Join us Friday afternoon, February 8th, 2013 at 3:00 CST!
1:00 pm PST … 2:00 pm MST … 3:00 pm CST … 4:00pm EST
Listen Live HERE!
Callin # 917-388-4520
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John and Pauline Holeton update us on the continuing fight to stop Smart Meter installation in Michigan.
Smart meters are not mandatory per the US Federal Energy Act of 2005 that says: Title Xll, Subtitle E, Section 1252, (a), (14), (C) states: “Each electric utility subject to subparagraph (A) shall provide each customer requesting a time-based rate with a time-based meter capable of enabling the utility and customer to offer and receive such rate, respectively.” (pg. 371-2) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ58/pdf/PLAW-109publ58.pdf
Pat Hudson of the
Michigan Public Service Commission has acknowledged verbally in the city of Ypsilanti MI that Smart Meters are not mandatory. The list of attendees included DTE, Consumer Energy and MPSC Commissioner Isiogu and others whom signed in. See documentation. See Documentation MPSC Declares No Mandate (W4AR)
Visit www.W4AR.com for more information.
_________________________________________________________________
To contact us: ppj1@hush.com
Or call : 320-281-0585 Skype
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley/2013/02/08/smart-meters-john-pauline-holeton
Feb 09, 2013 @ 17:50:55
http://www.mothering.com/community/a/the-thinking-parents-dilemma-or-another-dentist-refuses-to-treat-my-children
The 20-something dental hygienist, wearing dark purple scrubs, smiled at my children and me as she motioned for us to follow her to the examining room.
“Okay,” she chirped at my 10-year-old daughter, “Mom will wait outside while we take a quick picture of your teeth.”
I could feel my face stiffen.
“We aren’t going to do X-rays this time,” I said, keeping my voice as casual as possible. “I mentioned that we didn’t want X-rays when I called for an appointment, and I also wrote it in on the consent form.”
The young hygienist furrowed her brow. “Ah, okay,” she said, her eyes darting awkwardly away from my face. “Just wait in here while I, uh, go check on that.”
She came back a few minutes later.
“Dr. Y says that you have to have X-rays,” she said, still unable to look at my face. “She says she can’t treat your children without them.”
This was in May, 2010, just a few weeks after the President’s Cancer Report, “Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk: What We Can Do Now,” was released. On page 7 of the report, in large font, is a section entitled, “Children Are at Special Risk for Cancer Due to Environmental Contaminants and Should be Protected.”
That 240-page report states definitively that cancer among children (and adults) is on the rise in the United States. Out of 50 countries, the United States has the dubious distinction of rating #9 in the number of deaths from cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 10,700 children ages 0 –14 will be diagnosed with cancer in 2010, a rise of more than 10 percent from just five years ago. While childhood cancer is considered “rare,” it is the second most common cause of death among children (after accidents). It is predicted that 1,340 American children this year will die from cancer.
Feb 09, 2013 @ 17:49:49
Marti, the next time a health care worker calls you a “conspiracy theorist”, remind him of this:
BUSTER BROWN SHOES
http://nottotallyrad.blogspot.com/2008/02/using-x-rays-to-sell-shoes.html
Using X-rays to Sell Shoes
Consider this text from a radio commercial circa the late 1940′s.
Every parent will want to hear this important news! Now, at last, you can be certain that your children’s foot health is not being jeopardized by improperly fitting shoes.
Wow! How could any parent resist this call to action? If you’re not convinced, consider this quote by J.J. Lowe:
With this apparatus in his shop a shoe merchant can positively assure his customers that they never need wear ill-fitting boots and shoes; that parents can visually assure themselves as to whether they are buying shoes for their boys and girls which will not injure and deform the sensitive bone joints.
Fortunately, there’s no need for alarm. The product being hawked in the quotes above — a shoe-fitting fluoroscope — is no longer used.
Using X-rays to Sell Shoes
Consider this text from a radio commercial circa the late 1940′s.
Every parent will want to hear this important news! Now, at last, you can be certain that your children’s foot health is not being jeopardized by improperly fitting shoes.
Wow! How could any parent resist this call to action? If you’re not convinced, consider this quote by J.J. Lowe:
With this apparatus in his shop a shoe merchant can positively assure his customers that they never need wear ill-fitting boots and shoes; that parents can visually assure themselves as to whether they are buying shoes for their boys and girls which will not injure and deform the sensitive bone joints.
Fortunately, there’s no need for alarm. The product being hawked in the quotes above — a shoe-fitting fluoroscope — is no longer used.
The idea of using X-ray technology to improve the fit of shoes probably arose during World War I. Shoe-fitting fluoroscopes were patented in the U.S. and the U.K. in the 1920′s and were common fixtures in shoe stores throughout North America and Europe from the late 1920′s through the 1950′s.
In an excellent review of this topic, Duffin and Hayter state:
In our opinion, however, the shoe-fitting fluoroscope was nothing more nor less than an elaborate form of advertising designed to sell shoes. It entered a well-established culture of shoe-selling hucksterism that relied on scientific rhetoric; it took advantage of the woman client newly accustomed to the electrification of her home and the patter of experts’ advice about “scientific motherhood”; it neatly sidestepped the thorny problem of truth in advertising that became an issue in the interwar years; and it enticed thrill-seeking children into shops where salesmen could work their magic.
I can still remember looking at my 6 year-old feet through one of these devices in my local Sears store. It was extremely cool to watch my toes wiggle on the green glowing screen, and I was very disappointed when the machine was eventually removed from the store. However, I felt much differently about these devices once I became a radiologist and began to learn more about radiation and its effects on the body.
Feb 09, 2013 @ 17:19:37
Smart Meters
http://www.w4ar.com/Smart-Meters.html
Feb 08, 2013 @ 21:59:50
They are stepford something Louie. I swear they shoot them with a beam that wipes out their conscience, compassion, and any sense of being a human being.
thanks for listening! We had a HUGE crowd this afternoon. Not too many in the chat, but lots and lots of listeners.
Feb 08, 2013 @ 21:55:57
Marti, THANK YOU for such a good show this afternoon…VERY informative.
As you said and we have all seen, SOMETHING happens to people who get into positions of authority, whether they be elected or appointed. They all begin to look and sound alike…they get “on board”. Money? Threats? Cloning? Microchips? WHAT happens to them? A sudden thought occured to me…do you suppose..?
Stepford Congress?
The Stepford Wives (1975)
Feb 08, 2013 @ 15:52:28
DAMN! I won’t be able to here it live but I WILL listen to the pod cast. TU
Feb 08, 2013 @ 15:45:25
Reblogged this on Thepoliticalchef's Blog and commented:
This hits home for me, since we JUST discovered our home HAS one of these devices on our home…