, they’ll have to sit with strangers and hopefully be more subdued.
Each table will have a facilitator, who will know which way to help “steer” the group. The people will be instructed to answer some questions among themselves, then arrive at a table “consensus.”
The Delphi process often uses surveys to bring about this “consensus,” but the questions on the survey are loaded and skewed to manipulate the desired outcome. The survey will use grading like “agree all of the time, agree most of the time, agree some of the time, and don’t agree. Or, the survey will ask respondents to use ratings like “most important, moderately important and least important.”
After the first survey, people are told most people agreed or somewhat agreed with the predetermined outcome. Then, people are given another survey and are asked if they can be flexible and try to rethink the “few remaining” areas of disagreement. Then, the respondents are told that the majority achieved a “consensus” (which is the direction that the group leading this meeting wanted: the predetermined outcome).
Someone is chosen to speak for the table, most likely a person who has been secretly pre-briefed about the desired Delphi outcome. The table “spokesperson” is the only one allowed to address the podium and there will be little, if any, opportunity to address the podium or the crowd directly. More
June 28, 2013
2nd amendment, radio
2nd amendment, Constitution, fraudulent gun laws, government corruption, gun rights, Its not the law, Marti Oakley, TS Radio, Wayne Barbuto
5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST
Listen Live HERE!
Callin # 917-388-4520
Phone calls and questions and comments are encouraged.
Barbuto: In the year 2000 I was unlawfully attacked by the Puerto Rican-based BATF and accused of Manufacturing Firearms without a license, a non-existent law. More
June 25, 2013
2nd amendment, Government
2nd amendment, ATF, color of law, fictions of law, foreign corporations, gun control, gun rights, Its not the law, Marti Oakley, Wayne Barbuto
Due to more chronic problems on blogtalk this show is being rescheduled for Friday at 7:00 CST. More
June 10, 2013
2nd amendment, Dems attack 2nd Amendment, Gun control bills, NEVADA, Veto gun control
The Gov of Nevada has set up a hotline asking whether or not he should veto a proposed gun control bill….he has opened it up to out of state callers since it would impact everyone…
Mayor Bloomberg has asked his minions to call in supporting the legislation
we need to call in opposing it
775-684-5670 press #2 to ask for the veto…
it takes 15 seconds…
just make the call !! Please Share (seriousy, less than 15 second call — just press #2 and you’re done)
June 8, 2013
10th amend. Center, Constitution, DOMESTIC TERRORISM
civil rights, Constitution, Democrats Against Agenda 21, electronic propaganda, fundamental freedoms, non-profit corporations, Oathkeepers, Post Sustainability Institute, pro-American, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC net assets, The Tenth Amendment Center
The Intelligence Report published by the Southern Poverty
Law Lie Center is out! On these lists of supposed threats to the government are the Oathkeepers, Democrats Against Agenda 21 (I am a member!) Post Sustainability Institute, The Tenth Amendment Center, We Are Change, We The People and many other pro-American and Constitutionally based organizations originating from multiple political philosophies. SPLC has decided that patriot groups who support the Constitution and are pro-American, are a threat to the nation. So much so that they compiled these lists of people and groups who scare them really, really bad…..and they send these lists over to any of the federal agencies who spy on us, compile dossiers on all of us and who want to put drones in our skies to watch all of us, I suppose with the thinking that if they keep tattling on others no one will be watching them.
According to SPLC , its magazine the Intelligence Report is the nation’s preeminent periodical monitoring the radical right in the U.S. The only problem is…….there are just as many on the left and in the middle who are determined to preserve our liberty and our republic and who find the activities of the likes of SPLC to be a cancer on the nation. This mixing of political ideals seems to pass by those big thinkers at SPLC.
It is our constitutional right!
Who ever thought we would see the day in this country, that advocating for the Constitution, for fundamental freedoms and liberty would be deemed a threat…to the government. And why would SPLC decide that pro-liberty, anti United Nations interference in our country, and the refusal of law officers and military personal to violate our rights, to possibly use lethal force against us…… as something that represents a threat? A threat to whom?
We have fundamental liberties that include the right to freely assemble, to freely associate, to travel freely between the states and the freedom of speech, among many others. The lists SPLC has compiled is viciously opposed to the exercise of these freedoms unless it is in correlation with their philosophy……..whatever that actually is.
An Uber wealthy “non-profit”
The Southern Poverty
Law Lie Center had an illustrious history at one time. Founded primarily to fight for civil rights, the SPLC has devolved into a modern day electronic propaganda machine that peddles disinformation for the government and makes a truckload of money doing it. This so-called “non-profit” corporation now has net assets as of 2012 ending, of $256,554,758.
From SPLC pages:
The Southern Poverty Law Center is the country’s most effective nonprofit organization fighting dangerous extremist groups. We’ve documented a staggering 1,007 hate groups operating in our country — a nearly 70% increase since 2000.
Actually the SPLC is the country’s most lucrative non-profit dedicated to creating fictional threats out of thin air and, it is by far one of the most dangerous extremist groups operating at this time. SPLC exists today as a clear and present danger to our Constitutional Republic and advocates ferociously for an end to it. That is what is staggering.
In truth, the Southern Poverty
Law Lie Center has documented very few actual so-called [hate groups]. There are the usual suspects, i.e., the Aryan Brotherhood, etcetera, and instead have focused on those who support the Constitution and who object to the infringement of rights secured by that document. More
June 7, 2013
Child endangerment, Constitution, families, radio
Divorce courts, families, fundamental liberties, Marti Oakley, Not in the childs best interest, Parental Rights, procedural due process, Ron B Palmer, Sherry L Palmer, substantive due process, TS Radio
Join us this evening at 7:00 pm CST!
5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST
Listen Live HERE!
Callin # 917-388-4520
Not In The Child’s Best Interest
Please join us this evening as Sherry L Palmer and Ron B. Palmer discuss their newly published book, Not In The Child’s Best Interest.
This is a ground-breaking manual on how to protect not only your rights as a parent, but also, how to protect the rights of your child during and after a divorce. This is a must-have for those parents seeking to retain all rights to their children and preventing the courts from interfering in that relationship, unnecessarily and many times, unconstitutionally.
Attorneys still lead parents to believe that they don’t have rights to their children until either the divorce court grants to them or the other parent agrees to give them to them. The Palmer’s have written a book that expands the knowledge base for attorneys so that only divorce cases with a “genuine” violation of law can reduce a parent’s rights.
Sherry has experienced the terror of divorce custody battles first hand and has found a way out for us all through the U.S. Constitution. Her book on this topic is titled “Not in the Child’s Best Interest”, and is available here. If you find her articles insightful you will love her book.
Ron B Palmer
Ron is a constitutional scholar and a political activist. He focuses on parental rights in divorce. Having studied more than 100 Supreme Court opinions related to parental rights and the constitutional concepts that support those rights, Ron came to an amazing insight. The Supreme Court strongly supports that parental rights are among our oldest fundamental liberties. It is just that Divorce Courts have been allowed to ignore the Constitution. Ron intends to put a stop to this injustice perpetrated at the expense of divorced parents and children of divorce. More
May 30, 2013
California courts, California Legislators, California State Constitution, California State Legislator, civil rights, Constitution, constitutional rights, Jail4judges, judicial malfeasance, right to a jury, supreme law of the land, trial by jury
Mr. Don Bird below is pressing the point with his California State Legislator, with whom he has gained an open door of opportunity.
You see, back in 1969 a plot was engineered by the California Legislators that if they could dispose of the right to a jury in criminal cases, they could expedite cases much faster without the involvement of juries. To pull off this plot against the People of California, they had to “invent” a whole new class of jury less crimes heretofore unrecognized in the Constitution called “Infractions.”
While Don Bird wishes to keep his challenge limited to the State of California Constitution, I am not so limited in my lead-in statements. The fact is, in our U.S. Constitution it is clearly written:
“The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury.” Article III, Section 2, Clause 3.
The two controlling words herein are “except,” and “shall.” There is but only one criminal jury trial exception, and that is in matters of impeachment, otherwise there “shall” be a jury trial.
And, yes, the California State Constitution, as well as all states, recognizes that its Constitution and laws are subjective to the U.S. Constitution,
“The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Article III, Section I.
Here, I would like to relate to a humorous actual incident of a criminal trial in which I was called upon to appear in court and to answer to the criminal charge involved therein. Pursuant to Article I, Section 16, “Trial by jury is an inviolate right and shall be secured to all,” More
May 26, 2013
2nd amendment, Government
2nd amendment, assault weapons, gun control, gun rights, John Wallace, New York State legislature, NY SAFE Act, Oathkeepers, unconstitutional gun laws
By John W. Wallace – NY OathKeeper
Please send your ideas and suggestions for the “Plan A” to me by email: john@NewYorkOathKeeper.com
Every time I think about the Hitler-like, socialist, unconstitutional New York Safe Act that was passed in the middle of the night by the New York City dominated New York State Legislature and signed by a Governor who would be president, I think of the TV show “Cops” in which the theme song says: “Whaddya gonna do when they come for you – Bad Boys, Bad Boys” etc. etc.
We know that the state of New York arbitrarily came up with its own definitions of what so called “Assault Weapons” are. The definitions were obviously concocted out of thin air by a group of New York City “Girly Man” legislators who obviously know nothing about guns.
One of the things they identified that makes certain rifles “assault weapons” is if they have a loop on it for a bayonet. Never mind the fact that as far as I can determine, no person in New York State has been murdered or even assaulted by a person using a rifle with a bayonet attached to it in well over a hundred years. It doesn’t matter to these socialists because they will say and do anything to take our guns. That is their ultimate goal.
What is also interesting about this new law that was rushed through the legislature in the middle of the night is that there is a requirement that there can only be a maximum of seven bullets in a magazine. How did they come up with this magic number of seven? Unfortunately, the hastily passed legislation did not even exclude police officers. So, the criminals will have any number of bullets in their illegal guns, because they do not obey gun laws anyway, and the police officers and law-abiding citizens will be limited to seven. Never mind that seven bullet magazines are not even made in the USA.
The NY SAFE ACT makes certain rifles legally purchased in the past by American citizens, who happen to reside in New York State, illegal to purchase or sell to another state resident. This is clearly unconstitutional. Why has the New York State legislature concentrated their efforts on turning law-abiding American citizens into criminals using ex-post facto laws? The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that if a person doesn’t have a criminal background, laws that make something you own illegal when it was purchased legally, are unconstitutional. More
May 24, 2013
2nd amendment, Columbia County, gun rights, John Wallace, Liberty News Online, NY SAFE Act, Oathkeepers
John W. Wallace – NY OathKeeper
LIBERTY NEWS ONLINE
COLUMBIA COUNTY – The Columbia County District Attorney is making good on a promise not to prosecute a man arrested under the SAFE Act.
DA Paul Czajka said he would not prosecute Gregory Dean Jr.
Mr. Dean, 31, of Hopewell Junction in Dutchess County, was pulled over earlier this month after State Police say the light over his license plate was out. He was found to be driving his car while having a suspended driver’s license, a misdemeanor under the state’s Vehicle and Traffic Law.
During the processing for driving while having a suspended license, Mr. Dean was found to be in possession of a licensed handgun that had 9 bullets in the magazine (2 bullets more than legally allowed under the NY SAFE Act). The State Police then charged him under the violation of the SAFE ACT.
When he appeared in the town Court to face the gun charges, the District Attorney said he would not prosecute and the charge was dismissed. Mr. Dean still faces the Driving while Suspended chsarges.
A large crowd of Pro-Second Amendment supporters was on hand at the court to support Mr. Dean.
May 18, 2013
2nd amendment, Constitution
2nd amendment, Cosntitution, gun confiscation, gun rights, PPJ Gazette, Treason, UN Small Arms Treaty
We tracked this list back through several sites and were unable to determine who initially prepared it. Thanks to them just the same! The multiple attempts to pass gun laws abridging the 2nd Amendment are meant to by-pass the need for the states to ratify this unconstitutional treaty from the UN. With several states passing nullification laws on several issues including gun rights, you would think these senators would get a clue and realize we will not be disarmed!
May 4, 2013
anarchists, Constitutional Republic, CORPORATIONS, CRAPitol Hill, District of Criminals, Homeland Terrorism, Marti Oakley, military weapons, TSA
Marti Oakley ©copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved
The anarchists on CRAPitol Hill
We all have the carefully constructed vision of what anarchy looks like. We have allowed ourselves to become convinced that anarchists are wild looking radicals, brandishing guns, riding motorcycles; with their shaven heads and/or long flowing unwashed beards and tattooed women. We have allowed ourselves to be convinced that they are just looking for a reason to overthrow the government of the United States. (Gasp!!) If they don’t fit into this scenario, we are still equally convinced that they (the unknown anarchists) are plotting some kind of violent overthrow and that they hate government in all its forms. Should all 20 or so actual anarchists ever get together in one spot…….why, there is no telling what will happen! It will be chaos! Blood will run in the streets and no one will be safe from these wild-eyed haters of government who want nothing more than to terrorize the rest of us with their lawlessness!
Actually, we do know who the anarchists are. And they are gathered in one spot and there are far more of them than we ever imagined. More
April 26, 2013
2nd amendment, DOMESTIC TERRORISM
2nd amendment, “Morning Blow”, constitutional protections, fictional mental disorders, homegrown terrorism, Homeland Security Terrorism Department, Marti Oakley, spy drone program, The Patriot Act, TSA, UN Small Arms Treaty
Marti Oakley ©copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved
Note: **Might I suggest that those who are illegally seeking to obtain a firearm contact the ATF or Eric Holder? After Fast & Furious, obviously the biggest gun runners in the country are working for the federal government. Oh! excuse me……gun “walkers”
The push to “back door” the UN Small Arms Treaty
The push to establish an (inter-)national gun registry that would mirror the UN Small Arms Treaty requirements meant to prohibit, limit and eventually make gun ownership untenable, has failed to pass the senate. The anger from the Obama Administration is palpable. This was supposed to be a done deal and would have relieved the president from issuing a clearly unconstitutional executive order, which now he is most likely to do. This will be a direct assault on the 2nd Amendment in order to acquiesce to the United Nations demands that the citizens of the United States forfeit their 2nd Amendment protections and give up their guns. It is a demand that the federal corporation that operates as [government] sees as quite advantageous in their efforts to dispense with any notion of a constitutional republic.
Lame Street Media was simply abuzz with feigned angry indignation at the Senate for voting down what was clearly meant to be the door opener for future assaults on the 2nd Amendment.
An early morning show on MSNBC that we like to call “Morning Blow” was a prime example of LSM’s efforts to sway public opinion, to anger the public and to denigrate the Senate. Senators were called “stupid” for refusing to condone what everyone surely knew to be the opening volley against gun rights. At one point, the claim was made that 90% of the public supported these bills.
This is an outright lie.
These bills had nowhere near that amount of support, and in fact, the public was heavily against any such bills knowing full well that these bills had nothing to do with making us safer, keeping guns out of criminals hands or any other such drivel promoted by those who fear an armed public.
To hear these talking potato heads talk…you would think that there is not one state with waiting periods to clear back ground checks in existence and you would think that absolutely everyone out here is clamoring to have their 2nd Amendment rights struck down.
Most states have a minimum of three days before a gun sale can be completed and possession of the gun can occur, and gun shows do not necessarily equate to immediate possession. In fact, I know of no states that do not have a back ground check accompanied by a waiting period. But it is important to make the public think and believe that tens of thousands of guns are sold willy nilly with no record of sales, no back ground checks, no waiting periods.
Considering the massive amount of surveillance that has been conducted on the American public as a result of the Patriot Acts and subsequent bills which further encroached on our right to be left alone, and when you consider the fact that the CIA has been assembling dossiers on absolutely every one, the likely-hood that a criminal would obtain a gun through these resources is nill to none. Criminals will go to other criminals to buy guns, they will not go to legal gun owners who abide by the law.
Note: **Might I suggest that those who are illegally seeking to obtain a firearm contact the ATF or Eric Holder? After Fast & Furious, obviously the biggest gun runners in the country are working for the federal government. Oh! excuse me……gun “walkers”. If you supplied guns to the drug cartels in Mexico you would be a “gun-runner” and federally prosecuted. If THEY provide guns to the drug cartels it is gun”walking”….sounds much nicer and softer. YOU would be prosecuted but THEY just don’t remember anything so nothing happens. More
April 22, 2013
Agenda 21, Democrats Against Agenda 21, DHS/police surveillance, false flag operations, Government, Homeland Stupidity, HSD, Marti Oakley, PPJ Gazette, Rebecca Em Campbell, Seattle, surveillance, Washington state
Join us April 21st, 2013, at 7:00pm CST! More
April 22, 2013
2nd amendment, Constitution
2nd amendment, California Judicial Accountability Initiative Law, Constitution, constitutional protections, false flags, gun control, Jail for Judges, Marti Oakley, Ron Branson, shall not be infringed
By Ron Branson
April 21, 2013
“The battle line seems to be clear. According to the politicians, the Second Amendment should read; “Swarms of uniformed officers bearing guns and badges being necessary to keep us all safe, the people may have and bear such specified arms under specified and restricted circumstances as approved by federal, state, and local politicians and judges.”
We are in an age of passing laws. There is a law for everything! Whenever we perceive that something has gone wrong, we automatically think that we need to legislate another law. We even have a saying, “There outa be a law against that!” We now have more laws than any human being can possible reckon with.
Surprising to most, the more laws legislated within a nation, the more evil the nation becomes, for righteousness comes not by the law. Every tyrant establishes his dictatorship by new laws. Adolf Hitler was lawfully elected to office, and it was through fear instilled in the People that he announced, “An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland.” It was through fear that he instituted domestic security laws, creating the dreaded Gestapo that brought about the killing of millions of his own nation. Appropriate here is the quote of Benjamin Franklin, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Now as to America, let us take up just one class of the enumerable hundreds of thousands of laws now on the books; – Gun laws. There are currently an estimated 20,000 laws relating to gun ownership. Federal laws, state laws, county laws, city and local regulations. There are even imagined gun laws that are not laws, but enforced as laws.
Right now Congress is fighting over proposed passage of a number of new gun laws in addition to the already 20,000 existing gun laws. Does it dawn on anybody, that there are absolutely no guns laws that can be passed that will quell the issue of the right of the People to keep and bear arms? We just as well pass a law making it a crime to commit suicide with the penalty being death! We could even increase the penalty if the person uses a bomb to blow themselves. Gee, we could eliminate armed bank robberies by posting signs “No guns allowed in bank.” I think you have gotten my point.
With respect to these 20,000 gun laws in America there is but one gun law that controls all others, and it reads, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” To those unfamiliar with those words, it is the Second Amendment of the U.S Constitution. Those words were initiated by our Founding Fathers and placed into our Constitution, and those words have never changed throughout the entire history of the United States. More