Home

The fact of Ebola now uncontained internationally requires action. What action?

2 Comments

strip banner

 

new-logo25Dick Eastman M.S., M.A.

 

__________________________________________________________

Action for what purpose? A debate.

Does Ebola deserve the attention it’s been getting lately? Is it as dangerous as some so-called “alarmists” (e.g., Mike Adams, Donald Trump, etc.) are suggesting? Or is it the easily manageable threat others (like the CDC) are proclaiming? Actually, the truth may lie somewhere in the middle.

Ebola as a contagious disease deserves appropriate action. The disease exists and it is on the loose. But there something else in play here. The disease is obviously not being handled intelligently and those whom are generally thought to be the responsible authorities, government, American medicine and the Center for Disease Control are clearly not taking measures to address this un-contained fatal virus.

This president who signed in a medical reform bill that seems to have been written for the profit of the financial sector and the big pharmaceutical companies has not taken the steps that must be taken now. A national quarantine of everyone — with absolute minimization of contact, including schools and, simultaneously, the closing airports and border crossings — except for minimum personal contact imports, say from container ships or trucks carrying products in which the truck drivers are limited in whom they may contact. The system will not be perfect and there is no time to perfect it – it simply must be done now — while containment is still possible. With an incubation period of 20 days and people exposed wandering freely about right now, the option of containment as I have described will not be open for long.

Yes, infectious disease experts may know the most about the viruses that cause Ebola virus disease (EVD) and the other hemorrhagic fever diseases; scientific facts are always preferable to unfounded theories and worst-case prognostication; and some people do attempt to profit/benefit from the hysteria that comes from potential threats. More

What I Believe and Why: 9/11

2 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25James Hufferd Ph.D.

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

____________________________________________

I urge you to go to the www.911grassroots.org web site and read the last few articles I’ve posted, mostly from other sources which document what I was thinking far better than I could. Those postings will provide needed context for this article.

________________________________________________

A number of intriguing (and horrific) questions and theorized or partial answers have occurred to me over the past several weeks, which I will try to explore here.

For starters, what really provokes (or possesses) human beings to commit or endorse heinous acts of revolting violence and cruelty in the course of their purposeful lives?

What. For instance, would motivate the drivers of modern Zionism to endorse or commit genocide by strong military force endlessly for months against an already psychologically and physically abused, essentially unarmed population in Gaza over a desperately deployed arsenal of rockets akin to fireworks rockets?

What provokes a small percentage of extremist Islamic radicals to flaunt to the world and exult in apparent beheadings and mass-murders perpetrated hourly against any who dare to think differently?

And what provokes members of the world’s unified power-cult psychopathic cabal to blow to dust thousands of people, on 9/11/01, impossibly blaming fanciful foreign boogeymen, and then obliterate hundreds of thousands senselessly together with their targeted countries? More

Good Wolves and Other Fables: Part 2

Leave a comment

strip bannernew-logo25W. R. McAfee

OPINION: Part 2

__________________________________________________________

The Southwest is the area where Canadian and Mexican wolves mostly likely will meet and crossbreed. According to USFWS documents, the Mexican wolf’s inbreeding contributes to small litter sizes and low pup-survival rates. Cross-breeding with the non-native Canadian wolves would “solve” the Mexican wolf’s gene pool problem. Call it a “nonessential experimental Mexican wolf subspecies.” Or call it what it is—a bigger crossbred “Mexican” gray wolf.

Matt Cronin, a University of Alaska, Fairbanks and research professor of animal genetics, addressed USFWS officials at their Public Hearing Concerning Mexican Wolves in Arizona on December 3, 2013. He told the panel:

“. . . Mexican wolves went through a very large bottleneck. They don’t represent the original population. They came from a small Canis population. Assessing the subspecies is somewhat futile in that respect.

“. . . subspecies, in general, are basically a subjective category. They are not a hard scientifically blank category.

“. . . this phenomenon of naming species and subspecies has been termed by the broad scientific community as inflation, splitting things into groups with the intent of granting conservation, again. The entire scientific community outside of the wildlife is recognizing this. And it’s very important that we realize that subspecies as a scientific category is subjective. It’s not definitive. The scientific community agrees on it.

“ . . . I suggest you use the entire body of science and the recent discrediting of subspecies that have been listed and reconsider the science. . .”
More

Good Wolves and Other Fables: Part 1

Leave a comment

strip banner

new-logo25W. R. McAfee

OPINION: Part 1

______________________________________________________________

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is delisting and relinquishing management of gray wolves back to state wildlife officials while simultaneously proposing “new rules”1 to “save” the Mexican gray wolf. The proposals include:

► Keeping the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) on the endangered list as a subspecies. A conundrum. The Mexican wolf is a gray wolf that breeds with other gray wolves and is not a subspecies. A grizzly and a black bear are subspecies. A horse and donkey are subspecies that produce sterile offspring.

►Issuing permits to private landowners to kill wolves killing livestock on their property based on the number of Mexican gray wolves that exist in the wild, not immediate or continuing wolf depredations.

►Handling Mexican wolves killing livestock on private lands are not included in the USFWS’s new ‘problem’ wolf proposals. Mexican wolves killing livestock on private land are problem wolves. More

The History and Danger of Administrative Law

2 Comments

strip banner

A Nation Beguiled

__________________________________________________________

“But there are problems with this conventional history of administrative law. Rather than being a modern, post-constitutional American development, I argue that the rise of administrative law is essentially a re-emergence of the absolute power practiced by pre-modern kings. Rather than a modern necessity, it is a latter-day version of a recurring threat—a threat inherent in human nature and in the temptations of power.”

________________________________________________

Philip Hamburger

Columbia Law School

“Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PHILIP HAMBURGER is the Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. He received his B.A. from Princeton University and his J.D. from Yale Law School. He has also taught at the University of Chicago Law School, the George Washington University Law School, the University of Virginia Law School, and Northwestern Law School. A contributor to National Review Online, he has written for several law reviews and journals, including the American Journal of Legal History, the Supreme Court Review, the Notre Dame Law Review, and the Journal of Law and Politics. He is the author of Separation of Church and State, Law and Judicial Duty, and, most recently, Is Administrative Law Unlawful?

The following is adapted from a speech delivered on May 6, 2014, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series.

There are many complaints about administrative law—including that it is arbitrary, that it is a burden on the economy, and that it is an intrusion on freedom. The question I will address here is whether administrative law is unlawful, and I will focus on constitutional history. Those who forget history, it is often said, are doomed to repeat it. And this is what has happened in the United States with the rise of administrative law—or, more accurately, administrative power. More

Northshore “Live” – Cooper’s Corner: Investigative Journalist Michael Volpe

1 Comment

 National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse

Investigative journalist joins Bev Cooper to detail his recent investigations into guardian abuse both in Chicago and in Memphis, Tennessee.Volpe is the author of two books, “Prosecutors Gone Wild” and “The Definitive Dossier of PTSD in Whistleblowers”, and Volpe will talk about Norman Hughes, a Korean and Vietnam War veteran who is being held against his will in a nursing home in Memphis, and Mildred Willis, whose family recently lost their home on the order of the Cook County Public Guardian.

See Also:
T.S. Radio:  Tonight A Special Show With Reporter Michael Volpe:  Systemic Corruption in Family and Probate Courts

Korean Vietnam War Vet Inside VA System Held Against His Will

Korean War Veteran Norman Hughes Makes Passionate Plea to Go Home. He is Being Held Against His Will in Assisted Living

How the Cook County Public Guardian’s Office Can Take Your Home

Wild Horse & Burro Radio

6 Comments

painy

wild_horse_burro_radio_logo1

5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST More

Wild Horse & Burro Radio with Debbie Coffey & RT Fitch

8 Comments

painy More

THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER is OUT of CONTROL

2 Comments

VaRightLogoSmall11http://www.varight.com/news/the-southern-poverty-law-center-is-out-of-control/

But something went wrong. Today the SPLC is no longer a poverty law center. They are trying to smear and silence dissidents who dare to stand for the Constitution, question the hero worship of Lincoln, and who support national sovereignty against the UN. They have turned into something not unlike the Klan they sought so brilliantly to stop except without overt violence. Tom DeWeese is doing a great job fighitng Agenda 21 and ICLEI. He does not deserve this kind of treatment:

Click here to demand a congressional investigation of the SPLC

_____________________________________________________________________

I need your help by signing the “Citizen’s Demand for Congressional Investigation of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).”

Let me explain.

The American Policy Center (APC) and I have been openly attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

To date, there have been FOUR separate “special reports” released by SPLC against me personally – painting me as a hate-driven domestic terrorist!

Of course, SPLC has a long history of attacking organizations and individuals who defend the Constitution and oppose big government programs.

They regularly accuse us of racism and hate because we want to stop the massive growth of government and the wasteful spending programs that are bankrupting our country.

I get used to such attacks. It’s what they do to try to discredit us.

But this time the attack is different. It truly frightens me because the outcome of this new SPLC attack against APC and me could result in government investigations, the banning of my ability to travel, or even the destruction of APC.

Here’s why I’m concerned.

The Southern Poverty Law Center issued a new report titled “Agenda 21, The UN, Sustainability and Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory.” That report targeted me personally as a leader in the “anti-government Patriot movement.” And the SPLC report said I am part of a network of radicals peddling hysterical conspiracy theories against our Government.

Worse than just the SPLC report – is the fact that it was used as the bases of even more attacks from two national magazines – Fortune Magazine and Newsweek Magazine.

Newsweek’s attack was a cover story called “The Plots To Destroy America.” The article quoted SPLC’s Mark Potok, saying, “These kinds of theories…(are) completely distorting any rational discussion we can have in this country.” More

George W. Bush comments on 9/11

Leave a comment

strip bannernew-logo25Dr. Arden Gifford, MD

Commentary

____________________________________________________________________________

PPJ Poll:

 

Concerning the coming Election of Nov 4, 2014 do you think the response to this should be to re-elect the Party in power when this happened? Would Germany do that? Should we in the responsible electorate do it ONE MORE TIME?

________________________________________________________________________

Sept 16, 2014

[Ed Note: There were no television views of the first plane hitting the WTC tower . Yet George W. Bush said that he was able to see television of the first plane hitting the tower.

He stated the terrorists were “shifting the blame of 911 FROM THE GUILTY”

Many wars have been started by false flag attacks, RVN, Korea , WWI, Spanish American War, however, the single most recorded event in human history of the Regime bombing and setting on fire one of their own buildings is absent,  except for the Reichstag burned by Adolf Hitler and Hermann Goering, which was blamed on Communists.

THE BUILDING WAS EMPTY AND NO PEOPLE OF THE GERMAN PUBLIC WERE DELIBERATELY MURDERED, ONLY THE DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDING.

The planning was done within weeks to days of the actual event of Goering traveling through underground tunnel and setting the fire.

ONLY on 911 was the planning for the nuclear destruction of WTC  done years in advance, with 3,000 dead murdered US Citizens and blamed on 19 hijackers on the same day with no records of their being on the passenger lists.

TS RADIO: Collateral Victims of Abusive Guardianships

1 Comment

painyJoin us this evening September 14th, 2014, at 7:00 pm CST! More

Pre-Funding Continues to Burden Postal Service Finances

Leave a comment

strip bannernew-logo25Anonymous

___________________________________________________________________

The Postal Service recently reported their 2nd Quarter earnings for Fiscal Year 2014, and it shows that they once again would have made a profit if not for the pre-funding of future retiree health benefits.  The Postal Services accounting books show a loss of 1.9 billion for the 2nd quarter.  However, if you exclude the mandated pre-funding payment, the USPS actually would be showing a year-to-date profit of more than one billion dollars.

The pre-funding payment, a payment required by the 2006 Postal Accountability Act (Public law 109-435), requires the Postal Service to pre-fund its future retiree health benefits, a 75 year obligation, in only ten years.  The Postal Service is the only government agency or corporation that is required by law to pre-fund.  While it is true the Department of Defense (DOD) also pre-funds future retiree health benefits, the DOD recieves Congressional-appropriated monies to pre-fund.  The Postal Service does not receive a single dollar to pre-fund.  The Postal Service operates on rate payer money, money it receives from selling of stamps and services, not taxpayer money.

The Pre-funding payments, which range from $5.5 to $5.8 billion a year through 2016, represent over 80% of the Postal Services losses since 2007.  In fact, the pre-funding requirements  represented 100% of the losses incurred by the Postal Service in the last fiscal year.  If  not for the pre-funding payment, the Postal Service would have posted a $623 million profit delivering the mail.

The House and the Senate bills currently in Congress continue to require the Postal Service to pre-fund.  Chairman Darrel Issa (R CA) has released a new postal discussion draft  (as of press time the bill has not been officially introduced) that would require the Postal Service pay half of the required payments in 2015 and 2016.  This would reduce the payments to approximately 2.8 billion and 2.9 billion, respectively.  The remaining obligation would be paid under an amortized schedule. More

Oldies But Goodies on Wild Horse & Burro Radio

Leave a comment

painy

Wild_Horse_Burro_Radio_Logo

WE’LL BE BACK ON AIR NEXT WEDNESDAY NIGHT,

UNTIL THEN, PLEASE ENJOY ONE OF OUR ARCHIVED SHOWS LISTED BELOW.

This radio show is co-hosted by Debbie Coffey, Vice-President & Director of Wild Horse Affairs at Wild Horse Freedom Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________________

To contact us: ppj1@hush.com, or call 320-281-0585

LISTEN TO ARCHIVED RADIO SHOWS: More

THE VIEW FROM UNDER THE BUS: OUR ONCE PROUD MILITARY IS BRACING TO GET KICKED TO THE CURB AGAIN!

Leave a comment

strip banner

new-logo25 Miss American

_________________________________________________________________________________

“As for the men and women on that 4.5 BILLION DOLLAR ship? “Naaa, you’re fine folks, it’s all in your head, you don’t really need that wheelchair do you? Besides, we need to hold onto that money to buy a replacement ship! Tell ya what, we’ll name the new one in honor of your sacrifice. How does The USS F.U.KuShima sound”??

_____________________________________________________________

21150explosionIn March of 2011 the sailors on the USS Ronald Reagan spent 3 weeks giving humanitarian assistance to the victims of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. After the tsunami, the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in the Fukushima prefecture on the east coast of Japan suffered grave damage. The emergency back-up systems were destroyed and up to three nuclear explosions followed. The Navy personnal were sent in to assist with rescue logistics, but unbeknownst to them, they had already passed through lethal level radiation plumes three different times, one of them for five hours!! The owner of the nuclear plant, TEPCO, told them the area around the plant was safe. What I wonder is, if the ship was nuclear powered, wasn’t there radiation alarms going off like crazy?? It was reported that the potable water on the ship was also full of radio nuclides which they consumed and bathed in. I saw a video of them scrubbing down a room in the ship and clowning around, without wearing a stitch of protective gear. I was shocked! Some of the men and women suffered the typical immediate symptoms of radiation poisoning such as vomiting, diarrhea, and hair loss.

Now, three and a half years later, many of the USS Reagan’s men and women are suffering the longer term consequences including one death, rare cancers, leukemia, blindness, muscle wasting, birth defects in their children, and a long list of many others. Per usual, our government has denied that the symptoms are related to radiation or to the exposure they had in Japan while giving emergency relief. This is so predictive of them, that it induces yawns. They have even come out with their so-called studies (who did those?) saying the radiation readings on the ship were barely perceptible and the potable water was at low risk level. Someone who mans the gauges on the ship did reveal that they were getting a spike in the levels early on, soon after the tsunami. (I’m sure that fellow has been moved to another post by now) How sickening and disgusting can they be? More

BLM to send wild burros to Guatemala to become beasts of burden?

8 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25 Debbie Coffey, V.P. & Dir. of Wild Horse Affairs, Wild Horse Freedom Federation

Copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved.

___________________________________________________________________________________

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is planning to send America’s supposedly “protected” wild burros to Guatemala, where the once free-roaming wild burros may well become beasts of burden for poor rural Guatemalans with, most likely, little spare income for farriers or veterinary care (if there were any even available). Guatemala is one of the poorest countries in Latin America.

BLM plans to ship the burros about 2, 000 miles. The food for burros will certainly differ between the USA and Guatemala. The BLM recently had about 80 wild mare’s die, supposedly from stress, shipping the mares from one location to another WITHIN KANSAS.

Will the burros be shipped by ground, through regions with drug gangs? There are many human rights violations in Guatemala, so why would American burros be safe in this environment?

The BLM’s “From the Public” page, states this:

Question: Is the BLM looking into a wild burro-related partnership that would benefit small-scale farmers in Guatemala?

Answer: Yes, the BLM, which is dealing with limits on its off-range holding capacity for wild horses and burros, is exploring the feasibility of a wild burro-related partnership with the Defense Services Cooperation Agency and Heifer International (http://www.heifer.org).

To begin with, there isn’t a “Defense SERVICES Cooperation Agency” listed anywhere on the internet, but there IS a DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

Anyhow, putting this (seemingly) error aside, the BLM goes on to state:

The prospective partnership would provide gentled, sale-eligible wild burros under BLM management to assist communities and farmers in Guatemala, where burros are prized working animals and expensive for families in poverty to buy. If the partnership were to move forward, the gentled burros would help carry water, crops, and other supplies.

I wonder if the BLM realizes that a terrible problem for equine already exists in Guatemala, and humane organizations are trying desperately to help?

100201a3

American Veterinary Medical Association volunteers in Guatemala have often encountered severe saddle sores in horses.

guatemala-2

World Horse Welfare observes “Working hard to transport crops through dense forests, these horses often have high physical demands placed upon them.” More

Obamacare Death Panels and Rationing: Obamacare, Goebbels and Ginsburg

Leave a comment

strip banner

new-logo25 G. Keith Smith, M.D.,

http://www.aapsonline.org/

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

” Combining health care with government invariably results in the individual’s interests versus the state’s interests scenario playing out. Guess who has historically won this battle? Once the “state” is paying for healthcare, the “state” determines what health care will be paid for-even what qualifies as meeting the definition of health care. After all, “public” resources are distributed by popular vote and that’s not good news for the sick minority. That the federal government is mandating the collection of virtually everyone’s health information and data should be of great concern to anyone who has followed any history of what government’s typically do with information. They desire this information simply because they intend to use it. To ration.”
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A friend recently opined to me about his increasing frustration with those who are unable to distinguish between politics and religion, particularly those for whom politics is their religion. This describes statists of all stripes, I think. Folks either want to use the power of the state to abscond with the property of others in order to better complete “the Lord’s work,” or they justify the state’s trampling of individual rights in the name of “the greater good.” The fascist, Joseph Goebbels had the following to say:

“My party is my church and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do his will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel.” Or how about this one from Mr. Goebbels: “I am only the instrument that God uses to sing his song. I am only the vessel that nature smilingly fills with new wine.”

It is no mistake that Germany’s national anthem is entitled “Deutschland uber Alles.” The supremacy of the state and the individual’s role in feeding this parasitic institution are apologetically clear in the writings of men like Goebbels, while more subtle, but no less fascistic musings and thoughts surround us today.

Here is a quote from Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Actually, that isn’t very subtle at all, is it?

More

BLM contractor Gunnison prison caught with “hands in the cookie jar.”

8 Comments

_________________________________________________________

new-logo25 Debbie Coffey, V.P. & Dir. of Wild Horse Affairs, Wild Horse Freedom Federation, Copyright 2014 ~ All Rights Reserved.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

While BLM spokesman Tom Gorey seemingly frets that it will “complicate national efforts to make sure there is enough off-range holding capacity for wild horses and burros that are removed off public ranges,” he failed to mention that the final report of the Department of Interior Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit of Utah Correctional Industries (UCI), in which about $2 million dollars in costs submitted (and paid with taxpayer’s money) was questioned as being seemingly illegal, was issued Sept. 27, 2013.  That’s almost a year ago.

In this report, the OIG pointed out that “we found that UCI’s accounting systems do not fully comply with the standards set forth in 43 C.F.R. § 12.60 for financial reporting, budget control, and allowable costs.”

Why did it take the BLM about 6 years to figure out something was wrong with the accounting at Gunnison prison?  And why didn’t the BLM fire this contractor (rescind the contract) last year

Basically, it was uncovered that this BLM contractor overcharged the government by about $2 million dollars.  Why is the news twisted to make it seem like Utah Correctional Industries just decided not to renew their contract with the BLM because they weren’t making enough profit?

Has the BLM even bothered to review the facility reports and mortality reports from Gunnison?  Or was the BLM only focusing on the money?  More mismanagement by the Bureau of Land Management. More

Bankers, CDC Trying to Duck Financial and Vaccine Fallout

3 Comments

strip banner
new-logo25by W. R. McAfee, Sr.
August 27, 2014

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“The first major setback for Oz was the ‘Net’s revelations that America’s service men and women were exposed to radiation from depleted uranium (DU) used in the munitions for the two-decades-old Middle East “wars”. Use of DU appears to have been two-fold: (1)to scramble Middle East genes and chromes (along with the soldiers’) when anyone entered irradiated areas where this ordinance had been used, or handled, and (2) to weaken America’s army.”

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

10155281_461153860682070_1662322543_nThe Fed is now being touted by the London-headquartered international banking cabal as the savior of “domestic banking panics in the early 1900s.” They are also attempting to promote the Fed as the world’s “, , , financial steward in its current, privileged role at the center of the global monetary system. . .”
Say what?

Why would The City be attempting to shift the financial heat away from themselves and their Bank of England and the other 150 central banks they own and control (one of which is the Fed) along with the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the Vatican (and its bank), the10 (+) square miles that comprises Washington, D.C., the two world wars they started, Vietnam, and the two (+) decades-old Middle East “wars” to the Fed—one of their central banks?

They are the world’s so-called “financial stewards”—have been for centuries—and own and control the world’s money through their central banks in the nations where their central banks are located (that print and sell those nations their money with interest) and are responsible for what comes out of congress, the media, and Wall Street. What appears to be worrying these financial Wizards of Oz is the light the ‘Net is shining on them, and the unemployed pitchforkers and scythers beginning to fill streets seeking a “. . . come, let us reason together” moment. Oz’s public position is to “save the planet’s resources” [read: for themselves] and all it implies; which includes humans; even as populations decline in developed countries and are leveling in undeveloped countries.

The first major setback for Oz was the ‘Net’s revelations that America’s service men and women were exposed to radiation from depleted uranium (DU) used in the munitions for the two-decades-old Middle East “wars”. Use of DU appears to have been two-fold:

(1)to scramble Middle East genes and chromes (along with the soldiers’) when anyone entered irradiated areas where this ordinance had been used, or handled, and

(2) to weaken America’s army.
More

THE NEED TO TAKE A STRONG STAND AGAINST H.R. 5058: Doom for America’s Wild horses

2 Comments

strip banner

RED ALERT
From ISPMB (International Society for the Protection of Mustangs & Burros)

THE NEED TO TAKE A STRONG STAND AGAINST H.R. 5058

On July 10th, 2014, Representative, Chris Stewart (UT-R), introduced a bill to the Committee on Natural Resources which could ultimately spell doom for America’s Wild Horses and Burros. The bill is co-sponsored by Representatives Bob Bishop (UT-R) and Tom McClintock (CA-R).

On July 15th, the bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation and is titled “Wild Horse Oversight Act.” There are 26 members on this committee of which 14 are Republicans and 12 are Democrats.

To find out if your Representative is on this committee please click here: http://naturalresources.house.gov/subcommittees/subcommittee/?SubcommitteeID=5064

Act now and write your Representative if they are on the Committee and state the following in your own words:

The Wild Horses and Burros Act (PL 92-195) became a federal law to protect America’s wild horses and burros for all Americans and future generations to enjoy. Left to the state’s control in 1971, we would have no wild horses or burros left in our country. The same holds true for today if states take control of management.

Please let us remind you that wild horses and burros can ONLY be removed if they are causing damage to their habitat and that can only be proven through monitoring of their habitat by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This means that setting a permanent AML (appropriate management level), as BLM currently does, is arbitrary and capricious. In other words, it is illegal. More

Arizona: Clear the Bench going after corruption in the legal system full blast

2 Comments

strip bannerA m e r i c a n P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N S E N S E , in Arizona

Monday, August 25th, 2014

Clear the Bench going after corruption in the legal system full blast

Names judges, crooked attorneys and provides laundry list of misdoings

 

PRESS RELEASE Contact: Clear the Bench Arizona, LLC
Phone: 602-374-3483602-374-3483
http://www.clearthebench-az.com 10645 North Tatum Blvd Suite C200 Box 397
Phoenix, AZ 85028
clearthebenchaz@gmail.com CLEAR THE BENCH ARIZONA, LLC
Clear the Bench Arizona, announces its mission and call to action

Phoenix, August 25, 2014: Clear the Bench Arizona is seeking to make a difference and expose the issues and concerns involving the judicial and state bar systems. Its mission statement is:

“Toward the end that the Arizona judiciary remains impartial, apolitical, and able to dispense justice, we are organized to hold all judges, courts, commissioners, court officers and personnel accountable to the People and Constitutions of Arizona and the United States.”

On October 1, 2014, the organization will begin publishing information on judges that are up for retention and setting its first meeting of the Arizona Judicial Advisory Board, an independent group of people who will take in complaints from the public, investigate and make recommendations to the legislature for possible impeachment. Clear the Bench will also provide information regularly on its website so voters can have another source to determine the retention of judges until the election of judges can be reinstated in all counties in Arizona. The existing Commission has repeatedly ignored valid complaints on judges.In addition to addressing the current corruption in the system by a small but powerful group of individuals, Clear the Bench has two main goals it believes are necessary to achieve future justice in the system-

  • the election of judges in all jurisdictions and,
  • the abolishment of the “non-profit” State Bar of Arizona.

Clear the Bench Arizona is a growing organization that unites people from all over Arizona and from all walks of life, political positions and educational levels. Most of those involved have been victims of the system and want accountability. What members have found is that there is a small group of people controlling the legal system and profiting from their actions. The names of these people and the information are already in the hands of those at the state and national level and we are continuing to provide information as it comes in. Additional information about the statements below can be found on the website or obtained through documents we can provide. Attorneys in Arizona are afraid to represent victims due to the corruption in the Arizona State Bar and with select judges and they have gone so far to disbar attorneys who have tried to come to the clients’ aid after they were victimized.

The message has been clear— cross us and we will destroy you. Clear the Bench Arizona is fighting back!

The Arizona Supreme Court is attempting to deflect scrutiny by creating the ‘move along, nothing to see here’ commissions, offices or committees including the Independent Bar Counsel office. The “Independent Bar Counsel” has already been ignored in order to execute a politically motivated attack on an attorney that represented parties against former State Bar President Edward Novak, a person that appears regularly throughout state bar and court committees including the recent appointment as Chair of the committee that decides who gets admitted to practice law in Arizona. Ed Novak represented Arthur Anderson in the Baptist Foundation litigation.

After getting wind of numerous efforts in the works to disband the State Bar of Arizona, a Task Force was formed to “study” the structure but as usual, the same players are placed on the group, such as Novak, likely guaranteeing their interests will continue to be protected. Betsey Bayless, who led the “criminal defense fund” for Donald Stapley, Jr. while he was a sitting supervisor and she was being paid to head the Maricopa County Integrated Health System and Grant Woods, attorney for Conley Wolfswinkel, are also part of that Task Force as are John Phelps and Justice Rebecca Berch who brought in out-of-state “attorneys” to pursue the former Maricopa County Attorney.

The “Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee” has the very person who “decides” attorney discipline, Judge William O’Neil, as its Vice Chair. William O’Neil has been involved in numerous questionable dealings himself as detailed in the Arizona Republic and refused to remove himself from the disciplinary proceedings against the former Maricopa County Attorney and his assistants including filing false or misleading pleadings about his involvement in related investigations. He has disbarred or suspended numerous attorneys including targeting attorneys based on his religious beliefs except has spared a few represented by insiders including Novak, putting his friends on panels without disclosing their relationship.

Other information of note that Clear the Bench is actively pursuing at all levels includes: More

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,460 other followers