strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley             Copyright 2014   All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________________

“State terrorism can be useful, if a perceived enemy, contrived or real, can be blamed for something. A decided public perception can thus be cultivated and massaged or shaped, as well as fear that permits the state to act in the way it desires–though highly objectionable otherwise– to alleviate the perceived threat” James Hufferd, “Troublesome Country”

________________________________________________

Nothing has been more effective historically, than the creation of enemies to be feared. The intent of controlling the population, how it thinks, what it believes and who it might be/must be, afraid of is of utmost importance to those whose intentions are less than honorable or humane. These can be real or fictional, religious or political, but the intent and effect is the same.

Consider this:   CNN: Mistakes (or LIES) Found In Almost EVERY FBI Case Reviewed!

Fictional threats are far more useful as there is nothing other than the onslaught of government, religious, or private interests propaganda to support them. The opportunity to enlarge, to create an essentially terrifying presence that threatens your personal existence is a great religious and political weapon.

Combining religion and politics creates the perfect storm when it can be used to threaten not only political beliefs, but also religious beliefs. It is the sure-fire recipe for manipulating public opinion and whipping that same public into a frantic frenzy demanding blood be shed and the perceived enemy obliterated.

The problem becomes one of “whose politics” and “which religion”.

troublesome

 

In the book, “Troublesome Country” authored by James Hufferd, he states on page 112 para 4:

State terrorism can be useful, if a perceived enemy, contrived or real, can be blamed for something. A decided public perception can thus be cultivated and massaged or shaped, as well as fear that permits the state to act in the way it desires–though highly objectionable otherwise– to alleviate the perceived threat”. (end quote)

 

We ARE being terrorized

TSA, NSA, CIA, FBI, to name just a few of the federal corporate agencies that are actively engaging in domestic terrorism, are not focused on foreign operatives; they are focused on me and you. Homeland Security Terrorism was created not to protect the country from terrorism, but to direct and control the terrorizing of the American public, while telling us that they exist solely to prevent some unknown and unidentifiable boogeyman from harming us. The objective is to convince you to submit, comply and willingly give up your freedom. The threat is: Someone “over there” wants to kill you. They hate you. “They hate you” should be followed with “but we love you so much we are going to make your life miserable”.

The truth is: The threat you need to fear most is coming from the very people who claim they are only harassing and intimidating you to protect you. They are from the government and they are here to help you. Really? Do you believe that?

And one question we all need to be asking is: If Muslims and the Islamic countries hate us so much for our freedoms that they think of nothing other than ways to do us harm, why have more than 1.7 million of them been allowed and encouraged to immigrate here legally?

In response to these hyped up and usually contrived threats, buildings are blown up in Oklahoma, box-cutter wielding terrorists hi-jack planes and skillfully fly them into buildings and these terrorist activities somehow escape the prying eyes of all these spy agencies and public events like the marathons’ staged attacks continue to occur with regularity. Not only that, they also coincidentally occur when a direct attack on our liberty is in the works by the very people who claim they care so much for us.

How could that possibly happen? After all, you gave up your freedom, you gave up your privacy, you forfeited everything that made America what it was, and you did this in exchange for…. what?

The enemy shell game

But we needed an enemy even if one had to be created out of thin air. Without an enemy to point at, to fear, to blame, to make responsible for whatever horrendous event occurred, you might actually stop and think about the possibility, the plausibility of the conspiracy theory being extolled by the very agencies and agents who convinced you to forfeit your freedom for some false sense of security.

Of course, those who were pointing their fingers at these foreign suspects never made mention of the fact that they, and their agencies had been interfering in the matters of other nations for decades. Destabilizing economies, deposing their leaders and installing dictators of our choosing, withholding food, medical supplies and of course the obligatory efforts of the CIA to incite anti-government riots in the streets.

It would appear that anti-government sentiments become anarchy and domestic terrorism only if they are expressed in the US. In foreign nations where we instigated anti-government unrest, they are simply people fighting for their freedoms. How noble.

Stop the music….I don’t want to dance anymore

Regardless of political party, whether Democrat or Republican, and regardless of religion, whether Christian or even Muslim, we are being played like an old violin. We have all been deemed enemies of the state regardless of where that state is, and we are being pitted against one another to keep us diverted from the de-construction of nations as the One World Government prepares to make its entrance.

Recently, Obama made this statement, basically a reiteration and reinterpretation of statements made by Bush Sr., and others:

“Part of people’s concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people. …

The first American President to openly allude to a New World Order was George Bush Sr. , and he did so on numerous occasions.

We are being de-constructed as a nation, as all nations are. Diverse populations are being relocated around the globe to blur cultural, political and religious identities to facilitate the demand for a one world government.

The day will come that as a result of these intentional blurring’s of nations and national identity, the global community will demand one controlling government.

The worst part of this is……they will actually think it was their idea.

______________________________________________________

Troublesome Country: Why We Need to Live Up to Our Creed: A History of War, Injustice and Greed by James Hufferd

Available on  Amazon Paperback – September 15, 2013  Also available on Kindle

http://www.answers.com/topic/what-did-george-bush-mean-by-the-phrase-the-new-world-order

the Soviet Union, which began disintegrating in 1989 and dissolved into a loose confederation of independent republics and un affiliated states in 1991. The collapse left the United States as the world’s lone superpower, leading the world, in Bush’s view, to a new spirit of cooperation-a new world order.

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/what-did-george-bush-mean-by-the-phrase-the-new-world-order#ixzz38yj32qnd

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/07/25/obama-calls-collectivized-new-world-order/

During a 2010 West Point speech, the President encouraged the development of a new “international order” to help secure America’s interests.

Obama also urged Europeans and Americans to embrace the idea of “global citizenship” during a 2012 Berlin speech.

 http://www.pewforum.org/2013/05/17/the-religious-affiliation-of-us-immigrants/#affiliationn

Over the same period, the estimated share of legal Muslim immigrants entering the U.S. each year has roughly doubled, from about 5% of legal immigrants in 1992 to about 10% in 2012. Since 1992, the U.S. has admitted an estimated total of about 1.7 million Muslim immigrants.

About these ads