Marti Oakley © Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved **See Reservations below.
Follow @MartiOakley_______________________________________________________________________
A war of lies on a global scale
Most Americans have their eye on the UN Small Arms Treaty; a treaty intended to circumvent our 2nd
Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The backlash against this treasonous treaty is massive, not only because it is a direct assault on the 2nd Amendment and our right to defend ourselves against an increasingly tyrannical government, but because it also is the final act in handing over control of our military to a foreign government: the United Nations. This submission of US military forces to UN control was exposed in the recent testimonies of Panetta and Dempsey in front of the Senate committee, claiming they go to the UN for approval for war, not to congress.
The absolute silence from the Senate committee members regarding this claim, and the subsequent refusal and failure of the Senators to have Panetta and Dempsey immediately arrested and charged with treason, spoke volumes about who and what these Senators actually represent. To have this declaration of subordination to the UN expressed by these two jackasses was then followed up by Hillary Clinton joining the fray at the UN on the Small Arms Treaty.
Hillary Clinton has said she will sign the treaty, although she has no constitutional authority to do so, and Obama has said he will second that signing, also an act of treason, not to mention unconstitutional. Supposedly, the treaty can then be handed over to the State department for enforcement, bypassing the Constitutional requirement that any such treaty be ratified by the Senate. The problem is, it would not be a constitutionally recognized treaty and would not be the supreme law of the land trumping states laws and rights, but it will be sold to the public as if it is and all your state officials will submit your state to it.
According to the UN and those in our government, the fact that American citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, should be viewed as a threat to world peace. No one can come up with a rational, logical reason why this would be so. The only half hearted argument for disarming the US citizenry is of course, the children of the world who shouldn’t have to live with guns in their midst……unless those guns are in the hands of an invading military force bent on occupation. Then these same children they claim they are wanting to protect from private gun ownership in the US, simply become [collateral damage] when the shots fired come from military weapons.
We do know that our 2nd Amendment rights are basically what has kept the peace, for the most part, here at home and kept our own government at bay. Of course there have been those moments like Waco and Ruby Ridge where the government tested its testosterone levels, in two of the most gutless abuses of power in our history.
Americans owning guns has no affect on world peace or populations in other countries. Our gun ownership and 2nd Amendment rights are however, a direct threat to our own government which views this right as a direct impediment to establishing a full blown world government.
Congress is intentionally silent on this treaty and the unconstitutional plan for enacting it. This serves a great purpose……..now they don’t have to register a vote in front of the public which would more than likely expose them as traitors also.
Nationalism vs Internationalism
While we in the public are advocating a return to our national form of government, our elected officials are advocating the international system and rejecting nationalism. From this perspective, it is easy to see how and why the Homeland Terrorism Department views anyone who advocates for the constitution, the bill of rights and a preserving of national identity and sovereignty as “homegrown terrorists”. Those of us who advocate a reaffirmation of our founding documents are a threat to those who advocate the overthrow of the Republic in favor of international global controls.
Now if you are sitting there thinking your senators or representatives will object to this unconstitutional plan, you are sadly mistaken. Not one of them will do much more than grandstand in front of the cameras for a few moments, or maybe hold a few bogus hearings from which nothing will come. But its all intended to make it appear they really tried hard to stop this thing, when in fact, they all will go along with it.
Arms controls for peace while we expand the global wars
In what has to be the epitome of duplicity, Hillary Clinton is now conspiring with UN officials to begin the disarmament of the citizens of the US via this pseudo-treaty. Its all for world peace, right? Obviously not, as Clinton gave an excited speech in May 2012, to the Special Operations Forces Industry Conference describing the new six-point global plan for war intended to encompass numerous countries and her obvious desire for her department to be part and parcel of the newly emerging “global wars everywhere” plan. Clinton’s obvious disregard or refusal to acknowledge the deaths of children resulting from these wars is clearly an indication that the woman is lying about her desire for world peace. But I think we already knew that.
From the article on STRATRISK.com:
“The U.S. is also conducting counterterrorism training and equipping militaries in Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mauritania, Niger, and Tunisia. In addition, U.S. Africa Command (Africom) has 14 major joint-training exercises planned for 2012, including operations in Morocco, Cameroon, Gabon, Botswana, South Africa, Lesotho, Senegal, and what may become the Pakistan of Africa, Nigeria.
Even this, however, doesn’t encompass the full breadth of U.S. training and advising missions in Africa. To take an example not on Africom’s list, this spring the U.S. brought together 11 nations, including Cote d’Ivoire, The Gambia, Liberia, Mauritania, and Sierra Leone to take part in a maritime training exercise code-named Saharan Express 2012.”
We come in peace…NOT!
Our government is taking war operations into numerous nations as they continue to attack Pakistan, Somalia, Libya, and help to foment civil revolt and war in countries such as Egypt and Syria. At the same time we are conducting military training for troops in countries we evidently are planning on attacking in the near future. The CIA has been sent into these countries to set things up and we all know that spells nothing but trouble and misery for the countries targeted.
Clinton also bragged about how the State Department was instrumental in launching two cyber attacks on Iran supposedly disrupting their nuclear program, and various other cyber assaults against our ever-growing list of countries targeted for military attacks. All of this while we fought a huge battle against SOPA and PIPA, the cyber security acts that were supposedly necessary in part, because some country might attack our communications systems and internet. Realizing that the State Department and other US corporate agencies are the actual cyber attackers only highlights the fact that neither of the two internet takeover bills were designed to do anything but control the only access the public has to unwashed news and reports coming out of the District of Criminals. The free flow of information is useful only if you are able to control who might access the flow.
Having failed to pass an actual internet takeover bill, Obama responded by issuing Executive Order 13584 –Developing an Integrated Strategic Counterterrorism Communications Initiative. An order supposedly allowing the Chief Executive of the corporation operating and known as: “The USA” a.k.a., The United States of America” a.k.a., Corp USA, to seize control of all communications if he decides to.
In response to all of this, congress has said………..nothing. In response to all of this, congress has done…… nothing. That false left vs right paradigm is never more obvious than when both sides of the fictional isle fall silent on the same issue. Now you would think that when the Chief Executive of Corp USA has a plan established for global war, those that populate the permanent political class might have something to say about it.
Sometimes silence says far more than a few spoken words. Pay attention to what you didn’t hear from the permanent political elite.
Pay attention to Hillary “the war hawk” Clinton. Apparently, killing children or subjecting them to the horrors of war is really ok just as long as no one but a few political insiders know about it.
_________________________________________________________________________
**Reposting and reblogging: Retitling to redirect traffic will be treated as [theft of content]. No modifications of any kind are allowed. Original URL must be embedded in the repost and all author credits clearly visible, including copyright.
The new Obama doctrine, a six-point plan for global war
http://ppjg.me/2012/03/10/panetta-dempsey-and-treason-and-congress-did-nothing/
http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/6646
Executive Order 13584 –Developing an Integrated Strategic Counterterrorism Communications Initiative
Special Operations Forces Industry Conference
http://www.ndia.org/meetings/2890/pages/default.aspx
http://www.naveur-navaf.navy.mil/artical_138.html
Jan 14, 2013 @ 00:44:15
Sick losers wanting only power over everybody.The blood will be on their hands. Loss of freedom will even happen to them. These Government traitors will pay the higher price of being hunted down for their actions..
H.R. 814: In Defense Of The Second Amendment – Secrets of the Fed
Nov 26, 2012 @ 00:16:44
Nov 24, 2012 @ 20:20:45
Sep 03, 2012 @ 20:54:33
The UN needs to be run out of the US. Ever since Korea we have done 95% of the fighting, dying, and paying for “THEIR WARS!” If anyone comes to take our guns we will fight, make no mistake about this, be it the police, military, or anyone else wanting to come up on the loosing end. This is the same thing the Clintons tried to push through congress in 1992 and almost destroyed the Democratic party. Now they have come up with a sneaky back door trick.
Jul 29, 2012 @ 05:45:20
The U.S. NGO Second Amendment Foundation has voiced concern that a multinational treaty limiting the firearms trade might infringe on the constitutional privilege of private firearm ownership for self-defense in some countries such as the U.S.
Jul 28, 2012 @ 13:21:49
Sweet to read, for I love real freedom and knowing the facts and what is at stake is more than half the battle. Katrina gun confiscation was more of a top priority than helping the starving and very thirsty people in the Superdome. This obviously, utterly perverse set of priorities, still infect the mindless liars who lack a genuine love of free people. Exploitation and control of all Americans in a fearful schoolyard bully manner is what they seem to prefer, Too, bad none of them every grew up, Nasty golum brats and filth.
Gun Control; The hidden agenda of the epic failure obama regime « Conservative Libertarian Outpost
Jul 27, 2012 @ 14:41:23
Politics | The Aussie Digger : Home of all Australian Veterans ex Service and Serving members
Jul 27, 2012 @ 00:21:15
Jul 26, 2012 @ 06:06:29
I think unfortunately that Gitmo has established the definitive “precedent” for an attack on America by itself. As less and less sane people occupy the positions of power, the farce called “civilisation” must degenerate into civil war. Beyond the superficial ignorance and cowardice of the various peoples affected, there is no evidence of a ceasation of tactics by those determined to cause indefinite malice. In other words, the power brokers seem to be saying “bring it on” while the masses are too busy humming their favourite pop toons to hear.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 19:28:04
Reply to ppjg
I, too, agree with your reply. In the space allotted in my original Comment I did not think I should digress on the faults of SCOTUS, faults that are myriad and appalling. We cannot depend on SCOTUS, period. In retrospect it was naive of Hamilton in Federalist 78 to say, in effect, that we have nothing to fear from the Judiciary because all they have to do is apply the Law. Then to quote again from Hamilton in Federalist 78 when talking about the tenure of judges he says, “. . . .all judges who may be appointed by the United States are to hold their offices during good behavior;. . . ”
I would pose a question to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asking how she can reconcile her oath of office with the comments she made recently in Egypt to the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood. In her remarks she implored Egyptians NOT to use the U.S. Constitution as a model for their new Constitution stating that the U.S. Constitution was too old and outdated. This is a woman who swore an oath to uphold, support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Yet when one considers her remarks alongside those of Egypt’s new President one is forced to reconsider Hamilton’s remarks in Federalist 78 that judges “shall serve in good behavior,” that is, as long as they do no illicit acts and honor their oath to the Constitution. Here are Mr. Morsi’s remarks on the subject of the upcoming Egyptian Constitution: “The Koran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader, jihad is our path and death in the name of Allah is our goal” He has also said that Sharia is our Law!. Now if the U.S. Constitution is too old, dating from its ratification on June 21, 1788 how then is the Koran any more modern, dating from the earliest compilation in 650 A.D. (CE) to the earliest books ca. 750 CE? How can a 7th or 8th Century document be acceptable when a 224-year-old document is “too old and outdated?” Taken with other remarks in SCOTUS decisions implying that we should, in effect, be looking to international law rather than the Constitution in making our decisions, I would, with all due respect, question whether she and others on the Court are serving in times and actions required by “good behavior.” I would also apply the same reasoning to comments by Barack Obama in a 2001 radio interview where, in addition to discussing redistribution of wealth, he declared with conviction that “our Constitution is fundamentally flawed.” How, then, did he reconcile his beliefs with his oath of office?
At another time, I should like to address the virtually non-existent Constitutional Basis for the concept of the Presidential Executive Order. Although used by all presidents, it has morphed from a mere memorandum from George Washington to all departments in the Government that they should take care to keep a careful accounting of what they spend, to the outright, unconstitutional LEGISLATION being used by Mr. Obama as a way to circumvent Congress. With the acquiescence of Congress, we are only a pen stroke away from a Constitutional Republic and a Constitutional Dictatorship. When will our feckless Congress begin to challenge this unbridled usurpation of Constitutional power?
Publis
Jul 25, 2012 @ 18:33:35
Mad Obama is Shiva, destroyer of worlds like…Earth!
Jul 25, 2012 @ 17:36:16
Whoa! the Special Operations Forces INDUSTRY Conference? Theme: “Building the GLOBAL SOF PARTNERSHIP.” Conference includes:
-Collaborate and network with national and International stakeholders (who?)
-Hear USSOCOM Commander and Acquisition Executive discuss their perspectives on SOF’s current challenges, trends, and interests in support of SOF’s global missions with a vision toward forging global SOF partnerships
-Gain enhanced knowledge, understanding, and awareness of key acquisition, requirements, operations, and technology issues in the context of SOF’s current missions from USSOCOM Component and Theater Commanders
-Engage in:
◦ USSOCOM Senior Leader Panels
◦ Business Opportunities Sessions
◦ Program Executive Office Breakout Sessions
Wow, Patriots. Don’t forget the business opportunities available for selling out the people you were paid to protect! Hurray for Reagan privatizing the military. Look at all the money we saved! Win.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 17:12:26
From time to time it is necessary to water the tree of liberty with the sacrifice of human blood for those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 17:02:57
While i agree with what you have written…….we can no longer depend on SCOTUS to uphold the constitution or our rights therein listed. Looking back over decades of SCOTUS rulings reveals a pattern of rulings based on internationalism rather than national sovereignty and rights. SCOTUS has long since dispensed with even pretending to protect us from unconstitutional acts of governments….In this particular instance they will side with the unlawful treaty and throw us in the dirt.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 16:39:58
The threat of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty can cause a temporary inconvenience to the Nation. Because, however, it IS unconstitutional is will be struck down by the Supreme Court even if the Senate should ratify it. Most people do not understand the wording of Article VI of the Constitution called the Supremacy Clause. Even Dick Morris has unintentionally been distorting its meaning. One should read it carefully. There is already a SCOTUS decision on this matter in the case of Reid v. Covert that was finally decided in a reversal in 1957. The majority decision clearly holds that ANY treaty that violates the Constitution, even if ratified, is null and void. Read the text of the decision and understand that the threats the Treaty poses, although real and intentional by an out-of-control administration bent on turning America into a Marxist State, will not survive. Although SCOTUS has overturned itself more than 2,000 times since its founding, to accept this threat to U.S. Sovereignty would require the Court to overturn a case that it already overturned! This unprecedented action would make a mockery out of the Court.
Should this ever come to pass, however, it would be time to carefully consider the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. . . . “That to ensure these Rights, Governments are instituted among men deriving their just Powers from the consent of the Governed, That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying it Foundations on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to secure their safety and happiness.” The bottom line, is that “they” work for us, the People. As Jefferson said, “When the People fear the Government, there is Tyranny; when the Government fears the People, there is liberty.” Pax eterna dona nobis, et salva Republica nobis.
Publius
Jul 25, 2012 @ 14:44:24
What I’d like to know is how are we all going to communicate with each other once they take down the internet? It seems ‘We the people’ aren’t very well organized. Maybe something will happen to trigger the masses to rise up?
sitfu.com - Obama 6 Point Plan For Global War Using Arms Treaty
Jul 25, 2012 @ 13:16:48
Jul 25, 2012 @ 11:05:57
Even Ice-T said in an interview a few days ago that guns is, “The Last Form Of Defense Against Tyranny”. There is a very good reason why the founding fathers of America had the 2nd Amendment & it wasn’t just for hunting deer.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 08:31:21
“Gotta luv the TRUTH”…I know it, when I resonate with it!….very perspicacious & erudite…telling it like it is without, obfuscation & circumlocution …accolades my friend…Hopefully people are starting to ‘wake up’ in numbers approaching the critical mass needed, to get our ‘freedom’ from tyranny rolling in a positive & righteous emancipation …Cheers…Alex
Jul 25, 2012 @ 02:31:34
…it is going to be a cluster*#@*…the question will be how quickly will the American civilian response be to some obvious “last step before outright tyranny and abuse”..begins to occur…(though I think we are well past the initiation of that abuse)….Aneheim is boiling..
…you know at that point it will be outright civil-war in this country? Once the right number of folks begin to get and react to the the pattern of abuse and the effect of losing their liberties…if they act fast enough, they may be able to follow a peaceful, legal path to grand Juries and guilty verdicts for these traitors…
…but I think the war-criminals who lead our government have thought all that out… and have some plan prepared for dealing with us “traitors” who still insist on fidelity to the Constitution…
….I was a “Federally Protected Whistle-Blower”…(Ha!)..and let me tell you…it has been corrupt for generations and is ready to melt down…they know this and are going to default on the trillions they owe us baby-boomers in meeical care and retirement…
…good luck…
Regards,
RJ O’Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves-The Life of an Insane Family
Jul 25, 2012 @ 00:52:06
From this perspective, it is easy to see how and why the Homeland Terrorism Department views anyone who advocates for the constitution, the bill of rights and a preserving of national identity and sovereignty as “homegrown terrorists”
The pieces are falling in place suggesting that a civil war strategy will be applied. One of the idiosyncracies is there are empty FEMA camps in Australia yet there is no media build up around the possibility of martial law and nothing to indicate there would be any need for it there. The Occupy “protests” have been a fizzer.
I have considered the idea of a genuine ET invasion, but why would advanced invaders want improved technologies here before attacking and how would earth bound sources reliably verify it prior to it happening? The notion of a fake ET attack is just as silly as the “majority” “don’t believe” in ET’s so unless the aliens were “beyond a shaddow of doubt” 9 foot tall snarling beasts most would assume that guys in constume were the culprits. However, a fake ET attack might jump start a planned civil war in a “judgement day” assault on society NAZI style to purge anything that may deconstruct the NWO agenda and its resolution.
Jul 25, 2012 @ 00:28:52
Spells out the perils that lie ahead. We’ll see how it all plays out.
Nice job, Marti.